Comprehensive Investment Analysis: Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD)

The Gemini Brief - Investment Deep Dives
The Gemini Brief – Investment Deep Dives
Comprehensive Investment Analysis: Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD)
Loading
/

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive, data-driven analysis of Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD), a vertically integrated civil infrastructure company. The analysis indicates that ROAD has strategically positioned itself as a pure-play investment vehicle for exposure to publicly funded transportation and infrastructure development within the high-growth Sunbelt region of the United States. The company’s recent performance is characterized by a powerful confluence of secular tailwinds—including generational federal and state infrastructure spending and favorable regional demographics—and a disciplined, acquisition-driven corporate strategy. This combination has fueled rapid top-line growth, a significant expansion of its project backlog to record levels, and a tangible improvement in profitability metrics.

The core of ROAD’s strategy rests on three levers: accretive platform acquisitions, organic market share gains, and strategic greenfield expansions. The company has demonstrated a profound reliance on its role as a consolidator in a fragmented market, with acquisitions accounting for the vast majority of its recent revenue growth. This inorganic growth is supported by a vertically integrated business model, where ownership of hot-mix asphalt (HMA) plants and aggregate facilities provides a competitive moat through cost control, supply chain security, and enhanced margins.

Financially, ROAD exhibits a high-growth profile. Revenue increased 51% year-over-year in the third quarter of fiscal 2025, while Adjusted EBITDA grew 80% over the same period, with margins reaching a record 16.9%.1 A record project backlog of $2.94 billion provides substantial revenue visibility for the coming year.1 However, this aggressive growth has been financed through significant debt, resulting in elevated leverage. The company’s stock trades at a notable premium to its peers, reflecting high market expectations for continued execution.

Principal risks are commensurate with the company’s focused strategy. These include a high dependency on the cyclicality of government funding, significant execution and integration risk associated with its acquisitive nature, and operational vulnerability to factors such as adverse weather, persistent labor shortages, and input cost inflation. This report will dissect each of these components to provide a holistic and objective framework for evaluating Construction Partners, Inc. as a potential investment opportunity.

Company Profile & Strategic Positioning

Business Operations: A Vertically Integrated Model

Construction Partners, Inc. operates as a civil infrastructure company with a distinct and deeply integrated business model. The company’s primary focus is the construction and maintenance of roadways, a capital-intensive process that it controls from raw material production to final project delivery.3 The core operational activities encompass a full-spectrum value chain:

  • Manufacturing and Distributing Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA): This is the cornerstone of the business. ROAD operates a dense network of HMA plants that produce asphalt for both its own paving projects and for sale to third-party contractors.4
  • Mining Aggregates: The company mines essential raw materials like sand, gravel, and crushed stone from its own facilities. These aggregates are a primary input for HMA production, providing a crucial cost and supply advantage.4
  • Paving and Construction Services: This segment involves the application of its manufactured materials in construction projects, including roadway base layer construction, asphalt paving, and site development services like the installation of utility and drainage systems.4
  • Liquid Asphalt Cement Distribution: ROAD operates liquid asphalt terminals, securing the supply of another critical HMA component.3

This vertical integration is not an incidental feature but the central pillar of ROAD’s competitive strategy. By controlling the production of its primary inputs, the company can better manage costs, insulate itself from supply chain disruptions, ensure material quality, and maintain scheduling flexibility—advantages that are particularly potent against smaller, non-integrated competitors.5 This structure allows ROAD to capture margins at multiple stages of the construction process, from the quarry to the paved road.

To support this model, the company maintains a substantial physical asset base. As of late 2024, this included 84 HMA plants, 17 aggregates facilities, and 3 liquid asphalt terminals strategically located across its operating footprint.3 This dense network of production facilities represents a significant barrier to entry in its local markets, as the high weight-to-value ratio of aggregates and asphalt makes long-distance transportation economically unfeasible.

Geographic Footprint: A Pure-Play on the Sunbelt

ROAD’s strategy is geographically focused, with operations exclusively concentrated in the Sunbelt states: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Oklahoma, and Texas.3 This is a deliberate choice to capitalize on the region’s superior macroeconomic and demographic trends. The Sunbelt has consistently outpaced the rest of the U.S. in population growth, job creation, and corporate relocations, creating a virtuous cycle of demand for both public and private infrastructure development.7 The region is projected to grow its population at 22 times the rate of non-Sunbelt regions over the next decade, ensuring a long-term tailwind for construction activity.8

While this focus provides exposure to high-growth markets, it also concentrates risk. The company is inherently exposed to regional economic downturns, state-specific political or budgetary shifts, and climate-related events common to the Southeast, such as hurricanes and extreme rainfall. Management explicitly cited “record or near-record rainfall across many of our Sunbelt markets” as a headwind that caused project delays in the third quarter of fiscal 2025, illustrating the operational volatility associated with its geographic footprint.1

Customer & Project Segmentation

The company’s revenue stream is primarily derived from publicly funded projects, which have historically represented a stable source of demand.4 In the third quarter of fiscal 2025, public projects accounted for 64.9% of consolidated revenues.4 These projects are funded by federal, state, and local governments and encompass a range of infrastructure work, including highways, roads, bridges, and airports.4

State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) are the company’s largest and most critical customers. This creates a degree of customer concentration risk. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, projects for all state DOTs collectively accounted for 40.7% of total revenues, with the Florida DOT alone representing 13.6%.3 The company’s recent, large-scale entry into Texas is expected to make the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) one of its top five customers, which diversifies its reliance across multiple large, well-funded state programs but maintains the overall concentration within this customer class.3 The loss of the ability to bid for or win contracts with any of these major state agencies would materially impact the business.3

The remaining portion of revenue comes from the private sector, which accounted for 35.1% of revenue in the third quarter of 2025.4 These projects typically involve paving and site work for commercial and residential developers, local businesses, and industrial parks.10 This segment provides valuable diversification and allows the company to capitalize on the robust private development activity that accompanies the Sunbelt’s population boom.

Macroeconomic & Industry Analysis: A Favorable Environment

Construction Partners, Inc. is operating within one of the most favorable macroeconomic backdrops for the U.S. infrastructure industry in decades. This environment is characterized by a confluence of massive federal investment, strong state and local funding, and powerful regional economic tailwinds.

The Impact of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)

The IIJA, signed into law in November 2021, represents a generational investment in American infrastructure. The legislation authorized $1.2 trillion in spending, including approximately $560 billion in new funding over eight years.11 A significant portion of these funds is directed toward the transportation sector, with an estimated 52% of new funds allocated to roadway and transportation spending.12 This federal commitment provides a multi-year, highly visible pipeline of projects, de-risking the demand outlook for contractors focused on public works.

The impact is particularly pronounced in ROAD’s key operating states. For example, under the IIJA’s formula funding:

  • Alabama is projected to receive approximately $5.8 billion for highways and bridges over five years, representing a 32.3% increase over previous funding levels.13
  • North Carolina is set to receive $7.2 billion for roads and bridges, a 29% annual increase.14
  • Texas receives the highest allocation of any state from the IIJA, supporting its already massive transportation program.15

This surge in federal capital flows directly to ROAD’s primary customers—state DOTs—enabling them to undertake larger and more numerous projects. The long-term nature of this funding provides a level of demand certainty that is crucial for a capital-intensive business and allows management to plan its own strategic investments, including acquisitions, with greater confidence.

State & Local Transportation Funding

While federal funding grabs headlines, state and local governments remain the dominant force in infrastructure investment, accounting for 79% of all public spending in 2023.16 Critically, many of ROAD’s key states are not just passively receiving federal funds but are actively amplifying them with their own robust funding initiatives.

  • Florida: The state’s “Focus on Florida’s Future Budget” dedicated a historic $15.6 billion to transportation infrastructure, including $5.4 billion for highway construction.17
  • South Carolina: The state’s 10-Year Plan has nearly quintupled its active construction program to a record $4.8 billion.18
  • North Carolina: The legislature approved a measure to dedicate a portion of the state’s sales tax revenue to transportation, projected to provide an additional $9.7 billion in highway funds through fiscal 2033.14

This strong state-level commitment provides a secondary layer of demand security and underscores the political will within the Sunbelt to invest in infrastructure to support ongoing growth.

Sunbelt Economic & Demographic Tailwinds

ROAD’s exclusive focus on the Sunbelt positions it to directly benefit from the most powerful demographic and economic trends in the nation. The region continues to attract a massive influx of residents and businesses, driven by a lower cost of living, business-friendly regulations, and a favorable climate.7

  • Population Growth: The Sunbelt’s population is projected to grow at 22 times the rate of non-Sunbelt regions over the next decade.8 States like Texas and Florida led the nation in new residents in 2023.20
  • Construction Market Strength: This growth translates directly into construction demand. The 2024 construction outlook for the South region showed a net positive expectation of 37% for bridge and highway projects and 35% for water and sewer projects.21 Georgia and North Carolina have been ranked as the #1 and #5 states for construction, respectively, highlighting the dynamism of ROAD’s core markets.22

This growth fuels demand across ROAD’s entire project portfolio, from new public highways needed to accommodate more residents to the private site development for new manufacturing facilities, data centers, and residential communities that follow them.24

Industry Headwinds

Despite the positive demand outlook, the construction industry faces significant operational challenges.

  • Labor Shortages: A persistent and critical issue is the scarcity of skilled labor. The 2024 Associated General Contractors (AGC) survey for the South region found that 79% of firms reported difficulty filling positions, with 58% citing it as a top concern for the year.21 The influx of IIJA-funded projects is expected to create hundreds of thousands of new jobs, which will likely exacerbate this shortage.11 This bottleneck between a surge in funding and the capacity to execute projects places a premium on companies that can effectively attract, train, and retain a skilled workforce.
  • Material Costs and Supply Chain: While conditions have improved since the pandemic’s peak, material cost inflation and supply chain volatility remain risks. The AGC survey noted that 61% of Southern contractors cited material costs as a top concern.21 Sustained high demand from federally funded projects, which are often less sensitive to price, could keep costs for key inputs like liquid asphalt, cement, and steel elevated.12
  • Rising Interest Rates: Higher financing costs are a significant concern, particularly for the private development side of the business. 62% of Southern contractors listed rising interest rates as a top concern, as it can lead to the postponement or cancellation of projects that rely on private financing.21

Operational Analysis & Growth Drivers

Construction Partners, Inc. employs a clear and aggressive three-lever growth strategy: a dominant focus on acquisitions, supplemented by organic growth and greenfield plant expansions. This approach has allowed the company to rapidly scale its operations and solidify its market position.

The Acquisition Engine: The Primary Growth Lever

The company’s primary growth driver is its role as a strategic consolidator in the highly fragmented civil construction industry.26 Its M&A strategy is methodical, centered on a “platform” model where it enters a new state or major metropolitan area by acquiring a large, well-respected local company with an experienced management team. This platform then serves as a base for smaller, bolt-on acquisitions that increase market density and enhance vertical integration.15

The transformative power of this strategy is best exemplified by the recent acquisition of Lone Star Paving in Texas. This single transaction provided ROAD with an immediate, at-scale presence in the booming Central Texas markets of Austin, San Antonio, and Temple-Killeen. The deal was projected to add $530 million in annualized revenue and $120 million in Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2025, a massive step-change for the company that accelerated its long-term margin targets by two years.15

The financial impact of this M&A-centric approach is stark. In the third quarter of fiscal 2025, acquisitions contributed 46 percentage points to the company’s 51% year-over-year revenue growth; organic growth accounted for just 5%.1 Similarly, in the second quarter, acquisitions drove 47% of the 54% revenue growth, with organic growth contributing 7%.27 These figures underscore the company’s current reliance on M&A to achieve its high-growth trajectory. A key component of this strategy’s success is ROAD’s reputation as a trusted acquirer that retains local management and preserves the operational autonomy of the acquired companies, making it an attractive partner for founders seeking to sell their businesses.15

Table 1: Summary of Major Acquisitions (FY 2023-2025)

Date Announced/ClosedTarget CompanyState/MarketKey Assets Acquired / Strategic RationaleStated Financial Contribution
Aug 2025Durwood Greene ConstructionTexasVertically integrated company serving high-growth markets.Not Disclosed
Nov 2024 (Announced)Lone Star PavingTexas (Austin, San Antonio)“Transformational” platform acquisition; 10 HMA plants, 4 aggregate facilities, 1 liquid asphalt terminal.$530M Revenue, $120M Adj. EBITDA (FY25 est.)
May 2025Platform Company (PRI)TennesseeEntry into Tennessee market; platform for future growth.Not Disclosed
Sep 2024John G. Walton ConstructionAlabama (Mobile)1 HMA plant; strategic entry into the Mobile metro area.Not Disclosed
May 2023Southern Site Contractors (Huntsville Ops)Alabama (Huntsville)Excavation and grading services; enhances vertical integration in a high-growth market.Not Disclosed

Note: Data compiled from company press releases and SEC filings.10

The Power of Vertical Integration: A Margin-Enhancing Moat

ROAD’s vertical integration is a key source of competitive advantage. By owning and operating 17 aggregate facilities and 84 HMA plants, the company controls the most critical, highest-cost inputs for its paving projects.3 This strategy yields several benefits:

  1. Cost Control: It insulates the company from price volatility in the open market for aggregates and asphalt.
  2. Margin Capture: It allows ROAD to capture the material supply margin that would otherwise be paid to a third party.
  3. Supply Assurance: It ensures a reliable and timely supply of materials, which is crucial for meeting project deadlines and avoiding costly delays.
  4. Third-Party Sales: It creates an additional revenue stream from selling materials to smaller, local competitors.

The company actively uses its acquisition strategy to deepen this vertical integration. For instance, the 2021 acquisition of Good Hope Contracting in Alabama added four aggregate facilities, and a separate deal in North Carolina was executed specifically to secure an aggregate source to supply existing asphalt plants in the region.26 This continuous reinforcement of its supply chain strengthens its moat in each local market it serves.

Organic Growth & Backlog Analysis

While M&A is the primary growth engine, organic growth remains a key focus. Management’s stated philosophy is that “today’s acquisitions drive tomorrow’s organic growth,” implying that newly acquired platforms are expected to leverage ROAD’s scale and resources to win more work and gain market share over time.31 For fiscal 2025, the company has guided for 8% to 10% organic revenue growth, a healthy rate for the industry.30

The most tangible indicator of the company’s future revenue is its project backlog, which represents the total value of contracted but uncompleted work. The backlog has grown at a remarkable pace, reaching a record $2.94 billion at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2025.1 This provides a high degree of revenue visibility, with the backlog covering an estimated 80% to 85% of the subsequent 12 months of revenue.5 This rapid expansion, while a strong positive signal, also presents a significant operational challenge, as the company must now execute on a workload that has expanded dramatically in a short period.

Table 2: Project Backlog Growth

Quarter EndProject Backlog ($ Billions)Year-over-Year Growth (%)
Q3 FY24 (Jun 30, 2024)$1.86
Q4 FY24 (Sep 30, 2024)$2.6643.0%
Q1 FY25 (Dec 31, 2024)$2.8458.7%
Q2 FY25 (Mar 31, 2025)$2.9458.1%
Q3 FY25 (Jun 30, 2025)$2.9458.1%

Note: Data compiled from company earnings releases and conference call transcripts.1 Q4 FY24 backlog data is from Q2 FY25 press release comparison point.

Financial Performance Analysis

An examination of Construction Partners, Inc.’s financial performance reveals a company in a phase of rapid, acquisition-fueled expansion. This growth is evident in its top-line revenue, but more importantly, it is increasingly translating into improved profitability and margin expansion, though it comes with a more leveraged balance sheet.

Historical Performance Review

A review of recent fiscal years demonstrates the scale and velocity of ROAD’s growth strategy. In fiscal 2022, revenues grew by an impressive 42.9% to $1.3 billion, a year in which organic growth ($220.6 million) actually outpaced acquisition-related growth ($170.4 million), indicating strong underlying market demand.33 In fiscal 2023, revenue growth continued at 20.1% to reach $1.6 billion, with the mix shifting more towards acquisitions ($148.5 million) versus organic growth ($113.4 million).33 This trend has accelerated into fiscal 2025, where acquisitions now dominate the growth profile.

Table 3: Key Financial & Operational Metrics

MetricFY 2022FY 2023FY 2024Q3 FY25 (TTM)
Revenue ($M)$1,301.7$1,563.6$2,450.0$2,450.0
Revenue Growth (%)42.9%20.1%56.7%56.7%
Gross Profit ($M)$190.1$215.1$363.8$363.8
Gross Margin (%)14.6%13.8%14.8%14.8%
Net Income ($M)$40.0$47.5$68.9$74.5
Net Margin (%)3.1%3.0%2.8%3.0%
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)$135.2$166.4$268.0$325.1
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)10.4%10.6%10.9%13.3%
Project Backlog ($B)$1.36$1.71$2.66$2.94

Note: FY22 and FY23 data sourced from 10-K filings.33 FY24 and TTM data compiled from various sources including 36 and 35 for annual figures and 1 for latest backlog and TTM calculations. TTM Adjusted EBITDA calculated from quarterly press releases. FY24 Revenue and Net Income from.35 FY24 Adj. EBITDA calculated based on reported margin and revenue.

Recent Quarterly Performance (FY 2025)

Fiscal 2025 has been a breakout year for the company. In the third quarter, revenue surged 51% year-over-year to $779.3 million, while Adjusted EBITDA grew 80% to $131.7 million.1 While the company missed consensus analyst estimates for both revenue and EPS—reporting $0.81 per share against a forecast of $0.94—the market responded positively, with the stock price increasing significantly post-announcement.31 This seemingly counterintuitive reaction suggests that investors are prioritizing leading indicators of business health, such as margin expansion and backlog growth, over lagging quarterly results that were negatively impacted by transient factors like weather.

A critical theme in recent performance is margin expansion. The Adjusted EBITDA margin reached a company record of 16.9% in Q3 2025, a 280-basis-point improvement over the prior year.32 This demonstrates successful integration of higher-margin acquisitions and the realization of operating leverage, as evidenced by the decline in G&A expenses as a percentage of revenue, which fell from 7.3% to 6.6% year-over-year.1 Management has maintained its full-year fiscal 2025 guidance, projecting revenues between $2.77 billion and $2.83 billion and Adjusted EBITDA between $410 million and $430 million.1

Balance Sheet & Cash Flow Analysis

The company’s aggressive acquisition strategy is clearly reflected on its balance sheet. Total assets grew from $1.54 billion at the end of fiscal 2024 to $2.93 billion as of June 30, 2025, with goodwill increasing from $231.7 million to $775.8 million over the same period, primarily reflecting the large acquisitions in Texas and Tennessee.4

This growth has been funded with substantial debt. Total long-term debt (net of current maturities) increased from $487.0 million to $1.39 billion over that same nine-month period.4 Consequently, financial leverage is a key metric to monitor. As of the end of Q3 2025, the company’s debt-to-trailing-12-months-EBITDA ratio stood at 3.17x.32 Management has articulated a clear strategy to de-lever to approximately 2.5x by late fiscal 2026 through operational cash flow generation, while still preserving capacity for future acquisitions.5

The ability to generate cash is therefore critical to the sustainability of the strategy. In this regard, recent performance is strong. Cash provided by operating activities was $83 million in Q3 2025, a significant increase from $35 million in the prior-year quarter.32 The company projects it will convert 80% to 85% of its Adjusted EBITDA into cash flow from operations for the full fiscal year, which will be the primary source of funds for debt reduction and capital expenditures.32

Key Ratios & Valuation

Based on the latest financial data, ROAD’s stock trades at a premium valuation. Its trailing twelve-month P/E ratio is approximately 91.4x, and its Price/Sales ratio is 2.87x, both of which are significantly higher than the construction industry and broader market averages.35 Analyst estimates project a forward P/E ratio of 58.7 for fiscal 2025, falling to 41.5 for fiscal 2026, indicating that substantial earnings growth is anticipated and already reflected in the current stock price.36 This premium valuation underscores the high expectations investors have for the company’s ability to continue executing its high-growth strategy.

Competitive Landscape & Moat Assessment

Construction Partners, Inc. operates in a competitive and fragmented industry. Its competitive set includes other publicly traded civil contractors, large national and multinational private construction firms, and numerous smaller, local paving and materials companies.

Peer Group Analysis

The most direct publicly traded competitor is Knife River Corporation (KNF), another vertically integrated, aggregates-based construction materials and services company.35 A comparison reveals key differences in strategy and valuation. ROAD is a high-growth, geographically focused pure-play on the Sunbelt, while KNF has a broader, more mature footprint across 14 states with more modest growth.38 This strategic difference is reflected in their valuations.

Other relevant public peers include civil construction firms like Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) and Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA), which also compete for large public infrastructure projects.40 In the materials space,

Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is a dominant aggregates producer with a major presence in the Southeast.42 While primarily a supplier, Vulcan’s market activity and commentary serve as an important bellwether for regional construction demand.

Table 4: Peer Comparison: Valuation and Profitability Ratios

CompanyTickerMarket Cap ($B)P/E Ratio (TTM)P/S Ratio (TTM)Net Margin (%)
Construction Partners, Inc.ROAD$7.0291.392.873.04%
Knife River CorporationKNF$4.5930.141.525.20%
Jacobs Solutions Inc.J$17.4836.521.524.17%
APi Group CorporationAPG$14.84111.612.111.89%
TopBuild Corp.BLD$11.8420.692.2210.74%

Note: Data as of mid-2025, sourced from MarketBeat.35 Jacobs, APi Group, and TopBuild are included as broader construction/services peers for context.

The data clearly illustrates ROAD’s premium valuation. Its P/E and P/S ratios are substantially higher than those of its closest peer, Knife River. This premium is likely attributable to ROAD’s significantly higher revenue growth rate and its concentrated exposure to the fast-growing Sunbelt market, which investors may see as justifying a higher multiple.

Regional Competitive Dynamics

On a regional level, the market is highly fragmented. The ENR Southeast Top Contractors list includes a mix of large, diversified national players like Kiewit Corp., Turner Construction, and Balfour Beatty, alongside strong regional firms like Archer Western Construction.44 ROAD competes with these firms for larger transportation projects. However, a significant portion of its work is in smaller, local markets where its competition consists of smaller private companies. It is precisely these smaller firms that form the target pool for ROAD’s bolt-on acquisition strategy.

Identifying the Competitive Moat

ROAD’s competitive advantage, or “moat,” is built on several reinforcing pillars:

  1. Vertical Integration: As detailed previously, control over the HMA and aggregates supply chain in localized markets provides a durable cost, quality, and logistical advantage that is difficult for non-integrated competitors to replicate.6
  2. Local Market Density: The company’s strategy is not just to enter a state, but to build a dense network of assets within specific metropolitan areas. By acquiring multiple companies and operating numerous plants in a single region, ROAD achieves localized economies of scale, enhances asset utilization, and can more effectively serve customers and bid on a wider range of projects.26
  3. Reputation as a Trusted Acquirer: Management has cultivated a reputation for being a fair and reliable partner to the owners of private construction companies. By retaining local management and branding, they have created a proprietary pipeline of acquisition opportunities, as founders often prefer selling to an industry operator over a financial buyer.15 This is a key intangible asset that fuels its primary growth engine.

Risk Factor Analysis

While Construction Partners, Inc. benefits from significant tailwinds and a sound strategy, it is also exposed to a range of material risks that are critical for an investor to understand. These risks can be categorized as operational, financial, and regulatory.

Operational & Execution Risks

  • Acquisition Integration Risk: This is arguably the most significant risk facing the company. Its growth is overwhelmingly dependent on successfully identifying, acquiring, and integrating other companies. A failure to effectively integrate a large platform acquisition like Lone Star Paving could lead to culture clashes, departure of key local management, operational disruptions, and an inability to realize projected cost synergies and margin improvements, thereby undermining the rationale for the deal.3
  • Adverse Weather Conditions: As a construction company operating primarily outdoors in the southeastern U.S., ROAD’s operations are highly susceptible to weather. As demonstrated in Q3 2025, excessive rainfall can lead to significant project delays, pushing revenue and earnings into later quarters and creating volatility in financial results.1 The region is also prone to more severe weather events like hurricanes, which can halt operations for extended periods.
  • Project Bidding and Cost Estimation: A substantial portion of the company’s work is performed under fixed-unit-price contracts.45 While this protects against quantity risk, the company bears the risk of accurately estimating its costs. An inability to accurately forecast labor, materials, and equipment costs for a project could result in significantly lower margins or even losses.3

Financial & Market Risks

  • Substantial Indebtedness: The company utilizes significant leverage to finance its acquisition strategy. As of June 30, 2025, long-term debt stood at $1.39 billion.4 This level of indebtedness exposes the company to risks associated with rising interest rates, which increase debt service costs, and requires a disciplined focus on cash flow generation to meet its de-leveraging targets. A failure to reduce debt as planned could constrain its ability to make future acquisitions, thereby stalling its primary growth driver.3
  • Inflation and Input Costs: The business is exposed to price volatility for critical inputs, including liquid asphalt cement (a petroleum product), diesel fuel, steel, and concrete.3 While its vertical integration provides some buffer, sustained inflation can compress margins, particularly on longer-term projects where prices were bid in a lower-cost environment.
  • Labor Market Constraints: The nationwide shortage of skilled construction labor is a significant headwind. This can lead to increased labor costs, project delays due to insufficient staffing, and challenges in maintaining a high-quality workforce, particularly as the company rapidly expands into new markets.3

Regulatory & Political Risks

  • Dependence on Government Funding: With approximately two-thirds of its revenue derived from public projects, ROAD’s financial health is intrinsically linked to government infrastructure spending.4 A significant reduction in federal, state, or local transportation budgets due to a shift in political priorities, a severe recession impacting tax revenues, or other factors would have a direct and material adverse effect on the company’s project pipeline and revenue.3
  • Regulatory Compliance: The company operates in a highly regulated industry, subject to extensive environmental, health, and safety (EHS) laws. Non-compliance can result in substantial fines, penalties, and, critically, suspension or debarment from bidding on future government contracts, which would cripple its business model.3

These risks are highly interconnected. For example, a failure in acquisition integration (operational risk) could lead to lower-than-projected EBITDA. This, in turn, would make it more difficult to service and pay down debt (financial risk), potentially violating loan covenants and restricting the company’s ability to pursue its growth strategy.

Concluding Observations

Construction Partners, Inc. has successfully engineered a business model that places it at the center of several powerful, long-term secular trends: the generational reinvestment in U.S. infrastructure, the sustained demographic and economic shift to the Sunbelt, and the ongoing consolidation of the fragmented civil construction industry. Management has executed a clear and aggressive growth strategy, using a disciplined M&A playbook to rapidly gain scale, enter high-growth markets, and enhance its vertically integrated moat.

The results of this strategy are evident in the company’s financial and operational metrics. Revenue growth has been explosive, profitability margins are expanding to record levels, and a formidable project backlog provides a high degree of confidence in near-term revenue. The company is capitalizing on a uniquely favorable market environment where both federal and state governments are injecting historic levels of capital into the transportation sector.

However, this high-growth profile is accompanied by a commensurate level of risk and a premium market valuation. The company’s heavy reliance on acquisitions as its primary growth driver introduces significant integration and execution risk. Its financial leverage, while managed with a clear de-leveraging plan, remains elevated. Furthermore, its geographic and customer concentration, while strategically sound, exposes it to regional and political risks. The market has recognized the company’s growth potential, awarding its stock a valuation that is substantially higher than its peers, implying that a high degree of future success is already priced in.

Ultimately, an analysis of Construction Partners, Inc. presents a clear trade-off. The company offers a compelling, pure-play vehicle for participating in the growth of Sunbelt infrastructure, led by a management team with a proven track record in its M&A-driven strategy. The core analytical question is whether the potential for continued high growth and margin expansion adequately compensates for the inherent risks of its business model and the high expectations embedded in its current valuation.

Key metrics to monitor going forward will be critical in assessing the company’s ongoing performance against its strategic goals. These include: (1) the organic growth rates of its acquired platforms in the years following their integration, (2) the continued trajectory of Adjusted EBITDA margins as a measure of operational efficiency and synergy realization, (3) the pace of balance sheet de-leveraging as evidence of strong cash flow conversion, and (4) the continued health of its project backlog and the stability of state DOT funding in its key markets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Business & Operations

  • Are earnings at a cyclical high or cyclical low? Earnings are at a cyclical high. The heavy civil construction industry is inherently cyclical, tied to economic conditions and government spending. Currently, the sector is experiencing a period of exceptionally strong demand, driven by two main factors: the generational funding from the federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and robust, independent infrastructure spending by the high-growth Sunbelt states where the company exclusively operates. This has resulted in record project backlogs and strong profitability, suggesting the company is operating at or near a peak in the current cycle.  
  • Are earnings driven primarily by the external environment or internal company actions? Earnings are driven by a powerful combination of both. The external environment is extraordinarily favorable, with massive public infrastructure spending providing a strong tailwind. However, the company’s earnings growth has been supercharged by deliberate internal actions. Its primary growth lever is a highly active acquisition strategy, which has been responsible for the majority of its recent revenue growth (in Q3 2025, acquisitions drove 46% of the 51% year-over-year revenue growth). Furthermore, its internal focus on vertical integration—owning its own asphalt plants and aggregate sources—is a key driver of its expanding profit margins.  
  • Can this business be easily understood? Yes, the fundamental business model is straightforward and can be easily understood. Construction Partners builds and maintains roads and other civil infrastructure. Its core strategy is built on a vertically integrated model where it controls the key components of its supply chain by manufacturing its own hot-mix asphalt and mining its own aggregates (stone, sand, gravel). This integration gives the company better control over costs and materials supply, which is a key competitive advantage.  
  • Can this company be undermined by foreign, low-cost labor? This is highly unlikely. Highway and civil construction is an inherently local business that requires a physical presence of labor and heavy equipment at the project site. The logistics and costs associated with transporting a foreign labor force for this type of work would be prohibitive. Furthermore, a significant portion of the company’s work is funded by federal and state governments, which often carry “Buy America” provisions and other regulations that favor domestic labor and materials.  
  • Do brands matter in the business? Or is this a commodity producer? While the physical products (asphalt, aggregates) are commodities, brand and reputation are critically important. The primary customers are state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and other government agencies that award large, multi-year contracts based on a contractor’s track record of quality, safety, and reliability. A strong reputation is a significant competitive advantage in the bidding process. The company’s acquisition strategy specifically targets firms with well-established local reputations, which it then preserves, underscoring the value of branding in this industry.  
  • Has the business environment changed recently? Yes, the business environment has changed significantly for the better in the past few years. The passage of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) in late 2021 has injected historic levels of federal funding into the transportation sector, creating a highly visible, multi-year pipeline of projects. This federal tailwind is amplified by strong economic and population growth in the Sunbelt states, leading many of them to pass their own robust transportation funding packages. While the demand environment is exceptionally strong, recent challenges include persistent skilled labor shortages, input cost inflation, and supply chain issues.  
  • Has the company made any significant acquisitions recently? Yes, the company has made several significant and transformative acquisitions recently. The most notable was the acquisition of Lone Star Paving, which marked the company’s entry into Texas with a major platform in the high-growth Austin and San Antonio markets. The company also recently entered the Tennessee market by acquiring a platform company known as PRI. In August 2025, it expanded its Texas footprint by acquiring Durwood Greene Construction. These moves are central to its strategy of expanding across the Sunbelt.  

Financials & Capital Allocation

  • How CapEx hungry is this business? What % of cash from operations must be spent on CapEx to sustain the business? The business is highly capital-intensive (“CapEx hungry”), requiring significant and ongoing investment in heavy equipment, asphalt plants, and aggregate facilities.
    • For fiscal year 2025, the company expects total capital expenditures to be in the range of $130 million to $140 million.  
    • The company projects it will convert 80% to 85% of its Adjusted EBITDA into cash flow from operations. Based on its fiscal 2025 Adjusted EBITDA guidance of $410 million to $430 million, this implies cash from operations of approximately $328 million to $365 million.  
    • Therefore, planned CapEx for 2025 represents approximately 36% to 43% of expected cash from operations. The company’s filings do not provide a specific breakdown between maintenance and growth CapEx.
  • How much free cash flow does the business generate? How does management use this free cash flow? What is their philosophy? Free cash flow generation has been volatile, which is common for a company in a phase of heavy investment and rapid acquisition-led growth. After being negative in fiscal years 2021 and 2022 due to investments, it turned positive in 2023 ($114 million) and 2024 ($135 billion).  
  • Management’s stated philosophy for using its cash flow is clear and disciplined: the primary use is to pay down debt following acquisitions. The company has a stated goal of reducing its debt-to-EBITDA leverage ratio to approximately 2.5x by late fiscal 2026, while still maintaining financial capacity for future strategic acquisitions.  
  • How profitable is this business? What is the return on capital invested? Return on equity? The company’s profitability has been improving. Key metrics on a trailing twelve-month (TTM) basis are:
    • Return on Equity (ROE): 10.60%.  
    • Return on Invested Capital (ROIC): 7.01%.  
    • Historical data shows that ROIC has improved significantly from a low of 3.3% in fiscal 2022 to 8.6% in fiscal 2024, reflecting better profitability from both organic operations and the integration of higher-margin acquisitions.  
  • Is net income diverging from cash from operations? Cash from operations is significantly higher than net income, which is a healthy and expected sign for a capital-intensive company. For the third quarter of fiscal 2025, cash provided by operating activities was $83 million, while net income was $44 million. This divergence is primarily due to large non-cash expenses, such as depreciation and amortization, being added back to calculate operating cash flow. This indicates strong underlying cash-generating capabilities.  
  • Is the company buying back shares? Paying dividends?
    • Dividends: The company does not currently pay a dividend and has stated it does not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, retaining earnings to finance growth.  
    • Share Buybacks: Yes. In April 2024, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $40 million of its Class A common stock through September 2025. During the quarter ended June 30, 2024, the company repurchased approximately $5.3 million worth of shares.  

Industry & Competition

  • How profitable is this industry? Are there a lot of competitors? What are the barriers to entry? The highway construction industry is highly fragmented with many competitors, ranging from small local firms to large national and international players. Profitability can be solid but is subject to economic cycles and competitive bidding pressure.  
  • There are significant barriers to entry, especially for operating at scale. These include:
    • High Capital Investment: The cost of heavy equipment, asphalt plants, and other machinery is substantial.  
    • Access to Raw Materials: A key competitive advantage is owning strategically located aggregate quarries (stone, sand, gravel). These are finite resources, and obtaining permits for new quarries is a long and difficult process, creating a major barrier.  
    • Expertise and Reputation: Successfully bidding on and executing large, complex government projects requires significant expertise and a proven track record.  
  • How stable are revenues? How much do they fluctuate with the economy? Revenues have a degree of cyclicality but are more stable than other construction sectors due to their heavy reliance on public funding. Approximately 61-65% of the company’s revenue comes from public projects, which are funded by multi-year government budgets and are less sensitive to short-term economic downturns than private commercial or residential construction. The IIJA has further enhanced this stability by providing a predictable federal funding stream through 2026. However, revenues are vulnerable to shifts in political priorities and government budget constraints.  
  • What is the nature of competition? Do brand names matter? What are the customers switching costs? Competition is primarily at the local and regional level and is based on price, quality, and the ability to execute projects on time and on budget. As mentioned, brand reputation is a critical factor in winning bids from government agencies. For a specific project, a customer’s (e.g., a state DOT) switching costs are extremely high once a contract is awarded. Between projects, customers can choose other contractors, but the pool of qualified bidders for large projects is limited, and past performance and relationships play a significant role in future contract awards.  

Corporate Governance & Risk

  • Does the company have assets that are not fully recognized in the balance sheet? While all tangible assets like property, plant, and equipment are recorded on the balance sheet, the company possesses significant intangible assets whose full value may not be reflected. The most important of these is its reputation as a “trusted acquirer,” which gives it a proprietary pipeline of acquisition opportunities that financial buyers or other competitors may not have access to. Additionally, the strategic value of its network of quarries and asphalt plants, which create localized competitive moats, likely exceeds their book value. Goodwill from acquisitions is on the balance sheet, but its true economic value in generating future growth could be understated.  
  • Does the company issue large amounts of new shares to insiders? Yes, share-based compensation is a significant component of executive pay. In fiscal year 2024, the company recorded $15.03 million in share-based compensation expense. This figure represents over 21% of the company’s projected net income for that year (which was guided between $68 million and $70 million), indicating that share issuance to insiders is a material part of the company’s expense structure.  
  • Has the company recently changed accounting policies? There is no indication in the company’s recent SEC filings of any significant changes to its critical accounting policies. The company’s financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and are subject to audit. The policies are detailed within its annual 10-K report.  
  • How conservative is the company’s accounting? Are they over- or under- stating earnings? As a publicly traded company, Construction Partners’ accounting is governed by GAAP standards and reviewed by independent auditors. There are no apparent red flags in the provided materials to suggest that the company is being overly aggressive or conservative in its accounting practices. The company provides detailed reconciliations for non-GAAP measures like Adjusted EBITDA and issues standard cautionary language about preliminary financial results being subject to final review, which is a typical conservative practice.  
  • How many options / shares is the management issuing to insiders? Is it more than 10% of net income? Yes, the value of shares issued as compensation is more than 10% of net income. As noted previously, share-based compensation expense was $15.03 million in fiscal 2024 , while net income was projected to be approximately $69 million at the midpoint of guidance. This compensation represents about  
  • 21.8% of net income for that year.
  • What are the motivations of management? Do they own a lot of stock and options? Management’s stated focus is on making “great long term decisions that continue to compound wealth” for shareholders. Their motivations appear to be strongly aligned with those of shareholders due to significant personal stock ownership.
    • President and CEO Jule Smith owns approximately 1.14% of the company’s shares, valued at over $80 million.  
    • Executive Chairman Ned Fleming, a founder of the company, holds shares valued at approximately $249.5 million.  
    • This level of “skin in the game” suggests a strong motivation to ensure the company’s long-term success.
  • What factors would cause the stock to decline? Are these factors controlled by the company or the external environment? The stock faces risks from both internal and external factors:
    • External (Uncontrolled): A decline in government infrastructure spending, a sharp economic recession in the Sunbelt, prolonged periods of severe weather (e.g., hurricanes, heavy rain), persistent high inflation, or a worsening of the skilled labor shortage could all negatively impact the business.  
    • Internal (Company-Controlled): The most significant internal risk is poor execution of its acquisition strategy, such as overpaying for a company or failing to integrate it successfully. Other internal risks include inaccurate project bidding, cost overruns, and an inability to effectively manage its rapidly growing project backlog.  
  • What is the risk of a catastrophic loss on this investment? What is the chance of a total loss? The risk of a total loss (bankruptcy) appears low in the current environment, given the company’s record backlog, strong underlying demand, and positive cash flow. However, a catastrophic loss, while a low-probability event, could be triggered by a confluence of severe negative events, such as a complete political reversal on infrastructure spending combined with a major, debt-fueled acquisition that fails to perform as expected. Another catastrophic risk, common in this industry, would be debarment from bidding on government contracts due to regulatory or legal violations.  
  • What off B/S liabilities does the company have? The company does not have significant off-balance sheet arrangements. As of its fiscal year 2023 10-K filing, the primary items of this nature were approximately $9.8 million in outstanding letters of credit (related to insurance and bonding), $3.7 million in future purchase commitments for fuel, and $2.5 million in minimum royalty payments for mineral leases.  
  • What is the compensation policy of directors and management? The company’s compensation policy is heavily weighted towards performance-based and equity-based awards. For example, the CEO’s total annual compensation of $3.44 million is comprised of only 20.6% base salary, with the remaining 79.4% coming from bonuses, stock, and options. This structure is designed to align the interests of management with those of shareholders by tying a large portion of their pay to the company’s performance. The company’s proxy statement provides a full “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with further details.  

Stock Information

  • Is the stock an ADR? What are the ADR fees? No, Construction Partners, Inc. is not an American Depositary Receipt (ADR). It is a U.S. company incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Dothan, Alabama. Its stock trades directly on the NASDAQ exchange under the ticker symbol ROAD. Therefore, there are no ADR fees associated with owning the stock.  

Works cited

  1. Construction Partners, Inc. Announces Fiscal 2025 Third Quarter Results, accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/news/press-releases/detail/147/construction-partners-inc-announces-fiscal-2025-third
  2. Construction Partners, Inc. Announces Fiscal 2025 Third Quarter Results – PR Newswire, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/construction-partners-inc-announces-fiscal-2025-third-quarter-results-302523811.html
  3. 10-K – Construction Partners, Inc., accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/sec-filings/all-sec-filings/content/0001718227-24-000102/0001718227-24-000102.pdf
  4. 10-Q – 08/07/2025 – Construction Partners, Inc., accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/sec-filings/all-sec-filings/content/0001718227-25-000081/0001718227-25-000081.pdf
  5. ROAD Investor Relations – Construction Partners Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nasdaq/road/investor-relations
  6. Another Boring Business: Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) : r/SecurityAnalysis – Reddit, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SecurityAnalysis/comments/afdi54/another_boring_business_construction_partners_inc/
  7. Why Sunbelt Markets Will Continue to Boom in 2024 – Northspyre, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.northspyre.com/blog/why-sunbelt-markets-will-continue-to-boom-in-2024
  8. Sun Belt Commercial Real Estate Surge: Top Metro Areas to Watch – Blog – Brevitas, accessed September 14, 2025, https://brevitas.com/blog/sun-belt-commercial-real-estate-surge-top-metro-areas-to-watch
  9. Sun Belt Real Estate Boom | Clarion Partners, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.clarionpartners.com/insights/sun-belt-apartments-multifamily
  10. Construction Partners, Inc. Completes Texas Acquisition – PR Newswire, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/construction-partners-inc-completes-texas-acquisition-302520314.html
  11. What the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Means for Construction – Thriveon Blog, accessed September 14, 2025, https://blog.thriveon.net/what-the-infrastructure-investment-and-jobs-act-means-for-construction
  12. Industry Break down of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act …, accessed September 14, 2025, https://fmicorp.com/insights/quick-reads/thinking-ahead-breaking-down-the-details-of-the-infrastructure-investment-and-jobs-act
  13. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Will Deliver for Alabama – Department of Transportation, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2022-01/BIL_Alabama.pdf
  14. Keeping North Carolina Mobile: – TRIP, a national transportation research nonprofit, accessed September 14, 2025, https://tripnet.org/reports/keeping-north-carolina-mobile-report-september-2024/
  15. Construction Partners, Inc. Enters into Definitive Agreement to …, accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/news/press-releases/detail/129/construction-partners-inc-enters-into-definitive
  16. Four recent trends in US public infrastructure spending | Brookings, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/four-recent-trends-in-us-public-infrastructure-spending/
  17. Florida Department of Transportation Highlights 2023 Accomplishments in Florida’s Transportation Infrastructure, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.fdot.gov/info/co/news/2023/12292023
  18. 2023 Annual Accountability Report – Scdot, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.scdot.org/content/dam/scdot-legacy/performance/pdf/reports/South%20Carolina%20Department%20of%20Transportation%202023%20Annual%20Accountability%20Report.pdf
  19. Sunbelt Population Growth: A Trend to Watch – Rabbet, accessed September 14, 2025, https://rabbet.com/blog/sunbelt-population-growth-a-trend-to-watch
  20. Sun Belt Surge: Why Builders Are Betting Big on the South in 2025 | Snap.Build, accessed September 14, 2025, https://snap.build/sun-belt-surge-why-builders-are-betting-big-on-the-south-in-2025/
  21. The 2024 Construction Hiring and Business Outlook | Associated …, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.agc.org/2024-construction-hiring-and-business-outlook
  22. Georgia Ranks First in Construction Among All States : CEG, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.constructionequipmentguide.com/georgia-ranks-first-in-construction-among-all-states/64198
  23. Study Finds North Carolina Has Nation’s 5th Strongest Construction Industry, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.constructionowners.com/news/north-carolina-ranks-5th-in-construction-strength
  24. Construction Industry Outlook – Georgia Power Economic Development, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.selectgeorgia.com/blog/construction-trends-and-market-outlook-in-georgia/
  25. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Its Impact on Construction Staffing, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.peopleready.com/staffing-resources/the-infrastructure-investment-and-jobs-act-impact-on-construction-staffing/
  26. Construction Partners, Inc. Completes Strategic Acquisitions, accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/news/press-releases/detail/72/construction-partners-inc-completes-strategic-acquisitions
  27. Construction Partners, Inc. Announces Fiscal 2025 Second Quarter Results, accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/news/press-releases/detail/143/construction-partners-inc-announces-fiscal-2025-second
  28. Construction Partners, Inc. Completes Alabama Acquisition, accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/news/press-releases/detail/128/construction-partners-inc-completes-alabama-acquisition
  29. Construction Partners, Inc. Completes Alabama Acquisition, accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/news/press-releases/detail/103/construction-partners-inc-completes-alabama-acquisition
  30. CONSTRUCTION PARTNERS INC Earnings Call Transcript FY25 Q2 – stockinsights.ai, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.stockinsights.ai/us/ROAD/earnings-transcript/fy25-q2-535e
  31. Earnings call transcript: Construction Partners Q3 2025 unveils strong growth, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-construction-partners-q3-2025-unveils-strong-growth-93CH-4178058
  32. Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript | Seeking Alpha, accessed September 14, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4811703-construction-partners-inc-road-q3-2025-earnings-call-transcript
  33. Annual Reports :: Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD), accessed September 14, 2025, https://ir.constructionpartners.net/sec-filings/annual-reports
  34. Construction Partners Inc Stock Price Today | NASDAQ: ROAD Live – Investing.com, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.investing.com/equities/construction-partners-inc
  35. Construction Partners (ROAD) Competitors and Alternatives 2025 – MarketBeat, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/ROAD/competitors-and-alternatives/
  36. Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) Stock Price, Quote, News & Analysis | Seeking Alpha, accessed September 14, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ROAD
  37. Knife River Corporation – Investor Relations, accessed September 14, 2025, https://investors.kniferiver.com/overview/default.aspx
  38. Knife River Corporation – Investor Info – Why Invest, accessed September 14, 2025, https://investors.kniferiver.com/investor-info/why-invest/default.aspx
  39. Knife River – A Construction Materials & Contracting Company, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.kniferiver.com/
  40. Publicly Traded Heavy Construction Other Than Building Construction Contractors Companies – SIC Code 16 – Fintel, accessed September 14, 2025, https://fintel.io/industry/list/heavy-construction-other-than-building-construction-contractors
  41. list of publicly traded construction companies – InvestSnips: Your Sector Investment Guide, accessed September 14, 2025, https://investsnips.com/list-of-publicly-traded-construction-companies/
  42. Best Construction Stocks to Buy in 2025 | The Motley Fool, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/market-sectors/industrials/construction-stocks/
  43. VMC Investor Presentation, accessed September 14, 2025, https://s201.q4cdn.com/142563501/files/doc_presentations/2025/Mar/17/VMC-Investor-Presentation.pdf
  44. ENR Southeast Top Contractors 2022 | Engineering News-Record, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.enr.com/Southeast/Toplists/2022-Top-Contractors-Preview
  45. Construction Partners Inc. Assigned ‘B+’ Rating, Outlook Stable – S&P Global, accessed September 14, 2025, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/-/view/type/HTML/id/3271541