Section 1: Executive Summary & Investment Thesis Distilled

NVIDIA Corporation has fundamentally reshaped the technology landscape, evolving from a specialist in graphics processing units (GPUs) for the gaming market into the central architect of the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. The company’s accelerated computing platform, a tightly integrated ecosystem of hardware, software, and networking, has become the de facto standard for training and deploying the large-scale AI models that are driving a paradigm shift across global industries. This unique position has fueled a period of unprecedented financial performance, characterized by exponential revenue growth and a dramatic expansion of profitability, establishing NVIDIA as one of the most consequential companies in the world.

The central investment debate surrounding NVIDIA is whether its current market dominance, underpinned by its proprietary CUDA software platform, constitutes an enduring, monopoly-like competitive moat that justifies its premium valuation, or if the company is approaching an inflection point. At this juncture, a confluence of risks—including intensifying competition from formidable peers, the strategic threat of custom silicon from its largest customers, persistent geopolitical tensions, and the sheer challenge of maintaining hypergrowth at a massive scale—could lead to a normalization of its growth trajectory and margin structure.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of these factors, grounded in a thorough examination of the company’s financial statements, strategic initiatives, and the dynamic market in which it operates. The key findings are as follows:

• Unrivaled Market Position: NVIDIA’s leadership in the AI accelerator market is quantitatively dominant. The company holds an estimated 70% share of the AI infrastructure market and over 80% of the market for GPUs used in AI model training.¹ This hardware supremacy is fortified by the deep entrenchment of its CUDA software ecosystem, which has been cultivated over more than a decade and represents a formidable barrier to entry due to prohibitively high switching costs for developers and enterprises.³
• Extraordinary Financial Power: The company has translated its market leadership into extraordinary financial results, demonstrating immense operating leverage. For fiscal year 2025, revenues surged 114% to $130.5 billion, while annual GAAP gross margin expanded to 75.0%.⁵ This level of profitability is exceptional within the capital-intensive semiconductor industry and reflects the significant pricing power NVIDIA commands.
• Intensifying and Evolving Risks: Despite its strengths, NVIDIA faces a complex array of material risks. The most significant is the “frenemy” dynamic with its largest hyperscale customers (e.g., Google, Amazon, Microsoft), who are simultaneously developing their own custom AI chips (ASICs) to reduce costs and dependency on NVIDIA.⁷ Concurrently, U.S. government export restrictions on advanced chips to China have created significant revenue headwinds and operational uncertainty.¹⁰ Finally, the company’s heavy reliance on a single manufacturing partner, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), for its most advanced products creates a systemic supply chain and geopolitical risk.¹
• Valuation Implies Sustained Excellence: The company’s current valuation, reflected in a trailing Price-to-Sales ratio of approximately 30 and a Price-to-Earnings ratio near 57, is pricing in a multi-year runway of continued hypergrowth, market share retention, and margin stability.¹³ This leaves a narrow margin for error, making the stock highly sensitive to any potential execution missteps, a cyclical downturn in AI infrastructure spending, or an erosion of its competitive positioning.

Section 2: The New Computing Era: Semiconductor and AI Market Dynamics

2.1 The State of the Global Semiconductor Industry

NVIDIA operates within the broader global semiconductor industry, a sector characterized by strong secular growth, inherent cyclicality, and immense capital intensity. Understanding these foundational dynamics is critical to contextualizing NVIDIA’s performance and prospects.

The market has demonstrated robust growth, reaching a record $630.5 billion in global sales in 2024, a figure that surpassed initial forecasts.¹⁵ Projections from the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS) organization anticipate this momentum will continue, with sales forecast to grow by 11.2% to reach $701 billion in 2025.¹⁵ This expansion is not a short-term phenomenon; some industry analyses project the market could exceed $2 trillion by 2032, which would imply a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.4% from 2025.¹⁶ The primary drivers of this sustained demand are cutting-edge applications, most notably artificial intelligence, next-generation 5G and 6G communications infrastructure, and the increasing semiconductor content in autonomous vehicles.¹⁵ This provides a powerful secular tailwind for the industry’s leaders.

However, this growth is not linear. The semiconductor industry is notoriously cyclical, having experienced nine distinct contractions in the past 34 years.¹⁷ These cycles are often driven by mismatches between capital investment in new manufacturing capacity and fluctuations in end-market demand, leading to periods of oversupply and price pressure. Success and survival in this environment demand continuous and substantial investment in research and development (R&D). In 2024 alone, the U.S. semiconductor industry invested $62.7 billion in R&D, equivalent to 17.7% of its total sales—one of the highest R&D intensities of any industry.¹⁸ These high barriers to entry, both in terms of capital for manufacturing and investment in R&D, create a formidable advantage for established, well-capitalized incumbents like NVIDIA.

A crucial trend reshaping the industry is a fundamental decoupling of revenue growth from the volume of silicon wafers shipped. While AI-related semiconductor revenues have skyrocketed, global silicon wafer shipments have seen much more modest growth, even experiencing a projected 2.4% decline in 2024 despite a 19% forecast rise in chip revenues for that year.¹⁷ This divergence highlights a significant shift in value creation. The economic value is no longer primarily in the volume of silicon produced but in the architectural complexity, proprietary intellectual property, and advanced packaging technologies integrated into each chip. Generative AI accelerators, for instance, may account for 20% of industry revenues but less than 0.2% of total wafers.¹⁷ This value is captured in the intricate assembly of multiple chiplets, high-bandwidth memory (HBM), and sophisticated packaging techniques like TSMC’s Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate (CoWoS). This trend heavily favors fabless design leaders like NVIDIA, which control the high-value architecture and command premium prices, while simultaneously deepening their strategic dependence on the few manufacturing partners, chiefly TSMC, that possess these cutting-edge packaging capabilities.

2.2 The AI Hardware Gold Rush

At the epicenter of the semiconductor industry’s growth is the explosion in demand for specialized AI hardware. This segment, where NVIDIA is the undisputed leader, constitutes the company’s primary addressable market. Market sizing estimates vary but consistently point to a period of hypergrowth. In 2024, the AI hardware market was valued in a range of $25.5 billion to $59.3 billion.¹⁹ Forecasts for the next decade are dramatic, with projections for 2032-2034 ranging from $210.5 billion to $296.3 billion, implying CAGRs between 18% and 23.2%.²⁰ This hardware market is a component of the broader AI ecosystem, which includes software and services and is projected to become a nearly $1.8 trillion market by 2030.²²

This “gold rush” is driven by a fundamental architectural shift in computing. The rise of generative AI and large language models (LLMs) has exposed the limitations of traditional data centers architected around general-purpose central processing units (CPUs). These workloads require massively parallel processing capabilities, a task for which GPUs are uniquely suited. Consequently, the modern data center is being re-architected as an “AI factory,” an accelerated computing platform where the GPU, not the CPU, is the primary engine.⁴ NVIDIA’s strategic decision, made over a decade ago, to invest in general-purpose GPU computing with its CUDA platform positioned it perfectly to capitalize on this architectural sea change, granting it a profound first-mover advantage.

2.3 Geopolitical Battleground

The strategic importance of semiconductors as the foundational technology for AI, economic competitiveness, and national security has transformed the industry into a key arena for geopolitical competition. Governments around the world are now engaged in a “chip race,” providing hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies and incentives to strengthen their domestic semiconductor ecosystems.¹⁵

In the United States, legislation such as the CHIPS and Science Act is fueling a “re-industrialization” effort aimed at reversing a multi-decade decline in domestic manufacturing share.¹⁵ As of July 2025, these initiatives have catalyzed over half-a-trillion dollars in announced private-sector investments, which are projected to triple U.S. chipmaking capacity by 2032 and support over 500,000 jobs.¹⁵ While these programs create opportunities through subsidies, they also introduce significant challenges. The global push to build new fabrication facilities (fabs) is colliding with a pre-existing and worsening shortage of skilled talent in chip design, manufacturing, and maintenance.²⁴ This competition for a limited pool of specialized engineers could lead to project delays, increased labor costs, and operational bottlenecks, potentially constraining the very growth the industry forecasts.

The most acute geopolitical factor is the escalating technological rivalry between the U.S. and China. The U.S. government has implemented stringent export controls to restrict China’s access to advanced semiconductors and manufacturing equipment, particularly those critical for military and advanced AI applications.²⁴ These restrictions directly impact NVIDIA’s business, creating significant revenue headwinds and forcing the company to design specialized, compliant chips for the Chinese market and navigate a complex and evolving regulatory landscape.²⁵ This geopolitical friction represents a persistent source of risk and uncertainty for the entire industry.

Section 3: NVIDIA’s Market Dominance and Competitive Positioning

3.1 The AI Training and Inference Behemoth

NVIDIA’s position in the AI accelerator market is one of profound dominance. The company’s market share is commanding across multiple views: it holds an estimated 70% of the overall AI infrastructure market, a 92% share of the discrete desktop and laptop GPU market as of the first quarter of 2025, and a share widely estimated to be above 80% in the crucial data center AI accelerator segment.¹

This market leadership is sustained by a relentless pace of technological innovation. The company’s product roadmap features a rapid cadence of new, more powerful GPU architectures. The recent Blackwell platform, for example, is claimed to deliver up to a 25x improvement in efficiency for certain AI inference workloads compared to its predecessor.¹ This continuous cycle of performance gains consistently raises the competitive bar, forcing rivals into a perpetual game of catch-up and reinforcing NVIDIA’s image as the technological standard-bearer for AI computation.

3.2 The Strategic Pivot to Data Center

The most significant strategic transformation in NVIDIA’s history has been its pivot from a company primarily focused on PC gaming to one dominated by enterprise and cloud data center sales. This shift has fundamentally remade the company’s financial profile, growth drivers, and strategic priorities.

An analysis of the company’s segment revenues illustrates this transformation in stark terms. In fiscal year 2023, the Data Center segment accounted for 55.6% of total revenue. Just two years later, in fiscal 2025, its contribution had surged to 88.3% of total revenue, representing $115.2 billion of the company’s $130.5 billion total.⁵ Over the same period, the Gaming segment’s share of revenue contracted from 33.6% to a mere 8.7%.²⁷ This dramatic realignment has turned NVIDIA into a core enterprise and cloud infrastructure provider, with a business model now more aligned with the drivers of enterprise IT spending and hyperscale capital expenditures than with consumer electronics cycles.

3.3 The Competitive Gauntlet

Despite its dominant position, NVIDIA faces a multifaceted competitive landscape composed of traditional rivals, emerging challengers, and, most significantly, its own largest customers. The nature of this competition is notably asymmetric; rather than confronting NVIDIA head-on across its entire product stack, each competitor is targeting specific niches or weaknesses in NVIDIA’s armor.

• AMD’s Ascent: Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) stands as NVIDIA’s most direct competitor in the GPU market. While a significant gap remains—NVIDIA’s data center revenue was more than seven times that of AMD’s in 2024—AMD is executing a focused strategy.¹² The company is positioning its Instinct line of accelerators to compete on performance-per-dollar and total cost of ownership, particularly for AI inference workloads, which are expected to constitute a larger portion of the market over time than training.²⁸ However, AMD faces two primary hurdles. First, its ROCm software platform, the open-source alternative to CUDA, is significantly less mature and lacks the vast ecosystem of libraries, tools, and developer familiarity that CUDA enjoys.³⁰ Second, AMD may face challenges securing sufficient supply of advanced packaging capacity from TSMC, where NVIDIA has reportedly reserved over 70% of the available lines, potentially constraining AMD’s ability to meet demand even with a competitive product.¹²
• Intel’s Challenge: Intel is pursuing a different strategy with its Gaudi line of AI accelerators. The company has explicitly stated it is not aiming to match the raw performance of NVIDIA’s highest-end GPUs but is instead focused on providing a more cost-effective solution for mainstream enterprise AI deployments.³¹ Benchmarks indicate that the Gaudi 3 accelerator can be competitive with, and in some cases outperform, NVIDIA’s previous-generation H100 GPU, particularly in workloads with large output token sequences.³² Intel claims a significant workload-per-dollar advantage. However, like AMD, Intel’s greatest challenge is not in hardware but in software. It must convince a developer ecosystem deeply entrenched in CUDA to adopt a new platform, a task that has historically proven to be exceedingly difficult.³⁴
• The Hyperscaler Dilemma (Custom Silicon): The most formidable long-term threat to NVIDIA comes from its largest customers: the hyperscale cloud providers. These companies are investing billions of dollars to design their own custom silicon, or application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), tailored to their unique software stacks and data center environments.

• Google’s TPUs: Google’s Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) are purpose-built to accelerate AI workloads within its cloud ecosystem. For specific models, particularly those developed using Google’s TensorFlow framework, TPUs can offer superior performance-per-watt and faster training times than GPUs.⁷ Their primary limitation is their lack of versatility; they are accessible only through Google Cloud and are less flexible than GPUs, which support a broader array of AI frameworks.³⁶
• Amazon’s Trainium & Inferentia: Amazon Web Services (AWS) is aggressively developing its own AI chips to reduce both costs and its reliance on NVIDIA. The company is actively pitching its Trainium chips to cloud customers, claiming they can deliver performance comparable to NVIDIA’s H100 at a 25% lower cost.⁹ Its next-generation Trainium3 chip aims to double performance while halving energy consumption, targeting the critical need for efficiency at scale.⁸
• Microsoft’s Maia: Microsoft is also pursuing a custom AI chip strategy with its Maia accelerator, although it has reportedly encountered production delays, underscoring the immense complexity of these endeavors.²⁰

This “frenemy” dynamic, where NVIDIA’s top customers are also its most significant future competitors, is a central risk factor. However, the development of custom silicon is also a validation of the enormous market NVIDIA has pioneered. The immense investment required would not be undertaken unless the potential cost savings and performance gains were astronomical. The technical challenges and delays faced by these highly capable companies also serve to highlight NVIDIA’s exceptional execution capabilities. The most probable outcome is not a wholesale replacement of NVIDIA GPUs but a hybrid cloud environment. In this scenario, hyperscalers would utilize their custom ASICs for large-scale, stable, and predictable internal workloads (such as search indexing or social media feed ranking) while continuing to offer NVIDIA’s more flexible and powerful GPUs to their external cloud customers who require versatility and access to the industry-standard CUDA platform.

Section 4: Deconstructing the Financial Engine

NVIDIA’s financial performance over the past several fiscal years has been nothing short of extraordinary. The company has successfully translated its technological leadership in AI into a generational growth story, characterized by an explosive revenue trajectory, a dramatic expansion in profitability, and the creation of a formidable balance sheet.

4.1 A Generational Growth Trajectory

The onset of the generative AI era served as a powerful inflection point for NVIDIA’s top-line growth. As shown in Table 1, annual revenue remained relatively flat between fiscal 2022 and 2023, at approximately $27.0 billion. However, in fiscal 2024, revenue more than doubled to $60.9 billion, and then more than doubled again in fiscal 2025 to $130.5 billion.³⁸ The momentum has continued into the current fiscal year, with revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2026 reaching $44.1 billion, a 69% increase over the prior-year period.¹⁰

This revenue explosion has been accompanied by even faster growth in profitability, demonstrating the powerful operating leverage inherent in NVIDIA’s fabless semiconductor model. Annual net income surged from $4.37 billion in fiscal 2023 to $72.88 billion in fiscal 2025, while annual operating income grew from $4.2 billion to $81.5 billion over the same period.⁶

Fiscal Year End	Revenue ($M)	Revenue Growth (YoY %)	Gross Profit ($M)	Gross Margin (%)	Operating Income ($M)	Operating Margin (%)	Net Income ($M)	Diluted EPS ($)
Jan 2021	16,675	52.7%	10,400	62.3%	4,532	27.2%	4,332	1.73
Jan 2022	26,914	61.4%	17,480	64.9%	10,041	37.3%	9,752	3.85
Jan 2023	26,974	0.2%	15,360	56.9%	4,224	15.7%	4,368	1.74
Jan 2024	60,922	125.9%	44,300	72.7%	32,972	54.1%	29,760	1.19
Jan 2025	130,497	114.2%	97,860	75.0%	81,453	62.4%	72,880	2.94
Table 1: Key Financial Metrics (Fiscal 2021-2025). Data sourced from company filings and financial data providers.5 Note: EPS figures may reflect stock splits.

4.2 Margin Supremacy and Operating Leverage

NVIDIA’s profitability metrics are best-in-class and underscore the pricing power derived from its technological moat. As detailed in Table 1, annual GAAP gross margin expanded from 56.9% in fiscal 2023 to 75.0% in fiscal 2025.⁵ Recent quarterly non-GAAP gross margins have consistently been in the mid-70s, and management has guided for continued strength, targeting the mid-70% range for the latter half of the year.¹⁰ This level of gross margin is exceptionally high for a hardware-centric company and is more akin to that of a dominant software provider, reflecting the value customers place on the entire CUDA platform, not just the silicon.

The scalability of the business model is further evident in its operating margins. As revenue has scaled, operating expenses have grown at a much slower rate, causing a dramatic expansion in operating margin from 15.7% in fiscal 2023 to 62.4% in fiscal 2025.⁶ This demonstrates that each incremental dollar of revenue carries very high incremental profitability.

Fiscal Year End	Data Center Revenue ($B)	Data Center (% of Total)	Gaming Revenue ($B)	Gaming (% of Total)	Professional Visualization ($B)	Automotive ($B)	Total Revenue ($B)
Jan 2023	15.01	55.6%	9.07	33.6%	1.54	0.90	26.97
Jan 2024	47.53	78.0%	10.45	17.1%	1.55	1.09	60.92
Jan 2025	115.19	88.3%	11.35	8.7%	1.88	1.69	130.50
Table 2: Revenue by Market Platform (Fiscal 2023-2025). Data sourced from company filings and financial data providers.5 Percentages may not sum to 100% due to the exclusion of the “OEM and Other” segment.

4.3 Fortress Balance Sheet & Cash Flow Generation

The exceptional profitability has allowed NVIDIA to build a “fortress” balance sheet, providing immense financial flexibility to navigate market volatility and fund its ambitious growth initiatives. As of the end of fiscal 2025, the company held total assets of $111.6 billion, compared to total liabilities of just $32.3 billion. Long-term debt was a modest $8.46 billion, resulting in a very strong net cash position and a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.11.⁶

This financial strength is underpinned by massive cash flow generation. For fiscal 2025, cash flow from operating activities was $64.1 billion. After accounting for capital expenditures, the company generated $60.85 billion in free cash flow.⁶ This prodigious cash generation provides substantial capacity for continued heavy investment in R&D, strategic acquisitions, and significant capital returns to shareholders.

Fiscal Year End	Cash & Equivalents ($M)	Total Assets ($M)	Long-Term Debt ($M)	Total Liabilities ($M)	Shareholders’ Equity ($M)	Cash Flow from Operations ($M)	Capital Expenditures ($M)	Free Cash Flow ($M)
Jan 2023	13,295	41,182	9,702	16,956	24,226	5,595	1,940	3,655
Jan 2024	25,984	65,728	9,706	21,490	44,238	28,090	2,720	25,370
Jan 2025	34,970	111,600	8,460	32,270	79,330	64,090	3,240	60,850
Table 3: Key Balance Sheet & Cash Flow Items (Fiscal 2023-2025). Data sourced from company filings and financial data providers.6 Note: FCF is a non-GAAP measure calculated as CFO less CapEx.

Section 5: The Unassailable Moat: CUDA and the Full-Stack Ecosystem

NVIDIA’s remarkable financial performance is a direct result of its deep and defensible competitive advantages, or “moats.” The company’s strategy extends far beyond designing superior silicon; it has meticulously constructed an integrated, full-stack accelerated computing platform. This platform approach, centered on the CUDA software ecosystem, is the primary source of its pricing power and market dominance. This strategic positioning has effectively transitioned NVIDIA from being a semiconductor component supplier to a comprehensive platform provider, a shift that fundamentally alters its investment profile.

5.1 The CUDA Software Lock-In

The cornerstone of NVIDIA’s competitive moat is CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture). Introduced in the early 2000s, CUDA is a proprietary parallel computing platform and application programming interface (API) that allows developers to use NVIDIA GPUs for general-purpose computing tasks.⁴ Over more than a decade, NVIDIA has cultivated a rich ecosystem around CUDA, comprising hundreds of highly optimized software libraries (such as cuDNN for deep learning and cuBLAS for linear algebra), robust development and debugging tools, and support for multiple programming languages including C++, Fortran, and Python.³

This ecosystem has created a powerful network effect and high switching costs for customers. Millions of AI researchers, data scientists, and developers have been trained on and have built their applications using the CUDA framework. Porting these complex, highly optimized AI models and software stacks to a competing architecture, such as AMD’s ROCm, is a non-trivial task. It is often described as not merely time-consuming but “economically unviable” due to the extensive engineering effort and potential performance degradation involved.¹ This creates a durable software “lock-in” that makes it exceedingly difficult for competitors to gain market share, even if they offer hardware with comparable performance or a lower price point.³

5.2 The “AI Factory” Strategy

Building on the foundation of CUDA, NVIDIA has pursued a strategy of vertical integration, aiming to provide customers with a complete, end-to-end “AI Factory” solution. This involves moving up the value chain from selling individual GPUs to offering fully integrated systems that encompass compute, networking, and software. This platform strategy increases the moat’s depth significantly. A competitor must not only design a superior GPU but also replicate over a decade of software development, networking integration, and developer ecosystem cultivation, making the competitive challenge exponentially more difficult.

A key enabler of this strategy was the $6.9 billion acquisition of Mellanox Technologies in 2020.⁴⁸ Mellanox was a leader in high-performance networking technologies, particularly InfiniBand and high-speed Ethernet, which are critical for connecting thousands of GPUs together in large AI training clusters.⁴⁹ By bringing this expertise in-house, NVIDIA gained the ability to optimize the entire data flow across the data center—from storage to networking to compute—addressing critical performance bottlenecks that arise in massive, datacenter-scale AI workloads. This integration is central to CEO Jensen Huang’s vision of architecting future data centers as single, giant compute engines, where the network fabric is an integral part of the computing fabric itself.⁵¹

5.3 Innovation as a Weapon

NVIDIA sustains its technological lead through massive and consistent investment in R&D. For fiscal 2025, the company’s R&D expense was $12.9 billion, a 49% increase from the prior year.⁵³ For the twelve months ending in April 2025, that figure exceeded $14 billion.⁵³

This substantial investment fuels a rapid cadence of innovation, with NVIDIA introducing new, more powerful GPU architectures on a roughly annual cycle. This relentless pace—from Hopper to Blackwell to the announced Rubin platform—continuously pushes the performance frontier, forcing competitors to aim at a constantly moving target and reinforcing NVIDIA’s position as the industry’s technology leader.¹

It is important to analyze the company’s R&D spending in the proper context. Due to the company’s explosive top-line growth, R&D as a percentage of revenue has actually declined, from 27.2% in fiscal 2023 to 9.9% in fiscal 2025.⁵³ A superficial analysis might interpret this as a reduction in innovation focus. However, the reality is the opposite. The absolute dollar investment in R&D is at an all-time high and continues to grow rapidly. The declining percentage is a mathematical consequence of revenue growing much faster than R&D spending, which is a powerful indicator of the company’s extreme operating leverage and financial efficiency, not a lack of commitment to innovation.

Section 6: Capital Allocation and Strategic Priorities

NVIDIA’s immense free cash flow generation affords it significant flexibility in its capital allocation strategy. The company’s priorities are clearly focused on reinvesting to sustain its technological leadership, while also returning a substantial amount of capital to shareholders through share repurchases.

6.1 Fueling the Future (R&D)

As detailed previously, the primary use of capital is reinvestment in R&D to drive future growth and maintain the company’s competitive moat. The annual R&D budget of nearly $13 billion in fiscal 2025, representing a 49% year-over-year increase, underscores that maintaining technological supremacy is management’s foremost priority.⁵⁴

6.2 Shareholder Return Policy

NVIDIA employs a two-pronged approach to shareholder returns, with an overwhelming emphasis on share buybacks over dividends.

• Share Repurchases: The company has an active and substantial share repurchase program. A $50 billion buyback authorization was announced in mid-2025, following a $25 billion program initiated in August 2023.⁵⁵ Given the stock’s elevated valuation, the primary motivation for these buybacks is likely not a belief that the shares are fundamentally undervalued. Instead, the program serves as a tax-efficient mechanism to return a portion of the company’s massive free cash flow to shareholders and to offset the dilutive effect of significant stock-based compensation for employees.⁵⁶
• Dividend Policy: NVIDIA’s dividend policy is nominal and clearly secondary to its other capital allocation priorities. The company pays a quarterly dividend which, following its recent 10-for-1 stock split, stands at $0.01 per share, or $0.04 annually.⁵⁷ This results in an exceptionally low dividend yield of approximately 0.02% and a payout ratio of just 1.3% of earnings.⁵⁷ This policy signals that the company intends to retain the vast majority of its earnings for growth reinvestment and buybacks rather than providing a direct income stream to investors.

6.3 Strategic M&A

NVIDIA has used strategic acquisitions to bolster its technological capabilities and advance its platform strategy.

• Mellanox Success: The 2020 acquisition of Mellanox for $6.9 billion has proven to be a clear strategic success. It provided NVIDIA with best-in-class networking technology, which has become the critical interconnect pillar of its “AI Factory” and datacenter-scale computing strategy.⁴⁸
• Failed ARM Deal: The company’s ambitious attempt to acquire Arm Ltd., which was ultimately blocked by global regulators due to competition concerns, offered significant insight into management’s long-term vision.⁶⁰ The deal signaled NVIDIA’s desire to have a major presence across the entire computing spectrum, from high-performance data centers to low-power edge devices and CPUs. While the acquisition failed, it highlighted the company’s strategic thinking about the future convergence of CPU and GPU architectures under a unified platform.

Section 7: Headwinds and Challenges (2023-2025)

While NVIDIA’s growth has been historic, the company faces a series of significant headwinds and operational challenges that could impact its future performance. These range from direct geopolitical and regulatory pressures to questions about the long-term sustainability of the current AI investment cycle.

7.1 Navigating the China Restrictions

U.S. government export controls on advanced technology to China represent the most immediate and financially material headwind for NVIDIA. These restrictions have had a direct and quantifiable negative impact on the company’s results.

• Financial Impact: In its financial results for the first quarter of fiscal 2026, NVIDIA disclosed a $4.5 billion charge related to excess inventory and purchase obligations for its H20 chip—a product specifically designed to comply with earlier U.S. regulations for the Chinese market.¹⁰ The company also stated it was unable to ship an additional $2.5 billion of H20 revenue during that quarter due to new licensing requirements. Looking ahead, management’s guidance for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 included an anticipated loss of approximately $8.0 billion in revenue from H20 sales to China.¹⁰
• Strategic Dilemma: The situation remains fluid and complex. The U.S. government has reportedly brokered an unprecedented deal allowing NVIDIA and AMD to sell certain advanced chips to China in exchange for a 15% share of the revenue from those sales.²⁶ However, this arrangement has been complicated by reports that Chinese officials, angered by public comments from the U.S. Commerce Secretary, have pressured domestic technology firms to reduce their purchases of these U.S. chips.¹¹ This is accelerating China’s strategic push for technological self-sufficiency and creating significant uncertainty for a market that accounted for 13% of NVIDIA’s revenue in the prior year.¹¹

7.2 The Sustainability Question

The explosive growth of AI has brought its significant environmental footprint into sharper focus, creating potential long-term risks for the entire data center ecosystem.

• Energy & Water Consumption: AI data centers are voracious consumers of resources. Training and running large AI models is an incredibly energy-intensive process. The International Energy Agency has projected that the electricity demands of AI will lead to a significant increase in data center power consumption by 2026.⁶² Furthermore, these facilities require massive volumes of fresh water for cooling their servers. For context, Google’s data centers alone consumed an estimated 5 billion gallons of water in 2022.⁶³
• Regulatory & Social Risk: This growing environmental impact is attracting increased scrutiny from legislators, regulators, and the public in both the U.S. and Europe.⁶³ There is a rising risk of future regulations, such as carbon taxes or stricter water usage permits, that could increase the operating costs of data centers. Additionally, community opposition to the construction of new, resource-intensive data center facilities could constrain the physical expansion of the AI infrastructure upon which NVIDIA’s growth depends.⁶⁴

7.3 Managing Cyclicality

• Inventory Management: In response to soaring demand and in preparation for major product launches like the Blackwell platform, NVIDIA’s inventory levels have increased substantially. Total inventory grew from $5.2 billion at the end of fiscal 2024 to $10.1 billion by the end of fiscal 2025, and further to $11.3 billion in the first quarter of fiscal 2026.⁴⁴ While this build-up is a logical response to demand signals, it increases balance sheet risk in the event of a sudden slowdown in AI spending. The company’s inventory management metrics show signs of improvement after post-pandemic disruptions; inventory turnover, which hit a low of 2.99 in 2023, recovered to 4.25 by 2025, indicating a more efficient conversion of inventory to sales.⁶⁶
• Gaming Market Recovery: NVIDIA’s legacy Gaming segment, while now a smaller portion of the overall business, is showing signs of recovery from the downturn that followed the COVID-19 pandemic and the collapse of the cryptocurrency mining boom. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023, Gaming revenue was down 46% year-over-year but grew 16% sequentially, suggesting the market was bottoming out.⁴⁰ The stabilization of this segment is important for revenue diversification. It is worth noting that the company previously faced shareholder lawsuits alleging that it had misled investors by attributing volatile revenue from cryptocurrency miners to more stable demand from gamers.⁶⁷

7.4 Emerging Market Progress

• Automotive: The automotive segment represents a significant long-term growth opportunity for NVIDIA. The company is positioning its DRIVE platform, an end-to-end hardware and software solution, to be the centralized “brain” for autonomous vehicles and AI-powered in-cabin experiences. Revenue from this segment reached $1.7 billion in fiscal 2025, a 55% increase year-over-year.⁶⁹ NVIDIA has secured design wins with major global automakers, including Toyota and Hyundai Motor Group.⁵ While the segment currently accounts for only about 1.3% of total revenue, the potential addressable market is vast, and it represents a key pillar of the company’s diversification strategy beyond the data center.²⁷

Section 8: Risk Assessment

A comprehensive analysis of NVIDIA must include a clear-eyed assessment of the material risks that could impact its operational and financial performance.

• Customer Concentration & Hyperscaler In-Housing: NVIDIA’s largest customers—the major cloud service providers like Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta—are also its most significant long-term competitive threats. Their substantial investments in developing custom AI silicon are explicitly aimed at reducing their dependency on NVIDIA and lowering their operational costs. A faster-than-expected development or deployment of these in-house chips could materially reduce demand for NVIDIA’s highest-end, highest-margin products.
• Geopolitical & Supply Chain Risk: As a fabless semiconductor company, NVIDIA’s business model is fundamentally dependent on third-party foundries. Its most advanced products are manufactured almost exclusively by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).¹ This creates an extreme concentration risk. Any disruption to TSMC’s operations, whether from natural disasters, operational issues, or a geopolitical conflict involving Taiwan, would have a catastrophic impact on NVIDIA’s ability to supply its products to the market. Furthermore, the ongoing U.S.-China technological rivalry creates a volatile and unpredictable regulatory environment, posing a persistent risk to market access and revenue stability.²⁵
• Sustainability of AI Spending: The current level of global investment in AI infrastructure is unprecedented. A primary risk is that this represents an initial, massive build-out phase that will inevitably slow down or enter a cyclical downturn as the market matures. The capital expenditure plans of a handful of hyperscale companies are the single largest driver of NVIDIA’s revenue. Any significant reduction or pause in their spending would have a direct and severe negative impact on NVIDIA’s growth prospects.
• Technological Disruption: While NVIDIA currently enjoys a substantial technological lead, the history of the semiconductor industry is one of rapid and disruptive innovation. The risk remains that a competitor, whether an established player like AMD or a new entrant, could achieve an architectural breakthrough that challenges the performance of NVIDIA’s GPUs or, more critically, undermines the dominance of the CUDA software ecosystem.
• Valuation & Execution Risk: NVIDIA’s current market valuation reflects expectations of near-flawless execution and sustained high growth for years to come. The stock is priced for perfection. Consequently, any sign of slowing growth, material margin compression, product delays, or a failure to meet ambitious financial targets could trigger a significant and rapid de-rating of its valuation multiples.

Section 9: Valuation Context and Implied Expectations

This analysis does not provide a price target or a buy/sell recommendation. Instead, this section aims to provide a clear context for NVIDIA’s current valuation, comparing it to historical norms, industry peers, and growth expectations. The objective is to understand what level of future performance is currently implied by the stock’s market price.

9.1 Multiple Analysis

NVIDIA trades at a significant premium to the broader market and most of its semiconductor peers, a reflection of its superior growth profile and profitability.

• Current Multiples: As of August 2025, NVIDIA’s stock trades at a trailing twelve-month (TTM) Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 57, a TTM Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio of around 30, and a Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio exceeding 50.¹³
• Historical Context: While these multiples are high in absolute terms, they are not entirely without precedent for the company during periods of rapid expansion. The 10-year average P/E ratio for NVIDIA is 52.87, though the metric has been volatile, peaking as high as 138 in April 2023 during a period of lower earnings before the full impact of the AI boom was reflected.¹³ The current P/S ratio of approximately 30 is notably above its 5-year average of around 23, indicating that the market is willing to pay a higher price for each dollar of revenue than it has historically.¹⁴
• Peer Comparison: As illustrated in Table 4, NVIDIA’s valuation multiples are substantially higher than those of most of its peers. This premium is a direct function of its superior operational metrics. For example, while mature, profitable companies like Qualcomm and Texas Instruments trade at much lower P/E and P/S ratios, they also exhibit significantly lower growth rates and gross margins. NVIDIA’s valuation reflects the market’s belief that its combination of high growth and high profitability is sustainable.

Company	Market Cap ($T)	Forward P/E Ratio	Trailing P/S Ratio	EV/EBITDA (TTM)	PEG Ratio (Forward)	Gross Margin (%) (TTM)
NVIDIA (NVDA)	4.4	44.1	29.6	49.5	1.56	70.1%
AMD (AMD)	0.27	30.5	9.8	45.1	1.25	48.0%
Intel (INTC)	0.11	22.5	2.0	12.0	1.80	41.5%
Qualcomm (QCOM)	0.17	15.0	4.0	11.5	1.10	55.8%
Texas Instruments (TXN)	0.19	25.0	10.5	20.1	2.50	58.0%
S&P 500 Info Tech Sector	N/A	~28.0	~7.5	~20.0	~1.90	N/A
Table 4: Valuation Multiples Comparison. Data as of August 2025, sourced from financial data providers.13 Sector averages are approximate. AMD and Intel Forward P/E based on consensus estimates.

9.2 Growth-Adjusted Perspective

The Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio offers a way to contextualize a company’s P/E ratio by factoring in its expected earnings growth. A common rule of thumb is that a PEG ratio of 1.0 suggests a fair valuation, while a ratio significantly above 1.0 may indicate overvaluation.

NVIDIA’s forward PEG ratio, based on consensus analyst estimates for future earnings growth, is in the range of 1.56 to 1.98.⁷⁴ While not in extreme territory, this figure suggests that the market is paying a premium relative to the company’s expected forward growth rate. In essence, the current stock price has already factored in a significant amount of strong future growth.

9.3 Intrinsic Value Considerations (DCF)

Attempting to derive a precise intrinsic value for NVIDIA using a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model is an exercise fraught with significant challenges. The DCF methodology requires forecasting a company’s free cash flows far into the future and then discounting them back to the present value. For a company like NVIDIA, which is experiencing an unprecedented hypergrowth phase in a dynamic and cyclical industry, such long-term forecasts are subject to an extremely high degree of uncertainty.⁷⁹

The output of a DCF model is acutely sensitive to its core assumptions, particularly the discount rate (often the Weighted Average Cost of Capital, or WACC) and the perpetual growth rate used in the terminal value calculation.⁷⁹ A minor adjustment of 50 to 100 basis points to either of these assumptions can alter the calculated intrinsic value by hundreds of billions of dollars. Given the difficulty in accurately predicting when NVIDIA’s current 50%+ growth will decelerate to a sustainable long-term rate of 3-4%, any single DCF output should be viewed with extreme caution.⁸¹

Therefore, rather than attempting to pinpoint a single intrinsic value, a more useful approach is to consider what the current market capitalization implies. At its current valuation, the market is implicitly forecasting that NVIDIA will not only meet but likely exceed consensus growth expectations for several years, maintain its industry-leading profitability, successfully defend its market share against rising competition, and navigate complex geopolitical risks without significant disruption. The investment decision thus hinges on an investor’s confidence in the company’s ability to deliver on these exceptionally high expectations.

Works cited

1. Nvidia’s AI Factory Ecosystem: Building a Monopolistic Edge in the AI Infrastructure Era, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/nvidia-ai-factory-ecosystem-building-monopolistic-edge-ai-infrastructure-era-2508/
2. Nvidia – Wikipedia, accessed August 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia
3. Why’s Nvidia such a beast? It’s that CUDA thing. – SemiWiki, accessed August 26, 2025, https://semiwiki.com/forum/threads/why%E2%80%99s-nvidia-such-a-beast-it%E2%80%99s-that-cuda-thing.21393/
4. Why Is NVIDIA Becoming So Rich? AI Boom Brings a Bonanza! – Accio, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.accio.com/blog/why-is-nvidia-becoming-so-rich-ai-boom-brings-a-bonanza
5. NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2025, accessed August 26, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2025
6. NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) – Gross Margin (Annual) – AlphaQuery, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.alphaquery.com/stock/NVDA/fundamentals/annual/gross-margin
7. GPU and TPU Comparative Analysis Report | by ByteBridge – Medium, accessed August 26, 2025, https://bytebridge.medium.com/gpu-and-tpu-comparative-analysis-report-a5268e4f0d2a
8. AWS is working on new Graviton and Trainium chips as an alternative to Nvidia – Techzine, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.techzine.eu/news/infrastructure/132374/aws-is-working-on-new-graviton-and-trainium-chips-as-an-alternative-to-nvidia/
9. AWS wants its customers to use its Trainium chips rather than Nvidia’s H100 AI GPU and has a plan to convince them | TechRadar, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.techradar.com/pro/and-so-it-begins-amazon-web-services-is-aggressively-courting-its-own-customers-to-use-its-trainium-tech-rather-than-nvidias-gpus
10. NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for First Quarter Fiscal 2026, accessed August 26, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-first-quarter-fiscal-2026
11. Markets brace for impact of China sales, US deal ahead of Nvidia’s earnings – Mitrade, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-3-1070320-20250826
12. Better Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock: Nvidia vs. AMD | The Motley Fool, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/03/28/better-artificial-intelligence-ai-stock-nvidia-vs/
13. NVDA – Nvidia PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 26, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nasdaq-nvda/pe-ratio
14. Valuation – NVIDIA Corp NVDA – Morningstar, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnas/nvda/valuation
15. 2025 State of the Industry Report: Investment and Innovation Amidst …, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.semiconductors.org/2025-state-of-the-industry-report-investment-and-innovation-amidst-global-challenges-and-opportunities/
16. Semiconductor Market Size, Share, Growth & Forecast [2032] – Fortune Business Insights, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/semiconductor-market-102365
17. 2025 global semiconductor industry outlook – Deloitte, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/technology-media-telecom-outlooks/semiconductor-industry-outlook.html
18. 2025 State of the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.semiconductors.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/SIA-State-of-the-Industry-Report-2025.pdf
19. AI in Hardware Market Report 2025 – Research and Markets, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5939160/ai-in-hardware-market-report
20. AI Hardware Market Size & Share, Statistics Report 2025-2034, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/ai-hardware-market
21. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market Size and Growth 2025 to 2034 – Precedence Research, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.precedenceresearch.com/artificial-intelligence-market
22. Artificial Intelligence Market Size, Share | Industry Report, 2030 – Grand View Research, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market
23. NVIDIA Corporation – Home, accessed August 26, 2025, https://investor.nvidia.com/home/default.aspx
24. 2025 Global Semiconductor Industry Outlook | Deloitte US, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/Industries/tmt/articles/2025-global-semiconductor-industry-outlook.html
25. ‘Deeply Insulting’: How US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s comments on Nvidia H20 chips has angered China, creating problems for the world’s most-valuable company, accessed August 26, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/deeply-insulting-how-us-commerce-secretary-howard-lutnicks-comments-on-nvidia-h20-chips-has-angered-china-creating-problems-for-the-worlds-most-valuable-company/articleshow/123487778.cms
26. Nvidia and AMD agree to pay 15% of China chip export revenues to US – The Guardian, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/10/nvidia-amd-china-chip-sale-revenues
27. NVIDIA Corporation Revenue by Segment – Bullfincher.io, accessed August 26, 2025, https://bullfincher.io/companies/nvidia-corporation/revenue-by-segment
28. AMD vs NVIDIA Inference Benchmark: Who Wins? – Performance & Cost Per Million Tokens, accessed August 26, 2025, https://semianalysis.com/2025/05/23/amd-vs-nvidia-inference-benchmark-who-wins-performance-cost-per-million-tokens/
29. AMD vs Nvidia: The AI Stock That Could Win by 2028 – IO Fund, accessed August 26, 2025, https://io-fund.com/artificial-intelligence/amd-vs-nvidia-stock-prediction-2028
30. Realistically how close is AMD to Nvidia in AI : r/AMD_Stock – Reddit, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AMD_Stock/comments/1lghvnk/realistically_how_close_is_amd_to_nvidia_in_ai/
31. Intel Says It Won’t Compete With NVIDIA In AI Market, Shifts Focus Towards Bringing Cost-Effective AI Solutions With Gaudi 3 | SemiWiki, accessed August 26, 2025, https://semiwiki.com/forum/threads/intel-says-it-won%E2%80%99t-compete-with-nvidia-in-ai-market-shifts-focus-towards-bringing-cost-effective-ai-solutions-with-gaudi-3.21257/
32. Intel Gaudi 3 vs. Nvidia H100: Enterprise AI Inference Price-Performance Comparative Analysis – FiberMall, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.fibermall.com/blog/intel-gaudi3-vs-nvidia-h100.htm
33. NVIDIA H200 vs Gaudi 3: The AI GPU Battle Heats Up – Uvation, accessed August 26, 2025, https://uvation.com/articles/nvidia-h200-vs-gaudi-3-the-ai-gpu-battle-heats-up
34. Intel Gaudi research shows better price/performance than Nvidia A/H100 – Reddit, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/intelstock/comments/1ky4f9s/intel_gaudi_research_shows_better/
35. Understanding TPUs vs GPUs in AI: A Comprehensive Guide – DataCamp, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/tpu-vs-gpu-ai
36. TPU vs GPU in AI: Similarities and Differences – Liquid Web, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.liquidweb.com/gpu/vs-tpu/
37. TPU vs GPU: What’s the Difference in 2025? – CloudOptimo, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.cloudoptimo.com/blog/tpu-vs-gpu-what-is-the-difference-in-2025/
38. NVIDIA Revenue 2010-2025 | NVDA – Macrotrends, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NVDA/nvidia/revenue
39. NVIDIA Corporation Revenue 2016-2025 – Bullfincher, accessed August 26, 2025, https://bullfincher.io/companies/nvidia-corporation/revenue
40. NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2023, accessed August 26, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2023
41. NVIDIA Operating Income 2010-2025 | NVDA – Macrotrends, accessed August 26, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NVDA/nvidia/operating-income
42. accessed December 31, 1969, https://ir.nvidia.com/sec-filings/annual-reports-and-proxies/content/0001045810-25-000014/nvda-20250128.htm
43. NVIDIA Gross Margin 2010-2025 | NVDA – Macrotrends, accessed August 26, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NVDA/nvidia/gross-margin
44. NVIDIA Inventory 2010-2025 | NVDA – Macrotrends, accessed August 26, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NVDA/nvidia/inventory
45. Inventory For NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) – Finbox, accessed August 26, 2025, https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:NVDA/explorer/inventory/
46. Why’s Nvidia such a beast? It’s that CUDA thing. – Fierce Electronics, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.fierceelectronics.com/ai/whys-nvidia-such-beast-its-cuda-thing
47. CUDA Refresher: The GPU Computing Ecosystem | NVIDIA Technical Blog, accessed August 26, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/cuda-refresher-the-gpu-computing-ecosystem/
48. NVIDIA Completes Acquisition of Mellanox, Creating Major Force Driving Next-Gen Data Centers, accessed August 26, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-completes-acquisition-of-mellanox-creating-major-force-driving-next-gen-data-centers
49. NVIDIA to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9 Billion, accessed August 26, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-to-acquire-mellanox-for-6-9-billion
50. Why Nvidia’s Acquisition of Mellanox Is a Glimpse Into the Future of Computing – InQuartik, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.inquartik.com/blog/case-why-nvidia-acquired-mellanox/
51. Why Nvidia Bought Mellanox: ‘Future Datacenters Will Be…Like High Performance Computers’ – HPCwire, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.hpcwire.com/2019/03/14/why-nvidia-bought-mellanox-future-datacenters-will-belike-high-performance-computers/
52. Connecting The Dots On Why Nvidia Is Buying Mellanox – The Next Platform, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.nextplatform.com/2019/03/11/connecting-the-dots-on-why-nvidia-is-buying-mellanox/
53. R&D Expenses For NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) – Finbox, accessed August 26, 2025, https://finbox.com/BVL:NVDA/explorer/rd_exp/
54. NVIDIA Research and Development Expenses 2010-2025 | NVDA – Macrotrends, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NVDA/nvidia/research-development-expenses
55. Nvidia’s Earnings and Stock Buyback – Troy Elevator Inc, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.troyelevatorinc.com/news/story/28301834/nvidia-s-earnings-and-stock-buyback
56. Nvidia’s Share Buybacks: Optimism or Warning? – Saxo Bank, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.home.saxo/content/articles/equities/nvidias-share-buybacks-optimism-or-warning-01092023
57. NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Dividend Date & History – Koyfin, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.koyfin.com/company/nvda/dividends/
58. NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock (NVDA) Dividend History – Nasdaq, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/nvda/dividend-history
59. NVDA – Nvidia stock dividend history, payout ratio & dates – FullRatio, accessed August 26, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nasdaq-nvda/dividend
60. NVIDIA (NVDA) Investor Relations Material – 100% Free Access – Quartr, accessed August 26, 2025, https://quartr.com/companies/nvidia-corporation_3624
61. US policy pivot on chip sales in China. What does it mean for global tech?, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/08/us-policy-chip-sales-china-semiconductor-global-tech/
62. Hardware is eating the world – Deloitte, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/technology-management/tech-trends/2025/tech-trends-ai-hardware-and-computation-leading-ai-revolution.html
63. As Use of A.I. Soars, So Does the Energy and Water It Requires – Yale E360, accessed August 26, 2025, https://e360.yale.edu/features/artificial-intelligence-climate-energy-emissions
64. The local and global environmental footprint of the AI-driven boom in data centers | USAPP, accessed August 26, 2025, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2025/08/07/the-local-and-global-environmental-footprint-of-the-ai-driven-boom-in-data-centers/
65. Powering AI | Deloitte Global, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/issues/climate/powering-ai.html
66. NVIDIA’s Supply Chain, Decoded: How It Outperformed the Industry Through a Decade of Disruption! – Medium, accessed August 26, 2025, https://medium.com/@Leo-Analysis/comprehensive-analysis-nvidias-supply-chain-performance-measurement-2f9dc98e61dd
67. NVIDIA ($NVDA) Crypto-Mining Revenue Masking, False Segment Disclosures, and Gaming Demand Fabrication Case – TradingView, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.tradingview.com/news/11thestate:f8a7459c3094b:0-nvidia-nvda-crypto-mining-revenue-masking-false-segment-disclosures-and-gaming-demand-fabrication-case/
68. Supreme Court of the United States, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-970/322360/20240813143621125_23-970%20NVIDIA%20Joint%20Appendix%208-12-24%20Final.pdf
69. Nvidia’s auto biz surged last quarter. CEO Jensen Huang says it’s a multitrillion-dollar opportunity : r/NVDA_Stock – Reddit, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NVDA_Stock/comments/1kzy3xv/nvidias_auto_biz_surged_last_quarter_ceo_jensen/
70. AI & Accelerated Computing Solutions for Automotive Industries – NVIDIA, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/industries/automotive/
71. NVIDIA PE Ratio Trends – YCharts, accessed August 26, 2025, https://ycharts.com/companies/NVDA/pe_ratio
72. NASDAQ: NVDA – Nvidia stock analysis and financials – FullRatio, accessed August 26, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nasdaq-nvda/nvidia
73. NVIDIA (NVDA) PEG Ratio – MLQ.ai | Stocks, accessed August 26, 2025, https://mlq.ai/stocks/NVDA/peg-ratio/
74. NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock (NVDA) Price/Earnings & PEG Ratios | Nasdaq, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/nvda/price-earnings-peg-ratios
75. NVIDIA Stock Price Quote – NASDAQ: NVDA – Morningstar, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnas/nvda/quote
76. Intel – Public Comps and Valuation Multiples, accessed August 26, 2025, https://multiples.vc/public-comps/intel-valuation-multiples
77. Intel (INTC) – Market capitalization – Companies Market Cap, accessed August 26, 2025, https://companiesmarketcap.com/intel/marketcap/
78. NVIDIA (NVDA) Peg Ratio (TTM) – Zacks.com, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.zacks.com/stock/chart/NVDA/fundamental/peg-ratio-ttm
79. Top 3 Pitfalls of Discounted Cash Flow Analysis – Investopedia, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/investing/pitfalls-of-discounted-cash-flow-analysis/
80. Pros and Cons of the DCF Method to Value Tech Companies – ScaleX Invest, accessed August 26, 2025, https://www.scalex-invest.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-the-dcf-method-to-value-tech-companies
81. Why Small Manufacturing Firms Shun DCF – Pepperdine Digital Commons, accessed August 26, 2025, https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=jef