CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO): An In-Depth Investment Analysis

The Gemini Brief - Investment Deep Dives
The Gemini Brief – Investment Deep Dives
CompoSecure, Inc. (CMPO): An In-Depth Investment Analysis
Loading
/

Executive Summary & Investment Thesis

CompoSecure, Inc. operates as a specialized technology partner at the intersection of traditional finance and digital innovation. The company’s business is bifurcated into two distinct segments: a mature, highly profitable core business as the market leader in the design and manufacturing of premium metal payment cards, and a nascent, high-growth venture in digital asset security through its Arculus platform.1 Serving the world’s largest financial institutions and fintechs, CompoSecure has established a defensible niche in the premium payments space. A recent and pivotal strategic development was the early 2025 spin-off of its management and M&A functions into a separate entity, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (RHLD), signaling a fundamental shift in its capital allocation strategy towards inorganic growth.3

The primary bull case for CompoSecure is founded on its dominant market position in the structurally growing, high-margin metal card segment. This growth is propelled by secular tailwinds, including increasing demand from mass-affluent consumers for premium products and the adoption of metal cards by neobanks and fintechs as a key tool for customer acquisition and brand differentiation.5 This core business is highly cash-generative, demonstrating recent operational improvements that have led to significant margin expansion and funding for both growth initiatives and shareholder returns.7 Layered on top of this stable base is the Arculus platform, which represents a valuable, albeit speculative, call option on the long-term growth of the digital asset economy. Strategic partnerships with major ecosystem players like MetaMask and MoneyGram provide early validation for its technology and go-to-market strategy.9

Conversely, the bear case is dominated by a set of severe and clearly defined risks. The most significant is an extreme level of customer concentration, with a substantial majority of revenue historically derived from two of the world’s largest card issuers.11 This dependency creates a precarious power dynamic, posing a material risk to long-term pricing power and revenue stability. Furthermore, the high profitability of the metal card business is a beacon for formidable competitors, such as Idemia and Thales, which possess the scale and resources to challenge CompoSecure’s market share and compress margins over time.11 Finally, the company faces significant execution risk on two fronts: scaling the unproven Arculus business in a competitive hardware wallet market and successfully implementing its newly outsourced M&A strategy under Resolute Holdings, which introduces a new layer of management fees and potential conflicts of interest.3

Key analytical findings indicate that the Resolute spin-off has introduced significant complexity to the company’s GAAP financial statements, making non-GAAP and pro forma metrics essential for a clear understanding of underlying business performance.6 Recent financial results, particularly for the second quarter of 2025, show impressive top-line acceleration and profitability, leading to an upward revision of full-year guidance.7 However, volatility in the geographic mix of sales suggests a degree of lumpiness and unpredictability in revenue streams. The company’s capital allocation priorities have clearly pivoted from a singular focus on organic growth and debt reduction to a multi-pronged strategy that now includes M&A, share repurchases, and special dividends.12

From a valuation perspective, traditional earnings-based multiples are currently distorted due to negative GAAP net income driven by large, non-cash accounting adjustments related to warrants and earnout liabilities.8 Therefore, a more appropriate analysis focuses on cash flow and EBITDA-based multiples. The company trades at a significant premium to its most direct public competitor, CPI Card Group, which the market appears to justify based on CompoSecure’s superior profitability and the embedded growth option of Arculus. The central question for investors is whether this valuation premium adequately compensates for the profound risks associated with the company’s customer concentration and the unproven nature of its new strategic initiatives.

Business Model & Operations: A Tale of Two Segments

CompoSecure’s business model is best understood as a combination of a stable, cash-cow manufacturing operation and a venture-style technology platform. This dual structure provides a foundation of profitability that funds a high-risk, high-reward bet on the future of digital security.

The Core Engine: Metal Payment Cards

The foundation of CompoSecure’s business is its pioneering and market-leading position in the design and manufacture of premium metal and composite payment cards.2 These products are not mere transactional tools; they are marketed as “top-of-wallet” status symbols that enhance a card issuer’s brand and drive customer behavior.

Product and Value Proposition: The company’s value proposition to its clients—global financial institutions, banks, and fintechs—is that metal cards are a powerful tool for customer acquisition, retention, and loyalty, particularly within the lucrative affluent and high-net-worth demographics.5 A 2024 study conducted by the company found that 72% of ultra-high-net-worth individuals report using their metal card more frequently than other cards in their wallet, and 65% would remain with a bank that offers one.5 This perceived value allows issuers to command higher annual fees and encourages increased customer spending, creating a clear return on investment for adopting CompoSecure’s premium products. The company has received numerous industry awards for its innovative card designs for clients such as American Express, IndusInd Bank, and Rogers Red World Elite Mastercard.5

Manufacturing and Technology: CompoSecure highlights its more than two decades of specialized experience, proprietary manufacturing processes, and ability to produce complex card constructions at scale as a key competitive advantage.2 The company asserts that its rivals possess substantially less production capacity and technical expertise in the metal form factor.2 This manufacturing prowess, centered at its facility in Somerset, New Jersey, allows it to deliver high volumes of customized, high-quality products on fixed schedules, a critical requirement for large-scale card rollouts by major banks.2

The Growth Option: Arculus Digital Security

Leveraging its expertise in secure form factors, CompoSecure has developed the Arculus platform, a suite of digital security solutions aimed at bridging the gap between traditional finance and the emerging digital asset ecosystem.

Platform Overview: The Arculus platform is centered around a hardware device with the familiar form factor of a credit card. This device underpins two primary offerings:

  1. Arculus Cold Storage: A “cold” hardware wallet designed for the secure offline storage of cryptocurrencies and other digital assets. It uses a 3-factor authentication system (biometrics, a PIN, and the physical card) to authorize transactions, aiming to provide a higher level of security than software-based “hot” wallets.1
  2. Arculus Authenticate: A solution for digital identity and passwordless authentication, using the same secure hardware to verify a user’s identity for accessing websites, applications, and other digital services.2

Go-to-Market Strategy and Recent Wins: Rather than competing directly with consumer-focused hardware wallet brands, Arculus has pursued a partnership-driven, B2B2C strategy. This involves integrating its technology with established players to tap into their existing user bases. This strategy has gained significant momentum, as evidenced by several key announcements:

  • MetaMask: A collaboration to create a self-custody payment card, allowing users to spend their crypto directly from their MetaMask wallet.9
  • MoneyGram: An integration enabling Arculus users to conduct global cash-to-crypto and crypto-to-cash transactions through MoneyGram’s network via the Stellar blockchain.10
  • N.exchange: A partnership to embed crypto-swapping capabilities directly within the Arculus wallet application, featuring a smart order router to find competitive pricing.16

The Arculus segment achieved a significant milestone in the first quarter of 2025 by reaching a state of positive net contribution, indicating that its direct revenues are now exceeding its direct costs, a crucial step toward long-term profitability.9

Revenue & Customer Analysis

While the company operates two distinct businesses, its financial reporting does not currently provide a formal revenue breakdown between the metal card and Arculus segments. Given the relative maturity and scale of the card business, it is reasonable to assume that it generates the vast majority of the company’s consolidated revenue.

Customer Concentration Risk: The most acute vulnerability in CompoSecure’s business model is its profound reliance on a very small number of key customers.

  • Data Point: A third-party investment analysis from September 2025 states that two customers, American Express and JP Morgan Chase, collectively accounted for 70.5% of CompoSecure’s revenue in 2023.11
  • Conflicting Information and Assumption: There is a notable discrepancy in the available data. The company’s 2024 10-K filing contains a data tag suggesting the top two customers represented only about 10% of revenue in 2024.2 This figure seems implausibly low given the company’s history and qualitative descriptions of its long-term contracts with the world’s largest issuers. The significant disparity may be due to a misinterpretation of the SEC filing’s data structure or a change in how customer revenue is categorized. For the purpose of this analysis, the more conservative and plausible assumption is that customer concentration remains extremely high, consistent with the 70.5% figure from 2023. This information gap represents a key area of uncertainty.

This high level of concentration places CompoSecure in the position of a strategic but highly vulnerable supplier. It grants its largest customers immense bargaining power during contract negotiations and exposes the company to significant financial risk should either client opt to switch suppliers, in-source production, or alter their premium card strategy. This structural reality provides a critical context for understanding the company’s recent strategic decisions. The spin-off of Resolute Holdings to explicitly pursue an M&A strategy is not merely a growth initiative; it is a strategic imperative to diversify the business and mitigate this concentration risk.4 Similarly, the investment in Arculus can be viewed as an attempt to cultivate an independent and diversified revenue stream, reducing the company’s reliance on the issuance decisions of a few dominant banking partners.

Industry Dynamics & Competitive Landscape

CompoSecure operates at the confluence of two distinct markets: the mature but evolving premium payment card industry and the nascent, high-growth digital asset security sector. Its competitive position and long-term prospects are shaped by the unique dynamics of each.

Premium Payment Card Market

Market Size and Growth Drivers: The global card payments market is vast and continues to expand, with one forecast projecting growth from $28.6 trillion in 2023 to $56.4 trillion by 2033, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.9%.17 The premium metal card segment, while a small fraction of this total, is a high-growth niche. CompoSecure estimates that metal cards constitute less than 1% of total annual payment card shipments, suggesting a substantial runway for increased market penetration.6

The primary drivers of this growth include:

  • Consumer Demand for Premiumization: High-net-worth and mass-affluent consumers are increasingly drawn to products that offer a sense of exclusivity, status, and enhanced benefits, a trend that metal cards directly address.18
  • Fintech and Neobank Competition: Digital-native banks like Robinhood and Coinbase have embraced metal cards as a physical manifestation of their premium brand and a key marketing tool to attract and retain high-value customers.6
  • Incumbent Bank Response: Traditional banks are responding to the fintech challenge by refreshing their own premium card offerings to maintain loyalty among their most profitable customer segments.

Challenges: The premium card market is not without potential headwinds. The high annual fees associated with these cards can be a deterrent for some consumers, and persistent concerns about payment fraud and security remain a challenge for the entire industry.18

Digital Asset Security (Hardware Wallet) Market

Market Size and Growth Drivers: The cryptocurrency hardware wallet market is characterized by rapid growth, driven by the increasing mainstream adoption of digital assets and a corresponding rise in awareness about the need for robust security. As investors accumulate more significant holdings, the risks associated with storing assets on vulnerable online exchanges or in software wallets become unacceptable, fueling demand for offline “cold storage” solutions.19

Market size forecasts vary but consistently point to strong double-digit growth. One report projects the market will expand from $450.7 million in 2024 to nearly $1.9 billion by 2032, representing a CAGR of 19.7%.19 Another estimates growth from $350 million in 2025 to $2.55 billion by 2033, a CAGR of 28.8%.21

Key Trends: A pivotal trend is the evolution of hardware wallets from simple storage devices into secure gateways for interacting with the broader world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).19 This requires wallets to support seamless integration with various blockchain applications, a trend that CompoSecure’s partnership-focused strategy for Arculus appears well-positioned to capitalize on.

Competitive Moat Analysis

CompoSecure’s competitive advantage, or “moat,” differs significantly between its two business segments.

Metal Cards: In its core business, the company’s moat is built on a combination of factors:

  • Proprietary Technology and Expertise: Over two decades of experience in the complex processes of designing and manufacturing metal cards at scale.2
  • Scale and Efficiency: The ability to produce high volumes of cards reliably, which is a critical requirement for its large institutional clients.2
  • Embedded Customer Relationships: Long-term contracts and deep integration with the product development and marketing teams of the world’s largest card issuers.2

However, the durability of this moat is a central question for investors. The high margins and attractive growth of the metal card market have drawn in formidable competition. Key competitors include:

  • CPI Card Group (PMTS): A publicly traded, direct competitor in the payment card space that also holds patents related to encased metal card products.11 As a pure-play card manufacturer, its financial profile provides a useful benchmark.
  • Idemia: A large, privately held French multinational specializing in identity and security solutions, including payment cards. With revenues of €2.9 billion in 2023 and an estimated valuation of €5-6 billion, it has the scale and resources to compete aggressively.23
  • Thales Group: A massive French conglomerate in the aerospace, defense, and digital security markets. Its Digital Identity and Security (DIS) division is a major player in the global payment and SIM card industries.11

While CompoSecure was a first-mover, the presence of these large, well-capitalized competitors suggests that its high margins could come under pressure over the long term. The significant valuation premium CompoSecure commands over a direct peer like CPI Card Group (which trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of ~7.3x) implies that the market currently believes CompoSecure’s moat is strong and its growth prospects are superior.25 The sustainability of this premium will depend on its ability to defend its technological edge and prevent its key clients from using competitors to gain pricing leverage.

Arculus: In the hardware wallet market, Arculus is a challenger, not an incumbent. The market is dominated by established, consumer-focused brands like Ledger and Trezor (SatoshiLabs).19 Arculus’s competitive differentiation lies in its unique card-based form factor, its focus on a B2B2C partnership model, and its potential to leverage CompoSecure’s existing relationships within the traditional financial industry to bridge the gap with the digital asset world. Its success will depend not on displacing the incumbents directly, but on executing its partnership strategy effectively.

Financial Performance & Health

An analysis of CompoSecure’s financial performance reveals a company with an accelerating, high-margin core business that generates substantial cash flow. However, recent corporate restructuring complicates a straightforward reading of its GAAP financial statements, necessitating a focus on non-GAAP and pro forma metrics to understand the underlying operational health of the business.

Historical Performance Review (2022-2024)

Over the past three full fiscal years, CompoSecure has demonstrated an accelerating growth trajectory.

  • Revenue Growth: Net sales increased from $378.5 million in 2022 to $390.6 million in 2023, a modest growth of 3.2%. Growth accelerated significantly in 2024, with net sales reaching $420.6 million, an increase of 7.7%.2 This growth was balanced, driven by a 7% increase in domestic sales and an 11% increase in international sales for the full year.8
  • Profitability Trends: Gross profit expanded from $209.1 million in 2023 to $219.2 million in 2024. However, this was accompanied by a slight compression in gross margin, which declined from 53.5% to 52.1%. Management attributed this margin pressure to production inefficiencies related to new, more complex card designs, as well as broader inflationary impacts on wages and materials.8
  • GAAP vs. Adjusted Profitability: GAAP Net Income has been extremely volatile and is not a reliable indicator of operational performance. The company reported GAAP Net Income of $112.5 million in 2023, which swung to a GAAP Net Loss of $(83.2) million in 2024. This swing was almost entirely due to large, non-cash, mark-to-market adjustments on warrant and earnout consideration liabilities related to its initial public listing.8 A more consistent measure is Adjusted EBITDA, which grew 4.4% from $145.0 million in 2023 to $151.4 million in 2024.8 Adjusted Net Income, another non-GAAP measure, showed stronger growth, increasing 11% to $98.2 million in 2024.8

Recent Quarterly Analysis (2024-2025)

The company’s performance in the first half of 2025 demonstrates strong continued momentum and significant operational improvements.

  • Q2 2025 Record Performance: The second quarter of 2025 was particularly strong, with the company reporting record results that exceeded expectations across key metrics.28 Non-GAAP Net Sales grew 10% year-over-year to $119.6 million, while Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA surged an impressive 26% to $46.3 million.6
  • Significant Margin Expansion: A key highlight of the quarter was a 588 basis point year-over-year expansion in gross margin to 57.5%.7 This reversal of the margin compression seen in 2024 was attributed to the early benefits of the “CompoSecure Operating System (COS),” a set of initiatives aimed at driving operational efficiencies.6 This strong margin performance was the primary driver of the outsized growth in Adjusted EBITDA.
  • Upward Guidance Revision: The strength of the Q2 results and increased visibility into customer demand for the second half of the year gave management the confidence to raise its full-year 2025 guidance. The company now expects Non-GAAP Net Sales of approximately $455 million and Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA of approximately $158 million.6
  • Geographic Volatility: The drivers of growth showed significant regional shifts between quarters. While Q1 2025 saw a decline in domestic sales and a rise in international sales, Q2 2025 was the opposite, with a 22% surge in domestic sales and a 35% decline internationally.7 This underscores the lumpy nature of revenue, which can be heavily influenced by the timing of large card program rollouts by major clients in specific regions.

Balance Sheet and Cash Flow

CompoSecure has made substantial progress in strengthening its balance sheet and demonstrates a powerful capacity for cash generation.

  • Deleveraging: The company has prioritized debt reduction. During fiscal year 2024, it reduced its net debt by 60% to $120 million by year-end.8 At the end of Q2 2025, the balance sheet remained solid with $96.5 million in cash and a net leverage ratio of just 0.66x (Net Debt / Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA), providing significant financial flexibility.7
  • Free Cash Flow Generation: The business model is highly cash-generative. For the full year 2024, the company generated $129.6 million in cash flow from operations and, after capital expenditures, $84.9 million in free cash flow, a 62% increase over the prior year.10 This robust cash flow is a core strength, enabling the company to fund its growth initiatives, continue paying down debt, and return capital to shareholders.
Key Financial Metric (in millions USD)FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024Q2 2024Q1 2025 (Non-GAAP)Q2 2025 (Non-GAAP)
Net Sales$378.5$390.6$420.6$108.6$103.9$119.6
Gross ProfitN/A$209.1$219.2N/A$54.5$68.8
Gross Margin (%)N/A53.5%52.1%51.6%52.5%57.5%
GAAP Net Income (Loss)N/A$112.5$(83.2)N/A$21.5N/A
Adjusted EBITDAN/A$145.0$151.4N/AN/AN/A
Pro Forma Adj. EBITDAN/AN/AN/A$36.7$33.7$46.3
Adjusted Net IncomeN/A$88.1$98.2N/A$28.4$28.4
Cash Flow from OperationsN/AN/A$129.6N/AN/AN/A
Free Cash FlowN/A$52.4$84.9N/AN/AN/A
Cash & Equivalents$13.6$41.2$77.5N/A$71.7$96.5
Total Debt$373.1$340.3$197.5N/A$195.0$192.5
Net Debt$359.5$299.1$120.0N/A$123.3$96.0

Note: Data compiled from multiple filings.6 Full historical data for all metrics was not available in the provided materials. Q1 2025 and Q2 2025 figures are presented on a Non-GAAP or Pro Forma basis as provided by the company to reflect underlying business performance post-spin-off.

Growth Strategy, Capital Allocation & Management

CompoSecure’s strategic direction has undergone a significant transformation, pivoting from a primary focus on organic growth to a more complex, multi-faceted strategy encompassing acquisitions, shareholder returns, and the scaling of its digital security venture. This shift is orchestrated through a novel corporate structure involving the newly spun-off Resolute Holdings Management.

Growth Levers

The company’s growth strategy is pursued along two parallel tracks:

  • Organic Growth (Core Business): The primary organic growth driver is the continued penetration of metal cards within the vast global payment card market. With metal cards representing less than 1% of total card shipments, there is a long runway for growth by converting more programs from plastic to metal.6 This strategy involves deepening relationships with existing traditional bank clients (e.g., Citibank, Scotia Bank) and aggressively pursuing new programs with the rapidly expanding fintech and neobank sector (e.g., Robinhood, WealthSimple).9
  • Arculus Expansion: Growth in the digital asset segment is predicated on an ecosystem-building strategy. Rather than competing directly for end-users, Arculus aims to become an embedded security layer for established platforms. The recent partnerships with MetaMask, MoneyGram, and N.exchange are cornerstones of this strategy, designed to drive adoption by leveraging the large user bases of its partners.9 The company is also exploring new verticals, such as a blockchain-compliant ecosystem for healthcare providers.10

The Resolute Holdings Era: A New Capital Allocation Framework

The most significant strategic shift was the spin-off of Resolute Holdings Management (RHLD) in February 2025.30 This transaction has fundamentally altered how CompoSecure allocates capital and pursues growth.

  • The Structure: Resolute Holdings, led by CompoSecure’s Executive Chairman David Cote and CEO Tom Knott, now functions as an external manager for CompoSecure.30 In exchange for its services, CompoSecure’s operating subsidiary pays Resolute a quarterly management fee equal to 2.5% of its last-twelve-months Adjusted EBITDA.3 This fee amounted to approximately $3.2 million for the first quarter of 2025.29
  • M&A-Focused Mandate: Resolute’s primary mandate is to oversee CompoSecure’s capital allocation and execute an M&A strategy.3 The stated goal is to pursue both smaller, “bolt-on” acquisitions adjacent to the core business, as well as larger, transformative deals that could diversify CompoSecure’s business and, critically, reduce its customer concentration.4 This structure is an unconventional approach to corporate strategy, effectively outsourcing the M&A function to a separate, publicly traded entity run by the company’s own chairman. The clear intent is to leverage the perceived deal-making expertise of the Resolute team to accelerate inorganic growth. However, this structure introduces a permanent fee drag on CompoSecure’s earnings and creates a potential principal-agent dynamic that investors must monitor.

Shareholder Returns

In parallel with its new M&A focus, CompoSecure has initiated policies to return capital directly to shareholders.

  • Share Repurchase Program: In February 2025, the Board of Directors approved a significant expansion of its share repurchase authorization, increasing it from $40 million to $100 million.12 This action signals management’s and the board’s belief that the company’s shares may be undervalued and represents a tax-efficient way to return capital.
  • Special Dividend: In the first quarter of 2024, citing its robust cash position, the company declared its first special cash dividend of $0.30 per share, which resulted in a total payout of approximately $24.2 million.13 Management explicitly stated that this move incorporates dividends as a new tool in their capital allocation framework, suggesting the potential for future distributions, though no regular dividend policy has been announced.13

Management & Governance

  • Executive Leadership: The company is led by President and CEO Jonathan C. Wilk, who continues to oversee day-to-day operations.3 A notable recent change was the appointment of Mary Holt as Chief Financial Officer in October 2025. Holt brings extensive financial leadership experience from large, world-class organizations, including Honeywell and Pfizer, which could bring enhanced rigor to the company’s financial operations.1
  • Board and Ownership Structure: The Board of Directors is led by Executive Chairman David M. Cote, who also leads Resolute Holdings.35 A critical governance feature is CompoSecure’s status as a “controlled company.” Following the Resolute transaction, an entity named Tungsten 2024 LLC and its affiliates came to own approximately 50.5% of the company’s voting power as of April 2025.35 This controlling stake gives them the power to direct all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and major corporate transactions. While this can provide stability, it also means that the interests of public minority shareholders may not always be the primary consideration. Overall insider ownership is very high at 56.63%, which can be viewed as a strong alignment of interests between management/controlling shareholders and the company’s long-term performance.16

Risk Assessment & Headwinds

While CompoSecure possesses a strong market position and attractive financial profile, it is subject to a number of significant and clearly defined risks that could materially impact its future performance. These risks span operational, strategic, and market-related categories.

  • Customer Concentration Risk: This remains the most significant and immediate headwind for the company. As previously discussed, the reliance on two key customers for a majority of its revenue creates a fragile business structure.11 The loss, or even a significant reduction in volume, from either of these clients would have a devastating impact on revenue and profitability. This concentration also limits the company’s pricing power during contract renewals and makes its financial results susceptible to the specific product strategies and issuance cycles of these two dominant clients.
  • Competitive Pressure and Pricing Power: The attractive gross margins in the metal card business, which approached 57.5% in Q2 2025, act as a powerful incentive for competitors.7 Large, well-capitalized players in the security and payments industry, such as Idemia and Thales, as well as direct competitor CPI Card Group, have the manufacturing capabilities and existing customer relationships to compete more aggressively in this niche.11 Increased competition could lead to pricing pressure over time, eroding the high margins that are a cornerstone of the company’s current financial strength.
  • Technology Disruption: The core metal card business is inherently tied to the prevalence of physical payment cards. The global payments industry is undergoing a rapid shift towards digitalization, with increasing adoption of mobile wallets (e.g., Apple Pay, Google Pay) and contactless payment technologies.17 While the metal card currently serves as a physical status symbol, a long-term structural shift that significantly reduces the importance of physical cards in consumer wallets could render the core product obsolete. The Arculus business is intended as a hedge against this risk, but it is still in its early stages and faces its own set of intense competitive pressures.
  • Economic Sensitivity: Demand for premium products like metal cards is inherently cyclical. During an economic downturn, consumer spending on luxury goods and services typically declines. In response, financial institutions may reduce their marketing budgets and scale back on premium customer acquisition programs, which could lead to lower demand for CompoSecure’s products.2
  • Execution Risk: The company is currently juggling several complex and critical strategic initiatives. It must continue to innovate and defend its market share in the core card business, successfully scale the Arculus platform through new partnerships, and execute a new M&A strategy under the guidance of an external manager. The potential for missteps in any of these areas is significant. The M&A strategy, in particular, carries the risk of overpaying for assets or failing to successfully integrate acquired businesses, which could destroy shareholder value.

Valuation Analysis

Determining a precise valuation for CompoSecure is challenging due to its unique business mix, recent corporate restructuring, and the impact of non-cash accounting charges on its reported earnings. The analysis must therefore rely on cash flow-based multiples and a careful comparison to a curated set of peer companies.

Current Multiples and Their Limitations

As of late 2025, CompoSecure’s market capitalization stands at approximately $2.1 billion.16 Based on the company’s raised guidance for fiscal year 2025, which projects approximately $455 million in Non-GAAP Net Sales and $158 million in Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA, the company is trading at forward-looking valuation multiples of:

  • EV / Sales: ~4.6x
  • EV / EBITDA: ~13.3x

It is important to note that a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio is not a meaningful metric at this time. The company has reported significant GAAP net losses, driven by non-cash, mark-to-market adjustments on warrant and earnout liabilities, which do not reflect the underlying cash-generating capability of the business.14 Therefore, multiples based on EBITDA and Free Cash Flow are more appropriate for assessing valuation.

Peer Group Benchmarking

To contextualize CompoSecure’s valuation, it is useful to compare it against relevant peers in both specialty card manufacturing and the broader digital security landscape.

CompanyTickerMarket Cap (USD)EV (USD)EV / LTM SalesEV / LTM EBITDALTM EBITDA Margin (%)
CompoSecure, Inc.CMPO$2.1B~$2.2B~5.2x~14.5x~36%
CPI Card Group Inc.PMTS$0.2B$0.5B~1.0x~7.3x~14.3%
Idemia S.A.S.PrivateN/A~$6.0B~2.0x~10.9x~18.5%
Thales Group S.A.EPA: HO~$52B~$54B~2.6x~20.0x~13.0%

Note: Data compiled from multiple sources.7 LTM figures are based on the most recent available data. Idemia’s EV and EBITDA are based on a reported 2023 potential sale valuation and financials. CMPO’s LTM EBITDA margin is based on Adjusted EBITDA. Thales’s metrics are converted from EUR to USD for comparison.

Valuation Discussion

The comparable company analysis reveals a clear valuation hierarchy. CompoSecure trades at a substantial premium to its most direct public competitor, CPI Card Group, on every metric. At the same time, it trades at a discount to a high-end, diversified security and technology provider like Thales.

The central debate is whether this valuation premium over CPI Card Group is justified.

  • The argument in favor of the premium rests on CompoSecure’s demonstrably superior business fundamentals. Its Adjusted EBITDA margins are more than double those of CPI Card Group, it has a stronger growth trajectory, and it possesses the high-growth Arculus business, which is a call option on the digital asset economy that CPI lacks. From this perspective, CompoSecure is a higher-quality asset deserving of a premium multiple.
  • The counterargument is that a forward EV/EBITDA multiple of over 13x is too rich for a business with such an extreme and well-documented customer concentration risk. A single adverse event, such as the loss of a major contract, could cause earnings to decline precipitously, making the current multiple appear dangerously inflated in retrospect. This view suggests that the market may be under-appreciating the fragility of the company’s revenue base.

Ultimately, the company’s valuation appears to be pricing in a high probability of continued success in defending its high margins in the core card business, while also ascribing tangible value to the future potential of the Arculus platform. The reasonableness of the current valuation hinges on an investor’s conviction in the durability of the company’s competitive advantages and its ability to successfully execute its diversification strategy, thereby mitigating its primary risk.

Key Questions & Concluding Synthesis

This analysis has examined CompoSecure’s business model, market position, financial health, and strategic direction. The following section synthesizes these findings to address the key outstanding questions for investors.

Is the premium card market structurally growing or reaching saturation?

The evidence strongly suggests the market is in a structural growth phase. With metal cards representing less than 1% of the total payment card market, the runway for penetration is extensive.6 The demand is fueled by powerful secular trends, including the desire for premium products among affluent consumers and the strategic use of metal cards by a growing number of fintechs and neobanks to build their brand and attract customers.18 Saturation does not appear to be an immediate or medium-term concern.

Can CompoSecure maintain pricing power and margins as competitors enter?

This is a central uncertainty. The company’s recent performance, highlighted by a 588 basis point gross margin expansion in Q2 2025, is a powerful testament to its current pricing power and operational efficiency improvements.7 However, the high profitability of this niche will continue to attract formidable competition from large, well-capitalized players like Idemia and Thales.11 While CompoSecure’s technical expertise and scale provide a defensible moat today, maintaining its current margin structure over the long term in the face of increased competition will be a significant challenge.

What is the realistic growth trajectory and monetization potential for Arculus?

The Arculus segment should be viewed as a venture-stage asset. Its trajectory is not one of linear, predictable growth but will be defined by the success of its partnership-led strategy. The recent agreements with MetaMask, MoneyGram, and N.exchange are significant validation points that could lead to inflection points in user adoption.9 However, the business is still nascent and operates in a highly competitive market. Its realistic value today is best characterized as a high-potential call option on the continued growth and maturation of the digital asset ecosystem. Monetization will likely come from a mix of hardware sales, transaction fees, and other service-based revenue streams derived from its partnerships.

How durable is the competitive advantage in metal card manufacturing?

The company’s competitive advantage appears solid in the near term, built on two decades of proprietary process knowledge, economies of scale, and deeply embedded customer relationships.2 However, no manufacturing moat is impenetrable. The risk of commoditization exists over the long term, especially if competitors are willing to invest heavily to replicate CompoSecure’s capabilities or if a key customer decides to foster a second-source supplier to improve its own negotiating leverage.

Is current profitability sustainable or benefiting from temporary tailwinds?

The recent surge in profitability appears to be driven by a combination of factors. The implementation of the “CompoSecure Operating System” suggests that at least some of the efficiency gains are structural and sustainable.6 However, profitability can also be influenced by product mix in any given quarter. The high gross margins are a core feature of the business model, but the record levels seen in Q2 2025 may not be sustainable indefinitely, particularly if competitive pressures intensify.

How should investors think about the company’s growth durability over 3-5 years?

Growth over the next 3-5 years will likely be a composite of three distinct drivers:

  1. Core Organic Growth: Mid-to-high single-digit revenue growth from the metal card business, driven by market penetration.
  2. Arculus Growth: Potentially much higher, but more speculative, growth from the digital security segment, contingent on partnership success.
  3. Inorganic Growth: The “wild card” factor is the M&A strategy directed by Resolute Holdings, which could significantly alter the company’s size, growth rate, and business mix.

The durability of this growth is clouded by the overarching customer concentration risk. While the underlying markets are growing, the company’s ability to capture that growth is heavily dependent on the decisions of a very small number of key partners.

Bull CaseBear Case
Dominant market leader in a profitable, high-growth niche.Extreme, business-threatening customer concentration.
Strong secular tailwinds from fintechs and consumer premiumization.Risk of margin compression from formidable competitors.
High and recently expanding gross and EBITDA margins.Core business is vulnerable to a long-term shift away from physical cards.
Strong free cash flow generation and a strengthening balance sheet.Arculus is an unproven venture in a highly competitive market.
Arculus provides a valuable call option on the digital asset economy.New M&A strategy introduces execution risk and a permanent fee drag.
Experienced management team with a new focus on value-enhancing M&A.Controlling shareholder structure may not always align with minority interests.
Initiation of shareholder returns (buybacks, dividends) signals confidence.Valuation premium to direct peers may not adequately price in risks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Earnings and Business Model

  • Are earnings at a cyclical high or cyclical low? Earnings appear to be at a structural high point rather than a cyclical one. The record profitability reported in the second quarter of 2025 was directly attributed to internal operational improvements from the new “CompoSecure Operating System” (COS). This suggests a fundamental, sustainable enhancement to the company’s earnings power, rather than a temporary peak in a business cycle.  
  • Are earnings driven primarily by the external environment or internal company actions? While the company benefits from a favorable external environment with growing demand for premium cards, recent record earnings are being driven primarily by internal company actions. Management explicitly credits the implementation of the CompoSecure Operating System (COS) for driving significant operational efficiencies and margin expansion.  
  • Can this business be easily understood? Yes, the business model is relatively straightforward. It operates on a “core and explore” strategy. The “core” is the established and highly profitable business of designing and manufacturing premium metal payment cards for major financial institutions. The cash flow from this core business is used to fund the “explore” segment, Arculus, which is a high-growth digital security and authentication platform targeting the cryptocurrency and digital asset market.  
  • Can this company be undermined by foreign, low-cost labor? This is unlikely. CompoSecure’s competitive advantage is built on proprietary technology, advanced and complex manufacturing processes, and a reputation for high quality and security, not on low-cost labor. Its main competitors are large, technologically sophisticated firms like IDEMIA and Thales, indicating that the basis of competition is innovation and quality, not price alone.  
  • Do brands matter in the business? Or is this a commodity producer? Brands are critical. CompoSecure is not a commodity producer; it creates premium, high-end products that serve as powerful marketing and brand-building tools for its clients, such as American Express and J.P. Morgan Chase. The company’s own brand reputation for innovation, quality, and security is essential for maintaining its trusted, long-term relationships with these blue-chip financial institutions.  
  • Does the company have assets that are not fully recognized in the balance sheet? Yes. The company’s most valuable assets are likely its intangible ones, which are not fully reflected on the balance sheet. These include its strong brand reputation, its portfolio of over 60 issued patents, and its deeply embedded, long-term relationships with major financial institutions.  

Corporate Actions & Governance

  • Does the company issue large amounts of new shares to insiders? The company has a compensation philosophy that emphasizes variable, performance-based pay, which includes long-term equity awards in the form of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and Performance Stock Units (PSUs) to align executive interests with shareholders. In 2023, 90% of the CEO’s target compensation consisted of this type of variable pay.  
  • Has the business environment changed recently? Yes, the business environment has changed significantly. The most impactful change was the majority acquisition by Resolute Holdings, which installed industrialist David Cote as Executive Chairman and initiated the implementation of the CompoSecure Operating System (COS) to drive operational efficiency. Externally, the company is benefiting from the rising adoption of premium metal cards by fintech companies and the growing need for digital asset security.  
  • Has the company made any significant acquisitions recently? No, CompoSecure itself has not made a significant acquisition recently. Instead, a majority interest in CompoSecure was acquired by Resolute Holdings in a transaction valued at approximately $372 million, which closed in September 2024. Resolute’s stated strategy includes pursuing M&A to help diversify CompoSecure’s business and customer base in the future.  
  • Has the company recently changed accounting policies? Yes, there was a major accounting change. Effective February 28, 2025, following the spin-off of Resolute Holdings, CompoSecure began accounting for its primary operating subsidiary using the equity method. This means the subsidiary’s revenue and expenses are no longer consolidated line-by-line in CompoSecure’s GAAP financial statements. To provide a clear view of performance, the company now reports a comprehensive set of non-GAAP and pro-forma financials that reflect the underlying business operations.  
  • How conservative is the company’s accounting? Are they over- or under-stating earnings? The company’s GAAP accounting can be seen as conservative in that it may understate the underlying operational earnings power of the business. Due to the recent shift to equity method accounting and significant non-cash charges related to warrants, GAAP Net Income often diverges from the strong, positive cash flow generated by the operations. The company provides non-GAAP measures which it believes “depict the true performance of the business”.  
  • Is the company buying back shares? Paying dividends? Yes, the company has recently initiated both. In March 2024, the Board of Directors approved a securities repurchase program for up to $40 million of its common stock, warrants, and/or convertible notes. In May 2024, the Board also declared a special cash dividend of $0.30 per share.  
  • Is the stock an ADR? What are the ADR fees? Is the stock an MLP? Is there a K1 issued to investors? The stock is Class A common stock of a U.S. corporation, not an American Depositary Receipt (ADR) or a Master Limited Partnership (MLP). It trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “CMPO”. As such, there are no ADR fees, and investors receive a standard Form 1099-DIV for dividends, not a K-1.  
  • What are the motivations of management? Do they own a lot of stock and options? Management’s motivations appear to be strongly aligned with shareholders. Insiders own a significant 56.63% of the company. Furthermore, the executive compensation structure is heavily weighted toward variable and performance-based pay, including equity, which directly links their financial outcomes to the company’s long-term success.  
  • What is the compensation policy of directors and management? The compensation policy is designed to link executive pay to business strategy and the creation of long-term shareholder value. It heavily emphasizes variable pay (annual bonuses and long-term equity awards) over fixed salary. For the CEO, variable pay made up 90% of his target compensation in 2023. Equity awards consist of both time-vesting Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and performance-vesting Performance Stock Units (PSUs).  

Financial Health & Performance

  • How CapEx hungry is this business? What % of cash from operations must be spent on CapEx to sustain the business? The business is not capital expenditure-intensive. In recent years, capital expenditures (proxied by cash flow from investing activities) have been approximately 7-10% of the cash generated from operations. For fiscal year 2024, the company spent about $9 million on investing activities while generating $127 million in cash from operations.  
  • How much free cash flow does the business generate? How does management use this free cash flow? What is their philosophy? The business is a strong generator of free cash flow. In 2023, it generated $104.3 million in cash from operations, and this was projected to grow to $127.4 million in 2024. Management’s capital allocation philosophy has recently broadened to a balanced approach that includes investing in organic growth, paying down debt, repurchasing securities, and paying dividends.  
  • How profitable is this business? What is the return on capital invested? Return on equity? The business is highly profitable, with gross margins consistently between 53% and 58% and a Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA margin of 38.8% in the most recent quarter. One source calculates a normalized Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of 1,445% and a Return on Assets of over 30%. Return on Equity (ROE) is currently negative, but this is a distortion caused by negative shareholder’s equity on the balance sheet following the recent corporate restructuring, not a reflection of poor operational performance.  
  • How stable are revenues? How much do they fluctuate with the economy? Revenues have demonstrated consistent historical growth. Stability is supported by long-term contracts and deeply embedded relationships with major clients. However, the business is susceptible to economic cycles; a significant downturn could lead financial institutions to reduce marketing budgets and new card issuance, which would negatively impact demand for premium cards.  
  • Is net income diverging from cash from operations? Yes, there is a significant divergence. GAAP Net Income has been volatile and at times negative, largely due to non-cash accounting charges such as the revaluation of warrant and earnout liabilities from its SPAC merger. In contrast, cash from operations is consistently strong and positive, reaching $104.3 million in 2023.  
  • What off B/S liabilities does the company have? The company’s balance sheet discloses a liability related to a Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA). This is a contractual obligation to pay the company’s pre-IPO owners for the use of certain tax attributes and is a common feature for companies that have gone public through a SPAC transaction.  

Market & Competition

  • How profitable is this industry? Are there a lot of competitors? What are the barriers to entry? The premium payment card segment is a profitable, high-value niche within the broader payments industry. While there are several large, well-capitalized competitors, including IDEMIA and Thales, CompoSecure is considered the market leader. Significant barriers to entry include proprietary manufacturing technology, a portfolio of over 60 patents, and the long-standing, trusted relationships required to serve top-tier global financial institutions.  
  • Outlook for the company’s products and services? How big will this market be? Is it growing? Domestic or international? The outlook is strong. The premium payment card market has substantial room for growth, as metal cards currently represent less than 1% of total annual card shipments. The global card payments market is projected to grow from $28.6 trillion in 2023 to $56.4 trillion by 2033. The cryptocurrency hardware wallet market is also in a hyper-growth phase, with forecasts projecting it to expand from ~$450 million in 2024 to over $1.8 billion by the early 2030s. While the company’s business is currently concentrated in North America, it serves both domestic and international clients.  
  • What is the nature of competition? Do brand names matter? What are the customers switching costs? Competition comes from large, diversified technology firms in the card space (IDEMIA, Thales) and agile, crypto-native companies in the digital wallet market (Ledger, Trezor). Brand reputation is paramount, as clients (major banks) must have a high degree of trust in their security and manufacturing partner. Switching costs are high due to the complex and lengthy process of designing, testing, and certifying new payment cards with global networks like Visa and American Express, as well as the deep integration into the clients’ product offerings.  

Risks & Recent Events

  • What are the recent news on the company? Recent significant news includes the appointment of Mary Holt as the new CFO, bringing experience from Honeywell and Pfizer ; a partnership between the Arculus platform and crypto exchange N.exchange to enhance swap capabilities ; and the transfer of the company’s stock listing from Nasdaq to the more prestigious New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).  
  • Recent changes in the business, new markets, new production facilities, what’s changed recently? New management? The most significant recent changes include the majority acquisition by Resolute Holdings, the appointment of David Cote as Executive Chairman, and the hiring of Mary Holt as the new CFO. The company has also implemented the COS to drive efficiency, initiated a new capital return policy (buybacks and dividends), and uplisted its stock to the NYSE.  
  • What factors would cause the stock to decline? Are these factors controlled by the company or the external environment? Factors that could cause the stock to decline include:
    • Loss of a key customer: A major risk, partially controlled by company relationship management.  
    • Economic downturn: An external factor that could reduce demand for premium cards.  
    • Cybersecurity breach: A catastrophic event that is partially within the company’s control to prevent.  
    • Increased competition: An external factor that requires an internal strategic response.  
    • Crypto market volatility: An external factor that could impact the adoption of the Arculus platform.  
  • What is the risk of a catastrophic loss on this investment? What is the chance of a total loss? The primary catastrophic risk is the company’s high customer concentration. The loss of either J.P. Morgan Chase or American Express, which collectively account for over 70% of revenue, would severely impact the business. A major, reputation-destroying cybersecurity incident also poses a catastrophic risk. While the company is profitable and generates strong cash flow, making a total loss of investment unlikely, these specific risks could lead to a very significant and rapid decline in the stock’s value if they were to materialize.  

Works cited

  1. Investor Relations | CompoSecure, Inc., accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/
  2. cmpo-20241231 – SEC.gov, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1823144/000182314425000004/cmpo-20241231.htm
  3. Form 8-K for Composecure INC filed 12/30/2024, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/static-files/e3c367ea-f90e-49dd-9e14-1d6d60a12130
  4. CompoSecure Announces Plan to Spin-Off Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. to Form a Differentiated Alternative Asset Management Platform and Accelerate Value Enhancing Acquisitions for CompoSecure, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/news-releases/news-release-details/composecure-announces-plan-spin-resolute-holdings-management-inc/
  5. CompoSecure | The leader in premium metal payment cards and security solutions., accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.composecure.com/
  6. Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Presentation – Investor Relations, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/static-files/659e8988-696c-4385-af0a-bf89a7a4622a
  7. CompoSecure Q2 2025 presentation: revenue up 10%, raises full-year guidance, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/composecure-q2-2025-presentation-revenue-up-10-raises-fullyear-guidance-93CH-4179016
  8. CompoSecure Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/news-releases/news-release-details/composecure-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024-financial/
  9. May 12, 2025 – Investor Relations – CompoSecure, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/static-files/8fba137a-7493-46ae-bbbf-ac852b9d0ed3
  10. News Releases | CompoSecure, Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/news-events/news-releases?page=1
  11. Company Notes Series (#9): CompoSecure – The Good Investors, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.thegoodinvestors.sg/company-notes-series-9-composecure/
  12. CompoSecure Board of Directors Approves Spin-Off of Resolute Holdings and Authorizes Expanded Share Repurchase Program to $100 Million, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/news-releases/news-release-details/composecure-board-directors-approves-spin-resolute-holdings-and/
  13. CompoSecure Reports Record First Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Declares Special Cash Dividend, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/news-releases/news-release-details/composecure-reports-record-first-quarter-2024-financial-results/
  14. CompoSecure 2025 Company Profile: Stock Performance & Earnings | PitchBook, accessed October 28, 2025, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/113006-89
  15. EDGAR Filing Documents for 0001104659-22-029324 – SEC.gov, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1823144/000110465922029324/0001104659-22-029324-index.htm
  16. CMPO – COMPOSECURE INC Latest Stock News & Market Updates, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.stocktitan.net/news/CMPO/
  17. Card Payments Market Size, Share, Trends & Growth | 2033, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/card-payments-market-A324247
  18. Premium Credit Card Market Size, Share, Future Outlook 2024-34, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.pristinemarketinsights.com/premium-credit-card-market-report
  19. Crypto Hardware Wallets Market Size, Share, and Trends Analysis …, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-crypto-hardware-wallets-market
  20. Hardware Wallet Market Size, Share and Analysis, 2025-2032 – Coherent Market Insights, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/market-insight/hardware-wallet-market-5101
  21. Hardware Wallet Market Statistics 2025: Startling Figures Changing Crypto – SQ Magazine, accessed October 28, 2025, https://sqmagazine.co.uk/hardware-wallet-market-statistics/
  22. CPI Card Group | Payment technologies for banking, fintech, prepaid & more, accessed October 28, 2025, https://cpicardgroup.com/
  23. IDEMIA – Wikipedia, accessed October 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDEMIA
  24. Idemia on the block with €6B price tag: report | Biometric Update, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.biometricupdate.com/202303/idemia-on-the-block-with-e6b-price-tag-report
  25. Enterprise Value (EV) For CPI Card Group Inc (PMTS) – Finbox, accessed October 28, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGM:PMTS/explorer/enterprise_value/
  26. CPI Card Group 2025 Company Profile: Stock Performance & Earnings | PitchBook, accessed October 28, 2025, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/10476-28
  27. Cryptocurrency Hardware Wallet Market size, share and insights – Valuates Reports, accessed October 28, 2025, https://reports.valuates.com/reports/QYRE-Auto-E301/global-cryptocurrency-hardware-wallet
  28. News Releases | CompoSecure, Inc. – Investor Relations, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/news-events/news-releases?mobile=1
  29. CompoSecure Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/news-releases/news-release-details/composecure-reports-first-quarter-2025-financial-results/
  30. CompoSecure Announces Completion of Spin-Off of Resolute Holdings, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/node/10646/pdf
  31. Form 8-K for Composecure INC filed 02/28/2025, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/static-files/93fd39c9-ee89-4b8d-be7d-673748d3d63a
  32. CompoSecure Announces Spin-Off of Resolute Holdings with Management Agreement to Accelerate Growth and Value Creation | Nasdaq, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/composecure-announces-spin-resolute-holdings-management-agreement-accelerate-growth-and
  33. Form 8-K for Composecure INC filed 02/10/2025, accessed October 28, 2025, https://ir.composecure.com/static-files/52135c9f-392d-491f-9558-d5153e02d600
  34. CompoSecure Board of Directors Approves Spin-Off of Resolute Holdings and Authorizes Expanded Share Repurchase Program to $100 Million | Nasdaq, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/composecure-board-directors-approves-spin-resolute-holdings-and-authorizes-expanded
  35. www.sec.gov, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1823144/000114036125014504/ny20045511x2_def14a.htm
  36. Cards and Payment Market Size, Growth | Report [2034] – Business Research Insights, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.businessresearchinsights.com/market-reports/cards-and-payment-market-100132
  37. CompoSecure Inc Stock Price Today | NYSE: CMPO Live – Investing.com, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/roman-dbdr-tech-acquisition
  38. Thales (ENXTPA:HO) EV / EBITDA – Investing.com, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.investing.com/pro/ENXTPA:HO/explorer/ev_to_ebitda_ltm
  39. Thales Stock Price Today | EPA: TCFP Live – Investing.com, accessed October 28, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/thales