I. Executive Summary

Investment Thesis Synopsis

This report initiates coverage of Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) with a cautiously optimistic outlook. DRS presents a compelling investment case as a technologically differentiated, pure-play U.S. mid-tier defense contractor. The company is strategically positioned to capitalize on secular tailwinds in U.S. defense spending, particularly within high-priority areas such as naval modernization, advanced sensing, and network-centric warfare. Its robust organic revenue growth, expanding profitability, and a record contract backlog of $8.6 billion provide exceptional multi-year revenue visibility and de-risk near-term forecasts. The recent initiation of a capital return program signals strong management confidence in sustainable free cash flow generation.

However, this positive outlook is tempered by several key risks that warrant careful consideration. The company’s valuation on a trailing basis appears elevated, pricing in a high degree of execution success. Furthermore, DRS exhibits significant customer concentration, with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) accounting for the vast majority of its revenue, making it highly sensitive to shifts in budgetary priorities. Finally, its status as a majority-owned subsidiary of the Italian defense prime Leonardo S.p.A. introduces a layer of strategic complexity and potential constraints on its autonomy that may not be present for its peers. The analysis concludes that while the long-term fundamentals are strong, investors should closely monitor program execution, margin trends, and the demand pipeline to validate the current market valuation.

Key Findings Summary

• Strategic Positioning: DRS is a key supplier of mission-critical systems with strong incumbency in defensible niches, most notably in naval electric power and propulsion for the U.S. Navy’s highest-priority platforms and in advanced electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) sensing technologies.
• Favorable Industry Dynamics: The company is operating within a “defense spending supercycle,” fueled by heightened geopolitical tensions and a strategic pivot by the U.S. DoD towards countering near-peer adversaries. This has created sustained demand for the modernization and technological enhancement of military capabilities.
• Defensible Competitive Moat: DRS benefits from significant barriers to entry inherent in the defense industry, including stringent regulatory and cybersecurity requirements, high capital costs, and the critical importance of past performance. Its decades-long relationship with the DoD and the high switching costs associated with its deeply integrated technologies create a durable competitive advantage.
• Robust Financial Performance and Visibility: The company has demonstrated strong, mid-teens organic revenue growth, driven by accelerating demand. A book-to-bill ratio of 1.3x for fiscal year 2024 and a record backlog provide a clear and reliable pathway to future revenue growth, lending high confidence to management’s financial forecasts.
• Valuation Considerations: While trailing valuation multiples appear high, they become more reasonable when viewed in the context of the company’s strong forward growth profile, expanding margins, and strategic alignment with well-funded DoD priorities. The valuation reflects a premium for quality and visibility but leaves little room for execution error.

II. Company Overview & Business Model

Core Business and Market Position

Leonardo DRS, Inc. is a leading U.S.-based defense technology company that develops and manufactures a broad portfolio of advanced products and integrated systems for military forces, intelligence agencies, and defense prime contractors.¹ Founded in 1969 and headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, the company has established itself as a critical mid-tier contractor within the U.S. defense industrial base.⁴

The company’s overarching strategy is to achieve a balanced and diversified business model with leading technical and market positions in areas designated as high-priority by the U.S. Department of Defense.⁶ This focus has resulted in a deep and concentrated relationship with its primary customer; the U.S. government, with the DoD as the end-user for approximately 85% of its business.⁶ This customer concentration is a defining feature of the company’s risk and reward profile.

Business Segments Deep Dive

DRS organizes its operations into two technology-driven reporting segments: Advanced Sensing and Computing (ASC) and Integrated Mission Systems (IMS).⁶

Advanced Sensing and Computing (ASC)

The ASC segment is the company’s larger division, focused on providing the critical “eyes and ears” of the modern battlefield. It designs and manufactures a wide array of technologies that enable sensing, processing, and networking of battlefield information to provide U.S. forces with real-time situational awareness and enhanced decision-making capabilities.⁶

• Key Products and Capabilities: The segment’s portfolio is extensive and includes third-generation forward-looking infrared (FLIR) sensors, long-range threat detection systems, and advanced targeting solutions for ground vehicles.⁶ It is also a leader in aircraft survivability systems, producing quantum cascade lasers and two-color infrared missile warning sensors that protect aircraft from missile attacks.⁶ These sensing capabilities are complemented by a robust portfolio of rugged, cyber-resilient network computing products, including battle management systems and hardware for ground vehicles and naval platforms.⁶
• Financial Contribution: In the second quarter of 2025, the ASC segment generated revenues of $542 million, accounting for approximately 65% of the company’s total revenue. The segment’s adjusted EBITDA margin was 10.7%.¹⁰ Notably, the margin contracted by 50 basis points year-over-year, a development the company attributed to higher internal research and development investment and a less favorable program mix.¹⁰

Integrated Mission Systems (IMS)

The IMS segment serves as a systems integrator, providing critical force protection, vehicle integration, and, most significantly, naval power and propulsion systems.⁵ This segment often utilizes a “best available” technology approach, integrating both internally produced products and externally sourced solutions to meet customer needs.⁹

• Key Products and Capabilities: A cornerstone of the IMS segment is its leadership in next-generation electric power and propulsion for the U.S. Navy. DRS provides the complete electric propulsion system for the Columbia Class ballistic missile submarine, the Navy’s top modernization priority.⁶ This builds on a multi-decade legacy of supplying power components for nearly all U.S. naval combat vessels.⁶ The segment also produces advanced force protection systems, including counter-drone solutions and the Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) system for the U.S. Army.⁶
• Financial Contribution: For the second quarter of 2025, the IMS segment reported revenues of $290 million. Its financial performance was exceptionally strong, with adjusted EBITDA margin expanding by a significant 290 basis points year-over-year to 13.1%.¹⁰ This robust profitability was driven primarily by the strong execution and favorable performance of its electric power and propulsion programs.¹⁰

The divergence in profitability between the two segments points to a crucial strategic dynamic. The IMS segment is currently harvesting the rewards of its long-term, incumbent position on mature, high-priority production programs like the Columbia Class submarine. This program, a cornerstone of U.S. nuclear deterrence, provides a stable, high-margin revenue stream. In contrast, the ASC segment’s margin contraction reflects a deliberate investment phase. The higher R&D spending is directed at developing the next generation of sensing, computing, and electronic warfare technologies that are expected to become the high-margin programs of the future. This dynamic represents a classic product lifecycle strategy: leveraging the cash flows from mature programs to fund innovation and secure the company’s long-term competitive positioning. Consequently, the ASC margin should be monitored not as a sign of current weakness, but as a leading indicator of future growth potential. A key catalyst for the stock will be the successful transition of these R&D-intensive programs into full-rate production, which would unlock significant margin expansion for the ASC segment.

The Leonardo S.p.A. Nexus: A Strategic Symbiosis with Constraints

Leonardo DRS’s corporate structure is unique among its U.S. peers. While it trades independently on the NASDAQ, it is a majority-owned subsidiary of Leonardo S.p.A., a global aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Italy, which holds approximately 72% of DRS’s common stock.⁷ The Italian government is the largest shareholder of Leonardo S.p.A., with a 30.2% stake.¹⁵

This foreign ownership necessitates a special arrangement to allow DRS to perform sensitive, classified work for the U.S. government. The company operates under a proxy agreement with the DoD to mitigate any potential Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI).⁷ Under this agreement, the voting rights of the shares held by Leonardo S.p.A. are exercised by a board of independent proxy holders who are U.S. citizens and have been approved by the DoD.⁷ This structure is a critical component of the company’s competitive moat, as it allows DRS to function as a trusted domestic contractor while benefiting from the global scale and resources of its parent.

However, this arrangement is not without significant constraints. The proxy agreement and a related cooperation agreement grant Leonardo S.p.A. consent rights over major strategic decisions.⁷ These include the sale or acquisition of assets above a certain threshold (2% of revenue for a single transaction), the incurrence of debt that would cause the company to exceed a target leverage ratio, and any mergers or reorganizations.⁷ This creates a “strategic ceiling” on DRS’s autonomy. While CEO William Lynn has identified inorganic growth through M&A as a key priority for capital allocation, any large, transformative deal would require the approval of its parent company.¹⁶ Leonardo S.p.A., as a global entity with its own complex capital needs across diverse segments like helicopters and aircraft, may have strategic priorities that differ from those of DRS’s minority shareholders.¹⁴ This could lead to a situation where a value-creating acquisition for DRS is vetoed due to the parent company’s broader strategic or financial considerations. This constrained autonomy is a key risk and likely contributes to a valuation discount relative to what a fully independent DRS might command.

III. Industry Dynamics & Market Environment

The New Defense Spending Supercycle

Leonardo DRS is operating in a highly favorable macroeconomic environment for the defense industry. A confluence of geopolitical events has ushered in what many analysts describe as a new “defense spending supercycle,” characterized by a prolonged period of elevated military budgets globally.¹⁷ World military expenditure reached a new high of $2.46 trillion in 2024, a significant real-terms increase driven by a sharply deteriorating global security landscape.¹⁸

The primary drivers of this trend are the ongoing war in Ukraine and the intensifying strategic competition between the United States and China.¹⁷ In response, nations across Europe and Asia are aggressively increasing their defense investments.¹⁸ European defense spending, in particular, is set to grow at an estimated 6.8% annually through 2035, a rate that significantly outpaces projected growth in the U.S., Russia, or China.¹⁷ This surge in international demand creates a substantial growth opportunity for U.S. defense contractors with exportable products and strong allied relationships.

U.S. Defense Spending and Budget Priorities

The U.S. remains the world’s largest defense spender, with a proposed DoD budget for fiscal year (FY) 2025 of approximately $850 billion.²⁰ While this represents a slight decrease in inflation-adjusted terms, it remains at a historically high level. The Fiscal Responsibility Act has established a total national defense spending cap of $895 billion for FY2025, providing a degree of certainty to the top-line figure.²² However, the appropriations process remains subject to political headwinds, with the frequent use of Continuing Resolutions (CRs) posing a risk of delays to new program starts and creating funding inefficiencies.²⁰

Current DoD budget priorities are well-aligned with DRS’s core competencies. There is a strong, bipartisan focus on modernizing the U.S. nuclear deterrent, which provides durable support for the Columbia Class submarine program, DRS’s largest single platform.¹² Other key priorities include improving military readiness, recapitalizing aging equipment, and investing in next-generation technologies to maintain an advantage over near-peer competitors.²³

Pivotal Technology Megatrends

The character of modern warfare is being fundamentally reshaped by rapid technological advancements, creating a demand for new capabilities that DRS is positioned to provide.¹⁹

• Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation: AI is being integrated across all domains for applications such as intelligence analysis, autonomous navigation, predictive maintenance, and command and control. The global market for AI in aerospace and defense is projected to more than double, from approximately $28 billion today to $65 billion by 2034.²⁶
• Cybersecurity and Electronic Warfare (EW): The increasing digitization of military systems has made the electromagnetic spectrum and cyberspace critical warfighting domains. Protecting networks and controlling the spectrum are paramount, with projected investment in military cybersecurity expected to reach $23 billion in 2024.²⁵ DRS offers specific technologies in EW and cyber systems.⁶
• Unmanned Systems and Counter-UAS (C-UAS): The proliferation of inexpensive but highly effective unmanned aerial systems (drones) has made developing robust counter-UAS capabilities a top priority for the DoD. Effective C-UAS requires an integrated system of sensors (radar, EO/IR) and effectors, an area where DRS is actively demonstrating new solutions.¹

The confluence of these trends is driving a shift toward “data-centric warfare”.²⁷ The ability to collect vast amounts of data from a distributed network of sensors, process that data in real-time using AI, and securely disseminate it to decision-makers is becoming the central pillar of modern military doctrine. This elevates the strategic importance of the very technologies that form the core of DRS’s portfolio. The company is a leading supplier of the rugged, cyber-resilient computing hardware and advanced sensors that serve as the essential infrastructure for this new paradigm of warfare.⁶ As the DoD invests billions in overarching network concepts like Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), DRS’s incumbent position on thousands of ground and naval platforms provides a significant and sticky long-term growth opportunity.

Competitive Landscape

The defense industry is characterized by a tiered structure. At the top are large-scale prime contractors such as RTX and Lockheed Martin, which manage massive, complex programs.²⁹ Leonardo DRS operates in the “mid-tier,” a segment of companies that are large enough to act as prime contractors on specialized programs but also serve as critical subsystem and component suppliers to the top-tier primes.²

The company’s direct competitors are other firms specializing in defense electronics, sensors, and integrated systems. Based on business focus and market capitalization, a relevant peer group for analysis includes L3Harris (LHX), Elbit Systems (ESLT), Mercury Systems (MRCY), and Curtiss-Wright (CW).³¹ This peer group provides a benchmark for evaluating DRS’s financial performance, profitability, and market valuation.

The company’s portfolio is uniquely balanced, positioning it at the intersection of durable, long-cycle platforms and disruptive, high-growth technologies. The IMS segment provides stability through its foundational role in high-priority shipbuilding programs like the Columbia Class submarine, which are largely insulated from annual budget fluctuations due to their immense strategic importance. This provides a reliable stream of revenue and cash flow that can be used to fund the more speculative, higher-growth investments in the ASC segment. The ASC segment, in turn, is directly aligned with the most dynamic and rapidly growing areas of the defense budget, such as C-UAS, advanced sensing, and network computing. This dual-pronged structure creates a resilient business model that is less risky than that of a pure-play emerging technology firm, yet offers higher growth potential than a traditional legacy platform provider.

IV. Competitive Position & Strategic Moats

Leonardo DRS has established a strong competitive position fortified by several durable moats that protect its market share and profitability. These advantages are rooted in its technological differentiation, the formidable barriers to entry in the defense sector, and deep, long-standing customer relationships.

Technological Differentiation and Incumbency

With a history spanning over five decades, DRS has cultivated a legacy of technology leadership in several mission-critical niches.⁹ The company is a recognized market leader in electro-optical and infrared (EO/IR) sensing systems and is the sole-source provider of next-generation electric power and propulsion systems for the U.S. Navy’s most advanced submarines.⁴ A key element of its strategy is the development of “platform-agnostic” technologies, which are designed for integration across a wide variety of military platforms.⁹ This has resulted in a vast installed base, with DRS systems fielded on thousands of platforms worldwide, creating a powerful incumbency advantage. It is often significantly more practical and cost-effective for the DoD to fund upgrades and modernization of these existing DRS systems rather than designing, qualifying, and integrating a new system from a competitor.

High Barriers to Entry

The U.S. defense contracting market is exceptionally difficult for new entrants to penetrate, creating a protective moat for established players like DRS.

• Regulatory and Compliance Hurdles: The industry is governed by a labyrinth of complex regulations, most notably the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).³³ Furthermore, contractors must meet stringent and costly cybersecurity standards, such as the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), to handle sensitive government data.³⁴
• The “Valley of Death”: There exists a well-documented “valley of death” between the R&D phase and securing a large-scale, profitable production contract.³⁵ Many innovative small businesses lack the capital and resources to navigate this transition, leading to significant consolidation and a 43% decline in the number of small businesses in the defense industrial base over the past decade.³⁵
• Past Performance: Government contract awards are heavily weighted toward a bidder’s past performance.³³ This creates a significant structural advantage for incumbents like DRS, which can point to a long history of successful program execution to de-risk their proposals in the eyes of the government customer.

Customer Relationships and Switching Costs

The company’s primary competitive advantage is its deeply entrenched relationship with the U.S. DoD.⁶ These relationships, built over decades of collaboration, provide DRS with invaluable insights into customer requirements and future technology needs. This allows the company to align its internal R&D investments with the DoD’s long-range modernization plans.

Furthermore, the switching costs for many of DRS’s products are prohibitively high. A sensor suite, computing system, or propulsion motor that is designed into the fundamental architecture of a submarine, armored vehicle, or aircraft cannot be easily replaced with a competitor’s product without incurring massive redesign, testing, and requalification costs. This “designed-in” status locks in long product lifecycles and generates a predictable, high-margin stream of revenue from aftermarket services, spare parts, and technology upgrades for decades.

The company’s “mid-tier” status functions as a strategic asset. It is large and credible enough to serve as a prime contractor on specialized, technology-driven programs, as demonstrated by its marketing campaign to “Take on primes”.³⁶ At the same time, it is focused enough to be viewed as a “best-of-breed” technology partner by the top-tier prime contractors, supplying critical subsystems for their larger platforms without being perceived as a direct competitor for the overall platform contract. This unique positioning allows DRS to capture business that is too complex for small companies and too niche for the largest primes, creating a defensible and profitable market space.

Peer Benchmarking Analysis

To contextualize DRS’s market position and valuation, it is essential to compare it against a group of its closest peers in the defense electronics and systems integration space. The following table provides a snapshot of key financial and valuation metrics.

Metric	DRS	HII	KTOS	LHX	ESLT	CW
Market Cap ($B)	11.19	10.62	11.29	21.33	22.60	18.30
EV/Sales (TTM)	3.18	0.92	8.45	1.00	3.01	5.54
EV/EBITDA (TTM)	27.20	12.00	90.00	10.50	18.00	20.00
P/E (TTM)	45.67	20.27	707.07	17.70	50.00	45.00
P/E (Fwd)	37.18	18.29	128.45	16.50	25.00	35.00
Revenue Growth (YoY)	14.44%	5.00%	-14.23%	9.81%	14.28%	9.69%
Adj. EBITDA Margin (TTM)	12.37%	9.50%	1.13%	15.00%	10.00%	17.50%
Net Margin (TTM)	7.31%	5.00%	-16.48%	7.00%	4.70%	12.25%
Dividend Yield (Fwd)	0.88%	1.99%	N/A	2.10%	0.45%	0.80%

Note: Data compiled from various sources including ³¹, and.⁴³ Peer data is illustrative and based on available information, which may vary slightly across sources. TTM figures are as of the latest available reporting period.

The data shows that DRS commands a premium valuation on a P/E basis compared to larger, more diversified peers like HII and LHX, but is less expensive than high-growth story KTOS. Its revenue growth of 14.4% is strong relative to the peer group. Its profitability margins are solid and in line with many competitors, though they trail the margin leader, Curtiss-Wright.

V. Financial Performance & Growth Analysis

An examination of Leonardo DRS’s financial results reveals a company in a phase of accelerating growth, improving profitability, and strengthening future revenue visibility through a rapidly expanding contract backlog.

Revenue Growth Trajectory

DRS has demonstrated a robust and accelerating revenue growth profile in recent years. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the company reported total revenue of $3.23 billion, a significant increase of 14.4% from the $2.83 billion reported in 2023.³⁷ This followed a 4.9% growth rate in the prior year.³⁸ The momentum has continued into the current fiscal year; revenue for the trailing twelve months (TTM) ending June 30, 2025, stood at $3.42 billion, representing an 11.4% increase year-over-year.³⁷

Critically, this recent growth has been entirely organic, stemming from strong execution on existing programs and robust customer demand rather than acquisitions.³⁹ This underlying strength gave management the confidence to revise its full-year 2025 revenue guidance upward to a range of $3.525 billion to $3.600 billion, which implies a full-year growth rate of 9% to 11% over 2024’s strong results.¹⁰

Profitability and Margin Evolution

The company’s profitability has shown a clear upward trend, driven by operating leverage on higher sales volumes and improved execution on key programs.

• Gross Margin: For fiscal year 2024, DRS achieved a gross profit of $736 million on $3.23 billion of revenue, yielding a gross margin of 22.8%.⁴⁰ This is an improvement over the company’s 10-year average gross margin of 20.5%.⁴¹
• Operating Margin: The operating margin for 2024 was 8.81%, a notable expansion from 8.07% in 2023.⁴² This improvement reflects the company’s ability to control costs while growing the top line.
• Adjusted EBITDA Margin: This non-GAAP metric, which excludes items like depreciation and amortization, is a key measure of operational profitability. For the full year 2024, the adjusted EBITDA margin was 12.4% ($400 million on $3.23 billion revenue).⁴³ In the most recent quarter (Q2 2025), the margin expanded by 70 basis points year-over-year to 11.6%.¹⁰ Management’s 2025 guidance projects continued margin expansion.¹²

Cash Flow and Working Capital Management

DRS’s cash flow exhibits a seasonal pattern common in the defense industry, with a significant use of cash in the first quarter for working capital investments, followed by strong cash generation in the latter half of the year, particularly the fourth quarter.⁴³ For the full year 2024, net cash flow from operating activities was $271 million, from which the company generated $190 million in free cash flow.⁴³ For 2025, the company is targeting a free cash flow conversion rate of 80% of adjusted net earnings, indicating a focus on efficient cash management.¹² Recent cash usage has been directed toward funding working capital to support strong growth and for capital expenditures related to the construction of a new facility in South Carolina to support naval programs.¹⁰

Backlog Analysis and Revenue Visibility

The company’s contract backlog is a critical indicator of future revenue. As of the end of Q2 2025, DRS reported a total backlog of $8.6 billion, a company record and a 9% increase from the prior year.¹⁰ This substantial backlog provides approximately 2.4 years of revenue coverage based on trailing-twelve-month sales, a very healthy level that significantly enhances the predictability of future financial performance.

Even more telling is the book-to-bill ratio, which measures the value of new orders received relative to the revenue recognized during a period. A ratio above 1.0x indicates that the backlog is growing. For the full year 2024, DRS achieved an impressive book-to-bill ratio of 1.3x, signifying that new orders substantially outpaced revenues.⁴³ This strong demand signal is the most important leading indicator for the company’s future growth. While quarterly revenue figures can fluctuate, the sustained strength in new orders and the resulting backlog growth provide a clear and compelling line of sight to continued top-line expansion over the medium term. This high degree of visibility de-risks future revenue forecasts and supports the argument for a premium valuation multiple.

Table: Historical Financial Summary (2021-2025 TTM)

Fiscal Year	Revenue ($M)	Revenue Growth (%)	Gross Margin (%)	Adj. EBITDA ($M)	Adj. EBITDA Margin (%)	Net Income ($M)	Diluted EPS ($)	Op. Cash Flow ($M)	Free Cash Flow ($M)	Backlog ($B)	Book-to-Bill
2021	2,879	3.6%	19.0%	N/A	N/A	154	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
2022	2,693	-6.5%	21.4%	318	11.8%	405	N/A	N/A	N/A	4.3	1.2x
2023	2,826	4.9%	22.9%	N/A	N/A	168	$0.64	N/A	N/A	7.8	1.2x
2024	3,234	14.4%	22.8%	400	12.4%	213	$0.80	271	190	8.5	1.3x
TTM	3,421	11.4%	N/A	N/A	N/A	250	$0.93	N/A	N/A	8.6	1.1x

Note: Data compiled from.¹⁰ TTM is for the period ending June 30, 2025. Some historical GAAP/non-GAAP data points may not be directly comparable or available for all periods.

VI. Growth Opportunities & Strategic Initiatives

Leonardo DRS’s growth strategy is a well-defined combination of capitalizing on strong organic demand in its core markets, pursuing targeted inorganic growth through strategic acquisitions, expanding its international footprint, and investing in next-generation technology to maintain its competitive edge.

Key Organic Growth Drivers

The company is poised for sustained organic growth, driven by its alignment with several key DoD modernization priorities:

• Naval Modernization: The U.S. Navy’s shipbuilding plan is a cornerstone of DRS’s growth. The Columbia Class submarine program, for which DRS provides the integrated electric propulsion system, is the company’s single largest program and offers a multi-decade revenue stream.¹² To support this and future naval platforms like the next-generation DDG(X) destroyer, DRS is making significant capital investments, including the expansion of its Charleston, South Carolina manufacturing facility.¹²
• Advanced Sensing: There is persistent high demand for the company’s advanced infrared sensing technologies across multiple domains. These sensors are being designed into next-generation missile systems and are critical for ground combat vehicles and aircraft survivability suites.¹²
• Force Protection and Counter-UAS (C-UAS): The threat posed by unmanned aerial systems is driving one of the fastest-growing segments of the global defense market.⁴⁵ DRS is a key player in this space, providing the critical tactical radars and systems integration for the Army’s M-SHORAD program and developing advanced directed energy C-UAS solutions.⁴⁵
• Army Modernization: The U.S. Army is undergoing a significant modernization effort focused on network capabilities and preparing for potential conflicts in vast theaters like the Indo-Pacific. This strategy increases the demand for the network computing and long-range sensors that are central to DRS’s ASC segment.¹²

Inorganic Growth Strategy (M&A)

Management has clearly signaled that strategic M&A is a top priority for capital allocation, intended to supplement the company’s strong organic growth.¹⁶ The strategy is not to diversify broadly but to make targeted acquisitions that fill specific technology gaps within its four core markets or accelerate its entry into closely adjacent, high-growth areas like space.¹⁶

The 2022 all-stock merger with RADA Electronic Industries serves as a blueprint for this strategy.¹³ This was a strategically astute transaction that significantly enhanced DRS’s competitive posture. While DRS already possessed world-class EO/IR sensors and computing systems, RADA provided the missing piece of the puzzle for a comprehensive C-UAS solution: best-in-class, software-defined tactical radars. The combination of these technologies allows DRS to offer a more complete and integrated solution for detecting, identifying, tracking, and defeating drone threats. This move substantially expanded the company’s addressable market in one of the most dynamic defense sectors, and the full synergistic value of this combination may not yet be fully appreciated by the market.

International Expansion

DRS is actively working to increase its international sales, leveraging the global surge in defense spending. International revenue grew to 13% of total revenue in 2024, up from just 7% in 2022, with strong demand from Eastern European nations in the wake of the Ukraine conflict.⁷ The company is actively marketing its combat-proven technologies, particularly its battle management systems and C-UAS capabilities, to allied nations in Europe and the Middle East, often through partnerships with local industry.⁴⁵

Innovation Pipeline and R&D Capabilities

To maintain its technological leadership, DRS is increasing its investment in company-funded R&D, which is expected to be approximately 20 basis points of revenue higher than the prior year.¹² While this creates a near-term headwind for margins, it is a crucial long-term investment. Key areas of focus include directed energy, the application of AI and quantum technologies to sensing, and the expansion of its new Charleston facility.¹² A recent tangible result of this investment is the launch of a new, high-performance AI Processor designed to enhance situational awareness and threat detection in combat vehicles, demonstrating the company’s commitment to pushing processing capabilities to the tactical edge.¹²

VII. Capital Allocation & Financial Management

Leonardo DRS has adopted a clear and disciplined capital allocation framework designed to balance investment for growth with returning capital to shareholders. This strategy is underpinned by a strong balance sheet and a confident outlook on future cash flow generation.

Capital Allocation Priorities

At its 2024 Investor Day, management outlined a plan to deploy 75% to 100% of its free cash flow.⁴⁹ The hierarchy of priorities is clear: the primary focus is on funding value-enhancing M&A to supplement organic growth.¹⁶ This is followed by internal investments in R&D and capital expenditures to support key programs and innovation. Finally, the company has committed to returning excess capital to shareholders.¹²

Debt, Capital Structure, and Financial Flexibility

DRS maintains a robust and flexible balance sheet. As of the end of the second quarter of 2025, the company held $278 million in cash against $197 million in outstanding borrowings, resulting in a healthy net cash position.¹⁰ This provides substantial capacity for future investments. Management has indicated a willingness to use leverage for strategic acquisitions, targeting an optimal net leverage ratio of approximately 2.0x adjusted EBITDA, which implies significant additional debt capacity for the right transaction.⁴⁹

Shareholder Return Program

A significant development in 2025 was the initiation of the company’s first formal capital return program, a move that signals a new phase of maturity and financial strength.¹²

• Dividend: The company commenced a regular quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share in March 2025.¹⁰
• Share Repurchases: DRS has also begun to opportunistically repurchase its shares, buying back approximately $11 million of its common stock in the second quarter of 2025.¹⁰

The decision to initiate a dividend and buyback program is a powerful signal of management’s confidence. For a company that is simultaneously investing heavily in growth—through higher R&D and new facility construction—the commitment to return capital suggests a very high degree of conviction in the stability and predictability of future free cash flows. This confidence is likely anchored by the long-term, funded nature of its substantial contract backlog. This move could also serve to attract a broader class of “growth and income” investors to the stock, potentially expanding the shareholder base and providing a new source of support for the company’s valuation.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

A critical measure of capital efficiency is Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which assesses how effectively a company is using its capital to generate profits. DRS’s ROIC is reported to be 10.0%.⁵¹ This compares favorably to its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), which is estimated to be 8.58%.⁵² An ROIC that exceeds the WACC indicates that the company is creating economic value for its shareholders, as the returns generated by its investments are greater than the cost of financing those investments.

VIII. Recent Developments & Challenges (2023-2025)

The period from 2023 to 2025 has been transformational for Leonardo DRS, marked by its emergence as a public company, strong operational performance in the face of macroeconomic headwinds, and a steady cadence of strategic contract wins.

Corporate Developments

The most significant corporate development was the company’s public listing on the NASDAQ in November 2022.⁵⁰ This was achieved through an all-stock merger with RADA Electronic Industries, a publicly traded Israeli company specializing in tactical radars.¹³ This transaction fundamentally changed DRS’s structure from a wholly-owned subsidiary of Leonardo S.p.A. to a publicly traded entity in which Leonardo holds a majority stake.

Operational Headwinds

Like much of the industrial sector, DRS has had to navigate a challenging operating environment characterized by supply chain disruptions and significant inflation.⁷ These pressures are particularly acute for defense contractors working on long-term, fixed-price contracts, where unexpected cost increases can directly impact profitability.⁷ In recent earnings calls, management has specifically highlighted the elevated costs of key raw materials, such as germanium, which is critical for the production of its infrared sensing systems.¹¹

Despite these acknowledged headwinds, the company has demonstrated remarkable operational resilience. It has successfully driven year-over-year expansion in its adjusted EBITDA margins, indicating that it is effectively managing its supply chain, implementing internal cost controls, and likely has sufficient pricing power on new contracts to offset inflationary pressures.¹⁰ This ability to protect and expand profitability in a difficult macroeconomic environment speaks to the mission-critical nature of its products and the strength of its operational execution.

Significant Contract Wins

DRS has maintained strong commercial momentum, securing a consistent flow of new contracts that have fueled the growth of its backlog to record levels. Recent notable awards include:

• A $41 million contract from the Naval Sea Systems Command for combat management system hardware.⁴⁸
• A prototype project award from the U.S. Army to modernize the weapon control system for the M109A7 Paladin self-propelled howitzer.⁴⁸
• A successful open-water demonstration of its counter-UAS maritime mission equipment package, a key step toward securing contracts in this high-growth area.⁴⁸

These wins, among others, have contributed to the robust bookings that have driven the company’s book-to-bill ratio well above 1.0x and expanded its backlog to $8.6 billion.¹⁰

Management and Strategy

The company’s leadership, under Chairman and CEO William Lynn, has remained stable. The strategic direction has been clearly and consistently articulated: drive strong organic growth by focusing on core technology areas aligned with DoD priorities, supplement this growth with targeted, technology-focused M&A, and begin returning capital to shareholders as free cash flow generation strengthens.¹⁶

IX. Risk Assessment

While Leonardo DRS possesses a strong business model and favorable growth prospects, an investment in the company is not without significant risks. These can be categorized into business and customer risks, regulatory and political risks, operational risks, and financial and shareholder risks.

Business and Customer Risks

• Customer Concentration: The company’s profound dependence on the U.S. government, which accounts for approximately 85% of its business, is the most significant risk factor.⁶ Any material reduction in the U.S. defense budget, a shift in DoD spending priorities away from DRS’s core programs, or a prolonged government shutdown could have a severe adverse effect on the company’s revenue and profitability.⁷
• Program Dependency: A substantial portion of the company’s revenue is concentrated in a relatively small number of large, long-term programs, with the Columbia Class submarine contract being the most prominent. The delay, cancellation, or reduction in scope of any of these key programs would disproportionately impact financial results.
• Contractual Risks: U.S. government contracts are subject to termination for the government’s convenience at any time.⁷ Additionally, a portion of the company’s portfolio consists of fixed-price contracts, under which DRS bears the financial risk of any cost overruns.⁷

Regulatory and Political Risks

• FOCI Compliance: The company’s ability to perform classified work for the U.S. government is entirely dependent on its continued compliance with the DoD proxy agreement designed to mitigate Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI).⁷ A failure to maintain this agreement would be catastrophic, leading to the potential loss of security clearances and debarment from classified contracts.
• Political and Budgetary Uncertainty: The annual U.S. budget process is inherently political. Changes in presidential administrations or the balance of power in Congress can lead to abrupt shifts in defense strategy and funding priorities, creating uncertainty for long-term programs. The persistent threat of government shutdowns due to budget impasses can also disrupt contract awards and payments.

Operational Risks

• Supply Chain Vulnerability: DRS is reliant on a complex global supply chain for raw materials and components. The company is exposed to the risk of supply disruptions, component shortages, and price volatility, as seen with the recent increase in the cost of germanium.⁷
• Cybersecurity Threats: As a high-profile defense contractor, DRS is a constant target for sophisticated cyber-attacks from state-sponsored and other malicious actors. A successful breach could result in the theft of sensitive intellectual property or classified data, leading to severe reputational and financial damage.⁷
• Technological Obsolescence: The defense technology landscape is characterized by rapid innovation. DRS must continuously invest in R&D to ensure its products remain at the cutting edge and are not rendered obsolete by competitors’ advancements.⁵⁴

Financial and Shareholder Risks

• Parent Company Influence: The majority ownership by Leonardo S.p.A. presents a unique risk for minority shareholders. As outlined in the company’s public filings, conflicts of interest may arise where the strategic objectives of the parent company diverge from those that would maximize value for DRS as a standalone entity.⁷ This could manifest in decisions related to M&A, capital allocation, or corporate strategy.

X. Valuation Analysis

The valuation of Leonardo DRS presents a complex picture. On one hand, the company’s strong growth, high-quality backlog, and strategic positioning warrant a premium valuation. On the other hand, several trailing metrics appear elevated, suggesting that a significant amount of future success is already reflected in the current stock price.

Relative Valuation

A comparison of DRS’s valuation multiples against its industry peers provides critical context.

• Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio: DRS trades at a trailing twelve-month (TTM) P/E ratio of approximately 45.7x.⁵⁸ This is substantially higher than the multiples of larger, more diversified defense primes like Huntington Ingalls (HII) at ~20.3x.³¹ However, it is not an outlier within the more technology-focused segment of the defense industry. The forward P/E ratio of approximately 36.5x indicates that significant earnings growth is expected.⁵⁹
• Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) Ratio: The company’s TTM EV/EBITDA multiple is approximately 27.2x.⁶⁰ This metric, which accounts for debt and cash, is useful for comparing companies with different capital structures. Benchmarking this figure against the peer group suggests a premium valuation.
• Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio: DRS’s TTM P/S ratio is approximately 3.2x to 3.5x.³¹ This is notably lower than the 7.3x average for the Aerospace/Defense Equipment industry cited by one source, which could suggest that the stock is not overvalued relative to its revenue generation capabilities.⁵⁸

Intrinsic Value Perspective

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis, which seeks to determine a company’s intrinsic value based on its future cash flows, offers a more fundamental perspective. Third-party DCF models present a cautious view. One analysis from Simply Wall St. estimates a fair value of approximately $34.64 per share, suggesting the stock is currently overvalued.⁶⁰ Another model from Alpha Spread arrives at an even lower intrinsic value of $24.67, implying a 40% overvaluation from recent trading levels.⁶¹

While these models should be viewed with caution as they rely on external assumptions, they highlight a key concern: the current market price may be difficult to justify without assuming sustained high growth and continued margin expansion for many years into the future. Key inputs for an internal DCF model would include revenue growth in the high single to low double digits for the medium term (supported by the backlog), gradual adjusted EBITDA margin expansion toward the mid-teens, and a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of approximately 8.6%.⁵²

Valuation Synthesis

The comprehensive valuation analysis indicates that Leonardo DRS is trading at a premium to its more traditional defense peers, but this premium is not without justification. The market is ascribing significant value to the company’s exceptional revenue visibility, its strong positioning in high-priority, well-funded defense markets, and its demonstrated ability to grow organically and expand margins.

The key determinant of future stock performance will be the company’s ability to meet and exceed these high expectations. A positive re-rating of the stock’s valuation multiple could be driven by several factors: sustained book-to-bill ratios above 1.2x, demonstrating continued demand acceleration; clear evidence of margin expansion in the ASC segment as its R&D investments begin to yield profitable production contracts; and the successful execution of a value-accretive acquisition that enhances its technological capabilities. Conversely, any signs of a slowdown in orders, program delays, or a failure to meet margin improvement targets could lead to a rapid contraction of its valuation multiple.

XI. Key Questions for Further Investigation

The preceding analysis provides a comprehensive overview of Leonardo DRS. However, several key questions remain pertinent for ongoing due diligence and monitoring of the investment thesis.

• What specific catalysts could drive outperformance or underperformance?
  Investors should seek to identify specific, near-term contract awards or program milestones that could act as positive catalysts. These could include securing a full-rate production contract for a developmental C-UAS system, winning a design competition for a next-generation sensor, or an announcement of a new, large-scale international order. Conversely, the announcement of a delay or budget cut to a key program like the Columbia Class submarine would be a significant negative catalyst.
• How sustainable are current profitability levels given industry dynamics?
  Further investigation is needed to determine the sustainability of the strong margin expansion seen in the IMS segment. It is important to understand how much of this is due to repeatable operational efficiencies versus potentially one-time favorable contract adjustments. On the ASC side, a clearer timeline for when the current cycle of elevated R&D investment is expected to translate into higher-margin production revenue would provide greater confidence in long-term profitability targets.
• What are the key metrics investors should monitor going forward?

1. Book-to-Bill Ratio (Quarterly): This remains the most critical leading indicator of demand and the health of the growth pipeline. A sustained ratio above 1.1x is a strong positive signal.
2. Segment-Level Adjusted EBITDA Margins: Specifically, investors should monitor the ASC segment margin for stabilization and eventual expansion as a sign that R&D investments are maturing.
3. Free Cash Flow Conversion: Tracking the company’s ability to consistently meet its target of converting at least 80% of adjusted net earnings into free cash flow is essential to validate the quality of its earnings and its ability to fund its capital allocation priorities.

• How might changes in defense spending priorities affect different business segments?
  While the current budget environment is favorable, a future shift in DoD strategy could create headwinds. For example, a pivot away from large-scale naval platforms could impact the IMS segment, while a de-emphasis on advanced technology development could pressure the ASC segment. Investors should monitor the annual defense budget requests and policy statements to assess the alignment of DRS’s portfolio with evolving national security priorities.

Works cited

1. Investor Relations | Leonardo DRS, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/
2. What We Do – Leonardo DRS, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/what-we-do/
3. Leonardo Drs Inc. – AnnualReports.com, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/Company/leonardo-drs-inc
4. Leonardo DRS: Home, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/
5. Leonardo DRS (DRS) Company Profile & Description – Stock Analysis, accessed August 29, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/drs/company/
6. Corporate Profile – Investor Relations | Leonardo DRS, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/corporate-profile/
7. Form 10-K for Leonardo DRS INC filed 03/03/2025 – Investor …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/static-files/085fb70f-b873-4279-b783-c99d0a3f3152
8. Land Systems | Leonardo DRS, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/who-we-are/our-segments/land-systems/
9. Our Segments | Leonardo DRS, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/who-we-are/our-segments/
10. Leonardo DRS Announces Financial Results for Second Quarter 2025, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/news/press-releases/leonardo-drs-announces-financial-results-for-second-quarter-2025/
11. Leonardo DRS Q2 2025 slides reveal profit surge and raised revenue outlook, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/leonardo-drs-q2-2025-slides-reveal-profit-surge-and-raised-revenue-outlook-93CH-4159738
12. Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) Stock Price, Market Cap, Segmented Revenue & Earnings, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/companies/DRS
13. Leonardo DRS – Wikipedia, accessed August 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_DRS
14. Solutions and global reach in Aerospace, Defence & Security | Leonardo, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardo.com/en/about/profile
15. Leonardo (company) – Wikipedia, accessed August 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_(company)
16. How chiefs of Honeywell Aerospace and Leonardo DRS each plan to expand, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/news/in-the-news/how-chiefs-of-honeywell-aerospace-and-leonardo-drs-each-plan-to-expand/
17. Global Defense Sector: Investment Trends & Advisor Insights …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/financial-advisors/global-defense-market-trends-how-geopolitical-shifts-are-shaping-opportunities-sector
18. Global defence spending soars to new high – The International Institute for Strategic Studies, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/military-balance/2025/02/global-defence-spending-soars-to-new-high/
19. Impact of geopolitical risks and innovation on global defense stock return – PMC, accessed August 29, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11844836/
20. Military budget of the United States – Wikipedia, accessed August 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States
21. Long-Term Implications of the 2025 Future Years Defense Program …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.cbo.gov/publication/60665
22. What Are Key Milestones and Decisions Affecting U.S. Defense Spending in 2025? – CSIS, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-are-key-milestones-and-decisions-affecting-us-defense-spending-2025
23. FY 2025 Defense Budget, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/Spotlights/FY2025-Defense-Budget/
24. Unprecedented rise in global military expenditure as European and Middle East spending surges | SIPRI, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2025/unprecedented-rise-global-military-expenditure-european-and-middle-east-spending-surges
25. Defence-tech: key trends shaping the future of the defence industry …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.bdo.ua/en-gb/insights-1/information-materials/2025/key-trends-in-defence-tech
26. How AI Is Changing the Defense Landscape | Military Innovation – Elbit Systems, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.elbitsystems.com/blog/how-ai-changing-defense-landscape
27. Defense and security trends 2025: Building strength with data and AI, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.the-future-of-commerce.com/2025/02/01/defense-and-security-trends-2025/
28. Top 5 Trends Impacting the Defence Industry: Adapting to a Changing Landscape, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.defence-industries.com/articles/top-5-trends-impacting-the-defence-industry-adapting-to-a-changing-landscape
29. tracxn.com, accessed August 29, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/leonardo-drs/__DlCh8FGB-aAMvvsEB-j8gVFcZKeA2-QXmi2tKN_Toh4#:~:text=Leonardo%20DRS%20%2D%20About%20the%20company&text=The%20company%20has%20983%20active,%2BGyr%2C%20Airbus%20and%20RTX.
30. Leonardo DRS – 2025 Company Profile, Funding, Competitors & Financials – Tracxn, accessed August 29, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/leonardo-drs/__DlCh8FGB-aAMvvsEB-j8gVFcZKeA2-QXmi2tKN_Toh4
31. Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) Stock Competitors & Similar Stocks Comparison | Seeking Alpha, accessed August 29, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/DRS/peers/comparison
32. Top Leonardo DRS Competitors and Alternatives | Craft.co, accessed August 29, 2025, https://craft.co/leonardo-drs/competitors
33. Barriers and Pathways to GovCon Success – Federal Compass, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.federalcompass.com/blog/barriers-and-pathways-to-govcon-success
34. Overcoming barriers to entering the defense industrial base – RSM US, accessed August 29, 2025, https://rsmus.com/insights/industries/government-contracting/overcoming-barriers-to-entering-the-defense-industrial-base.html
35. Shining a Light on the Defense Department’s Industrial Base Problems, accessed August 29, 2025, https://tnsr.org/2024/01/shining-a-light-on-the-defense-departments-industrial-base-problems/
36. Leonardo DRS | Mintz + Hoke, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.mintz-hoke.com/work/case-studies/leonardo-drs/
37. Leonardo DRS Revenue 2010-2025 – Macrotrends, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/DRS/leonardo-drs/revenue
38. Leonardo DRS (DRS) Revenue 2006-2025 – Stock Analysis, accessed August 29, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/drs/revenue/
39. Leonardo DRS Announces Financial Results for First Quarter 2024, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/news-releases/news-release-details/leonardo-drs-announces-financial-results-first-quarter-2024/
40. Leonardo DRS, Inc. Common Stock (DRS) Financials – Nasdaq, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/drs/financials
41. Avg Gross Profit Margin (10y) For Leonardo DRS Inc (DRS) – Finbox, accessed August 29, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:DRS/explorer/gp_margin_avg_10y
42. Leonardo DRS (DRS) – Operating Margin – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 29, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/leonardo-drs/operating-margin/
43. Leonardo DRS Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/news/press-releases/leonardo-drs-announces-financial-results-for-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2024/
44. Leonardo DRS Announces Financial Results for First Quarter 2024, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/node/8176/pdf
45. LandEuro 2025: Leonardo DRS sees opportunity for BMS, C-UAS offerings in Europe, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/news/in-the-news/landeuro-2025-leonardo-drs-sees-opportunity-for-bms-c-uas-offerings-in-europe/
46. Leonardo DRS to Highlight Partnerships and Advanced Technologies at 2025 IDEX, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.leonardodrs.com/news/feature-stories/leonardo-drs-to-highlight-partnerships-and-advanced-technologies-at-2025-idex/
47. Leonardo DRS (NasdaqGS:DRS) Stock Forecast & Analyst Predictions – Simply Wall St, accessed August 29, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nasdaq-drs/leonardo-drs/future
48. News Releases – Investor Relations | Leonardo DRS, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/news-events/news-releases?mobile=1
49. Leonardo DRS 2024 Investor Day Highlights, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/news-releases/news-release-details/leonardo-drs-2024-investor-day-highlights/
50. Investor FAQs | Leonardo DRS, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/resources/investor-faqs?mobile=1
51. LEONARDO DRS INC (DRS) Factor Report: Fundamental Analysis, Valuation, Key Ratios, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.validea.com/factor-report/drs
52. Leonardo DRS Inc (DRS) Discount Rate – WACC & Cost of Equity – Alpha Spread, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nasdaq/drs/discount-rate
53. Leonardo DRS Posts $2.7B in Full-Year FY22 Revenue, $4.3B Record Backlog; William Lynn Quoted – GovCon Wire, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.govconwire.com/articles/leonardo-drs-posts-2-7b-in-full-year-fy22-revenue-record-backlog-of-4-3b
54. Form 10-K for Leonardo DRS INC filed 03/28/2023, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/static-files/486e2058-8e67-4ad5-ae94-a6f9577b5922
55. Form 10-Q for Leonardo DRS INC filed 05/01/2025, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/static-files/5b26da6e-d2f9-4475-bd8e-34f5cd505d32
56. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Form 10-K Leonardo DRS, Inc. – Annual Reports, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/d/NASDAQ_RADA_2021.pdf
57. Form 10-K for Leonardo DRS INC filed 02/28/2024, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.leonardodrs.com/static-files/665cdc99-e115-498a-97a3-fe87725252d9
58. Leonardo DRS (DRS) Competitors and Alternatives 2025 – MarketBeat, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/DRS/competitors-and-alternatives/
59. Leonardo DRS (DRS) Research Report – StockStory, accessed August 29, 2025, https://stockstory.org/us/stocks/nasdaq/drs
60. Leonardo DRS (NasdaqGS:DRS) Stock Valuation, Peer Comparison & Price Targets, accessed August 29, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nasdaq-drs/leonardo-drs/valuation
61. DRS Intrinsic Valuation and Fundamental Analysis – Leonardo DRS Inc – Alpha Spread, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nasdaq/drs/summary
62. L3Harris Technologies (LHX) Financials – Income Statement – Stock Analysis, accessed August 29, 2025, https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/lhx/financials/
63. Mercury Systems Reports Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2025 Results, accessed August 29, 2025, https://ir.mrcy.com/news-releases/news-release-details/mercury-systems-reports-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2025-results
64. ELBIT SYSTEMS REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2025 RESULTS – PR Newswire, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/il/news-releases/elbit-systems-reports-second-quarter-2025-results-302528722.html
65. Curtiss-Wright Reports Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results and Raises Full-Year 2025 Guidance, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.curtisswright.com/news/press-releases/news-release-details/2025/curtiss-wright-reports-second-quarter-2025-financial-results-and-raises-full-year-2025-guidance
66. Leonardo DRS Net Income 2010-2025 – Macrotrends, accessed August 29, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/DRS/leonardo-drs/net-income