Slide Deck

1. Business Overview & Industry Structure

RTX Corporation (formerly Raytheon Technologies) operates as a profoundly consolidated aerospace and defense conglomerate. The entity was forged through the seminal 2020 merger of United Technologies Corporation (UTC) and Raytheon Company, a transaction explicitly designed to insulate commercial aerospace cyclicality with defense revenue stability. Headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, RTX functions as the fourth-largest contractor for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and a ubiquitous supplier to the global commercial aviation duopoly.

Following a strategic realignment in 2023, RTX streamlined its operations into three principal reporting segments ¹:

• Collins Aerospace: A premier Tier 1 supplier of technologically advanced aerospace and defense products. The segment designs, manufactures, and supports avionics, flight control systems, electric power generation, environmental control systems, and cabin interiors.¹ Collins serves both commercial airlines and defense contractors, maintaining a massive installed base of $170 billion, encompassing content on more than 115,000 aircraft.⁴ For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025, Collins Aerospace generated $30.2 billion in adjusted sales and $4.9 billion in adjusted operating profit, yielding an operating margin (Return on Sales) of 16.2%.⁵
• Pratt & Whitney: A global leader in the design, manufacture, and servicing of aircraft engines and auxiliary power units (APUs). The segment operates over 90,000 engines in service across commercial and military sectors.⁴ Its flagship commercial product is the PW1000G Geared Turbofan (GTF) engine family, predominantly utilized on the Airbus A320neo, while its military portfolio includes the F135 engine for the F-35 Lightning II.⁷ In 2025, Pratt & Whitney reported $32.9 billion in adjusted sales and $2.7 billion in adjusted operating profit, resulting in an 8.3% margin.⁵
• Raytheon: The defense-centric arm providing advanced integrated air and missile defense systems, precision weapons, radars, command and control systems, and electronic warfare solutions.¹ Key franchises include the Patriot missile system, Tomahawk cruise missiles, Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM), and the Standard Missile (SM) family.¹ In 2025, Raytheon delivered $28.0 billion in adjusted sales and $3.2 billion in adjusted operating profit, reflecting an 11.5% margin.⁵

For the fiscal year 2025, RTX achieved total consolidated adjusted sales of $88.6 billion, representing 11% organic growth year-over-year, alongside $7.9 billion in free cash flow and a record year-end backlog of $268 billion.⁵

Industry Structure and Competitive Dynamics

The aerospace and defense (A&D) industry structure is highly consolidated, characterized by immense barriers to entry, complex regulatory frameworks, and unique operational constraints that dictate capital flow and profitability.

Commercial Aerospace Structure: The commercial aviation airframer sector operates as a rigid global duopoly controlled by Boeing and Airbus. Within this ecosystem, RTX acts as a critical OEM supplier. The propulsion and avionics sub-sectors operate on a classic “razor-and-blade” economic model.⁸ Original equipment (engines and avionics suites) is frequently sold to airframers or airlines at cost, or even at a slight loss, to secure placement on the aircraft.⁸ The true economic value is extracted over the subsequent 20 to 30 years through high-margin aftermarket maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services, as well as the sale of proprietary life-limited parts (LLPs).⁷ In propulsion, RTX competes primarily with GE Aerospace, Safran, and Rolls-Royce. In avionics and systems, competitors include Honeywell, Safran, Parker-Hannifin, and TransDigm.

Defense Contracting Structure: The U.S. defense market is a monopsony (a single major buyer) serviced by a “cozy oligopoly” of five prime contractors: Lockheed Martin, RTX, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman.⁸ The contracting structure fundamentally dictates profitability. Historically, the DoD utilized “cost-plus” contracts for high-risk development programs, assuring contractors a guaranteed margin regardless of technical hurdles. However, over the past decade, the DoD shifted substantial risk onto contractors via “fixed-price development contracts”. Under these agreements, contractors bid a fixed amount to develop unproven technologies. If engineering hurdles arise or macroeconomic inflation drives up material and labor costs, the contractor absorbs 100% of the cost overruns. This dynamic severely limits upside profitability while exposing primes to asymmetric downside risk, fundamentally altering the unit economics of defense innovation.

2. Competitive Advantage Analysis

A rigorous analysis of competitive advantage requires separating the theoretical existence of a moat from the actual financial returns generated. Only a business with a competitive advantage is worth investing in, and that advantage must manifest in superior Return on Equity (ROE), Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), and unit economics.

Segment Moat Evaluation

Pratt & Whitney: The Propulsion Duopoly Pratt & Whitney’s theoretical competitive advantage is rooted in its ~35% market share in commercial aircraft engines and its co-monopoly position on the Airbus A320neo family alongside CFM International (a joint venture between GE Aerospace and Safran).⁸ The development of a modern commercial jet engine requires billions of dollars in R&D, decades of metallurgical expertise, and rigorous FAA/EASA safety certifications, establishing an insurmountable barrier to entry. Once an airline selects an engine platform for its fleet, it is virtually locked in. Switching costs are astronomical due to the necessity of maintaining homogenous engine pools for maintenance efficiency, pilot and mechanic training, and spare parts inventory. Pratt & Whitney’s installed base acts as a captive audience for decades of highly predictable, inflation-protected aftermarket service revenue.⁴

Collins Aerospace: Spec-In Switching Costs

Collins Aerospace benefits from profound “spec-in” switching costs. When an airframer designs a new aircraft, they select specific components—ranging from flight control systems to thermal management—that are rigorously tested and certified for that specific airframe. Once a Collins product is “specced in,” it becomes a sole-source or dual-source necessity for the life of the aircraft program. Replacing a Collins component with a competitor’s alternative would require the airframer to undergo a prohibitively expensive and time-consuming recertification process with aviation authorities, ensuring Collins retains pricing power over the lifecycle of the platform.

Raytheon: Classified Barriers and Mission Criticality Raytheon’s defense franchise possesses an ironclad moat built on classified technology, security clearances, and deeply entrenched relationships with the U.S. DoD. Raytheon is a sole-source provider for critical national security infrastructure, including the Patriot and AMRAAM missile systems. The barriers to entry are insurmountable for new entrants due to the classified nature of the intellectual property, the requirement for thousands of cleared personnel, and the massive capital intensity required for specialized munitions foundries, rocket motor casting, and testing ranges.¹⁴

Quantitative Evidence: The Disconnect Between Moat and Returns

Despite these formidable structural advantages, a quantitative evaluation of RTX’s historical financial performance reveals a severe disconnect. A true wide-moat business must generate returns substantially above its cost of capital. RTX has largely failed to do so.

Fiscal Year	Return on Equity (ROE)	Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)	Operating Margin
2016	18.33%	9.86%	14.36%
2017	15.37%	9.02%	13.60%
2018	13.71%	2.05%	8.29%
2019	13.26%	3.77%	10.84%
2020 (Merger)	-4.88%	1.56%	-3.34%
2021	5.29%	3.23%	7.98%
2022	7.16%	3.70%	8.21%
2023 (GTF Charge)	5.34%	2.47%	5.17%
2024	7.94%	3.85%	8.10%
2025	10.32%	5.72% – 8.50%*	10.50%

Data compiled from historical financial metrics and multiple data providers. ROIC calculation methodologies vary slightly between sources, with estimates for 2025 ranging from 5.48% to 8.5%.¹⁷

Over the past decade, RTX’s ROE has averaged a mediocre 9.18%.¹⁷ More concerning is the ROIC. For the trailing twelve months ending December 2025, RTX’s ROIC sits between 5.72% and 8.5%.¹⁹ When measured against an estimated Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of approximately 6.89%, RTX frequently earns returns that barely match, or fall below, its cost of capital.²¹

Furthermore, the consolidated operating margin of 10.5% ¹⁷ is severely compressed compared to pure-play aerospace compounders like TransDigm, which routinely posts operating margins exceeding 45%.¹¹

Conclusion on Competitive Advantage: Through the framework of capital returns, RTX is currently a poorly performing business trapped inside a structurally magnificent industry. The theoretical moat is wide, but chronic operational missteps, fixed-price contract losses, and catastrophic manufacturing defects have prevented the company from translating its market position into superior shareholder value creation.

3. The Pratt & Whitney GTF Engine Issue — A Critical Deep Dive

The primary catalyst suppressing RTX’s financial returns and valuation is the severe manufacturing defect within Pratt & Whitney’s PW1000G Geared Turbofan (GTF) engine program. This issue represents a fundamental failure in quality control and risk management.

The Defect and Scope

In July 2023, RTX disclosed a “rare condition” in the powdered metal used to forge high-pressure turbine and high-pressure compressor disks.²³ Manufactured at an RTX subsidiary facility (HMI) in Clayville, New York, between October 2015 and September 2021, the nickel-based superalloy powder contained a microscopic contaminant—specifically, a microscopic occlusion that could not be detected by standard “north-south” inspection methods.²³ This inclusion creates a severe risk of micro-cracking and premature fatigue failure in components operating at extreme temperatures and pressures.²⁷

The defect necessitated a massive, accelerated global recall. Approximately 1,200 to 3,000 GTF engines powering the Airbus A320neo family require early removal, complete disassembly, and specialized “angle scan” ultrasonic inspections.²³

Operational and Financial Impact

The operational fallout for airline customers has been catastrophic. Wing-to-wing engine repair times, initially estimated at 60 days, ballooned to between 250 and 360 days due to severe constraints in global MRO capacity and spare parts availability.²³ Consequently, an average of 350 A320neo aircraft are projected to remain grounded (Aircraft on Ground, or AOG) simultaneously through 2026, severely crippling the capacity of airlines such as Wizz Air, Spirit Airlines, and IndiGo.²³ Wizz Air specifically noted that the lower time-on-wing performance constrained capacity and led to lower-than-expected profits, projecting groundings to last until March 2027.³⁰

The financial toll on RTX is staggering. In the third quarter of 2023, RTX recorded a massive $3 billion pre-tax operating profit charge to account for Pratt & Whitney’s 51% program share of the liability.²⁴ The gross industry-wide cost of the disaster is estimated between $6 billion and $11 billion.²³ From a cash flow perspective, RTX is burdened with heavy compensation payments to grounded airlines. Cash outflows for powder metal compensation totaled approximately $1 billion in 2025 and are modeled to be $700 million in 2026, pushing cumulative cash usage toward $2.8 billion by the end of 2026.³²

Competitive Fallout and Long-Term Implications

This episode reveals severe deficiencies in Pratt & Whitney’s legacy manufacturing quality controls. The inability to detect the microscopic occlusion prior to final component forging highlights vulnerabilities in the incredibly tight tolerances required by the geared turbofan architecture.²³

Consequently, this failure has handed a significant competitive opening to GE Aerospace and Safran. The competing CFM LEAP-1A engine is currently winning roughly 75% of new A320neo orders as airlines aggressively pivot toward reliability, demonstrating a willingness to sacrifice the GTF’s slight fuel-burn advantage to avoid crippling groundings.³³ Pratt & Whitney’s reputation, built over a century on the tagline “Dependable Engines,” has suffered severe damage.²⁶

Remediation Status (Early 2026)

As of early 2026, management claims the financial and technical remediation is “on track”.³² PW1100 AOG levels peaked in 2025 and declined by over 20% by the fourth quarter.⁹ To clear the backlog, RTX successfully increased GTF MRO output by 26% for the full year 2025, culminating in a 39% output surge in Q4, aided by a 16% reduction in turnaround time and the implementation of additive manufacturing repairs that reduce processing time by 60%.⁶

Looking forward, Pratt & Whitney is banking on the “GTF Advantage” engine variant, which received FAA certification in 2025 and enters service in 2026.⁵ The GTF Advantage features a redesigned hot section that lowers operating temperatures and utilizes improved cooling hole geometries, promising to double time-on-wing durability compared to the original design.²⁷ While this provides a technical pathway to restore performance, the cash drag and market share erosion will persist as a headwind through at least 2027.

4. Defense Segment Dynamics & the Current Geopolitical Environment

The post-2022 geopolitical landscape—characterized by the protracted war in Ukraine, escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific, and multi-front conflicts in the Middle East—has triggered a global defense super-cycle. NATO allies have committed to increasing core defense spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2035 (up from the historical 2% target), while defense budgets in the Asia-Pacific and Middle East are projected to grow at 3-4% annually over the next five years.⁶

Demand and Backlog Trajectory

This macroeconomic environment has driven historic demand for Raytheon’s specialized products. At the close of 2025, RTX’s total defense backlog stood at an unprecedented $107 billion.⁵ The Raytheon segment specifically achieved a full-year book-to-bill ratio of 1.43, culminating in a segment-specific record backlog of $75 billion.⁶ International orders now comprise 47% of Raytheon’s backlog, an increase of three percentage points year-over-year, which is highly favorable as Foreign Military Sales (FMS) and direct commercial international sales typically carry superior margins compared to domestic U.S. procurement.⁹

Growth is heavily concentrated in integrated air and missile defense systems and global munitions replenishment. Key franchise drivers include ⁹:

• Patriot Systems and GEM-T: Secured massive international orders, including a $1.2 billion contract from Spain and a $2.5 billion GEM-T order supporting multiple international customers.
• AMRAAM: Production is ramping up significantly, backed by multi-billion dollar awards, with output more than doubling year-to-date through Q3 2025.³⁹
• LTAMDS (Lower-Tier Air and Missile Defense Sensor): Advanced next-generation radar transitioning into production with a $2 billion initial award.¹⁰
• Tamir / SkyHunter: A $1.2 billion contract utilizing a newly completed Raytheon-Rafael joint venture manufacturing facility in Camden, Arkansas.⁹

Capacity Constraints and Execution

The primary constraint on RTX’s defense growth is not end-market demand, but industrial capacity. The U.S. defense industrial base is struggling with severe supply chain fragility, particularly regarding specialized castings, forgings, and solid rocket motors.

To alleviate these bottlenecks, RTX is deploying massive capital. The company successfully increased munitions output by 20% across critical programs (GEM-T, AMRAAM, Coyote) in 2025.³⁷ In February 2026, Raytheon signed five landmark, up-to-seven-year framework agreements with the DoD designed to quadruple the production of certain munitions, targeting over 1,000 Tomahawks and at least 1,900 AMRAAMs annually.⁴¹ This requires aggressive domestic infrastructure expansion, including a $115 million, 50% physical expansion of the Redstone missile integration facility in Huntsville, Alabama.¹⁰

Fixed-Price Development Contract Risk

Despite robust demand, Raytheon remains exposed to severe margin compression from legacy fixed-price development contracts. RTX has suffered material losses when technical hurdles combined with persistent inflation to push costs well above fixed bid limits. For example, in Q2 2024, Raytheon recognized a $575 million to $600 million charge related to the termination of a fixed-price development contract with a foreign customer.⁴³ While not as catastrophic as peer Boeing’s multi-billion dollar write-downs on programs like the KC-46A and VC-25B ⁸, these contracts remain a structural drag on Raytheon’s ability to expand operating margins beyond the 11-12% range.⁷ Management has publicly committed to avoiding high-risk fixed-price development contracts for future programs, but the legacy backlog remains a liability.

Political and Regulatory Risks (DOGE & Executive Orders)

A severe new risk vector emerged in early 2026. On January 7, 2026, President Donald Trump signed an executive order explicitly threatening to block defense companies from executing share buybacks or issuing dividends if they are deemed to be “underperforming” on contract deliveries or failing to invest sufficiently in production capacity.⁴⁵ Trump specifically singled out Raytheon on social media as being the “least responsive” to DoD needs.⁴⁶

Concurrently, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has begun auditing Pentagon budgets, claiming over $11 billion in initial efficiency cuts primarily focused on civilian workforce reductions and consulting contracts.⁴⁸ While these early cuts target overhead, a deeper DOGE review poses a tail risk to major prime contractor margins if the administration forces renegotiations of legacy hardware programs.⁴⁸ The immediate result of this political pressure is a forced capital allocation pivot: defense primes are being publicly coerced to prioritize domestic capital expenditures over shareholder returns, fundamentally altering the investment thesis.⁴⁵

5. Commercial Aerospace Cycle & Aftermarket Economics

The commercial aerospace market is currently experiencing a unique, prolonged upcycle driven paradoxically by systemic failures at the primary airframers.

Airframer Constraints as an Aftermarket Tailwind

Global air passenger traffic (RPKs) grew approximately 5% in 2025 and is projected to grow another 5% in 2026, demonstrating resilient consumer demand.³⁸ However, the OEM duopoly is failing to meet this demand. Boeing is crippled by quality control scandals and FAA production caps, while Airbus is missing delivery targets due to severe engine (GTF and LEAP) and aerostructure supply shortages.⁵⁰

This inability of OEMs to deliver new aircraft forces airlines to extend the service lives of older, less fuel-efficient aircraft. This dynamic creates an extraordinarily bullish environment for RTX’s aftermarket businesses.⁵⁰ The longer legacy planes fly, the more intensive and frequent their maintenance requirements become.

The Aftermarket “Cash Flywheel”

RTX’s commercial aftermarket is a massive, highly profitable enterprise. Collins Aerospace currently commands an installed base representing $105 billion in out-of-warranty aircraft content.³⁸ Pratt & Whitney’s massive fleet of legacy V2500 engines (powering older A320ceos) continues to require highly lucrative, heavy shop visits, with over 800 V2500 shop visits expected in 2026.³²

As the GTF fleet matures, its aftermarket revenue is also accelerating. GTF shop visit content is increasing in complexity as engines hit their first major overhaul cycles, pushing aftermarket margins into the “low double-digits” with an expected 100 to 200 basis points of expansion in 2026.³² In 2025, commercial aftermarket sales at Pratt & Whitney grew 21% organically, while Collins Aerospace aftermarket sales grew 13%.³⁸ This aftermarket revenue stream acts as a highly predictable, high-margin annuity that insulates RTX against cyclical downturns in new aircraft orders, serving as the company’s primary cash-generation flywheel.⁸

6. Growth History, Trajectory & Organic Growth

Since the 2020 merger, RTX’s headline revenue growth has been obscured by pandemic-era airline bankruptcies, the spin-offs of Otis and Carrier, and the multi-billion dollar GTF charges. However, the underlying organic growth trajectory of the remaining aerospace and defense assets has stabilized at a robust level.

In 2024, RTX delivered 11% organic sales growth.⁵³ This momentum continued seamlessly into 2025, with full-year adjusted sales reaching $88.6 billion, representing another 11% organic growth figure.⁶ This growth was broad-based across all end markets: commercial OE up 10%, commercial aftermarket up 18%, and defense up 8%.³⁸

Medium-Term Outlook

RTX’s medium-term growth (3-5 years) is heavily derisked by its staggering $268 billion total backlog.⁵ This backlog provides nearly three full years of revenue visibility without requiring a single new order.³⁶

For 2026, management has provided conservative guidance for adjusted sales between $92.0 billion and $93.0 billion, representing 5% to 6% organic growth.⁶

• Collins Aerospace: Expected to grow mid-single digits on an adjusted basis, and high-single digits organically.⁶
• Pratt & Whitney: Expected to grow mid-single digits organically. A slight headwind in commercial OE mix (low single-digit growth) will be offset by high-single-digit aftermarket growth, which is projected to account for ~70% of the segment’s growth in 2026.⁶
• Raytheon: Projected to achieve mid-to-high single-digit growth in both sales and operating profit as the massive $75 billion backlog converts into active production deliveries.⁶

Assuming the GTF remediation remains contained to the forecasted $700 million cash drag in 2026 and tapers off entirely by 2028 ²⁷, RTX’s organic growth profile is set to reliably compound in the mid-single digits over the next 3 to 5 years, driven almost entirely by the execution of existing, funded backlog.

7. Capital Allocation

From the perspective of LRT Capital Management, capital allocation is the definitive link between business value and shareholder value. If management’s capital allocation is bad, the investment is flawed. For RTX, the strategy presents a mixed track record that is currently undergoing a forced evolution.

The Merger and Divestitures

The original 2020 merger rationale—combining UTC’s commercial aerospace assets with Raytheon’s defense portfolio—successfully created a balanced entity that used defense cash flows to survive the commercial aerospace collapse during COVID-19. More importantly, the strategic spin-offs of Otis Elevator and Carrier Global prior to the merger were masterful capital allocation decisions, unlocking massive shareholder value by separating pure-play industrial assets from the A&D conglomerate. More recently, in Q3 2024, Collins sold its actuation and flight control business to Safran for $1.8 billion, a highly disciplined move to divest lower-margin, non-core commodity manufacturing and focus on higher-value systems.

Share Buybacks: Value Destructive Timing

Historically, RTX aggressively returned capital to shareholders, returning over $33 billion between the 2020 merger and 2024.⁵⁸ However, the timing and execution of these buybacks were highly questionable. In late 2023, amidst the depths of the GTF crisis and facing a $3 billion charge, management executed a massive $10 billion Accelerated Share Repurchase (ASR) program.⁵⁸ To fund this, RTX took on additional debt. Borrowing money to buy back stock at a premium, precisely when operational cash was desperately needed to fund engine remediation and customer compensation, is a textbook example of poor capital allocation driven by short-term EPS targets rather than intrinsic value creation.

By 2025, capital returns shifted drastically. Over the first nine months of 2025, RTX repurchased a paltry $50 million in stock ³⁶, effectively halting the program. The company is now actively prioritizing debt reduction, paying down $1.1 billion in Q4 2025 alone.⁶

Dividends and Political Pressure

RTX currently pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share (1.34% yield), utilizing approximately 54.8% of trailing earnings and 27.3% of cash flow.⁶³ Despite the January 2026 Executive Order from the Trump administration threatening to block payouts, CEO Chris Calio publicly affirmed RTX’s commitment to the dividend, noting the company’s 88-year history of consecutive payouts.⁵⁸ The dividend appears highly secure based on the $7.9 billion in 2025 free cash flow, which covers the ~$3.65 billion annual dividend obligation by roughly 2.1 times.⁶²

Capital Expenditures and Balance Sheet

Driven by DoD pressure and genuine backlog demand, RTX is significantly ramping up internal investments. CapEx and R&D spend exceeded $10 billion in 2025, with pure CapEx hitting $2.6 billion.⁶ For 2026, total investment will rise to $10.5 billion, with CapEx accelerating to $3.1 billion.⁶ These investments are highly accretive and necessary to sustain the moat, funding automation, digital factory integration (>50% of manufacturing hours are now digitally connected), and new physical capacity (e.g., a $200 million isothermal forging press expansion in Columbus, GA, and the $115 million Redstone expansion in Alabama).¹⁰

Total debt stands at approximately $38.2 billion, maintaining a manageable leverage profile with an interest coverage ratio near 6.6x.²² The balance sheet is adequately capitalized to absorb the remaining GTF liabilities without threatening investment-grade credit ratings.

8. Management Quality

Christopher T. Calio assumed the role of CEO in May 2024, succeeding Greg Hayes, the architect of the UTC/Raytheon merger.³ Calio is slated to assume the Chairman title in April 2026.⁶⁷

Track Record and Background

Calio’s background is somewhat unorthodox for a highly technical A&D prime; he holds a Juris Doctor (JD) and an MBA, lacking a formal engineering background.⁶¹ He rose through the legal and corporate strategy ranks at UTC before serving as President of Pratt & Whitney from 2020 to 2022, and subsequently as COO of RTX.³

Critically, Calio was the President of Pratt & Whitney during the tail end of the manufacturing window (2015-2021) when the powdered metal defect was actively occurring.²³ While he did not initiate the flawed manufacturing process, the failure of quality control to detect the occlusion occurred under his watch. However, as COO and then CEO, Calio has been lauded by the market for his transparent and aggressive fleet management response. He took the painful $3 billion charge upfront, rapidly scaled global MRO capacity, and avoided obfuscating the issue—a stark contrast to peer management teams handling crises.²⁴

Incentive Alignment

Executive compensation is appropriately aligned with shareholder value creation, utilizing metrics that penalize poor capital allocation. The 2024 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) is heavily weighted toward Adjusted Net Income (40%) and Free Cash Flow (40%).⁶⁷ More importantly, the long-term Performance Share Units (PSUs) are tied to Adjusted EPS (35%), Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) (35%), and relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) (30%).⁶⁷ The heavy weighting of ROIC is vital; it theoretically penalizes management for destroying value through overpriced acquisitions or inefficient capital expenditures, forcing discipline on the balance sheet.

9. Key Risks

Beyond the existential threat of further GTF engine defects or delays in the GTF Advantage rollout, RTX faces several material risks:

• Political and Regulatory Risk (DOGE/EO): The Trump administration’s hostility toward defense prime profit margins is a severe overhang. If the DoD aggressively enforces the January 2026 Executive Order, RTX could be legally barred from share repurchases or dividend hikes, destroying the stock’s appeal to dividend-growth investors and altering the fundamental capital return thesis.⁴⁵ Furthermore, DOGE-driven budget cuts could force the renegotiation of highly profitable sustainment contracts or cancel future procurement.⁴⁸
• Supply Chain Fragility: The aerospace supply chain remains fundamentally broken. RTX is highly dependent on constrained sub-tier suppliers for specialized castings, forgings, and solid rocket motors. Any disruption in these critical nodes immediately halts final assembly, trapping working capital in unfinished inventory.
• Fixed-Price Contract Execution: While RTX has pledged to avoid future fixed-price development contracts, legacy agreements remain on the books. If inflation spikes or engineering talent shortages worsen, Raytheon could face further multi-hundred-million-dollar charges, suppressing margin expansion.
• Tariff and Trade Friction: As a global manufacturer relying heavily on international material sourcing and foreign military sales, RTX is highly exposed to trade wars. In Q4 2025 alone, RTX faced an estimated $600 million gross impact from tariffs.⁶ While mitigation strategies (pricing adjustments, rerouting supply, duty drawbacks) are in place, a broader global trade war would compress gross margins across Collins and Pratt & Whitney.⁷

10. Valuation Context

As of early 2026, RTX trades at a forward P/E ratio of approximately 18x to 20x, and an Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple of roughly 18x to 20x.⁸

Peer Comparison

RTX’s valuation reflects a persistent “conglomerate discount” and the lingering stigma of the GTF crisis.

• Commercial Peers: Pure-play commercial aerospace compounders command massive premiums due to their cleaner balance sheets and unencumbered aftermarket flywheels. GE Aerospace trades at 37x-40x forward P/E and 24x EV/EBITDA.⁸ TransDigm, the gold standard for aerospace unit economics, trades near 32x-40x forward P/E.¹¹ Safran trades at approximately 27x P/E.⁸
• Defense Peers: RTX trades roughly in line with, or slightly above, traditional defense primes like Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics, which typically hover in the 15x-18x P/E range.⁸

Implied Growth and Normalized Earnings

Consensus estimates for 2026 project revenues of $92.0 billion to $93.0 billion, Adjusted EPS of $6.60 to $6.80, and Free Cash Flow of $8.25 billion to $8.75 billion.⁶ At a ~$200 share price, this implies a forward P/E of ~29.4x (based on 2026 consensus) and an attractive Free Cash Flow yield of over 4% on 2026 estimates.⁹

To understand RTX’s true intrinsic value, an investor must look to “normalized” earnings power in 2027 and beyond. Once the $700 million annual GTF compensation cash drag rolls off entirely ³², and the $3.1 billion in 2026 CapEx begins generating returns through automated factory output and increased munitions capacity ⁶, RTX’s baseline free cash flow should comfortably exceed $10 billion annually. The current market multiple appears to be penalizing the company heavily for the near-term GTF cash drain and political noise, while discounting the long-term annuity value of the commercial aftermarket and the absolute certainty of the $107 billion defense backlog.

11. Bull Case vs. Bear Case

The Bull Case

The strongest bullish thesis for RTX centers on the absolute inevitability of its backlog conversion and the superior economics of its aftermarket. The commercial airline industry is trapped; unable to secure sufficient new aircraft from Boeing or Airbus due to systemic supply chain failures, airlines must fly older planes longer. This guarantees unprecedented, highly visible demand for Collins and Pratt & Whitney’s high-margin MRO services.³⁸ Simultaneously, the geopolitical environment ensures that Raytheon’s munitions factories will run at maximum capacity for the next decade to restock depleted U.S. and NATO inventories.⁹ As the $2.8 billion cumulative GTF compensation penalty concludes in 2026/2027 ³², cash flow will violently accelerate. If management successfully executes its CapEx automation plans, operating margins will expand, ROIC will climb above 10%, and the valuation gap between RTX (18x EV/EBITDA) and pure-play peers like GE Aerospace (24x EV/EBITDA) will organically close, resulting in substantial multiple expansion and shareholder returns.⁸

The Bear Case

The bear thesis posits that RTX is a bloated, poorly integrated conglomerate incapable of executing flawlessly on highly complex engineering programs. In this view, the GTF powdered metal defect was not a one-off anomaly, but a symptom of systemic quality control degradation resulting from the relentless pursuit of cost-cutting. If the “GTF Advantage” engine fails to achieve its durability promises in harsh environments, airlines will permanently shift market share to the CFM LEAP engine, destroying Pratt & Whitney’s terminal value.³³ On the defense side, legacy fixed-price development contracts will continue to hemorrhage cash due to persistent supply chain inflation and labor inefficiencies.⁸ Finally, the Trump administration’s DOGE efficiency drive and anti-buyback Executive Orders effectively cap Raytheon’s profit margins, turning the defense segment into a heavily regulated, low-return utility that perpetually drags down the consolidated Return on Invested Capital. Under these conditions, the company will continuously fail to earn its cost of capital, making the stock dead money and fundamentally undeserving of a premium aerospace multiple.

Frequently Asked Questions

General Questions

• What thoughtful questions have other investors asked about this company?
  During the Q4 2025 earnings call, analysts probed several critical vulnerabilities. Peter Arment (Baird) questioned the actual progress and financial trajectory of the GTF engine fleet management plan. Ronald Epstein (Bank of America) pressed management on how they will navigate increased government scrutiny and new policies attempting to restrict capital allocation (dividends/buybacks). Robert Stallard (RBC) questioned the conservatism in Pratt & Whitney’s OEM guidance given airframer demands, while Scott Dorsley (Deutsche Bank) probed why high-margin commercial aftermarket growth is forecast to slow.

Cyclicality & Earnings Nature

• Are earnings at a cyclical high or cyclical low? Earnings are expanding toward a cyclical high. RTX reported $88.6 billion in adjusted sales for 2025 (up 11% organically) and adjusted EPS of $6.29 (up 10%).
• Are earnings driven primarily by the external environment or internal company actions? Both. The external environment is driving unprecedented demand, resulting in a record $268 billion backlog fueled by a global rearmament super-cycle and constrained commercial aircraft supply. However, internal operational failures—specifically the Pratt & Whitney powdered metal defect—have acted as a massive structural drag, resulting in billions in cash outflows for customer compensation [],.
• How stable are revenues? Extremely stable. The $268 billion backlog provides nearly three full years of revenue visibility ,.
• Outlook and Market Size?
  The market is expanding globally. NATO allies have committed to increasing defense spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2035, and Middle East/Asia-Pacific budgets are growing 3-4% annually. Commercial passenger traffic (RPKs) is expected to grow 5% in 2026.

Business Quality & Competitive Moat

• Is the industry getting more or less competitive? The industry remains a rigid oligopoly with insurmountable barriers to entry.
• How profitable is this business? Operating margins sit around 10.5%. Return on Equity (ROE) was 10.32% in 2025. Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) improved to roughly 8.5% in 2025. While the business is generating returns slightly above its estimated ~6.89% cost of capital , these returns are mediocre for a business with such profound structural advantages.
• Nature of competition and switching costs?
  RTX benefits from extreme customer captivity. Collins Aerospace relies on “spec-in” switching costs, meaning once a part is certified for an airframe, it is rarely replaced. Pratt & Whitney operates a razor-and-blade model where engine sales lock airlines into decades of lucrative aftermarket services.
• Foreign, low-cost labor threat? Direct disruption from foreign low-cost labor is nonexistent due to classified clearances, ITAR regulations, and extreme engineering tolerances. However, supply chain reliance on foreign materials (like Chinese rare earth elements) remains a severe vulnerability, and RTX faced $600 million in tariff impacts in Q4 2025 alone [],.

Financial Condition & Balance Sheet

• Off-balance sheet liabilities and hidden assets? The largest “hidden asset” is the $268 billion backlog. The most severe off-balance sheet liability is the remaining cash obligation to airlines grounded by the GTF engine defect. RTX expects $700 million in cash outflows for this in 2026, bringing cumulative cash usage to approximately $2.8 billion.
• How CapEx hungry is this business? Highly capital intensive. RTX spent $10 billion on CapEx and R&D in 2025. For 2026, CapEx alone will accelerate to $3.1 billion to build out new munitions foundries and automated factories.
• Accounting conservatism? RTX utilizes percentage-of-completion accounting on fixed-price development contracts, which requires significant management judgment. This is a risk vector; in Q2 2024, RTX had to recognize a $575 million charge on a terminated fixed-price contract.

Capital Allocation & Management

• Free cash flow and management philosophy? RTX generated $7.9 billion in free cash flow in 2025 and guides for $8.25 billion to $8.75 billion in 2026. Historically, management relied heavily on share buybacks, including a debt-funded $10 billion Accelerated Share Repurchase in 2023.
• Recent acquisitions or buybacks? Management has pivoted from buybacks to divestitures and debt reduction. They recently sold Collins’ actuation business for $1.8 billion and Simmonds Precision Products for $765 million. In the first nine months of 2025, they repurchased a mere $50 million in stock.
• Executive compensation?
  Incentives are tied to Adjusted EPS, Free Cash Flow, and ROIC.

Valuation & Market Data

• Valuation metrics?
  RTX is a standard US C-Corp. It currently trades at a trailing P/E of roughly 40x and a forward P/E of roughly 29x,.
• Dividend Policy?
  RTX pays an annualized dividend of $2.72 (yielding ~1.34%), utilizing about 54.8% of trailing earnings.
• Earnings vs. Cash Flow divergence? Free cash flow ($7.9 billion) is robust and closely tracks net income ($6.73 billion), indicating healthy earnings quality.

Risks & Downside

• Catastrophic loss or total loss?
  A complete total loss is practically impossible due to the U.S. government implicitly backstopping the defense industrial base. However, catastrophic equity drawdowns remain a risk if the GTF Advantage engine fails to resolve durability issues, or if fixed-price defense contracts suffer massive inflationary overruns.
• What factors would cause the stock to decline?
  A major overhang is regulatory and political risk. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is auditing major procurement programs. Furthermore, in October 2024, RTX was forced to pay a massive $1 billion fine to the DOJ and SEC for defrauding the DOD with inflated pricing and bribing Qatari military officials to win contracts,.

Recent News & Events

• Business environment changes?
  In January 2026, the White House issued an executive order threatening to block defense contractors from paying dividends or repurchasing shares if they are deemed to be “underperforming” on delivery schedules. This actively threatens management’s capital return framework, though CEO Chris Calio has publicly stated RTX remains committed to its dividend.
• New production and contracts? In February 2026, RTX signed five landmark framework agreements with the DOD to quadruple the production of critical missiles (Tomahawk, AMRAAM, and SM-6) over the next seven years. RTX is also investing $200 million into a new isothermal forging press facility in Columbus, Georgia to alleviate supply chain bottlenecks.

Works cited

1. Form 10-K – RTX Investor Relations, accessed February 28, 2026, https://investors.rtx.com/static-files/5357f81e-6506-48d7-bebd-dea40e0fd051
2. Form 10-K for RTX Corp filed 02/05/2024 – Lobbyregister, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/41/40/613613/RTX-Annual-Report.pdf
3. Chris Calio to succeed Greg Hayes as CEO of RTX – Euro-sd, accessed February 28, 2026, https://euro-sd.com/2023/12/major-news/35663/calio-to-be-next-rtx-ceo/
4. RTX Corporation FORM 10-K 2024, accessed February 28, 2026, https://materials.proxyvote.com/Approved/75513E/20250304/AR_597218/INDEX.HTML?page=1
5. RTX reports 2025 results and announces 2026 outlook, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.rtx.com/news/news-center/2026/01/27/rtx-reports-2025-results-and-announces-2026-outlook-
6. RTX Corporation Earnings – Analysis & Highlights for Q4 2025, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.alpha-sense.com/earnings/rtx/
7. RTX (RTX) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript | The Motley Fool, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2026/01/26/rtx-rtx-q1-2025-earnings-call-transcript/
8. GE Aerospace Investment Analysis, https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QHzicziocugiMpDRiRkDyqUM2FVHSWvuAnAQK93XB_4
9. RTX Crushes Q4 Estimates as Record $268B Backlog Fuels, accessed February 28, 2026, https://fintool.com/news/rtx-q4-earnings-record-backlog
10. RTX 2024 Annual Report, accessed February 28, 2026, https://investors.rtx.com/static-files/673824a6-3297-4b89-93cd-8aa5378a5e4f
11. TransDigm’s 47.2% Operating Margin Crushes GE’s 21.4%. Why, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/02/20/transdigms-472-operating-margin-crushes-ges-214-wh/
12. Profits of War: Top Beneficiaries of Pentagon Spending, 2020 – 2024, accessed February 28, 2026, https://quincyinst.org/research/profits-of-war-top-beneficiaries-of-pentagon-spending-2020-2024/
13. Airbus A320neo family – Wikipedia, accessed February 28, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A320neo_family
14. Spring 2022 Industry Study Final Report Missile Defense, accessed February 28, 2026, https://es.ndu.edu/Portals/75/Documents/industry-study/reports/2022/AY22%20Missile%20Defense-Cleared.pdf
15. Overcoming the Six Unspoken Barriers That Impede Defense, accessed February 28, 2026, https://web-assets.bcg.com/41/37/44f7bf5d409d8fb4705484b29308/overcoming-the-six-unspoken-barriers-that-impede-defense-innovation.pdf
16. Read “Defense Software for a Contested Future: Agility, Assurance, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.nationalacademies.org/read/29129/chapter/6
17. RTX Corporation – ROE – Wisesheets, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.wisesheets.io/roe/RTX
18. RTX (RTX) Return on Equity (ROE) – Current & Historical Data (Feb, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.financecharts.com/stocks/RTX/growth/roe
19. Return on Invested Capital For Rtx Corp (RTX) – Finbox, accessed February 28, 2026, https://finbox.com/NYSE:RTX/explorer/roic/
20. RTX (RTX) ROIC – Current & Historical Data (Feb 2026), accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.financecharts.com/stocks/RTX/value/roic
21. RTX (RTX) ROIC % – GuruFocus, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.gurufocus.com/term/roic/RTX
22. RTX Corporation Statistics — RTX CN Key Data & Ratios — Roic AI, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.roic.ai/quote/RTX:CN/statistics
23. JetBlue: 360-Day Engine Crisis Grounds 15 Jets, More Coming, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.traveltourister.com/news/jetblue-pratt-whitney-360-day-engine-maintenance-crisis-15-aircraft-grounded-caribbean-flights-aruba-incident-exposes-11-billion-gtf-disaster-january-2026/
24. RTX Provides Update on Pratt & Whitney GTF fleet, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.forecastinternational.com/news/index.cfm?recno=292671
25. RTX engine issue will ground 350 planes per year through 2026, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/rtx-expects-3-billion-hit-in-q3-from-pratt–whitney-gtf-engine-issues-3171584
26. Pratt & Whitney GTF update | – AirInsight, accessed February 28, 2026, https://airinsight.com/pratt-whitney-gtf-update/
27. Making a more durable GTF engine – RTX, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.rtx.com/news/2025/06/06/making-a-more-durable-gtf-engine
28. Pratt & Whitney Engine Issues IATA Guidance: JNUS, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.iata.org/contentassets/7eca924ee98c4b0c997cfb2f8d77b5c1/pratt-whitney-engine-faults-20240625.pdf?csf=1&web=1&e=BoUGhf
29. RTX Corporation Analysis: GTF Headwinds, Defense Growth, and, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.monexa.ai/blog/rtx-corporation-analysis-gtf-headwinds-defense-gro-RTX-2025-04-21
30. GTF engine issues hit Wizz Air profits: Airbus groundings until 2027, accessed February 28, 2026, https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/wizz-air-gtf-engine-issues-2027-pratt-whitney-advantage/
31. GTF powder metal issue keeps P&W busy well through 2026 |, accessed February 28, 2026, https://airinsight.com/powder-metal-issue-keeps-pw-busy-well-into-2026/
32. RTX 2025 Earnings: Commercial Aerospace Leads Growth as Pratt, accessed February 28, 2026, https://leehamnews.com/2026/01/27/rtx-2025-earnings-commercial-aerospace-leads-growth-as-pratt-advances-gtf-recovery/
33. The TOW Gap: Why Airlines Favor the LEAP in 2025 | – AirInsight, accessed February 28, 2026, https://airinsight.com/the-tow-gap-why-airlines-favor-the-leap-in-2025/
34. RTX Corp (RTX) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Backlog, accessed February 28, 2026, https://ca.investing.com/news/company-news/rtx-corp-rtx-q4-2025-earnings-call-highlights-record-backlog-and-strong-financial-performance-4421773
35. RTX’s Pratty & Whitney Implements Additive Manufacturing to … – AIAA, accessed February 28, 2026, https://aiaa.org/2025/04/08/rtxs-pratty-whitney-implements-additive-manufacturing-to-reduce-engine-repair-time/
36. RTX Keeps Adding to Its Strong Backlog – The Successful Investor Inc, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.tsinetwork.ca/daily-advice/growth-stocks/rtx-keeps-adding-to-its-strong-backlog
37. RTX Q4 2025 Earnings Report on 1/27/2026 – MarketBeat, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.marketbeat.com/earnings/reports/2026-1-27-raytheon-technologies-co-stock/
38. RTX (RTX) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript | The Motley Fool, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2026/01/27/rtx-rtx-q4-2025-earnings-call-transcript/
39. RTX Logs 12% Sales Growth in Q3 2025 With $251B Backlog, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.govconwire.com/articles/rtx-q3-2025-12-percent-sales-growth-251b-backlog
40. RTX Investor Webcast Q4 2025, accessed February 28, 2026, https://investors.rtx.com/static-files/10494d39-c1d0-4ff0-b945-1db5288a923b
41. RTX to Dramatically Increase Missile Production Under Pentagon, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/202602045334/rtx-to-dramatically-increase-missile-production-under-pentagon-deals
42. RTX’s Raytheon inks 5 long-term missile deals – Stock Titan, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.stocktitan.net/news/RTX/rtx-s-raytheon-partners-with-department-of-war-on-five-landmark-p4dm0gkmajdq.html
43. Form 10-Q for RTX Corp filed 07/22/2025, accessed February 28, 2026, https://investors.rtx.com/static-files/ecf6e129-850c-4081-be5b-e5b46b2874bc
44. RTX Reports Q2 2025 Results – PR Newswire, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rtx-reports-q2-2025-results-302510074.html
45. Trump says he plans crackdown on defense firms over executive, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jan/07/trump-defense-companies-shareholder-payouts
46. Trump blocks defense company stock buybacks until … – Fox Business, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-signs-order-block-defense-companies-from-buying-back-stock-until-arms-production-improves
47. Pentagon Needs More Time to Finalize Defense Firms on Naughty, accessed February 28, 2026, https://dealbreaker.com/2026/02/pentagon-needs-more-time-to-finalize-defense-firms-on-naughty-list-after-initial-review
48. Defence stocks in focus: US military spending cuts and Russia, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.home.saxo/content/articles/equities/defence-stocks-in-focus-us-military-spending-cuts-and-russia-ukraine-peace-deal-buzz-26022025
49. Mining for DOGE: Defense budget docs show $11B in ‘efficiencies, accessed February 28, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2025/08/mining-for-doge-defense-budget-docs-show-11b-in-efficiencies-but-what-are-they/
50. Airbus Investment Analysis: Deep Dive, https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GvSjz_IdVydlM8hLqphLcI_8qDpl8efD4DYCWGwyGII
51. Airbus Expresses Concern Over GTF Engine Delays and Slow SAF, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.eplaneai.com/news/airbus-expresses-concern-over-gtf-engine-delays-and-slow-saf-development
52. RTX (RTX) Investor Relations, Earnings Summary & Outlook – Quartr, accessed February 28, 2026, https://quartr.com/companies/rtx-corporation_10904
53. RTX Reports 2024 Results and Announces 2025 Outlook, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.rtx.com/news/news-center/2025/01/28/rtx-reports-2024-results-and-announces-2025-outlook
54. RTX Reports 2024 Results and Announces 2025 Outlook, accessed February 28, 2026, https://investors.rtx.com/static-files/ceebbf85-eb69-4563-a303-c62ad9918fba
55. RTX Reports 2025 Results and Announces 2026 Outlook, accessed February 28, 2026, https://investors.rtx.com/static-files/6d2e2fd9-aa0e-40e2-aa9f-a4051a058306
56. RTX Surges to Record Highs as Defense Orders Explode – MarketBeat, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.marketbeat.com/originals/rtx-surges-to-record-highs-as-defense-orders-explode/
57. RTX Q4 2025 slides: Strong organic growth and record backlog, accessed February 28, 2026, https://uk.investing.com/news/company-news/rtx-q4-2025-slides-strong-organic-growth-and-record-backlog-drive-positive-2026-outlook-93CH-4472485
58. RTX CORPORATION NPS 2025 – ProxyVote.com, accessed February 28, 2026, https://materials.proxyvote.com/Approved/75513E/20250304/NPS_597174/INDEX.HTML?page=1
59. RTX CORPORATION NPS 2025 – ProxyVote.com, accessed February 28, 2026, https://materials.proxyvote.com/Approved/75513E/20250304/NPS_597174/INDEX.HTML?page=53
60. RTX Reports 2023 Results and Announces 2024 Outlook, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.rtx.com/news/news-center/2024/01/23/rtx-reports-2023-results-and-announces-2024-outlook
61. Chris Calio : r/Raytheon – Reddit, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Raytheon/comments/1pb71wk/chris_calio/
62. Raytheon Stock Forecast: Policy Shock, Dividend and Buyback Risk, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.ebc.com/forex/raytheon-stock-forecast-policy-shock-dividend-and-buyback-risk
63. RTX (RTX) Dividend Yield 2026, Date & History – MarketBeat, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/RTX/dividend/
64. Amid Trump’s broadsides, RTX tells investors it’s ‘committed’ to, accessed February 28, 2026, https://breakingdefense.com/2026/01/amid-trumps-broadsides-rtx-tells-investors-its-committed-to-paying-dividends/
65. RTX’s Pratt & Whitney broadens manufacturing capabilities with, accessed February 28, 2026, https://aeromorning.com/en/rtxs-pratt-whitney-broadens-manufacturing-capabilities-with-200-million-investment-in-columbus-georgia/
66. RTX board chair to step down in April – Virginia Business, accessed February 28, 2026, https://virginiabusiness.com/rtx-board-chair-to-step-down-in-april/
67. Christopher Calio | RTX (RTX) Executive Profile & Compensation, accessed February 28, 2026, https://fintool.com/app/research/companies/RTX/people/christopher-calio
68. Chris Calio? : r/Raytheon – Reddit, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Raytheon/comments/18ik5gi/chris_calio/
69. Christopher T. Calio | RTX, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.rtx.com/who-we-are/our-leadership/christopher-calio
70. A Look At TransDigm Group’s Valuation As Raised 2026 Guidance, accessed February 28, 2026, https://www.sahmcapital.com/news/content/a-look-at-transdigm-groups-valuation-as-raised-2026-guidance-follows-solid-first-quarter-results-2026-02-08