Slide Deck

I. Business Overview and Industry Structure

An objective evaluation of Gruma S.A.B. de C.V. requires a highly granular understanding of its operational framework, technological foundations, and the underlying dynamics of the global macroeconomic environment in which it operates. Founded in 1949 and headquartered in San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, Mexico, Gruma has evolved from a regional processor of agricultural commodities into the world’s largest producer of corn flour (masa harina) and tortillas.¹ The enterprise operates a massive industrial footprint comprising approximately 75 manufacturing plants globally, employs over 25,000 individuals, and distributes its products across more than 100 countries.² The operational structure of the business is highly globalized, divided into distinct geographic and functional segments that present fundamentally different unit economics, competitive landscapes, and long-term growth trajectories.

The Business Segments and Unit Economics

The business is primarily segmented into Gruma USA (operating largely under the Mission Foods and Azteca Milling brands), Grupo Industrial Maseca or GIMSA (the Mexican corn flour division), Gruma Europe, Gruma Central America, and Gruma Asia & Oceania.

Gruma USA is the undeniable economic engine of the enterprise. By the close of the 2024 and 2025 fiscal periods, Gruma USA consistently accounted for approximately 55% to 58% of consolidated net sales and generated between 65% and 70% of the consolidated Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA).³ The United States division operates two distinct business lines: Azteca Milling, which produces corn flour and accounts for roughly 20% of the subsidiary’s revenues, and Mission Foods, which produces finished tortillas and wraps, accounting for the remaining 80%.⁵

GIMSA, conversely, operates as a high-volume, lower-margin cash cow within its domestic market. It represents roughly 25% to 29% of consolidated net sales but generates a disproportionately lower 17% of consolidated EBITDA.³ GIMSA’s operations are almost exclusively dedicated to the production of nixtamalized corn flour for the Mexican market.⁵ The remaining international divisions—Europe, Central America, and Asia/Oceania—serve as emerging growth vectors. Gruma Europe, for instance, represents approximately 7% to 8% of sales, while Central America and Asia & Oceania represent 5% to 6% and 3% to 4%, respectively.³ During the third quarter of 2025, non-Mexican operations represented 72% of consolidated net sales and 80% of consolidated EBITDA, underscoring the reality that Gruma is functionally a U.S. and international consumer staples enterprise that merely happens to be domiciled and listed in Mexico.⁶

A critical distinction must be drawn between the unit economics of nixtamalized corn flour and finished tortillas. The production and sale of corn flour (Azteca Milling in the U.S., GIMSA in Mexico) operates largely as an industrialized commodity business. Margins are fundamentally constrained by raw material costs, agricultural cycles, global weather patterns affecting corn harvests, and, historically, government pricing policies. Conversely, the finished tortilla segment (Mission Foods) functions as a branded, value-added consumer packaged goods (CPG) business. The margin differential between these two models is structural and permanent. Selling finished, branded tortillas directly to retail consumers and foodservice operators commands substantially higher gross and operating margins, as well as superior returns on invested capital, compared to wholesale corn flour distribution. The ongoing pivot toward a richer product mix in the finished tortilla segment—specifically, the aggressive expansion of the “Better for You” category featuring low-carb, gluten-free, organic, and keto-friendly variants—has been the primary driver of consolidated margin expansion in recent years.⁵

Global Industry Structure and Competitive Dynamics

The industry structure of the global corn flour and tortilla market is bipartite, characterized by extreme fragmentation at the local artisanal level and intense consolidation at the industrial level. The global tortilla market was valued at an estimated $48.2 billion to $49.1 billion in 2025 and is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 5.1% to 5.6% through the early 2030s.⁹

In the United States, the competitive landscape is dominated by a few major industrial players and a long tail of regional manufacturers. Gruma, through its Mission Foods subsidiary, controls a dominant market share of the U.S. tortilla production industry, estimated at roughly 40% to 49% depending on the specific retail or foodservice channel.⁴ Primary industrial competitors in the U.S. market include Grupo Bimbo (owner of the Thomas’, Sara Lee, and Oroweat brands, alongside its Tia Rosa tortilla brand), Flowers Foods, General Mills (Old El Paso), Olé Mexican Foods, and Tyson Foods.⁹ The market structure outside the United States and Mexico is highly fragmented, with Gruma aggressively acquiring market share and establishing greenfield production facilities to capture first-mover advantages in regions where tortilla consumption is newly emerging, such as Eastern Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.

The barriers to entry vary wildly depending on the scale of operation. Opening a localized, artisanal tortilleria requires minimal capital, leading to virtually non-existent barriers to entry at the neighborhood level. However, entering the market as an industrial, nationally distributed manufacturer requires hundreds of millions of dollars in sunk capital for specialized milling equipment, high-speed baking ovens, and, most importantly, a sophisticated distribution logistics network. Therefore, while local competition is fierce, the threat of new entrants at the multinational, industrial scale is negligible.

Secular Trends and Structural Shifts

Secular trends underpinning the industry provide a robust tailwind for the enterprise. Beyond the demographic expansion of the Hispanic population in North America, the fundamental driver of volume growth is the mainstream culinary adoption of tortillas and wraps globally. Wraps have increasingly displaced traditional sliced bread as a versatile, convenient carbohydrate base in non-Hispanic households and foodservice operations.³ The health-conscious consumer pivot has elevated the demand for customized tortilla formulations, allowing manufacturers with superior research and development capabilities to price their products at a premium.³

In Mexico, a distinct structural trend continues to play out: the gradual transition from traditional artisanal tortilla production utilizing wet corn dough (nixtamal) toward the utilization of industrialized, dry nixtamalized corn flour.¹⁶ This transition provides a steady, albeit maturing, demand floor for GIMSA’s operations. The traditional wet-dough method is highly energy and water-intensive, and it suffers from rapid spoilage. Industrial corn flour, which can be stored for extended periods and easily reconstituted with water, drastically improves the economics and consistency for local tortilla vendors.¹⁷

II. Competitive Advantage Analysis

The core philosophy of sound investment analysis dictates that a business without a durable competitive advantage is inherently a poor investment, regardless of its absolute scale or top-line revenue growth. A true economic moat must systematically insulate an enterprise from the margin-eroding forces of competition, and this insulation must inevitably manifest in sustainably superior financial returns over the firm’s cost of capital. A rigorous, evidence-based examination of Gruma’s operational architecture and historical financial performance indicates the presence of a wide, highly durable economic moat derived from multiple compounding sources.

Scale Economies and Absolute Cost Leadership

Scale represents the most visible pillar of Gruma’s competitive advantage. Operating 75 manufacturing facilities globally and processing millions of metric tons of corn annually establishes a cost structure that smaller regional competitors simply cannot replicate.³ In the highly commoditized corn flour segment, absolute cost leadership is the only viable strategy for long-term survival. Gruma’s immense procurement leverage over agricultural suppliers, combined with high-capacity utilization rates across its global network, significantly dilutes fixed overhead costs per unit.¹⁸ This scale advantage is amplified by the capital intensity of industrial milling. Constructing a network of localized mills across the Americas and Europe requires billions of dollars in sunk capital. For instance, Gruma’s consistent allocation of over $220 million annually in capital expenditures just to maintain and slightly expand its existing footprint illustrates the insurmountable financial barrier to entry for prospective market challengers attempting to operate at a national or international scale.⁶

Brand Equity and Consumer Captivity

Brand equity serves as a second, powerful moat source, particularly within the U.S. and European retail segments. The “Mission” brand enjoys near-ubiquity in North American supermarkets and represents the default choice for both consumers and institutional foodservice operators.² While private label alternatives exist, and consumer sensitivity to price increases occasionally drives marginal trade-down behavior, the Mission brand has demonstrated immense pricing power. During the severe inflationary periods of 2022 through 2024, Gruma successfully executed aggressive price increases to offset raw material and labor cost inflation without suffering catastrophic volume losses.⁷ This pricing power is particularly evident in the “Better for You” segment, where consumers exhibit high brand loyalty to specific formulations (e.g., Mission’s Carb Balance line) and are less willing to substitute with generic store brands. The fierce competition in this specific niche is evidenced by ongoing legal and advertising challenges, such as the 2024 National Advertising Division (NAD) disputes initiated by competitor Olé Mexican Foods regarding the nutritional claims on Gruma’s zero net carb packaging.²⁰ The willingness of competitors to aggressively litigate over marketing claims underscores the lucrative nature of this specific market segment and Gruma’s dominant positioning within it.

Distribution and the DSD Network

Perhaps the most structurally impenetrable facet of Gruma’s moat in the United States is its Direct-Store-Delivery (DSD) network.⁷ In the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector, controlling the physical distribution of short-shelf-life products directly to the retail shelf is a paramount advantage. Gruma’s DSD network ensures optimal shelf placement, precise inventory management, rapid replenishment of fresh tortillas, and immediate feedback on localized consumer purchasing patterns.⁷ Regional competitors and private label manufacturers largely rely on third-party warehouse distribution models, which inherently degrade product freshness and reduce the manufacturer’s control over retail merchandising and promotional execution. Replicating a national DSD network requires a massive fleet of delivery vehicles, a localized sales and distribution force, and immense route density to achieve profitability—a logistical and financial hurdle that effectively protects Gruma’s market share from aggressive encroachment by smaller rivals or diversified food conglomerates lacking a specialized bakery DSD infrastructure.

Vertical Integration and Proprietary Technology

Vertical integration further solidifies the firm’s cost leadership and operational resilience. Gruma operates across the entire value chain: it procures raw grain, designs, engineers, and patents its own proprietary milling and tortilla manufacturing machinery, produces the intermediate flour, and bakes the finished consumer goods.⁷ The company’s proprietary nixtamalization process fundamentally disrupted the industry upon its invention by substituting the traditional, highly water- and energy-intensive alkaline cooking process with an accelerated industrial method.¹⁷

Traditional nixtamalization produces a highly alkaline waste liquid known as nejayote, which carries severe environmental disposal costs.²³ Gruma’s patented technologies drastically reduce wastewater emissions and improve corn solid retention yields, directly lowering the marginal cost of production relative to competitors utilizing legacy processing methods.²³ By manufacturing its own equipment and controlling the milling of raw corn into masa harina, which is subsequently transferred inter-company to its own tortilla manufacturing facilities, Gruma captures multiple margin layers that non-integrated competitors must surrender to third-party suppliers.

The Regulatory Proof of Monopoly Power in Mexico

In the Mexican market, Gruma possesses a structural, quasi-monopolistic moat. The most definitive proof of this competitive advantage was perversely provided by the Federal Economic Competition Commission (COFECE) of Mexico in a 2024 antitrust investigation. The regulatory body’s Investigative Authority conducted a rigorous quantitative analysis of the Mexican nixtamalized corn flour market between 2016 and 2022. COFECE determined that Gruma controls between 50% and 90% of total sales across eight different geographic regions, maintaining a market share between 22 and 80 times larger than its nearest competitor in those regions.¹⁶ Furthermore, the investigation noted that Gruma possessed the unilateral capacity to set market prices approximately 10% higher than competitors nationwide without fearing market share erosion, a textbook definition of monopoly pricing power.¹⁶ While this dominance attracted severe regulatory scrutiny, it serves as empirical, third-party validation of an entrenched and unassailable competitive advantage in its domestic market.

Empirical Validation: Superior Financial Returns

The ultimate validation of these qualitative moat sources is their translation into demonstrably superior financial returns. An analysis of Gruma’s financial metrics over the past decade confirms the existence of a durable advantage.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), the purest measure of a business’s ability to generate value from its asset base, has consistently hovered in the upper teens. By the end of 2025, Gruma’s ROIC stood at approximately 16.48%, vastly exceeding its estimated Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 9.58%.²⁵ Generating a persistent spread of roughly 700 basis points over the cost of capital on an asset base exceeding $4.5 billion is mathematically impossible in a perfectly competitive, commoditized market. It is the direct mathematical output of a wide economic moat.

Return on Equity (ROE) exhibits similar structural strength. As of late 2025, the trailing twelve-month ROE was an exceptional 27.15%, a massive improvement over the 20.40% ten-year historical average and a complete reversal from the depressed single-digit returns experienced in 2015 prior to the full optimization of the U.S. business.²⁶

Operating margins have demonstrated a structural upward trajectory, moving from approximately 11.2% in 2014 to 14.8% by the end of 2024, and sustaining roughly 14.1% to 14.4% through the first three quarters of 2025.⁶ This margin expansion, achieved against a backdrop of severe global commodity volatility, validates the pricing power derived from brand equity and the operational leverage inherent in the firm’s scale and vertical integration.

Financial Metric	2015	2021	2022	2023	2024	2025 (YTD/TTM)
Gross Margin	39.4%	36.6%	35.4%	35.5%	38.5%	39.3%
Operating Margin	12.3%	12.5%	10.9%	11.8%	13.7%	14.1%
EBITDA Margin	16.4%	16.3%	14.5%	15.3%	17.4%	17.9%
Return on Equity (ROE)	4.4%	20.9%	22.2%	23.3%	27.2%	27.1%
Return on Invested Capital	N/A	18.2%	18.6%	19.1%	21.3%	16.5%

Data synthesized from historical earnings reports, annual filings, and aggregated financial platform data.¹ Note: Minor fractional variances in ROIC and ROE may occur based on the treatment of cash, goodwill, and operating leases across independent data aggregators, but the structural reality of returns significantly exceeding the cost of capital remains absolute.

Therefore, the conclusion is absolute: Gruma possesses a formidable, multifaceted, and highly durable competitive advantage that clearly manifests in superior unit economics and exceptional returns on capital.

III. Growth History and Growth Opportunities

A competitive advantage without the capacity for capital reinvestment at high rates of return limits the compounding potential of an enterprise. Over the past decade, Gruma has successfully evolved from a predominantly Mexican commodity miller into a global consumer packaged goods manufacturer. The firm’s top-line and bottom-line growth have been a function of both organic volume expansion and systematic pricing actions, augmented by strategic capacity additions.

Historical Growth Decomposition

From 2021 through the third quarter of 2025, Gruma delivered a consolidated net sales CAGR of 7% and an EBITDA CAGR of 10%.³ The expansion in unit economics is particularly notable; consolidated EBITDA per metric ton grew from $195.20 in 2021 to $260.70 by the third quarter of 2025.³ In the core Gruma USA segment, EBITDA per ton consistently increased from $317.30 in 2021 to $472.40 over the same period.³ This absolute growth in unit profitability demonstrates that Gruma’s expansion has been highly value-accretive, relying on price realization and favorable product mix shifts rather than merely chasing low-margin volume.

Growth over the last decade has been overwhelmingly organic. Following the strategic buyout of Archer-Daniels-Midland’s (ADM) 23% equity stake in 2012/2013, Gruma largely pivoted away from debt-fueled, large-scale M&A.³¹ Instead, growth has been driven by Greenfield capacity expansions, such as the $110 million investment to expand the Indianapolis tortilla plant and the $89 million investment in a new facility in Yucatán, Mexico, announced in 2024.³²

Forward-Looking Growth Opportunities

A critical assessment of the underlying growth engines reveals varying degrees of future potential across the company’s geographical segments. Management teams are inherently optimistic, necessitating a skeptical evaluation of future runways.

The U.S. Market: Gruma USA remains the primary profit engine, but it is displaying definitive signs of volume maturation in specific channels. Historical growth was propelled by the aggressive, multi-decade penetration of Mexican cuisine into mainstream American diets. Future growth relies heavily on premiumization rather than broad demographic shifts. The “Better for You” category has been a spectacular success, commanding premium price points and buffering the retail segment against broader macroeconomic headwinds.⁶

However, an objective analysis must acknowledge the recent structural volume contraction within the U.S. foodservice channel. Throughout late 2024 and 2025, U.S. sales volumes declined by approximately 2% year-over-year as weak consumer sentiment, cumulative inflation, and price sensitivity pressured restaurant traffic and institutional catering demand.⁶ Management explicitly projects flat to fractional volume growth for the U.S. in 2026, alongside flat to slightly lower sales and a 50-70 basis point EBITDA margin contraction.¹⁹ Therefore, while the U.S. business is a phenomenal cash generator, its runway for rapid, volume-driven organic expansion appears heavily constrained in the near term, shifting the burden of growth to pricing power and international markets.

European Expansion: The European division represents a highly compelling, high-ROIC growth opportunity. Accounting for less than 10% of consolidated revenue, Gruma Europe has demonstrated an ability to rapidly scale its tortilla business, which is actively replacing legacy, lower-margin corn milling volumes.⁶ In the third quarter of 2025, European sales volume grew by 4%, while net sales surged by 15% and EBITDA expanded by 16%, reflecting a highly favorable shift in the product mix toward retail tortillas.⁶ The European consumer is actively adopting tortillas and wraps at a meaningful rate, driven by the expansion of fast-casual dining concepts and convenience food trends. Management guidance for 2026 anticipates low single-digit volume growth but high single-digit sales growth and an impressive 70-100 basis points of margin expansion in Europe, suggesting this geography still possesses a genuine, multi-year runway for capital deployment.¹⁹

The Mexican Market (GIMSA): GIMSA is fundamentally a mature cash cow. Demographic trends, high per-capita consumption rates (with 98.6% of the population consuming tortillas, and 68% consuming them daily), and the saturation of the Mexican corn flour market dictate that substantial volume growth is impossible.¹⁶ In 2024 and 2025, GIMSA volumes were functionally flat or experienced fractional 1% growth.⁶ Growth in this segment is entirely dependent on pricing actions to offset the volatility of domestic corn prices and labor inflation. Management explicitly guided for 10-50 basis points of margin contraction in Mexico for 2026 due to corn price risks.¹⁹ Consequently, GIMSA should be viewed purely as an engine for free cash flow generation to fund international expansion and shareholder returns, rather than a standalone growth asset.

Asia, Oceania, and Central America: These divisions are exhibiting the fastest relative growth, though they are expanding from a very low revenue base. The Asia and Oceania segment saw volume growth of 10% and sales growth of 6% in the third quarter of 2025, driven by strong underlying demand in China, Malaysia, and Australia.⁶ Central America similarly posted robust 5% volume growth and a remarkable 31% expansion in EBITDA during the same period.⁶ While highly promising, these markets require continued capital expenditure to build localized milling and production capacity. The recent addition of a new plant in China, for example, has temporarily hampered margin absorption due to the initial lack of operational leverage, causing the segment’s EBITDA margin to decline from 14.9% in early 2024 to 12.9% in early 2025.⁶

Sustainable Growth Forecast

Synthesizing these dynamics, the realistic, sustainable organic revenue growth rate for Gruma over the next 5 to 10 years is likely to settle in the 3% to 5% range. Consolidated volume growth will likely remain constrained to the low single digits (1% to 2%), driven primarily by the European and Asian markets. Positive product mix shifts (the continued rollout of “Better for You” products) and routine inflationary pricing will contribute an additional 2% to 3% to the top line. Profitability growth may slightly outpace revenue growth as the enterprise continues to automate packaging facilities and optimize its geographic footprint, but investors should not underwrite historical double-digit EBITDA CAGRs indefinitely into the future.

IV. Capital Allocation

The ultimate translation of a firm’s competitive advantage into shareholder wealth relies entirely upon the capital allocation acumen of executive management. If management destroys value through poor capital allocation—by overpaying for acquisitions or hoarding cash in low-yielding assets—the quality of the underlying business is irrelevant to minority shareholders. A critical review of Gruma’s capital deployment over the past decade reveals a disciplined, rational, and highly shareholder-friendly approach, contrasting sharply with the value-destroying empire-building often observed in diversified global food conglomerates.

Capital Expenditure Analysis

Gruma operates in a capital-intensive manufacturing industry. However, management has exercised stringent discipline regarding capital expenditures (CAPEX), ensuring capital is only deployed when visibility on ROIC is clear. Over recent fiscal years, annual CAPEX has consistently ranged between $220 million and $240 million ($233 million in 2024, and an estimated $220 million for 2026).¹⁹ This represents a highly manageable 3.4% to 3.6% of total net sales.

Expenditures have been rationally directed toward high-return projects: the expansion of high-margin tortilla production lines in the United States (e.g., the $110 million Indianapolis expansion), the construction of new capacity in high-growth European and Asian markets, and vital automation upgrades to offset structural labor inflation.⁶ The absolute stability of Gruma’s ROIC metric over time (maintaining a ~16-21% range) proves that management is not over-investing in low-return, vanity projects; capital is only deployed when demand visibility and margin profiles explicitly support the investment.²⁵

Mergers and Acquisitions History

Following the death of founder Roberto González Barrera in 2012, Gruma executed a vital strategic pivot away from aggressive, debt-fueled acquisitions and unwieldy joint ventures. The most consequential transaction of the past decade was the 2012/2013 buyout of Archer-Daniels-Midland’s (ADM) 23% equity stake in Gruma and the dissolution of associated joint venture interests.³¹ This transaction was highly accretive, permanently increasing the controlling shareholders’ stake in the underlying cash flows of the U.S. and Mexican operations while eliminating a complex corporate structure.

Subsequent to this structural reorganization, Gruma has largely eschewed large-scale M&A, opting instead to build greenfield capacity and focus on organic market penetration. The absence of massive goodwill impairments on the balance sheet—outside of the forced write-off of Venezuelan operations (MONACA and DEMASECA) due to geopolitical expropriation by the Venezuelan government in 2015 ³⁰—indicates a highly conservative and disciplined approach to inorganic growth.

Shareholder Returns: Dividends and Repurchases

Gruma’s commitment to returning excess free cash flow to shareholders is exemplary. The company utilizes a balanced framework of regular cash dividends and highly aggressive share repurchases.

Dividends: The company maintains a steady, reliable dividend policy. In 2024, the total dividend paid was MXN $5.76 per share. For 2025 and 2026, the company continues to declare dividends at a run-rate of MXN $1.44 per quarter, maintaining the MXN $5.76 annualized payout.³⁵ The dividend yield generally oscillates between 1.0% and 1.7%, representing a conservative payout ratio of approximately 18% to 20% of net earnings.¹ This low payout ratio ensures the dividend is entirely safe across all macroeconomic environments while preserving ample liquidity for internal reinvestment and opportunistic stock buybacks.

Share Repurchases: Management has aggressively utilized share repurchases to compound per-share intrinsic value, acting as a highly rational buyer of its own undervalued equity.

• In 2020 and 2021, the company repurchased 15.8 million and 16.3 million shares, respectively, deploying over $336 million.³
• In 2024, the company acquired 8.6 million shares for approximately US$153 million, reducing the outstanding share count by 2.4%.³⁴
• This program accelerated significantly in 2025; by the third quarter, Gruma had repurchased 14.0 million shares for US$243 million, representing a massive 3.9% reduction in outstanding equity.³
• The company operates under a renewed authorization to deploy up to MXN 7.0 billion for ongoing repurchases.³⁶

Buying back stock at prevailing depressed multiples (sub-7x EV/EBITDA) is a mathematically superior allocation of capital compared to holding low-yielding cash balances or engaging in expensive acquisitions. This systematic reduction in the share count provides a mechanical floor to Earnings Per Share (EPS) growth, even in years where top-line revenue is flat.

Capital Allocation Action	2020	2021	2024	2025 (YTD Q3)
Dividends Paid per Share (MXN)	$5.64	$5.20	$5.76	$5.40 (YTD)
Shares Repurchased (Millions)	15.8m	16.3m	8.6m	14.0m
Capital Deployed in Buybacks (USD)	$150m	$186m	$153m	$243m
% of Outstanding Shares Retired	~3.6%	~3.8%	2.4%	3.9%

Data sourced from company filings and investor presentations.³

Balance Sheet and Leverage

The financial position of the enterprise is fortified and highly conservative. Following a period of elevated leverage post-ADM buyout in 2013 (where Net Debt/EBITDA breached 3.0x), management ruthlessly directed cash flows toward debt reduction.³¹ By the third quarter of 2025, total debt stood at US456 million, resulting in a Net Debt to EBITDA multiple of just 1.2x.⁶

The debt maturity profile is exceptionally well-structured. The bulk of the debt consists of long-term Senior Notes due in 2034 ($500 million) and 2054 ($300 million), locking in fixed interest rates of 5.39% and 5.76%, respectively.⁷ This extended maturity profile eliminates near-term refinancing risk. Approximately 68% of the debt is USD-denominated, aligning naturally with the primary cash flows generated by Gruma USA, thereby creating a natural currency hedge on the balance sheet.⁶ This is a phenomenally strong balance sheet for a highly stable, cash-generative consumer staples business, providing total immunity against credit market shocks and offering vast optionality for future capital deployment.

Ownership and Governance

Gruma is fundamentally a family-controlled enterprise. The founding González family, led by Chairman and CEO Juan Antonio González Moreno, controls approximately 52% to 55% of the outstanding equity.³⁹ While concentrated family ownership can occasionally pose governance risks to minority shareholders regarding related-party transactions or board entrenchment, the empirical evidence in Gruma’s case suggests a powerful alignment of economic interests. The family’s vast wealth is entirely tethered to the long-term equity value of the enterprise, incentivizing the exact behaviors observed over the past decade: prudent capital expenditure, rigorous margin protection, debt reduction, and aggressive share repurchases that benefit all shareholders equally.

V. Risks, Headwinds, and Recent Developments (2024-2026)

While the fundamental quality of the business is exceptionally high, an objective analysis must quantify the material risks and near-term headwinds confronting the enterprise.

1. The COFECE Antitrust Resolution (Mexico)

The most severe existential threat to Gruma’s Mexican profitability materialized in late 2024. In October 2024, the Investigative Authority of Mexico’s Federal Economic Competition Commission (COFECE) issued a preliminary ruling stating that Gruma operated without effective competition in the nixtamalized corn flour market. The authority proposed a draconian structural remedy: forcing Gruma to divest five production plants, along with their associated distribution fleets and sales forces, to artificially manufacture competition.¹⁶ This structural intervention threatened to permanently impair GIMSA’s economies of scale and operating leverage.

However, a definitive and highly favorable resolution was achieved in January 2026. The COFECE Plenary formally approved alternative measures proposed by Gruma, permanently ruling out any forced asset divestments.⁴² In exchange for maintaining its physical infrastructure intact, Gruma committed to behavioral remedies, primarily the elimination of exclusivity clauses and minimum purchase requirements for local tortilla shops.⁴²

This resolution is a massive victory for the enterprise. While the removal of exclusivity clauses may theoretically invite marginal competition at the local level, Gruma’s absolute cost advantage in industrial milling ensures that new or existing competitors cannot systematically undercut its pricing without destroying their own unit economics. The structural moat remains entirely intact, and a massive regulatory overhang has been permanently removed from the stock.

2. U.S. Foodservice Contraction and Consumer Sentiment

The most pressing operational headwind is the persistent weakness in the U.S. foodservice channel. Throughout 2024 and 2025, restrictive monetary policy, cumulative inflation, and subsequent declines in consumer discretionary income led to reduced foot traffic in the restaurant and institutional catering sectors.⁶ This resulted in a 2% volume contraction for Gruma USA in late 2024 and early 2025.⁶ While management anticipates a gradual recovery in 2026, any macroeconomic recession in the United States would disproportionately impact the higher-margin institutional volumes. Gruma has attempted to mitigate this by relying on the resilience of its retail “Better for You” portfolio, but total volume elasticity remains a tangible risk to top-line growth.

3. U.S. Trade Policy and the 2026 USMCA Review

As a cross-border entity, Gruma is theoretically exposed to the volatile trade policies of the U.S. administration. The impending 2026 review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) introduces a layer of geopolitical uncertainty, particularly concerning threats of blanket tariffs on Mexican exports.⁴⁴

However, a critical analysis of Gruma’s operational footprint reveals that this risk is largely mitigated, if not entirely optical. Gruma USA operates domestically within the United States, utilizing U.S.-grown corn to produce tortillas in U.S.-based manufacturing facilities. The company is not merely exporting finished goods from Mexico across the border; it is a localized domestic manufacturer in its largest market. While aggressive cross-border tariffs could complicate the transfer of proprietary machinery, administrative services, or specific specialized inputs, the core revenue and profit engine of Gruma USA is fundamentally insulated from border taxation.

4. Commodity and Foreign Exchange Volatility

As a processor of agricultural inputs, Gruma is constantly exposed to the price volatility of corn and wheat. In late 2025, rising corn costs in Mexico directly pressured GIMSA’s EBITDA, driving a 4% decline in the third quarter despite flat volumes.⁶ While Gruma has a strong track record of utilizing financial hedging and passing costs through to consumers via price increases, there is inevitably a lag effect that can compress margins in specific quarters.

Concurrently, because Gruma reports its consolidated financials in U.S. dollars (and previously in Mexican Pesos), currency translation effects introduce massive optical volatility. The depreciation of the Mexican Peso against the dollar in 2024 mechanically reduced consolidated reported revenues, masking the underlying organic growth of the Mexican operations.¹ Investors must continuously separate this optical foreign exchange noise from the core unit economic performance of the underlying business.

VI. Valuation Context

A critical assessment of intrinsic value relies on comparing the firm’s fundamental financial architecture to the expectations currently embedded in its market price. Based on available financial data through late 2025 and early 2026, Gruma trades at highly depressed multiples relative to both its own historical baseline and its global consumer staples peers.

Historical Valuation Multiples: Gruma currently trades at an Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple of approximately 6.7x to 6.8x.⁴⁶ This represents a discount to its 3-year and 5-year historical average of roughly 6.9x, and a stark compression from peak historical multiples that occasionally breached the 10x threshold during periods of unbridled optimism regarding U.S. demographic growth. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio currently sits in the highly compressed 11.9x to 12.3x range.¹

Furthermore, given the high cash conversion of EBITDA to Operating Cash Flow and the disciplined CAPEX ceiling, the business generates exceptional free cash flow. Based on an Enterprise Value of approximately $7.6 billion and robust FCF generation (frequently exceeding $500 million annually), the EV/FCF multiple hovers around 16.5x, implying a highly attractive structural free cash flow yield for a dominant CPG enterprise.²⁹

Comparative Peer Analysis:

When benchmarked against direct competitors and equivalent CPG entities, the valuation discrepancy is glaring.

• Grupo Bimbo: A direct Mexican-domiciled bakery competitor with inferior operating margins and lower Returns on Invested Capital, Bimbo commands an EV/EBITDA multiple closer to 8.5x-9.0x and P/E ratios frequently exceeding 20x.⁴⁷
• U.S. Branded Peers: U.S.-based peers such as Flowers Foods (FLO) trade at approximately 11.2x EV/EBITDA. Diversified global giants like General Mills and Hershey routinely command mid-to-high teens EV/EBITDA multiples.⁴⁶

Company	Domicile	EV/EBITDA	P/E Ratio	ROE
Gruma S.A.B. de C.V.	Mexico	~6.7x	~12.0x	~27.1%
Grupo Bimbo	Mexico	~8.5x	~22.5x	~14.6%
Flowers Foods (FLO)	USA	~11.2x	~17.8x	~20.5%
General Mills (GIS)	USA	~12.0x+	~15.0x+	~22.0%

Data aggregated from comparative financial platforms as of early 2026.²⁶ Note: Specific multiples fluctuate daily based on market pricing.

Embedded Market Expectations:

The current valuation of 6.7x EV/EBITDA implies highly pessimistic, if not actively distressed, market expectations. The stock is being priced as a zero-growth, commoditized industrial asset rather than a branded CPG manufacturer generating a 27% ROE and maintaining a mid-teens spread over its cost of capital.

The market appears to be perpetually applying a severe “domicile discount” due to the company’s Mexican headquarters, alongside lingering, albeit outdated, fears regarding the now-resolved COFECE antitrust investigation and geopolitical noise surrounding U.S.-Mexico trade relations. If Gruma merely maintains its current profitability architecture and executes low single-digit top-line growth (3-4%), the current entry multiple offers a highly asymmetric risk-reward profile. This is particularly true when augmented by the aggressive share repurchase program, which is mechanically forcing up per-share metrics by retiring nearly 4% of the float annually at depressed valuations.

VII. Summary of Key Findings

An exhaustive, evidence-based analysis of Gruma S.A.B. de C.V. yields the following definitive conclusions:

1. A Durable Competitive Advantage Exists: Gruma possesses a formidable and highly defensible economic moat. This advantage is derived from absolute global scale in corn procurement, proprietary and patented vertical integration in milling technology, dominant brand equity in the U.S. (“Better for You” segment), and an irreplaceable Direct-Store-Delivery (DSD) network that locks out warehouse-reliant competitors. This moat is empirically verified by the firm’s superior financial performance, specifically a sustained ROIC of ~16-21% against a WACC of ~9.6%, and structural operating margin expansion to over 14%.

2. Growth is Maturing but Sustainable: The hyper-growth phase of Hispanic demographic expansion in the U.S. is concluding, and recent macroeconomic headwinds have stalled foodservice volumes. However, organic revenue growth of 3% to 5% is highly sustainable over the medium term, driven by pricing power, the continued premiumization of the U.S. retail portfolio, and aggressive geographic expansion in under-penetrated markets across Europe, Asia, and Oceania.

3. Capital Allocation is Exceptional: Management has proven to be highly rational, disciplined, and fully aligned with minority shareholders. Capital expenditures are strictly controlled to maintain high ROIC. Value-destroying M&A has been aggressively avoided for over a decade. Excess free cash flow is systematically routed toward massive, highly accretive share repurchases (retiring up to 3.9% of the float annually) and a safe, reliable dividend. The balance sheet is heavily fortified, with Net Debt/EBITDA sitting at a conservative 1.2x.

4. Catastrophic Risks Have Been Neutralized: The most severe regulatory risk to the enterprise—the potential forced divestiture of five Mexican production plants orchestrated by the COFECE antitrust authority—was formally avoided in January 2026 through negotiated behavioral remedies. While standard operational risks regarding commodity inflation and U.S. trade policy persist, Gruma’s localized U.S. production footprint heavily insulates its core cash engine from cross-border tariffs.

5. The Valuation is Dislocated from Fundamentals: At ~6.7x EV/EBITDA and a ~12x P/E ratio, the market is pricing Gruma at a severe discount to its historical baseline and its inferior, lower-margin peers. The valuation implies a permanent impairment of growth or regulatory destruction that the operational data entirely refutes. The enterprise represents a high-quality, wide-moat compounder that is currently trading at the multiple of a distressed commodity processor.

Frequently Asked Questions

General Questions

• What thoughtful questions have other investors asked about this company? Recent institutional investor inquiries have focused on three main topics: the effectiveness of the company’s strategy to recover market share in the U.S., the long-term business impact of the finalized antitrust agreement with Mexico’s competition authority (COFECE), and the specifics regarding the company’s increased share repurchase program for 2026.

Cyclicality & Earnings Nature

• Are earnings at a cyclical high or cyclical low? Earnings are not highly cyclical as Gruma is a consumer staples business. However, operating margins currently face slight near-term headwinds (guided 40-60 basis points of contraction for 2026) due to recent weakness in the U.S. foodservice channel and higher domestic corn costs in Mexico.
• Are earnings driven primarily by the external environment or internal company actions? Both. External factors like global corn and wheat prices, FX volatility (USD/MXN), and macroeconomic consumer sentiment heavily influence costs and volumes [],. However, internal actions—specifically product mix premiumization (the “Better for You” line), manufacturing automation, and strict cost controls—are the primary drivers of the company’s structural margin expansion.
• How stable are revenues? Revenues are highly stable. The company has grown net sales at a 7% CAGR from 2021 through 2025, supported by the resilience of staple food consumption.
• Outlook for the company’s products and services? The outlook is robust. Tortillas are transcending traditional Hispanic demographics to become a mainstream, versatile staple globally, displacing traditional bread in many markets.
• How big will this market be? Is it growing? Shrinking? Domestic or international? The global tortilla market was valued between US$45.4 billion and US$48.2 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to over US$70 billion to US$75 billion by 2032/2033, exhibiting a CAGR of roughly 5.1% to 5.6%. This growth is heavily international, driven by expansion in the U.S., Europe, and Asia.

Business Quality & Competitive Moat

• Is the industry getting more or less competitive? Competition remains intense, particularly from local and artisanal producers who can offer fresh products and constraint the pricing power of larger manufacturers. However, at the industrial scale, the market remains moderately concentrated among a few heavyweights like Gruma, Bimbo, and General Mills.
• How profitable is this business? What is the return on capital invested? Return on equity? The business is highly profitable. As of late 2025, Gruma generated a Return on Equity (ROE) of 27.15%. Its Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) stands at 16.48%, maintaining a wide spread over its estimated 9.58% cost of capital.
• Are there a lot of competitors? What are the barriers to entry? There are many regional competitors (e.g., Olé Mexican Foods, La Tortilla Factory) and large conglomerates (Grupo Bimbo, Flowers Foods). Barriers to entry are virtually non-existent at the local artisanal level but are massive at the national scale due to the capital required for industrial milling, baking, and operating a massive Direct-Store-Delivery (DSD) logistics network.
• Can this business be easily understood? Yes, the business model is highly straightforward: Gruma purchases raw corn and wheat, mills it into flour, and bakes it into tortillas, wraps, and snacks for retail and B2B distribution.
• Can this company be undermined by foreign, low-cost labor? No. Fresh tortillas have a short shelf life and must be produced close to the end consumer. Gruma mitigates labor costs by manufacturing domestically within its end markets (e.g., operating dozens of plants across the U.S. and Europe) rather than relying on cross-border shipping for finished goods.
• Do brands matter? Yes, significantly. The “Mission” brand in the U.S. and Europe, and the “Maseca” brand in Mexico, carry massive brand equity, allowing Gruma to command premium pricing, particularly in the health-oriented segments.
• What is the nature of competition? Competition is fought over supermarket shelf space, product freshness (where DSD distribution is key), and rapid innovation in health-conscious formulations like gluten-free or low-carb tortillas.
• What are the customers switching costs? For retail consumers, switching costs are zero. For Mexican tortilla shops (tortillerías), switching costs are high; COFECE noted Gruma historically provided proprietary equipment tied to exclusivity agreements , though this practice is being phased out under recent regulatory settlements.

Financial Condition & Balance Sheet

• Does the company have assets that are not fully recognized in the balance sheet? Yes. Gruma holds nearly 150 patents and industrial designs for its proprietary nixtamalization processes and tortilla manufacturing equipment.
• What off-balance sheet liabilities does the company have? As of mid-2025, Gruma reported approximately US$393 million in operating leases that are not included in its primary debt figures. Outside of leases, the company has explicitly stated it does not have material off-balance sheet arrangements.
• How conservative is the company’s accounting? The company adheres strictly to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and employs conservative debt classification.
• How CapEx hungry is this business? It is moderately capital intensive. Management guides for roughly US$220 million to US$233 million in annual CapEx , which equates to roughly 3.5% of total revenues and is easily funded by internal operating cash flow.

Capital Allocation & Management

• How much free cash flow does the business generate? How does management use this free cash flow? What is their philosophy? The business generates exceptional cash flow, recording approximately US$554 million in trailing Free Cash Flow by late 2025. Management’s philosophy is to aggressively return excess cash to shareholders while maintaining low leverage (1.2x Net Debt/EBITDA).
• Has the company made any significant acquisitions recently? No. Gruma’s recent growth strategy has been predominantly organic, focusing on Greenfield facility expansions in places like Yucatán, Puebla, Indiana, and China.
• Is the company buying back shares? Yes, aggressively. The company repurchased 8.6 million shares in 2024 (2.4% of float) and accelerated this in 2025, buying back 14.0 million shares (3.9% of float) for US$243 million by the third quarter alone.
• Does the company issue large amounts of new shares to insiders?
  No. There is no evidence of meaningful shareholder dilution; the share count has been steadily declining due to the massive buyback program.
• What are the motivations of management? Management is highly aligned with minority shareholders. The founding González family, led by Chairman and CEO Juan Antonio González Moreno, beneficially owns roughly 52% to 55% of the outstanding equity.

Valuation & Market Data

• Is the stock an ADR? MLP? K-1? The primary listing is in Mexico (BMV: GRUMAB). In the U.S., it trades as an unsponsored ADR on the OTC markets under the tickers GMKKY and GPAGF [],. It is not an MLP and does not issue a K-1.
• Dividend Policy? Gruma pays a regular, stable cash dividend. For 2025 and 2026, the company maintained an annualized payout of MXN 5.76 per share (paid quarterly at MXN 1.44). The payout ratio is conservative at roughly 18% of earnings.
• Is net income diverging from cash from operations? No. Earnings quality is high. For the trailing twelve months ending late 2025, Gruma reported net earnings of US$519.2 million and generated US$554.1 million in Free Cash Flow , indicating excellent cash conversion.

Risks & Downside

• What factors would cause the stock to decline? The primary near-term risks are continued weakness in U.S. consumer sentiment depressing higher-margin foodservice volumes, spikes in Mexican corn prices squeezing GIMSA’s margins, and adverse foreign exchange translations (a weaker Peso lowers consolidated USD-reported earnings) [], ,.
• What is the risk of a catastrophic loss / total loss? Extremely low. The company operates a heavily entrenched consumer staples monopoly/duopoly, maintains a very healthy balance sheet with no near-term debt walls (major maturities in 2034 and 2054), and consistently generates half a billion dollars in free cash flow annually.

Recent News & Events

• Has the business environment changed recently?
  The U.S. foodservice segment has faced contraction due to macroeconomic headwinds, forcing Gruma to lean heavier on its retail channel and promotional discounting.
• Recent changes in the business, new markets, new production facilities, what’s changed recently? In January 2026, Gruma successfully resolved a major overhang when COFECE (Mexico’s antitrust authority) approved alternative behavioral measures, formally ruling out any forced divestitures of Gruma’s Mexican production plants. Operationally, Gruma recently opened a new $89 million plant in Yucatán, a $46.5 million snack plant in Puebla, expanded capacity in Indiana, and is ramping up a new facility in China ,.

Works cited

1. Presentación de PowerPoint, accessed February 28, 2026, https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/67048dee5ae1c6934497f085/682cbda409aa61cd0eaa7688_GRUMA%20-%20Annual%20Report%202024.pdf
2. What is Competitive Landscape of Gruma Company? – MatrixBCG.com, accessed February 28, 2026, https://matrixbcg.com/blogs/competitors/gruma
3. Investor Presentation, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/729780/investor_presentation_3q25.pdf
4. 1 Ryan Albert Company – Columbia Business School, accessed February 28, 2026, https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/imce-uploads/Gruma_VI%20with%20Legends%20Pitch_Ryan%20Albert%206-15-21.pdf
5. GRUMA is the World´s Largest Corn Flour and Tortilla Producer with, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/721271/investor_presentation_3q23v.pdf
6. EARNINGS RELEASE, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/729774/3q25-gruma.pdf
7. IMPORTANT NOTICE THIS OFFERING IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/727178/offering_memorandum_notes_2024.pdf
8. GRUMA REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2019 RESULTS, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gimsa.com/media/691160/2q19-gruma.pdf
9. Tortilla Market Size, Share & Growth – ReAnIn, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.reanin.com/reports/tortilla-market
10. Tortilla Market Value and Forecast to 2026-2033, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/market-research/tortilla-market.asp
11. Tortilla Market Consumption Trends: Growth Analysis 2026-2034, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/tortilla-380250
12. Gruma Sab De Cv – Company Profile Report – IBISWorld, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/company/gruma-sab-de-cv/9271/
13. What is Competitive Landscape of Gruma Company?, accessed February 28, 2026, https://pestel-analysis.com/blogs/competitors/gruma
14. Sector Trend Analysis – Bakery products in the United States, accessed February 28, 2026, https://agriculture.canada.ca/en/international-trade/market-intelligence/reports-and-guides/sector-trend-analysis-bakery-products-united-states
15. Tortilla Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2024-2028 – Technavio, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.technavio.com/report/tortilla-market-size-industry-analysis
16. Investigative Authority finds that Gruma must sell 5 production plants, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.cofece.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Cofece-040-2024_ENG.pdf
17. What is Brief History of Gruma Company? – Matrix BCG, accessed February 28, 2026, https://matrixbcg.com/blogs/brief-history/gruma
18. GRUMA, S.A. DE C.V. – SEC.gov, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1053947/000095012303007702/y87963e20vf.htm
19. Gruma (GRUMA) Investor Relations, Earnings Summary & Outlook, accessed February 28, 2026, https://quartr.com/companies/gruma-s-a-b-de-c-v_18654
20. NAD Recommends Modifications on Tortilla Packaging, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.shb.com/intelligence/newsletters/fblu/2024/fblu-828
21. NAD Recommends Modifications on Tortilla Packaging – JD Supra, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/nad-recommends-modifications-on-7075762/
22. Stay ADvised: 2024, Issue 20 | Davis Wright Tremaine, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.dwt.com/insights/2024/10/stay-advised-brand-protection-october-17
23. US7220443B2 – Method for making instant masa – Google Patents, accessed February 28, 2026, https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220443B2/en
24. Nixtamalization process and products produced therefrom, accessed February 28, 2026, https://patents.google.com/patent/US7740895B2/en
25. GrumaB de CV (MEX:GRUMAB) ROIC % – GuruFocus, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gurufocus.com/term/roic/MEX:GRUMAB
26. Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. – ROE – Wisesheets, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.wisesheets.io/roe/GRUMAB.MX
27. GRUMA REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2015 RESULTS, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/609885/1q15-gruma.pdf
28. EARNINGS RELEASE, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/729268/2q25-gruma.pdf
29. Gruma. de (OTCPK:GMKK.Y) – Earnings & Revenue Performance, accessed February 28, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/food-beverage-tobacco/otc-gmkk.y/gruma-de/past
30. GRUMA REPORTS FOURTH QUARTER 2015 RESULTS, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/650731/4q15-gruma.pdf
31. i . company overview, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/28432/gruma-oct-2013.pdf
32. What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of Gruma Company?, accessed February 28, 2026, https://pestel-analysis.com/blogs/growth-strategy/gruma
33. EARNINGS RELEASE, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/727978/1q25-gruma.pdf
34. EARNINGS RELEASE, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/724638/4q24-gruma.pdf
35. Gruma SAB de CV Class B – WKN 915731, ISIN MXP4948K1056, accessed February 28, 2026, https://divvydiary.com/en/gruma-sab-de-cv-stock-MXP4948K1056
36. GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V., accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/728212/proposal_summary_agoa_gruma_april_25__2025.pdf
37. Gruma. de (BMV:GRUMA B) Dividend Yield, History and Growth, accessed February 28, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/mx/food-beverage-tobacco/bmv-gruma-b/gruma-de-shares/dividend
38. Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V. Dividends | GRUMAB.MX – MLQ.ai, accessed February 28, 2026, https://mlq.ai/stocks/GRUMAB.MX/dividends/
39. Who Owns Gruma Company? – MatrixBCG.com, accessed February 28, 2026, https://matrixbcg.com/blogs/owners/gruma
40. GRUMA, S.A.B. DE C.V., accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gruma.com/media/719568/reporte_anual_gruma_2022_ingl_s_-_versi_n_final_con_anexos.pdf
41. Gruma, SAB de CV’s (BMV:GRUMAB) market cap increased by Mex, accessed February 28, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/mx/food-beverage-tobacco/bmv-gruma-b/gruma-de-shares/news/gruma-sab-de-cvs-bmvgrumab-market-cap-increased-by-mex44b-in
42. Gruma – BBVA Market Strategy, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.bbvamarketstrategy.com/companies/gruma/
43. Mauricio Hernandez Prida – BBVA Market Strategy, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.bbvamarketstrategy.com/author/mauricio-hernandez-prida/
44. Mexico’s Economy Under US Tariffs and Trade Uncertainty, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/mexicos-economy-under-us-tariffs-and-trade-uncertainty
45. USMCA Review 2026 – CSIS, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.csis.org/analysis/usmca-review-2026
46. GRUMAB EV/EBITDA – Gruma SAB de CV – Alpha Spread, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/bmv/grumab/relative-valuation/ratio/enterprise-value-to-ebitda
47. Gruma. de Valuation – Simply Wall St, accessed February 28, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/mx/food-beverage-tobacco/bmv-gruma-b/gruma-de-shares/valuation
48. Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V EV Multiples | GRUMAB.MX – MLQ.ai, accessed February 28, 2026, https://mlq.ai/stocks/GRUMAB.MX/ev-multiples/
49. Grupo Bimbo, S.A.B. De C.V. Compare against Competitors, accessed February 28, 2026, https://ng.investing.com/pro/BMV:BIMBOA/compare/BMV:GRUMAB,OTCPK:ASBFF,BMV:SJM*,BMV:TSN*,BMV:HRL*,NYSE:FLO