Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive investment analysis of GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL), the fourth-largest environmental services company in North America. The analysis concludes that GFL represents a compelling investment opportunity following a pivotal strategic transformation. The early 2025 divestiture of its Environmental Services division has fundamentally reshaped the company, creating a more focused, deleveraged solid waste pure-play with a clear and credible path toward significant margin expansion, enhanced free cash flow conversion, and a newly balanced capital allocation framework that includes substantial shareholder returns.

GFL’s core strengths are rooted in its industry-leading organic growth, a proven and repeatable mergers and acquisitions (M&A) platform operating in a fragmented market, and a significant runway for operational optimization. The strategic reset has not only fortified the balance sheet but has also simplified the investment narrative, positioning the company to close its historical valuation gap with larger peers. Key growth vectors, including price-led organic expansion and high-return sustainability initiatives in Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), are set to drive superior earnings growth for the foreseeable future.

While risks related to the successful integration of future acquisitions, execution on margin improvement targets, and general macroeconomic sensitivity remain, they are outweighed by the potential rewards. The company’s current valuation does not appear to fully reflect its enhanced financial profile and superior growth trajectory relative to its peers. 

1. Company Overview & Business Model

GFL Environmental Inc. stands as the fourth-largest diversified environmental services company in North America, built on a strategy of rapid growth and market consolidation.¹ Headquartered in Vaughan, Ontario, the company has established a significant operational footprint across Canada and more than half of the U.S. states, employing approximately 15,000 people as of mid-2025.¹

Business Segments and Strategic Pivot

Historically, GFL operated through two primary segments: Solid Waste and Environmental Services. However, the company reached a critical inflection point in early 2025. On March 1, 2025, GFL completed the landmark divestiture of its Environmental Services business to a consortium of funds for a total enterprise value of $8.0 billion.⁶ This transaction was a fundamental strategic reset, transforming GFL into a more focused “pure-play” solid waste company.

The remaining core Solid Waste business offers a vertically integrated suite of services, including the collection, transportation, transfer, recycling, and disposal of non-hazardous solid waste.¹ The company’s pro-forma revenue mix, as outlined during its 2025 Investor Day, is well-diversified across the value chain: 27% from commercial collection, 24% from residential collection, 19% from industrial collection, 12% from landfill operations, 8% from transfer stations, and 7% from Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs).¹⁰

Geographic Footprint and Market Presence

GFL’s extensive network of facilities is strategically located throughout Canada and across 18 U.S. states.⁵ This broad geographic presence is the result of a deliberate strategy focused on entering and densifying high-quality growth markets.¹ The company’s M&A approach is centered on acquiring assets that are contiguous with its existing operations, allowing for the realization of route density and internalization synergies.¹¹

Scalability and Defensibility of Business Model

The business model of GFL is characterized by its high scalability and strong defensive attributes.

• Scalability: The primary engine of GFL’s growth has been its highly effective M&A platform. Since its Initial Public Offering (IPO) in 2020, the company has successfully executed and integrated over 270 acquisitions.¹⁰ This “rigorous & repeatable” due diligence and integration process, particularly for smaller “tuck-in” acquisitions, has been shown to compound the return on invested capital (ROIC) over time.¹
• Defensibility: The waste management industry is inherently defensive, providing an essential service with relatively stable demand across economic cycles. GFL’s competitive moat is fortified by its ownership of vertically integrated assets, most notably its network of landfills. Landfills are exceptionally difficult to permit and develop, creating formidable barriers to entry and providing GFL with control over a critical part of the waste value chain. This allows the company to “internalize” the waste it collects, capturing higher margins and ensuring long-term disposal capacity.

Position Within the North American Waste Management Ecosystem

GFL is firmly established as the fourth-largest participant in the North American solid waste market, trailing the industry’s “Big Three”: Waste Management (WM), Republic Services (RSG), and Waste Connections (WCN).¹⁴ While the industry is dominated by these four major players, who collectively control approximately 45% of the solid waste collection market and 56% of U.S. landfill volumes, it remains highly fragmented at the local level.¹⁵ This fragmentation provides a long runway of acquisition opportunities from thousands of small, privately-owned operators, which forms the basis of GFL’s external growth strategy.

The sale of the Environmental Services business serves as more than a financial transaction; it is a fundamental catalyst for a potential re-rating of the company’s valuation. This strategic reset simplifies the business narrative, transforming GFL from a complex, multi-line entity with a high debt load into a streamlined solid waste company that is more easily understood and analyzed by the investment community. Prior to the sale, GFL’s balance sheet was stretched, with total debt to adjusted EBITDA at 4.7x, and its earnings profile was blended with the more cyclical and lower-margin Environmental Services segment.¹⁷ The proceeds from the divestiture were explicitly earmarked for a substantial debt repayment of approximately $3.75 billion and opportunistic share repurchases, with a clear target of reducing net leverage to the low 3.0x range.⁸ This de-risking of the balance sheet and simplification of the business model makes GFL a more attractive candidate for a broader universe of institutional investors, particularly those with mandates that preclude investments in highly leveraged or overly complex companies. This potential increase in investor demand, combined with the fundamentally improved financial profile, should support a narrowing of the historical valuation gap between GFL and its more mature industry peers.

2. Industry Dynamics and Market Position

GFL operates within the large, stable, and growing North American waste management industry. The sector’s non-discretionary nature, coupled with high barriers to entry and favorable consolidation trends, creates a highly attractive environment for well-capitalized incumbents.

Current State of the Waste Management Industry

The North American waste management market is a cornerstone of the industrial economy, with an estimated size exceeding $200 billion in 2025.¹⁸ Projections indicate steady growth, with various market studies forecasting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in the range of 4% to 6% through the next decade.¹⁸ This growth is underpinned by fundamental drivers including population growth, continued urbanization, and general economic expansion.¹⁸

Superimposed on these foundational drivers are powerful secular trends that are reshaping the industry. A growing emphasis on environmental sustainability and the concept of a “circular economy” is driving significant investment and innovation.¹⁸ This includes the expansion of recycling and composting programs, the development of advanced waste-to-energy technologies, and a regulatory push toward greater producer responsibility.¹⁸ A key example is the conversion of landfill gas into Renewable Natural Gas (RNG), a sustainable energy source that is becoming a significant value driver for landfill owners.

Industry Consolidation and GFL’s Role

The waste management industry has been undergoing a decades-long trend of consolidation, with large public companies systematically acquiring smaller, independent operators to expand their geographic reach and build route density.¹⁹ The share of industry revenue controlled by public companies has grown from 62% in 1992 to over 83% by 2024, illustrating the effectiveness of this roll-up strategy.¹⁹

GFL has been one of the most active and successful consolidators in the industry. Since its IPO, the company has acquired over 270 businesses, demonstrating its capacity to execute a high volume of transactions.¹⁰ Following its recent deleveraging, management has signaled a renewed focus on M&A, with a stated framework to deploy between $700 million and $900 million annually on acquisitions, primarily focused on tuck-in opportunities that enhance the density of its existing network.³

Barriers to Entry, Regulatory Environment, and Moats

The industry is protected by formidable barriers to entry, which insulate incumbents from new competition.

• High Barriers: These include the immense capital required for fleets, transfer stations, recycling facilities, and landfills, as well as the high ongoing operational costs.¹⁸ Furthermore, the regulatory environment is exceptionally stringent. The process for permitting a new landfill can take years, if not decades, and faces significant public and political opposition, making new landfill development exceedingly rare.²⁰
• Competitive Moats: The most significant competitive moat in the waste industry is the ownership of a vertically integrated network of disposal assets, particularly landfills. Companies that own landfills can internalize the waste they collect, securing a low-cost disposal option and capturing a larger portion of the profit stream. Another critical moat is route density. As a hauler adds more customers in a given geographic area, the incremental cost to service each new customer decreases, creating powerful economies of scale.

Market Share and Positioning versus Competitors

The North American market is led by a small group of large players. Based on trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue share among public companies, Waste Management is the leader at approximately 35%, followed by Republic Services at 26%, and Waste Connections at 14%. GFL holds the number four position with a share of approximately 9.4%.¹⁶ This hierarchy is mirrored in market capitalization, where WM ($87 billion), RSG ($71 billion), and WCN ($44 billion) are all significantly larger than GFL ($17 billion).¹⁴ Each of these companies employs a slightly different strategy. WM and RSG pursue broad penetration across major metropolitan markets. WCN has historically focused on securing exclusive contracts in secondary and rural markets. GFL’s strategy has been defined by its aggressive, M&A-fueled growth across a diverse set of markets in both the U.S. and Canada.²⁴

Municipal Contracts and Customer Relationships

A substantial portion of the industry’s residential collection revenue is secured through long-term contracts with municipalities. These exclusive franchise agreements provide highly predictable, recurring revenue streams. Critically, many of these contracts contain provisions for annual price increases tied to an inflation index, such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI), as well as mechanisms to pass through volatile fuel costs via surcharges.¹⁷ This contractual structure provides a powerful, built-in hedge against inflation, allowing companies to protect their margins from rising costs.

While all major waste companies benefit from these attractive industry characteristics, GFL is at a distinct point in its corporate lifecycle. Its historical revenue growth has been demonstrably faster than its larger peers, a direct result of its more aggressive M&A posture. A comparison of three-year revenue CAGRs shows GFL at 19.87%, significantly outpacing WM (9.87%), RSG (14.35%), and WCN (14.28%).²³ The crucial point is that this superior growth algorithm is poised to continue. Management’s forward-looking framework, which calls for deploying $700-$900 million in M&A annually, represents a much larger percentage of GFL’s pro-forma revenue base (approximately $6.5 billion for 2025) than a similar dollar amount would for its larger competitors.³ This provides GFL with a higher level of “growth octane” from its M&A strategy. Consequently, the market’s valuation of GFL should reflect this superior growth potential, suggesting that the historical valuation discount to its more mature peers may be unwarranted.

3. Competitive Analysis

A comparative analysis of GFL against its primary competitors—WM, RSG, and WCN—reveals a company with a distinct profile characterized by faster growth, a significant margin improvement opportunity, and a uniquely entrepreneurial culture.

Operational Metrics, Margins, and Efficiency

Historically, a key point of differentiation has been GFL’s operating margin profile. The company has traditionally operated at a lower Adjusted EBITDA margin compared to the Big Three. For the full year 2024, GFL reported an Adjusted EBITDA margin of 28.6%.²⁵ This compares to 29.7% for WM, 31.1% for RSG, and an industry-leading 32.5% for WCN.²⁷

However, this historical gap is rapidly closing. GFL is on a steep margin expansion trajectory, a core element of its current strategic plan. This progress was clearly demonstrated in the fourth quarter of 2024, when the company’s Solid Waste Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded by a remarkable 270 basis points year-over-year to 33.4%.¹¹ Management has guided for continued progress, targeting long-term margins in the low-to-mid 30s, which would bring GFL in line with its peers.³

Pricing Power and Cost Pass-Through

The entire industry benefits from substantial pricing power, a function of the essential nature of its services and the high barriers to entry. GFL has proven equally adept at leveraging this advantage. The company has consistently implemented core price increases that outpace underlying cost inflation, creating a positive “price-cost spread” that drives margin expansion. For instance, in its 2025 guidance, management outlined an expected core price increase of 5.25% to 5.5% to more than offset projected cost inflation in the low-to-mid 4% range.¹¹ This disciplined pricing strategy is supplemented by fuel surcharge programs that effectively pass through volatile energy costs to the customer, protecting profitability.³¹

Differentiation Factors and Competitive Advantages

GFL’s competitive differentiation stems from several key factors:

• Aggressive M&A Platform: More than any other single factor, GFL is defined by its highly effective M&A engine, which has enabled it to achieve scale at an unprecedented pace.
• Entrepreneurial Founder-Led Culture: Led by its founder and CEO, Patrick Dovigi, GFL maintains an agile and entrepreneurial culture that stands in contrast to the more established corporate structures of its larger competitors.³² This can enable faster decision-making and a more aggressive pursuit of growth opportunities.
• Nascent Optimization Opportunity: As a younger and more rapidly assembled enterprise, GFL has a greater opportunity to realize operational efficiencies. While its peers have spent decades refining procurement, fleet management, and route optimization, GFL has more “low-hanging fruit” to harvest. This untapped potential is a key source for future margin expansion, driven by a dedicated “Enterprise Transformation Team”.¹

The historical margin gap between GFL and its peers is not an indication of an inferior business model, but rather a reflection of its stage in the corporate lifecycle. GFL’s rapid growth has been fueled by the acquisition of more than 270 companies, many of which were smaller, family-owned businesses with less sophisticated operations and lower margins.¹⁰ The process of consolidating these disparate assets naturally results in a temporarily diluted margin profile for the combined entity. The core of the investment thesis rests on the company’s ability to systematically improve the operational efficiency of these acquired businesses. This involves integrating them onto GFL’s platform, leveraging scaled procurement to lower costs, optimizing collection routes, and implementing disciplined pricing strategies. The significant margin expansion of 300 basis points seen in the fourth quarter of 2024 provides tangible evidence that this strategy is not just theoretical but is actively being executed.²⁵ Should GFL succeed in closing the remaining 200-300 basis point margin gap with its peers over the coming years, it will generate EBITDA growth that meaningfully outpaces its revenue growth, creating a powerful lever for earnings per share accretion.

Peer Comparison Matrix

Metric	GFL Environmental (GFL)	Waste Management (WM)	Republic Services (RSG)	Waste Connections (WCN)	Source Snippets
Market Cap	~$17B	~$87B	~$71B	~$44B	14
Revenue (FY 2024, in billions)	$7.86B	$22.06B	$16.03B	$8.92B	25
Revenue Growth (FY 2024 YoY)	4.6% (8.8% ex-divestitures)	8.0%	7.1%	11.2%	25
Adj. EBITDA Margin (FY 2024)	28.6%	29.7%	31.1%	32.5%	25
Net Leverage (Debt/EBITDA, Year-End 2024)	3.85x (target) / 4.06x (actual)	~$2.6x (derived)	~$2.6x (derived)	2.67x	11
Dividend Yield	0.13%	~$1.3% (derived)	1.02%	0.73%	34

4. Financial Performance and Growth History

GFL’s financial history is one of rapid, M&A-fueled expansion, which has recently pivoted toward a more balanced focus on profitability and balance sheet strength.

Revenue Growth Trajectory

The company has a demonstrated history of robust top-line growth. Revenue increased from $6.76 billion in 2022 to $7.52 billion in 2023, and further to $7.86 billion in 2024.⁶ This growth has been a potent combination of strong organic performance and significant contributions from acquisitions. For the full year 2024, revenue grew 8.8% on an organic basis (excluding the impact of divestitures), driven primarily by strong core pricing in the solid waste segment of 5.25% to 5.50%.²⁵

Profitability Trends and EBITDA Progression

Adjusted EBITDA has grown in lockstep with revenue, increasing from $2.00 billion in 2023 to $2.25 billion in 2024.¹⁷ More importantly, the rate of EBITDA growth has begun to outpace revenue growth, reflecting the company’s successful focus on margin expansion. The Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded by a significant 190 basis points, from 26.7% in 2023 to 28.6% in 2024.²⁵ This trend accelerated through the year, culminating in a 300 basis point year-over-year improvement in the fourth quarter.²⁶ Management’s guidance for 2025 anticipates a further margin expansion of approximately 100 to 120 basis points, signaling continued momentum in profitability.³

Free Cash Flow Generation

GFL has steadily grown its cash generation capabilities. Adjusted Free Cash Flow (FCF) rose from $701.2 million in 2023 to $820.3 million in 2024.²⁵ A key strategic priority for management is to improve the FCF conversion rate, which measures the percentage of Adjusted EBITDA that is converted into Adjusted FCF. The company has set a long-term target to increase this conversion rate to the mid-40s percentage range, which would align it more closely with best-in-class peers.³ The company’s 2025 Investor Day presentation laid out a clear “bridge” detailing the specific levers—including lower cash interest, optimized capex, and working capital improvements—that will drive this improvement.¹

Debt Levels, Leverage, and Financial Flexibility

To finance its aggressive acquisition strategy, GFL historically operated with a higher degree of financial leverage than its peers, with total debt reaching $10.55 billion at the end of 2024.¹⁷ Net leverage stood at 4.06x Adjusted EBITDA at year-end, a figure that was inflated by adverse currency movements; on a constant currency basis, leverage was 3.85x, in line with the company’s target.¹¹

The divestiture of the Environmental Services business in March 2025 marked a transformational deleveraging event. The company used approximately $3.75 billion of the proceeds to repay debt, which is expected to reduce annual cash interest expense by nearly $200 million.⁹ This single transaction dramatically improved GFL’s financial flexibility and set the company on a path to achieve its new net leverage target in the low 3.0x range by the end of 2025.⁷

This deleveraging places GFL on a clear and credible trajectory toward achieving an investment-grade credit rating, a stated goal of the management team.¹² Credit rating agencies prioritize stable and predictable cash flows, moderate leverage ratios, and a disciplined financial policy. GFL’s new corporate profile—a focused solid waste business with recession-resilient characteristics, a significantly lower debt-to-EBITDA ratio, and a publicly articulated commitment to financial discipline—aligns squarely with investment-grade criteria. Securing such a rating would be a significant catalyst, as it would lower the company’s future cost of capital, thereby reducing interest expenses and freeing up additional cash flow for growth investments or shareholder returns. It would also broaden GFL’s appeal to a wider range of debt and equity investors, creating a virtuous cycle of improving financial strength and valuation.

5. Growth Opportunities and Strategic Initiatives

Post-transformation, GFL is positioned to pursue a multi-faceted growth strategy that combines disciplined organic expansion, strategic acquisitions, and high-return investments in sustainability.

Key Growth Drivers

GFL’s growth algorithm is built on three core pillars:

1. Price-Led Organic Growth: This remains the foundation of the company’s growth model. Management has guided for annual organic revenue growth of approximately 5.0% to 6.0%, driven primarily by disciplined pricing strategies designed to produce a positive spread over cost inflation.³ The company believes the current rational industry backdrop allows for structurally higher price-cost spreads than have been seen historically.¹¹
2. Synergistic M&A: With a fortified balance sheet, GFL has reinvigorated its M&A program. The strategy is focused on deploying $700 million to $900 million annually on tuck-in acquisitions within its existing geographic footprint.³ This approach is designed to build market density, improve asset utilization, and generate strong returns.
3. Sustainability-Linked Initiatives: This has emerged as a major new growth vector. Investments in Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) are expected to become significant contributors to earnings. Combined, these initiatives are projected to add between $270 million and $380 million in incremental Adjusted EBITDA during the 2026 to 2028 period.³

Acquisition Pipeline and Integration Capabilities

Management consistently describes the M&A pipeline as “robust,” citing the highly fragmented nature of the North American waste industry as a source of continued opportunity.³ The company’s ability to successfully integrate acquisitions is a core competency, supported by a dedicated “Enterprise Transformation Team” tasked with standardizing operations, implementing best practices, and unlocking cost and revenue synergies from newly acquired businesses.¹

Opportunities in Emerging Waste Streams

While now a solid waste pure-play, GFL is strategically leveraging its asset base to capitalize on high-growth, sustainability-focused waste streams.

• Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): GFL has established itself as a leader in capitalizing on new EPR legislation, particularly in Canada. EPR regulations shift the financial and operational responsibility for recycling from municipalities to the producers of packaged goods. GFL has secured long-term, fee-for-service contracts to manage these programs, creating a stable, predictable, and high-margin revenue stream. The company is investing significantly in upgrading its MRFs to service this growing demand.¹
• Renewable Natural Gas (RNG): GFL is actively developing a portfolio of RNG projects at its landfills. These facilities capture methane gas—a potent greenhouse gas—and process it into a pipeline-quality renewable fuel. These projects not only have a positive environmental impact but also generate high-margin revenue streams through the sale of the gas and associated environmental credits. GFL aims to double its beneficial use of biogas by 2030 and expects its RNG projects to generate approximately $175 million of Adjusted EBITDA annually starting in 2028.¹⁷

Margin Expansion Potential

Driving margin expansion is a central pillar of GFL’s current strategy. Management is targeting 40 basis points of annual organic Adjusted EBITDA margin expansion.³ This improvement is expected to be achieved through a variety of operational initiatives, including: continued price discovery and optimization of ancillary fees, leveraging scale for procurement savings, converting the collection fleet from diesel to lower-cost Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), and reducing costs associated with high employee turnover.¹

Historically, sustainability and ESG-related activities were often viewed by investors as necessary costs of compliance. For GFL, however, these initiatives have transformed into a material, high-margin growth engine. Management has described its investments in RNG and EPR as offering the “best risk adjusted returns that we have seen in decades”.¹² These projects are not speculative; they are largely underpinned by long-term contracts (EPR) or supported by strong market demand and government incentives (RNG), providing a high degree of earnings visibility.¹⁷ This creates a powerful “second engine” of growth for the company, complementing the traditional waste industry model of price and volume. It diversifies GFL’s earnings stream, reduces its correlation to purely macroeconomic factors, and positions the company as a key enabler of the circular economy, which could attract a broader base of ESG-focused investors.

6. Capital Allocation Strategy

The divestiture of the Environmental Services business has ushered in a new era of capital allocation for GFL, marked by a more balanced approach that now includes significant returns of capital to shareholders alongside continued investment in growth.

Management’s Approach to Capital Allocation

The company’s post-divestiture capital allocation framework, detailed at the 2025 Investor Day, is a clear departure from its previous, M&A-centric model. The new strategy prioritizes a balanced deployment of capital across four key areas:

1. Deleveraging: The initial priority was to use a significant portion of the divestiture proceeds to reduce debt and achieve the company’s target leverage ratio.⁹
2. Organic Growth Investments: Continued investment in high-return sustainability projects like RNG and EPR.¹
3. Accretive M&A: A sustained, disciplined program of tuck-in acquisitions.¹⁰
4. Shareholder Returns: For the first time, share repurchases and potential dividend growth are a major component of the strategy.¹⁰

Acquisition Multiples and Synergy Realization

GFL’s acquisition strategy focuses on smaller, private companies where it can create value through operational improvements and synergy realization. While specific acquisition multiples are not disclosed, the emphasis is on densifying existing markets to improve route efficiency and internalizing more waste into GFL’s own disposal facilities, which captures higher margins. The success of this strategy is contingent on the Enterprise Transformation Team’s ability to integrate these businesses and bring their performance up to GFL’s standards.¹

Dividend Policy and Share Repurchase Programs

GFL maintains a dividend, though the current yield is modest at approximately 0.13%.³⁵ The most significant shift in capital return policy is the initiation of a substantial share repurchase program. The company allocated up to $2.25 billion of the divestiture proceeds for buybacks and was highly active in the first half of 2025, repurchasing 31.7 million shares in the first quarter and another 3.5 million in the second quarter.⁸ Management has clearly stated its intention to remain “opportunistic on further share repurchases going forward,” signaling confidence in the stock’s value.³⁸

Capital Expenditure Requirements

The company makes a clear distinction between maintenance and growth capital expenditures.

• Maintenance Capex: These are the normal course expenditures required to maintain the company’s existing asset base, including trucks and facilities. This was guided to be in the range of $850 million to $900 million for 2024.¹²
• Growth Capex: These are discretionary investments in new, high-return projects. For 2025, GFL intends to deploy approximately $325 million in growth capex, primarily for the final build-out of its contracted EPR and RNG facilities.¹¹

The introduction of a large-scale share buyback program is a pivotal development, marking the maturation of GFL’s capital allocation philosophy. Prior to the divestiture, the company’s high leverage and singular focus on acquisitive growth made shareholder returns a low priority. The new capacity for repurchases is a direct result of the enhanced financial flexibility and signals management’s strong belief that the company’s shares are trading below their intrinsic value. This provides a direct and efficient mechanism to return capital to shareholders and can be highly accretive to earnings per share. For investors, the buyback program provides a degree of support for the stock price and demonstrates a clear commitment from management to creating per-share value, not just growing the absolute size of the enterprise.

Post-Divestiture Capital Allocation Framework (2025 Outlook)

Sources of Capital	Amount (Illustrative)	Uses of Capital	Amount (Guided)	Source Snippets
Cash Proceeds from Divestiture (Net)	~$6.2B	Debt Repayment	~$3.75B	9
2025 Adjusted FCF	~$750M	Share Repurchases	Up to $2.25B	8
Available Liquidity / Revolver	As needed	M&A Deployment	$700M – $900M (annual target)	3
		Growth Capex (RNG/EPR)	~$325M	11
		Dividends	~$24M (annualized)	45

7. Recent Developments and Challenges (2023-2025)

The period from 2023 to 2025 has been one of the most transformative in GFL’s history, defined by a major strategic repositioning and successful navigation of a challenging macroeconomic environment.

Significant Strategic and Financial Changes

The defining event of this period was unquestionably the strategic review and subsequent sale of GFL’s Environmental Services business. The transaction, announced in January 2025 and closed on March 1, 2025, was executed at an enterprise value of $8.0 billion, a valuation that significantly exceeded initial expectations.⁷ The strategic rationale was multifaceted: to unlock the embedded value of a high-quality but non-core asset, to materially de-lever the balance sheet, and to allow the company to sharpen its focus on its higher-margin, more predictable Solid Waste operations.⁷ The result was a fundamental reshaping of the company’s financial structure and strategic priorities, as detailed in the preceding sections.

Navigating Macroeconomic Headwinds

GFL, along with the broader industry, has contended with significant macroeconomic challenges, including persistent inflation and rising interest rates.

• Inflation and Labor Costs: The company faced inflationary pressures on key inputs such as labor, fuel, and equipment maintenance.³¹ GFL’s management team responded proactively and effectively, leveraging the industry’s inherent pricing power to implement core price increases and fuel surcharges that successfully offset these rising costs. This strategy has enabled the company to protect and even expand its margins during a period of high inflation.¹¹
• Interest Rates: The sharp rise in interest rates beginning in 2022 increased the cost of capital, impacting the financing for M&A and the cost of servicing the company’s substantial debt load. The deleveraging achieved through the Environmental Services divestiture was a crucial strategic move to mitigate this risk. By paying down a significant portion of its debt, GFL has substantially reduced its exposure to interest rate fluctuations and lowered its annual cash interest payments by an estimated $200 million.⁹

Regulatory and Policy Shifts

A key development on the regulatory front has been the continued rollout of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation, particularly in several Canadian provinces. GFL has been a first-mover in this area, viewing the regulatory shift not as a burden but as a significant commercial opportunity. The company has successfully secured long-term contracts to manage recycling programs on behalf of producers, turning a regulatory requirement into a stable, fee-based growth driver.¹

Management and Strategic Pivots

Throughout this period of significant change, the senior leadership team, led by founder Patrick Dovigi, has remained stable, providing continuity of vision and execution.³² The primary strategic pivot has been the evolution from a model heavily weighted toward “growth at all costs” to a more mature and balanced strategy. The new focus emphasizes profitable organic growth, improved free cash flow conversion, and a disciplined capital allocation framework that now incorporates meaningful returns to shareholders.

8. Risk Factors and Industry Headwinds

Despite its strong market position and positive outlook, an investment in GFL is subject to a range of operational, financial, and industry-specific risks.

Operational Risks

• Regulatory and Environmental Compliance: GFL operates in a heavily regulated industry. Its operations are subject to a complex web of federal, state, and local environmental laws governing waste collection, transportation, disposal, and emissions. Failure to comply with these regulations can lead to substantial fines, penalties, and operational disruptions. Furthermore, the ownership and operation of landfills carry inherent long-term environmental risks, including potential liability for soil and groundwater contamination, which require significant financial reserves for closure and post-closure monitoring.⁵
• Safety: The waste collection industry involves significant safety risks for its workforce, primarily related to vehicle operation and materials handling. Maintaining a strong safety culture and record is critical to employee well-being, operational continuity, and managing insurance costs. GFL’s Sustainability Action Plan explicitly includes goals aimed at enhancing its health and safety priorities.⁴⁰
• Contract Risk: A portion of GFL’s revenue is dependent on municipal contracts, which are subject to competitive bidding and renewal risk. The loss of a major municipal contract could adversely affect revenue and profitability in a specific market.⁵

Financial Risks

• Leverage and Interest Rate Sensitivity: While the company’s leverage profile has improved dramatically, it continues to carry a significant amount of debt on its balance sheet. An unexpected downturn in business performance could pressure its ability to service this debt. Additionally, a portion of its debt may be subject to variable interest rates, exposing the company’s earnings to fluctuations in the broader interest rate environment.
• Acquisition Integration: GFL’s growth strategy remains heavily reliant on the successful execution and integration of acquisitions. There are inherent risks in this strategy, including the potential to overpay for assets, the failure to realize anticipated synergies, or the disruption of operations during the integration process.

Competitive Threats and Market Disruption

The North American waste market is highly competitive, particularly in open markets where GFL competes directly with the three larger, well-capitalized industry leaders: WM, RSG, and WCN.¹⁴ These competitors have extensive resources, established market positions, and similar vertical integration advantages.

Economic and Cyclical Exposure

The waste industry is generally considered recession-resilient due to the stable, non-discretionary nature of residential waste generation. However, certain segments of the business are more sensitive to economic cycles. Commercial and industrial waste volumes, particularly those linked to manufacturing and construction and demolition (C&D) activity, can decline during economic downturns, impacting revenue and profitability.⁴⁶

ESG-Related Risks

According to ESG rating agency Sustainalytics, GFL has an ESG Risk Rating of 23.4, which is categorized as “Medium Risk.” This rating is notably higher (indicating greater perceived risk) than its direct peers, including Republic Services (16.4, Low Risk) and Waste Connections (19.6, Low Risk).⁴⁸ This suggests that GFL may be perceived by some stakeholders as lagging in its management of material environmental, social, and governance issues. A failure to effectively manage these risks or a significant environmental or safety incident could result in reputational damage, increased regulatory scrutiny, and a higher cost of capital. To mitigate these risks, GFL has developed a comprehensive Sustainability Action Plan that outlines specific goals related to greenhouse gas reduction, recycling, and employee engagement.⁴⁰

9. Valuation Analysis

GFL’s valuation presents a classic case of a growth company trading at a discount to its more mature peers. The central question for investors is whether this discount is justified or if it represents a significant mispricing opportunity given the company’s transformed financial profile and superior growth prospects.

Valuation Multiples: Peer and Historical Context

The most relevant valuation metric for the capital-intensive waste management industry is the Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple, as it is independent of capital structure and provides a clearer view of operating value.

• Peer Comparison: GFL has consistently traded at a valuation discount to its primary competitors. As of early 2025, GFL’s LTM EV/EBITDA multiple stood at approximately 16.1x. This was in line with the multiples of the larger, slower-growing incumbents WM (16.6x) and RSG (16.6x), but represented a substantial discount to the industry’s premium-valued operator, Waste Connections, which traded at 22.8x.⁴⁹
• Historical Context: GFL’s own valuation multiple has been volatile, reflecting its rapid evolution as a public company. The EV/EBITDA multiple peaked near 19.8x in 2020 following its IPO, troughed at 14.3x at the end of 2023 during a period of peak leverage concerns, and recovered to 19.3x by the end of 2024 as the market began to anticipate the benefits of its strategic review.⁴⁹

The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio for GFL can be misleading due to the impact of non-cash depreciation and amortization charges, as well as one-time gains or losses related to its extensive M&A and divestiture activities.³⁵ Therefore, EV/EBITDA remains the preferred metric for comparative analysis.

Appropriateness of Current Valuation

The bull thesis for GFL is predicated on the argument that its historical valuation discount is no longer appropriate. The company’s strategic transformation has addressed the primary concerns that previously justified this discount: excessive leverage and business complexity. With a de-risked balance sheet, a simplified pure-play solid waste model, a clear path to margin expansion, and a demonstrably superior growth outlook, GFL’s investment profile now warrants a valuation multiple that is at least in line with, and arguably at a premium to, its slower-growing peers.

Market Valuation of Waste Management Companies

The market consistently assigns premium valuations to waste management companies due to their highly attractive business characteristics: stable, recurring revenues, significant pricing power, and formidable barriers to entry.⁵⁰ Within the sector, companies that demonstrate a consistent ability to execute on M&A, drive margin expansion, and generate strong, predictable free cash flow—such as Waste Connections—tend to command the highest multiples.¹⁵

The persistence of a valuation gap for GFL, even after the strategic rationale for its transformation has been clearly articulated, reflects a degree of market skepticism. This represents a classic “show me” story, where investors are waiting for the company to deliver tangible proof of its ability to execute on its margin and free cash flow improvement targets. This skepticism creates a compelling opportunity for investors who have confidence in the management team’s ability to deliver on its stated plan. As GFL continues to report quarters of strong margin expansion and disciplined capital deployment, this execution risk will diminish, and the valuation gap should progressively narrow. This provides investors with the potential for a “double-play” return, benefiting from both the growth in the company’s underlying EBITDA and an expansion of the EV/EBITDA multiple that the market applies to those higher earnings.

Valuation Multiples Analysis

Company	Ticker	Current EV/EBITDA (LTM)	5-Year Average EV/EBITDA	LTM Revenue Growth	2025E EBITDA Growth (Pro-forma)
GFL Environmental	GFL	~16.1x	~16.7x	4.6%	High-teens
Waste Management	WM	~16.6x	~15.3x	8.0%	Mid-single digits
Republic Services	RSG	~16.6x	~15.0x	7.1%	Mid-single digits
Waste Connections	WCN	~22.8x	~19.7x	11.2%	High-single digits
Source Snippets		49	49	25	Analyst Estimates/Guidance

10. Management Quality and Corporate Governance

The quality and alignment of a company’s leadership team and the robustness of its governance framework are critical factors in any long-term investment thesis. GFL appears strong on both fronts.

Management Track Record, Strategic Vision, and Execution

GFL is a founder-led company, with Patrick Dovigi serving as Founder, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board.³² This provides a unique advantage in terms of long-term strategic vision and an embedded entrepreneurial culture. Mr. Dovigi has an exceptional track record, having built GFL from a small Canadian startup in 2007 into the fourth-largest environmental services provider in North America through astute M&A and capital raising.³³

The senior leadership team is composed of seasoned executives with deep industry and financial expertise. This includes individuals who have held senior roles at key competitors like Waste Management and Republic Services, such as COO Billy Soffera, bringing valuable operational experience to the organization.³² The successful execution of the complex Environmental Services divestiture and the subsequent strategic pivot demonstrate the management team’s ability to make bold, value-creating decisions.

Communication with Investors and Transparency

GFL maintains a high level of transparency with the investment community. The company hosts regular quarterly earnings calls and periodic investor days, where it provides detailed financial results, operational updates, and comprehensive forward-looking guidance.¹ The detailed capital allocation plan provided in late 2023 and the comprehensive strategic update at the 2025 Investor Day are prime examples of proactive and transparent communication.³

Insider Ownership, Compensation, and Shareholder Alignment

As the company’s founder, Mr. Dovigi’s significant equity stake ensures a high degree of “skin in the game,” which strongly aligns his personal financial interests with those of public shareholders. While specific ownership percentages and details of the executive compensation structure are contained within the company’s Management Information Circular, the founder-led nature of the business inherently fosters a culture of ownership and long-term value creation.

Corporate Governance Practices and Board Composition

GFL has established a robust corporate governance framework. As of the company’s annual meeting in May 2025, the Board of Directors was composed of eight members.⁵⁸ The board features a Lead Independent Director, Dino Chiesa, ensuring independent leadership and oversight.⁵⁶ The company has shown a commitment to board refreshment and independence; following a 2023 appointment, nine of the ten board members at that time were independent.⁵⁹ The board maintains standard committees—including Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation—which are composed of independent directors, consistent with best practices in corporate governance.⁶⁰

Investment Thesis and Recommendation

GFL Environmental Inc. stands at a pivotal inflection point in its corporate journey. The recent divestiture of its Environmental Services business was a bold and value-unlocking move that has fundamentally de-risked the company’s balance sheet, simplified its investment story, and provided the capital for a new, more balanced allocation strategy. GFL has emerged as a focused solid waste pure-play with an industry-leading organic growth profile and a clear, multi-year runway for significant margin expansion. This powerful combination of superior growth and improving profitability is not yet fully reflected in the company’s stock valuation.

The investment thesis is built on the impending closure of GFL’s historical valuation gap relative to its peers. This gap was previously justified by higher leverage and business complexity—factors that have now been decisively addressed. As the management team continues to execute on its operational optimization plan, driving margin expansion and enhancing free cash flow conversion, the market is expected to re-rate the company’s shares to a valuation multiple more in line with its growth profile. This re-rating, combined with strong underlying earnings growth, creates a compelling opportunity for outsized shareholder returns.

The company’s transformed financial profile, superior growth prospects, and discounted valuation present an attractive risk/reward proposition for long-term investors.

Frequently Asked Questions

Earnings and Business Model

• Are earnings at a cyclical high or cyclical low? The waste management industry is generally considered defensive and less cyclical than many other sectors due to the essential nature of its services. While certain segments, like industrial and construction waste collection, are tied to economic activity, the majority of GFL’s revenue from residential and commercial collection is stable. Recent strong performance appears to be driven more by internal strategic actions, such as disciplined pricing and operational efficiencies, rather than a cyclical peak in the economy.  
• Are earnings driven primarily by the external environment or internal company actions? Earnings are driven primarily by internal company actions. GFL has consistently demonstrated strong pricing power, implementing core price increases that outpace cost inflation. Management’s strategy is centered on driving operating efficiencies, successfully integrating tuck-in acquisitions, and capitalizing on high-growth sustainability initiatives like Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) programs. While external factors like commodity prices and fuel costs have an impact, the company’s core profitability is propelled by its own operational and strategic execution.  
• Can this business be easily understood? Yes, the core business model is straightforward. GFL provides essential environmental services, primarily focused on the collection, transportation, transfer, recycling, and disposal of non-hazardous solid waste for residential, commercial, and industrial customers. The recent divestiture of its more complex Environmental Services division has further simplified the company into a solid waste “pure-play,” making its operations and value drivers easier for investors to understand.  
• Can this company be undermined by foreign, low-cost labor? No. Waste management is an inherently local service that requires a significant physical presence, including local fleets, facilities, and a domestic workforce to service customers in specific geographic areas. As such, it is not exposed to direct competition from foreign, low-cost labor.  
• Do brands matter in the business? Or is this a commodity producer? The business has elements of both. While waste collection can be viewed as a commoditized service where price is a key competitive factor, brand reputation, service reliability, and scale are critical for securing and retaining long-term, exclusive contracts with municipalities. Furthermore, owning vertically integrated assets like landfills provides a significant competitive advantage that differentiates the company from smaller players.  

Financial Health & Capital Allocation

• How much free cash flow does the business generate? How does management use this free cash flow? What is their philosophy? GFL generated $820.3 million in Adjusted Free Cash Flow in 2024, with guidance for the now pure-play solid waste business to generate approximately $750 million in 2025. Following the recent divestiture and deleveraging, management has adopted a new, balanced capital allocation philosophy. The priorities for using cash flow are: (1) investing in high-return organic growth projects like RNG and EPR, (2) pursuing a disciplined strategy of smaller, “tuck-in” acquisitions, and (3) returning capital to shareholders through a significant share repurchase program and dividends.  
• Is the company buying back shares? Paying dividends? Yes, the company does both. GFL pays a quarterly dividend, which currently yields approximately 0.13%. More significantly, after the sale of its Environmental Services business, the company initiated a substantial share repurchase program. It was highly active in the first half of 2025, buying back over 35 million shares, and management has stated its intention to remain “opportunistic on further share repurchases going forward”.  
• How CapEx hungry is this business? What % of cash from operations must be spent on CapEx to sustain the business? The waste management industry is capital-intensive. For 2024, GFL’s normal course maintenance capital expenditures (the amount needed to sustain the business) were guided to be between $850 million and $900 million. Based on the $1.54 billion in operating cash flow generated in 2024, this represents approximately 55-60% of cash from operations being reinvested to maintain the existing asset base. The company also allocates separate “growth capex” for new projects like RNG and EPR facilities.  
• How profitable is this business? What is the return on capital invested? Return on equity? The business is demonstrating improving profitability. For the full year 2024, GFL’s Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded by 190 basis points to 28.6%. The core Solid Waste segment, which is now the company’s sole focus, operated at an even higher Adjusted EBITDA margin of 32.9%. The company’s reported return on equity was 3.71%. While a specific Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) figure is not provided, management has stated that its strategy of tuck-in acquisitions has been shown to compound ROIC over time.  
• Is net income diverging from cash from operations? Yes, at times there can be a significant divergence, which is typical for a company undergoing major strategic transactions. In 2024, GFL reported a net loss of $737.7 million, while its cash flow from operations was a positive $1.54 billion. This difference was primarily due to a large non-cash loss related to an asset divestiture. This highlights why analysts often focus on metrics like Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow to assess the underlying operational performance.  

Company Structure & Governance

• What are the motivations of management? Do they own a lot of stock and options? As a founder-led company, management’s motivations appear strongly aligned with long-term shareholder value creation. Founder and CEO Patrick Dovigi has built the company from the ground up and maintains a significant equity stake, giving him substantial “skin in the game”. The executive compensation program reinforces this alignment by using a mix of salary, annual bonuses, and long-term equity-based incentives such as stock options and Restricted Share Units (RSUs).  
• Does the company issue large amounts of new shares to insiders? The provided materials do not indicate any recent large-scale issuance of new shares to insiders. In fact, the company’s recent capital allocation strategy has been focused on reducing the number of outstanding shares through an aggressive buyback program. While executives receive equity as part of their standard compensation, the primary focus has been on share repurchases.  
• What is the compensation policy of directors and management? The executive compensation policy is designed to attract, retain, and motivate high-performing leaders by aligning their interests with those of shareholders. The program consists of a mix of fixed and variable compensation, including a base salary, annual non-equity incentives (cash bonuses), and long-term equity-based awards like stock options and RSUs to encourage a focus on long-term value creation.  
• Is the stock an ADR? What are the ADR fees? GFL’s stock is not an American Depositary Receipt (ADR). GFL is a Canadian company, but its shares are dual-listed and trade directly on both the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the ticker symbol “GFL.” Therefore, there are no ADR fees associated with trading its shares on the NYSE.  

Industry and Market Environment

• How profitable is this industry? Are there a lot of competitors? What are the barriers to entry? The North American waste management industry is structurally profitable due to its essential services, recurring revenue streams, and significant pricing power. The competitive landscape consists of three other large public companies (Waste Management, Republic Services, Waste Connections) and a highly fragmented market of thousands of smaller, privately-owned operators, which provides a long runway for consolidation. Barriers to entry are formidable, primarily due to the immense capital required for trucks, facilities, and landfills, as well as an exceptionally stringent and lengthy regulatory process for permitting new disposal sites.  
• How stable are revenues? How much do they fluctuate with the economy? Revenues are highly stable and resilient. The residential collection business is largely insulated from economic cycles. While commercial and industrial volumes can fluctuate with economic activity, this is often offset by long-term municipal contracts that include annual price escalators tied to inflation, providing a predictable and growing revenue base.  
• Outlook for the company’s products and services? How big will this market be? Is it growing? Shrinking? Domestic or international? The outlook is positive. GFL operates exclusively in the North American (Canada and U.S.) waste management market, which is valued at over $200 billion and is projected to grow at a steady rate of 4-6% annually. Growth is driven by population and economic expansion, as well as powerful sustainability trends like the circular economy, which are creating new revenue opportunities in areas like RNG and EPR that GFL is actively pursuing.  
• Has the business environment changed recently? Yes, the environment has evolved significantly. The most impactful change for GFL was its own strategic decision to sell its Environmental Services division in early 2025, which simplified its business and fortified its balance sheet. Externally, a higher interest rate environment has increased the cost of capital across the industry, and there is a growing regulatory and commercial focus on sustainability, which GFL is leveraging as a key growth driver.  

Recent Events & Risk Factors

• What are the recent news on the company? Recent announcements include the release of strong second-quarter 2025 financial results, an increase in the company’s full-year guidance, the declaration of its regular quarterly dividend, and continued activity under its share repurchase program. The landmark event of early 2025 was the completion of the $8.0 billion sale of its Environmental Services business.  
• Has the company made any significant acquisitions recently? The most significant recent transaction was the divestiture of its Environmental Services business for an enterprise value of $8.0 billion. Since then, the company’s acquisition strategy has focused on smaller, “tuck-in” deals to increase density in existing markets. In 2024, GFL acquired 11 businesses, and through the first half of 2025, it has completed acquisitions expected to generate approximately $105 million in annualized revenue.  
• What factors would cause the stock to decline? Are these factors controlled by the company or the external environment? Potential risks include both internal and external factors.
  • Internal/Company-Controlled: A failure to successfully integrate future acquisitions, an inability to execute on planned margin improvements, or a major operational issue such as a significant safety or environmental incident could cause the stock to decline.  
  • External: A severe and prolonged economic recession could negatively impact higher-margin industrial waste volumes. Unfavorable regulatory changes, a sharp rise in interest rates, or intensified price competition could also pose risks.  
• What is the risk of a catastrophic loss on this investment? What is the chance of a total loss? The risk of a total or catastrophic loss on this investment is extremely low. GFL is the fourth-largest provider of an essential service in the highly defensive and stable North American waste management industry. The business is supported by significant physical assets and high barriers to entry, making the underlying enterprise robust. While investment risks exist, the probability of a total loss of capital is remote.  

Accounting and Liabilities

• Has the company recently changed accounting policies? No significant changes to accounting policies have been reported. The company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and are audited by KPMG LLP. Following the sale of the Environmental Services division, prior-period financial statements were re-presented to show that segment as a discontinued operation, which is a standard accounting requirement and not a change in policy.  
• How conservative is the company’s accounting? Are they over- or under-stating earnings? The company’s accounting appears to be in line with industry standards. The financial statements are audited by a major accounting firm in accordance with PCAOB standards. Like its peers, GFL uses non-IFRS financial measures such as “Adjusted EBITDA” to provide investors with a clearer picture of ongoing operational performance, excluding the impact of non-recurring or non-cash items like the loss on an asset sale. The company provides detailed reconciliations of these non-IFRS measures to their nearest IFRS equivalents, which is a transparent practice.  
• What off B/S liabilities does the company have? The company utilizes performance bonds in the normal course of business, which are a form of off-balance sheet commitment. Significant long-term liabilities, such as those for landfill closure and post-closure care, are recorded on the balance sheet and amounted to over $1 billion as of December 31, 2024. The provided information does not detail other material off-balance sheet arrangements.  

Works cited

1. GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/home/default.aspx
2. gfl environmental inc. – SEC.gov, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1780232/000110465925017743/gfl-20241231xex99d2.htm
3. GFL Environmental Inc. Hosts 2025 Investor Day, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/news/news-details/2025/GFL-Environmental-Inc.-Hosts-2025-Investor-Day/default.aspx
4. GFL Environmental Inc. – Resources – Investor FAQs, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/resources/investor-faq/default.aspx
5. GFL ENVIRONMENTAL INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For the three and, accessed September 26, 2025, https://s24.q4cdn.com/409248530/files/doc_financials/2025/q2/GFL-Environmental-Inc-_Q2-MDA-2025.pdf
6. GFL Environmental – M&A Summary and Business Overview | Mergr, accessed September 26, 2025, https://mergr.com/company/gfl-environmental
7. Apollo and BC Partners’ $8.0bn acquisition of GFL Environmental – MergerSight, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.mergersight.com/post/apolloandbcpartners-8-0bnacquisitionofgflenvironmental
8. GFL Environmental Reports First Quarter 2025 Results, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/news/news-details/2025/GFL-Environmental-Reports-First-Quarter-2025-Results/default.aspx
9. GFL Environmental Inc. Announces Agreement to Sell Environmental Services Business Valued at $8.0 Billion, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/news/news-details/2025/GFL-Environmental-Inc.-Announces-Agreement-to-Sell-Environmental-Services-Business-Valued-at-8.0-Billion/default.aspx
10. GFL-2025-Investor-Day-Presentation.pdf, accessed September 26, 2025, https://s24.q4cdn.com/409248530/files/doc_financials/2024/q4/GFL-2025-Investor-Day-Presentation.pdf
11. GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) Q4 2024 Earnings Call Transcript …, accessed September 26, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4761686-gfl-environmental-inc-gfl-q4-2024-earnings-call-transcript
12. GFL Environmental Inc. Provides Update on 2024 Capital Allocation Strategy, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/news/news-details/2023/GFL-Environmental-Inc.-Provides-Update-on-2024-Capital-Allocation-Strategy/default.aspx
13. Republic Services, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2024 Results; Provides 2025 Full-Year Financial Guidance – PR Newswire, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/republic-services-inc-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-results-provides-2025-full-year-financial-guidance-302376557.html
14. Largest waste and recycling companies by market cap, accessed September 26, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/waste-recycling/largest-waste-and-recycling-companies-by-market-cap/
15. With 5,000% returns, this trash firm’s a treasure – Finimize, accessed September 26, 2025, https://finimize.com/content/5000-returns-why-one-mans-trash-firm-could-be-your-stock-treasure
16. Publicly Traded Waste Management Industry Report: Autumn 2023 Results, accessed September 26, 2025, https://einvestingforbeginners.com/publicly-traded-waste-management-industry-report-autumn-2023-results/
17. Investment analysis of GFL Environmental Inc – Freedom24, accessed September 26, 2025, https://freedom24.com/ideas/details/17496
18. North America Waste Management Market Size & Share Analysis …, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/north-america-waste-management-market
19. Waste and recycling is now a $100B industry, report says, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.wastedive.com/news/us-recycling-waste-market-100-billion-revenue-milestone-waste-business-journal/743163/
20. Waste Management Market Size | Industry Report, 2033 – Grand View Research, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/global-waste-management-market
21. North America Waste Management Market Size and Share Analysis, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.nextmsc.com/report/north-america-waste-management-market
22. North America Waste Management Market Size & Outlook, 2033 – Grand View Research, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/waste-management-market/north-america
23. Publicly Traded Waste Management Industry Report: Spring 2024 Results, accessed September 26, 2025, https://einvestingforbeginners.com/publicly-traded-waste-management-industry-report-spring-2024-results-schil/
24. Waste Connections Inc vs. Republic Services Inc: Comprehensive Stock Comparison – Taurigo, accessed September 26, 2025, https://taurigo.com/stocks/WCN/comparison/RSG
25. GFL Environmental Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results – PR Newswire, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/gfl-environmental-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-results-provides-full-year-2025-guidance-302383850.html
26. GFL Environmental Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Results; Provides Full Year 2025 Guidance, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/news/news-details/2025/GFL-Environmental-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2024-Results-Provides-Full-Year-2025-Guidance/default.aspx
27. WM Announces Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2024 Earnings | WM, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.wm.com/news-releases/news-release-details/wm-announces-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-earnings/
28. Republic Services, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2024 …, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investor.republicservices.com/news-releases/news-release-details/republic-services-inc-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024
29. WASTE CONNECTIONS REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER 2024 …, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.wasteconnections.com/2025-02-12-WASTE-CONNECTIONS-REPORTS-FOURTH-QUARTER-2024-RESULTS-AND-PROVIDES-2025-OUTLOOK
30. Waste Connections 2024 Annual Report, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.wasteconnections.com/annual-report-2024/
31. GFL Environmental largely overcomes inflation through pricing and fuel charges, raises 2022 revenue guidance | Waste Dive, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.wastedive.com/news/q2-2022-earnings-gfl-dovigi-inflation-rng-acquisitions/628327/
32. GFL Executive Team, accessed September 26, 2025, https://gflenv.com/about-us/our-leadership/
33. Executive Management – GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/esg/executive-management/default.aspx
34. NYSE: RSG – Republic Services stock analysis and financials – FullRatio, accessed September 26, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nyse-rsg/republic-services
35. GFL Environmental (GFL) Competitors and Alternatives 2025 – MarketBeat, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/GFL/competitors-and-alternatives/
36. WCN vs. RSG — Stock Comparison Tool – PortfoliosLab, accessed September 26, 2025, https://portfolioslab.com/tools/stock-comparison/WCN/RSG
37. GFL Environmental Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results and Raises Full Year 2025 Guidance, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/news/news-details/2025/GFL-Environmental-Reports-Second-Quarter-2025-Results-and-Raises-Full-Year-2025-Guidance/default.aspx
38. Financials – Quarterly Results – GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/financials/quarterly-results/default.aspx
39. SEC Filings Details – GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/financials/sec-filings/sec-filings-details/default.aspx?filingid=16637919
40. Sustainability Reporting – GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/esg/sustainability/default.aspx
41. Our Commitment to Sustainaining The Planet | GFL Environmental, accessed September 26, 2025, https://gflenv.com/about-us/sustainability/
42. GFL Environmental (GFL) Competitors and Alternatives 2025 – MarketBeat, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/TSE/GFL/competitors-and-alternatives/
43. GFL Environmental: Revenue, Competitors, Alternatives – Growjo, accessed September 26, 2025, https://growjo.com/company/GFL_Environmental
44. Financials – SEDAR Filings – GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/financials/sedar-filings/default.aspx
45. GFL GFL Environmental Inc. Peers & Competitors – Seeking Alpha, accessed September 26, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/GFL/peers/comparison
46. GFL ENVIRONMENTAL INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For the three mon, accessed September 26, 2025, https://s24.q4cdn.com/409248530/files/doc_financials/2025/q1/GFL-Environmental-Inc-_Q1-MDA-2025.pdf
47. 2023 CLIMATE REPORT | GFL Environmental, accessed September 26, 2025, https://gflenv.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/DIGITAL-Climate-Report.pdf
48. GFL Environmental, Inc. ESG Risk Rating – Sustainalytics, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-rating/gfl-environmental-inc/2007235834
49. Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc (XNYS:GFL) EV / EBITDA – Investing.com, accessed September 26, 2025, https://ng.investing.com/pro/XNYS:GFL/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm
50. EBITDA Multiples by Industry: Asset-Heavy Businesses – Clearly Acquired, accessed September 26, 2025, https://www.clearlyacquired.com/blog/ebitda-multiples-by-industry-asset-heavy-businesses
51. Waste Management Rules of Thumb | 2025 Industry Guide – DealStream, accessed September 26, 2025, https://dealstream.com/industry-guides/waste-management-businesses/rules-of-thumb
52. EV / EBITDA For Waste Connections Inc (WCN) – Finbox, accessed September 26, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:WCN/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
53. EV / EBITDA For Waste Management Inc (WM) – Finbox, accessed September 26, 2025, https://finbox.com/WBAG:WM/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
54. EV / EBITDA For Republic Services Inc (RSG) – Finbox, accessed September 26, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:RSG/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm/
55. Board of Directors – Person Details – GFL Environmental Inc. – Sustainability, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/esg/board-of-directors/person-details/default.aspx?ItemId=7d05377e-ce2e-4341-b299-ba4ad3685534
56. Board of Directors – GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/esg/board-of-directors/default.aspx
57. Events & Presentations – GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/events-and-presentations/default.aspx
58. Hired, retired & promoted: May 15, 2025 – Waste & Recycling, accessed September 26, 2025, https://wasterecyclingmag.ca/human-resources/appointment-new/hired-retired-promoted-may-15-2025/1003292506/
59. GFL Environmental Inc. Appoints Sandra Levy to its Board of Directors, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/news/news-details/2023/GFL-Environmental-Inc.-Appoints-Sandra-Levy-to-its-Board-of-Directors/default.aspx
60. Committee Composition – GFL Environmental Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed September 26, 2025, https://investors.gflenv.com/English/esg/committee-composition/default.aspx