Slide Deck

Executive Summary

The rigorous evaluation of a financial institution demands an uncompromising assessment of its structural competitive advantages, the cyclical sustainability of its returns on equity, and the prudence of its executive capital allocation. Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) operates as a diversified financial holding company within the highly concentrated Peruvian financial sector, commanding significant market share across universal banking through its flagship subsidiary Interbank, insurance via Interseguro, wealth management through Inteligo, and merchant acquiring through Izipay. An objective review of the entity’s financial performance, particularly its record 2025 net profit of S/ 1,943.2 million and a consolidated Return on Equity (ROE) of 16.8% ¹, indicates that IFS possesses a demonstrable, functioning economic moat. The enterprise consistently generates returns in excess of its cost of capital, navigating the inherent volatility of an emerging market economy.

However, a comparative structural analysis reveals that the competitive advantage held by IFS is distinctly narrower and less absolute than that of the apex market leader, Banco de Crédito del Perú (BCP), operated by Credicorp. The fundamental reality of the IFS business model is that it operates with a structurally higher cost of liabilities. To achieve parity in return metrics with the market leader, the institution is mathematically forced to assume greater credit risk on the asset side of the balance sheet, deliberately overweighting uncollateralized consumer and small business lending. While management has demonstrated exceptional, counter-cyclical capital allocation—evidenced by aggressive insider share repurchases at market bottoms—the institution remains highly levered to the cyclicality of the Peruvian consumer and faces latent risks from investment portfolio concentrations and the normalization of domestic credit costs. This comprehensive report dissects the structural mechanics of the IFS business model, evaluating the durability of its competitive positioning, the empirical quality of its growth, and the underlying macroeconomic and balance sheet risks.

1. Competitive Advantage Assessment

A financial institution operating without a structural competitive advantage cannot sustain excess returns on invested capital over a prolonged duration. The forces of market competition will inevitably compress margins to the cost of capital. In commercial banking, a durable economic moat typically manifests through one of three avenues: a structurally low-cost deposit franchise generating a liability advantage, proprietary underwriting capabilities yielding an asset advantage, or insurmountable economies of scale that relentlessly drive down non-interest operating costs. The evidence demonstrates that IFS possesses a viable, secondary competitive advantage derived from high switching costs, network effects within its payments ecosystem, and formidable regulatory barriers to entry.

Evidence of the Economic Moat

The primary subsidiary, Interbank, benefits from the high customer switching costs inherent to primary operating and payroll accounts. Once a retail consumer or mid-sized commercial entity integrates its daily transaction flow, payroll processing, and cash management into the Interbank architecture, the friction, time, and administrative burden of migrating to a competitor become prohibitive. This inertia is actively fortified by the company’s aggressive digital ecosystem expansion. Through the integration of the Plin digital wallet and the Izipay merchant acquiring network, IFS has constructed a closed-loop transactional hub. As of 2025, Plin had achieved massive scale with an estimated 13 million to 14 million users nationwide, processing roughly 34% of all in-person digital wallet transactions in Peru.² This digital integration drove an 11% year-over-year growth in retail primary banking customers in 2025.⁴

However, this moat is fundamentally constrained by the presence of a superior competitor. BCP, operating the rival Yape digital wallet with over 17 million users, commands a significantly larger share (approximately 54%) of the transactional ecosystem.² Consequently, while IFS enjoys a wide moat against new market entrants, fintech startups, and smaller regional banks, it lacks the absolute, systemic pricing power enjoyed by the dominant market leader.

Financial Proof of Competitive Advantage

A theoretical moat must translate into superior unit economics and absolute financial outperformance to be deemed investable. For the full year 2025, IFS reported a consolidated ROE of 16.8%, which rises to 18.5% when excluding a specific, non-recurring investment impairment related to the Rutas de Lima concession.¹ The Return on Assets (ROA) expanded to 2.0% in 2025, an improvement from the 1.4% recorded in 2024.¹ These metrics unequivocally demonstrate systemic value creation.

Yet, the structural reality of the IFS market position becomes apparent when comparing its unit economics directly to its peers. The ultimate empirical metric of a banking moat is the blended cost of funds. In 2025, IFS reported an average cost of funds of approximately 3.1%.¹ By contrast, the market leader BCP operates with a consolidated cost of funds of merely 2.3%.⁶ This 80-basis-point liability disadvantage is the defining operational characteristic of the IFS business model. To bridge this profitability gap and generate a highly competitive double-digit ROE, Interbank must seek higher yields on the asset side.

This strategic imperative is reflected in the bank’s Net Interest Margin (NIM). Despite suffering from higher funding costs, IFS achieved a robust NIM of 5.2% for the full year 2025, with a risk-adjusted NIM (factoring in provisioning costs) expanding by 50 basis points to 4.0% in the fourth quarter.⁷ The institution achieves this by intentionally overweighting high-yielding, uncollateralized consumer loans, credit cards, and small-to-medium enterprise (SME) lending, which now represent approximately 22% of the total loan portfolio.¹

Unit Economics and Sustainability

While precise Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC) and Lifetime Value (LTV) metrics for specific product cohorts are guarded as proprietary trade secrets and absent from regulatory filings, aggregate efficiency ratios serve as a highly reliable proxy for unit economic sustainability. A bank’s CAC is essentially its branch network operating expense and marketing spend divided by new accounts, while LTV is the net present value of the net interest margin spread over the life of the customer minus expected credit losses.

In 2025, IFS reported an efficiency ratio (cost-to-income) of 36.8%, an improvement from 37.4% in 2024.¹ This operational efficiency is highly competitive on a global scale and specifically surpasses domestic peers such as Scotiabank Peru and BBVA Peru, which generally operate near the 39% to 40% efficiency threshold.¹⁰

The transition to digital channels fundamentally alters these unit economics. With 84% of retail clients now classified as active digital users ¹², the marginal CAC for acquiring a user via the Plin digital wallet approaches zero due to viral network effects. The strategic challenge, however, is monetization. Because peer-to-peer wallet transfers are largely free ³, the LTV of a pure digital wallet user is negligible. The economic model relies entirely on cross-selling high-yield credit products to these digital users. If the cost of risk on these uncollateralized loans spikes, the LTV collapses. The sustainability of the IFS competitive advantage is therefore completely dependent on the precision of its algorithmic underwriting models to price consumer risk accurately across the economic cycle.

5-Year Peer Financial Comparison

Metric (Full Year 2025)	IFS (Interbank/Consolidated)	Credicorp (BCP/Consolidated)	BBVA Peru (Proxy)*	Scotiabank Peru (Proxy)*
Return on Equity (ROE)	16.8%	19.0%	16.7%	13.0% – 15.8%
Return on Assets (ROA)	2.0%	2.5%	2.0%	1.5% – 1.9%
Cost of Funds	3.1%	2.3%	N/A	N/A
Efficiency Ratio	36.8%	~35.0%	39.3%	39.9%
Cost of Risk	2.3%	~2.0%	3.38%	N/A

Note: BBVA and Scotiabank data derived from mid-year and Q3 2025 reporting proxies and historical averages.¹

2. Peruvian Banking Industry Dynamics

The Peruvian banking sector functions as a rigidly concentrated, heavily supervised oligopoly. Understanding this market structure is an absolute prerequisite for contextualizing the strategic positioning, growth limitations, and risk profile of IFS.

Market Structure and Concentration

The industry is dominated by four apex institutions that collectively control over 80% of total commercial banking system assets. Banco de Crédito del Perú (BCP) is the undisputed market leader, holding approximately 35% to 36% of total system loans and deposits.⁶ BBVA Peru, a localized subsidiary of the Spanish global banking conglomerate, holds the secondary position with roughly 21% to 22% market share.¹⁴ Interbank (the banking arm of IFS) and Scotiabank Peru compete fiercely for the third and fourth positions, each controlling between 13% and 14% of the market.¹¹

This extreme concentration provides immense structural benefits to the incumbents. Rational oligopoly pricing limits destructive, race-to-the-bottom price wars on the asset side of the balance sheet. Furthermore, the sheer scale of the required physical distribution networks and sophisticated digital cybersecurity architecture establishes a capital-intensive barrier to entry that deters new challengers. While two new niche banks entered the system in 2025 (Comparamos and Santander Consumer Bank), their aggregate impact on the market share of the top four remains entirely negligible.¹⁰

Competitive Intensity and Technology Disruption

Competition among the top four banks rarely manifests as pure interest rate warfare. Instead, the institutions compete ruthlessly on digital ecosystem dominance, user experience, and the acquisition of primary transactional accounts. The strategic battleground has shifted decisively away from physical branch density and toward mobile platforms and digital wallets.

The market is currently defined by a fierce duopoly in digital payments: Yape (wholly owned by BCP) and Plin (a consortium platform embedded within the mobile applications of Interbank, BBVA, and Scotiabank).³ In a pivotal regulatory intervention, the Central Reserve Bank of Peru (BCRP) mandated interoperability between these platforms in 2023.¹⁷ While this interoperability mandate prevented Yape from achieving a total monopoly via impenetrable network effects, it simultaneously commoditized the basic peer-to-peer transfer function. Plin and Yape now account for over 50% of total retail cashless transactions in Peru, fundamentally eclipsing traditional debit and credit card usage.³

The critical vulnerability for the banking industry is the deflationary impact of these wallets on traditional fee pools. Currently, peer-to-peer and small peer-to-business transactions on these wallets are largely free of charge for both the payer and payee.³ These wallets are rapidly cannibalizing traditional card transaction volumes, which historically generated lucrative interchange fees for the banks, subject to a Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) of approximately 2.05%.³ IFS has strategically hedged this risk through its 2022 full acquisition of Izipay, a major payment acquiring network. This allows the holding company to capture merchant fees across the broader ecosystem, but the structural deflationary pressure of digital wallets on traditional fee revenue remains a permanent headwind.

Regulatory Environment

The Peruvian regulatory framework, governed by the Superintendency of Banking, Insurance, and AFP (SBS), is widely regarded by international rating agencies as one of the most conservative, rigorous, and sophisticated in Latin America. The system is currently executing a transition to Basel III capital standards, with full implementation and phase-in periods expected to conclude by 2026 to 2027.¹¹ Local implementation frequently requires higher core capital buffers than standard international Basel III minimums, ensuring systemic stability but depressing theoretical maximum ROEs.

A severe and recurring regulatory distortion in recent years has been the populist legislation authorizing massive withdrawals from the private pension system (AFPs) and severance indemnity deposits (CTS). Between 2020 and 2025, the Peruvian congress authorized eight separate rounds of liquidity withdrawals to stimulate the consumer economy.⁵ While this injected temporary, artificial liquidity into the banking system—temporarily lowering funding costs and artificially suppressing non-performing loans as consumers utilized pension capital to clear delinquent debts—it severely damaged the depth of the domestic capital markets and created a superficial credit environment that masks underlying borrower distress.

3. Macroeconomic and Country-Specific Factors

An equity investment in IFS is inextricably linked to the macroeconomic trajectory of the Republic of Peru. Financial institutions serve as leveraged proxies for their underlying economies, and the outsized exposure of IFS to consumer and SME credit amplifies this macroeconomic sensitivity.

Peru Economic Backdrop (2023-2026)

Following a highly challenging 2023 characterized by severe social unrest, adverse climate events associated with the El Niño phenomenon, and a mild economic contraction of 0.6%, the Peruvian economy demonstrated robust systemic resilience.²⁰ GDP growth rebounded decisively to approximately 3.2% to 3.3% in 2024 and maintained a similar expansionary trajectory throughout 2025.¹⁹ This recovery was driven by a normalization of the agricultural and fishing sectors, sustained private consumption, and highly favorable international commodity prices, particularly for copper and gold, which fortify the country’s external accounts and trade balance.⁸

Forecasts for 2026 from the BCRP and international bodies suggest a slight moderation in GDP growth to around 2.8% to 3.1%.²² This moderation is attributed to the mathematical reality of a higher comparative base effect and rising domestic uncertainty preceding the national elections.

Interest Rate Environment and Inflation

Inflation, which precipitated a global crisis in recent years, has been masterfully contained by the fully independent Central Reserve Bank of Peru (BCRP), led by the globally respected Julio Velarde. By the end of 2025, inflation stabilized around 1.5% to 2.0%, perfectly within the central bank’s target band of 1.0% to 3.0%.¹¹

Because the BCRP acted aggressively and early to tame inflationary pressures, it became one of the first central banks in the region to initiate an easing cycle. The monetary policy reference rate was systematically reduced from a peak of 7.75% down to 4.25% by late 2025, eventually settling near 4.0%.¹⁹ This declining rate environment possesses dual implications for the net interest margins of IFS. Declining rates immediately reduce the cost of funds across the institution’s deposit base. However, they also exert downward pressure on asset yields as floating-rate commercial loans reprice downward. Because the IFS portfolio is deliberately tilted toward fixed-rate consumer loans and credit cards, the liability repricing occurs faster than asset repricing, theoretically supporting margins, provided credit losses remain contained.

Dollarization and FX Risk

Peru operates as a dual-currency economy, a legacy of historical hyperinflation. While the BCRP has successfully driven a long-term de-dollarization trend, a significant portion of corporate loans and mortgages remain denominated in United States Dollars (USD), while consumer loans are overwhelmingly denominated in Peruvian Soles (PEN).²³ This structural dynamic creates acute currency mismatch risks for unhedged commercial borrowers.

Fortunately, the Peruvian Sol (PEN) has exhibited remarkable and sustained strength. Supported by strong terms of trade and high international reserves (exceeding $81 billion) ²⁶, the currency appreciated by approximately 10% against the USD during 2024 and maintained stability in the narrow range of 3.35 to 3.45 PEN/USD throughout 2025.⁸ This currency strength directly limits foreign exchange default risk for unhedged borrowers and minimizes negative translation impacts on the bank’s equity base. However, sudden currency depreciation remains a tail risk that would instantly trigger a spike in commercial non-performing loans.

Credit Cycle Positioning

Peru is currently exiting the bottom of a severe consumer credit cycle. The economic stagnation of 2023 severely pressured real wages and consumer balance sheets, leading to a spike in retail non-performing loans across the sector. Throughout 2024 and early 2025, Peruvian banks engaged in a rigorous, painful de-risking process, heavily tightening origination standards and prioritizing collections over volume growth.²⁵ Consequently, system-wide NPL ratios stabilized near 2.9% to 3.1% by late 2025.²⁶ The current environment reflects a normalization phase; the massive liquidity events (AFP withdrawals) have artificially cleansed consumer balance sheets, allowing banks like Interbank to cautiously re-accelerate consumer lending originations.

Political Risk

Political volatility remains the primary systemic discount factor applied to Peruvian equities. The country has experienced significant executive turnover, presidential impeachments, and legislative gridlock over the past five years.²⁰ The upcoming 2026 general elections present a highly tangible risk of populist rhetoric, fragmented governance, or market-unfriendly policy proposals.²² However, the analysis must separate political noise from macroeconomic reality. Peru’s institutional framework—specifically the fierce independence of the BCRP, the strict fiscal rules maintained by the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF), and a low gross public debt-to-GDP ratio of roughly 31% to 32% ²⁴—has historically insulated the core macroeconomic engine from the volatility of the political theater.

4. IFS Business Model Deep Dive

IFS does not operate merely as a bank; it operates as a deeply integrated, multifaceted financial ecosystem designed to extract economic rents across the full lifecycle of a client’s wealth accumulation. The synergies between the subsidiaries are authentic operational realities, not theoretical corporate architecture constructed for investor presentations.

Interbank (Universal Banking)

Interbank serves as the core earnings engine, generating the vast majority of the holding company’s revenue and profit. In 2025, Interbank generated a record net income of S/ 1,475 million, representing a 46.4% year-over-year increase.¹

The bank operates a highly bifurcated strategic model. In commercial banking, it focuses heavily on mid-sized enterprises, deliberately avoiding direct, margin-destroying price wars with BCP and BBVA for top-tier, blue-chip corporate syndications. In retail banking, Interbank is a dominant, aggressive player in high-yield segments. It holds approximately 20% market share in consumer loans, commands over 26% market share in credit cards, and maintains a leading position in payroll-deductible loans directed at public sector employees.¹²

The distribution model is an omnichannel hybrid. While maintaining a physical footprint of nearly 190 financial stores and over 1,500 ATMs ³², Interbank has aggressively migrated standard transaction volumes to digital channels to permanently lower variable operating costs. By late 2025, a staggering 84% of its retail clients were classified as active digital users.¹²

Interseguro (Insurance)

Interseguro provides essential revenue diversification and serves as a vital source of long-duration investment capital. The subsidiary focuses primarily on individual life insurance, private annuities, and mandatory annuities. It commands a formidable, market-leading position with an excess of 30% market share in regulated annuities as of 2025.¹

The underlying economics of this insurance business rely on capturing upfront premium flows and investing the resulting float in fixed-income securities and real estate at a spread over the actuarial liability. In 2025, Interseguro demonstrated exceptional commercial growth, with written premiums increasing by 61% year-over-year.⁴ The business routinely generates high Returns on Investment Portfolios (ROIP) of 6.0% to 7.2% ⁵, funneling excess capital generation back to the parent holding company.

Inteligo (Wealth Management)

Inteligo targets affluent Peruvian clients, providing offshore wealth management, securities trading, and bespoke advisory services. The segment operates with minimal regulatory capital requirements, generating high-margin, recurring fee income. As of the end of 2025, Inteligo managed a record $9.1 billion in Assets Under Management (AuM), representing double-digit year-over-year growth.⁴

The profitability of this segment is, however, highly geared to global equity market performance and the mark-to-market valuations of its proprietary investment book. In periods of strong global market performance, Inteligo delivers outsized returns, frequently exceeding a 20% to 25% ROE ³³, acting as a high-beta earnings accelerator for the consolidated group.

Izipay (Merchant Payments)

Fully acquired in 2022, Izipay serves as the critical infrastructural link in the IFS ecosystem. As a leading payment acquirer in Peru, it processes point-of-sale (POS) and e-commerce transactions for hundreds of thousands of local merchants.³³ The strategic value of Izipay extends far beyond mere transaction fee generation. It provides IFS with proprietary, real-time data on merchant cash flows, enabling vastly superior commercial credit underwriting. Furthermore, it forces merchant cash flows to pool directly within Interbank deposit accounts, driving down the consolidated cost of funds and deepening the primary banking relationship.⁷

5. Growth Analysis

A competitive advantage without corresponding growth results in a static valuation. To merit investment, IFS must demonstrate the persistent ability to compound its intrinsic value by reinvesting retained earnings at high rates of return.

Record 2025 Performance and Growth Quality

The financial results for the full year 2025 represent a structural high-water mark for the company. IFS reported a consolidated net profit of S/ 1,943.2 million, an exceptional 48.6% increase over 2024.¹ This translated to an Earnings Per Share (EPS) of $16.83 (local currency) and a consolidated ROE of 16.8%.¹

However, a critical, forensic deconstruction of this growth is necessary to determine its actual quality and forward sustainability. The 49% profit explosion was not driven by massive, aggressive balance sheet expansion. Total loans grew by a moderate 4% (or 6.5% excluding foreign exchange effects).⁸ Net interest and similar income grew by only 1.8% to S/ 4,629.4 million.¹

Instead, the sheer magnitude of the earnings growth was mechanically driven by two primary vectors:

1. Normalization of Credit Costs: Impairment losses on loans plummeted by 33.9% year-over-year, falling from S/ 1,720.2 million in 2024 to S/ 1,136.7 million in 2025.¹ The consolidated cost of risk contracted sharply to 2.3%.¹ This indicates that the massive 2025 bottom-line growth is largely a mechanical recovery from the severely elevated provisioning required during the 2023 macroeconomic stagnation, rather than pure core revenue expansion.
2. Fee and Investment Income: The wealth management and insurance divisions posted massive mark-to-market valuation gains and robust fee growth, capitalizing on highly favorable global equity market conditions.³⁰

Forward Growth Prospects and Strategy

The quality of growth is currently in transition. Having exhausted the mechanical earnings boost provided by falling provision expenses, future earnings growth must be driven by organic volume expansion and sustainable margin widening.

Management clearly recognizes this reality. The forward strategic shift involves deliberately accelerating originations in higher-yielding segments to combat the structural liability disadvantage against BCP. In 2025, while the total loan book grew only 4%, the higher-yielding loan portfolio (consumer lending, credit cards, and small business loans) expanded by 8%.⁸ Small business loans specifically surged by an aggressive 25% year-over-year.³⁸

This intentional mix shift drove a 50-basis-point expansion in the risk-adjusted Net Interest Margin to 4.0% in the fourth quarter of 2025.⁴ Management guidance for 2026 is highly credible based on these underlying mechanics: they project a sustained ROE of approximately 17%, high single-digit loan growth (outpacing the broader system), and explicitly anticipate that the cost of risk will naturally normalize upward toward 2.5% as the portfolio mix inherently absorbs more uncollateralized risk.⁴

Geographic Expansion and Market Opportunity

Crucially, IFS is a pure-play bet on the Republic of Peru. While incorporated in Panama for legacy structural and tax purposes, its operations are entirely domestic.³⁹ Unlike Credicorp, which has aggressively expanded its Mibanco and wealth management operations into Colombia and Chile, IFS remains geographically concentrated.

The domestic total addressable market (TAM), however, remains vast. Peru suffers from severely low financial penetration compared to regional peers like Chile or Brazil, with a system-wide loan-to-GDP ratio hovering near 40%.¹¹ As the formal economy gradually expands, IFS possesses the digital infrastructure to capture unbanked populations at near-zero marginal customer acquisition costs via the Plin platform.

6. Capital Allocation Track Record

Management’s capital allocation serves as the vital bridge between a business’s operational success and the creation of tangible shareholder wealth. The actions of IFS’s leadership must be analyzed directly through the lens of their controlling shareholder.

Ownership Structure and Alignment

The Rodriguez-Pastor family, operating through the holding company Intercorp Perú Ltd. and associated shell entities, controls approximately 71% to 73% of IFS’s outstanding shares.⁴⁰ This highly concentrated ownership structure guarantees that management’s strategic horizon is measured in decades rather than fiscal quarters. The alignment of interests regarding long-term value creation is absolute. However, this structure simultaneously subjects minority shareholders to the risk of corporate governance decisions that may favor the broader parent conglomerate (which includes massive retail operations like InRetail and Supermercados Peruanos) over the standalone financial entity.

Strategic Share Repurchases

The most definitive proof of highly rational, shareholder-friendly capital allocation occurred between late 2024 and mid-2025. Following a cyclical downturn in consumer banking earnings that depressed the IFS stock price into the low $20s, the controlling shareholder entities aggressively and systematically acquired shares in the open market. SEC Form 4 filings indicate continuous insider buying, including multiple tranches executed at prices between $19.50 and $19.80 per share.⁴²

Purchasing shares of a financial institution generating mid-teens returns on equity at prices significantly below tangible book value is the absolute essence of value accretion. The subsequent surge in the share price to roughly $50 by early 2026 ⁴⁴ dramatically validated this aggressive capital deployment. A formal $100 million share repurchase program authorized in March 2023 further demonstrates management’s willingness to return capital through tax-efficient mechanisms when intrinsic value diverges significantly from market pricing.⁴⁵

Dividend Policy and Balance Sheet Management

The company maintains a flexible, conservative dividend policy. In 2025, IFS declared an annual dividend of $1.00 per share ⁴⁶, representing a payout ratio of roughly 21% to 23% based on trailing earnings.⁴⁷ This is a notably conservative payout compared to its primary peer BCP, which frequently distributes over 60% of earnings to shareholders.⁴⁹

Retaining nearly 80% of earnings while simultaneously generating a 16.8% ROE is highly accretive to intrinsic value, provided the retained capital can be effectively deployed into the high single-digit loan growth guided for 2026. Capital and liquidity metrics remain fortress-like. By the end of 2025, IFS maintained a total capital ratio of 16.0% and a Core Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 12.5%, comfortably exceeding the stringent SBS regulatory requirement of 13.6% (which includes conservation buffers).¹

7. Risks and Red Flags

A rigorous, objective investment analysis must relentlessly seek out contradictions, points of failure, and reasons not to invest. Despite pristine headline profitability numbers, the IFS balance sheet harbors specific structural vulnerabilities that demand critical attention.

The Rutas de Lima Impairment: A Failure in Underwriting Discipline

The most glaring red flag in the 2024-2025 reporting period is the massive impairment taken on the Rutas de Lima concession within the Interseguro portfolio. This toll road infrastructure project became embroiled in severe, highly publicized legal and political disputes with the Municipality of Lima. Consequently, Interseguro was forced to recognize impairment charges totaling S/ 205 million to S/ 216 million throughout 2025.¹

While executive management asserts that approximately 80% of the exposure is now fully provisioned and no further material impairments are expected on the residual S/ 74 million valuation ³⁴, the event exposes a critical flaw in risk management. Insurance subsidiaries inherently rely on pristine, low-risk asset underwriting to match long-duration annuity liabilities. Taking a near-total loss exceeding S/ 200 million on a single domestic infrastructure asset strongly suggests a breakdown in portfolio concentration limits, inadequate political risk assessment, or an inappropriate chase for yield within the fixed-income portfolio.

Artificial Liquidity and Latent Consumer Credit Risk

The dramatic improvement in asset quality reported in 2025—with Stage 3 NPLs falling to 2.3% and the cost of risk dropping to 2.3% ¹—must be viewed with intense skepticism. Between 2020 and 2025, the Peruvian government authorized eight separate, massive withdrawals from private pension funds (AFPs) and severance accounts (CTS).⁵

This unleashed billions of Soles in artificial, unearned liquidity into the retail economy. Extensive data suggests that many consumers utilized these liquidated retirement funds to cure delinquent credit card and personal loan balances, artificially suppressing banking sector NPLs. As these exogenous liquidity injections definitively cease, and as Interbank deliberately accelerates its origination of high-yielding uncollateralized consumer and SME lending, a delayed, severe spike in delinquencies is highly probable. The management’s guided upward drift in the cost of risk to 2.5% for 2026 ³⁸ may prove dangerously optimistic if domestic employment falters.

Structural Liability Disadvantage

As previously established, Interbank operates with a 3.1% cost of funds compared to BCP’s 2.3%.¹ In a rising rate environment, or in a scenario where competition for retail deposits intensifies, IFS will suffer margin compression long before its larger peer. To maintain its targeted 17% ROE, IFS is structurally addicted to originating riskier asset classes. Should a severe macroeconomic recession occur, the lack of a dominant, zero-cost corporate transactional deposit base will leave IFS mathematically exposed to sharper earnings contractions than the market leader, exactly as occurred during the 2023 downturn.

Illiquidity and Constrained Public Float

With the controlling Rodriguez-Pastor family holding over 71% of the equity, the public float is inherently constrained to approximately 27% to 29%.⁴⁰ Furthermore, large institutional investors (such as BlackRock, Fidelity, and Franklin Resources) manage roughly 15% of the total shares outstanding ⁴⁰, leaving an exceptionally thin retail float. This chronic lack of daily trading liquidity limits efficient price discovery, deters massive institutional accumulation, and subjects the stock to severe, violent price gaps on low volume during periods of generalized emerging market stress.

8. Recent Developments (2023-2025)

The trajectory of IFS over the past three years perfectly encapsulates the intense cyclicality of its consumer-heavy model and the adaptive resilience of its management team.

• The 2023 Contraction: In 2023, the Peruvian economy stalled. Interbank’s aggressive consumer lending book deteriorated rapidly as inflation eroded real wages, driving impairment losses up by more than two-fold year-over-year. Consolidated net profit collapsed by 35.7% to S/ 1,079.3 million, and ROE plummeted to an anemic 11.3%.³³ Management reacted decisively, severely tightening credit origination standards and executing a painful de-risking strategy.²⁵
• The 2024 Stabilization: The de-risking strategy proved effective. Impairment losses contracted by S/ 261.6 million, and ROE began a steady, grinding recovery, closing the year at 12.6%.⁵ During this phase, the company leaned heavily on its wealth management and insurance arms to stabilize group profitability while the bank cleansed its balance sheet.
• The 2025 Acceleration: Supported by stabilizing inflation, the final waves of AFP pension withdrawals, and aggressive digital penetration, the company roared back. Fourth-quarter 2025 risk-adjusted NIM hit 4.0%, and full-year earnings achieved a historic record of S/ 1,943.2 million.¹ The successful scaling of interoperability between Plin and Yape permanently cemented IFS’s role in the national digital payments infrastructure.²

9. Valuation Analysis

Valuation cannot be assessed in a vacuum; it must be firmly tethered to the sustainability of the underlying returns on equity, the quality of the loan book, and the cost of equity capital associated with Peruvian macroeconomic risk.

Current Metrics vs Historical Averages

As of early 2026, IFS trades at approximately $50.00 to $51.00 per share on the NYSE.⁴⁴

• Price-to-Earnings (P/E): The stock trades at approximately 9.8x to 10.5x trailing earnings.⁴⁴
• Price-to-Book (P/B): The stock trades at roughly 1.5x to 1.6x book value.⁵²
• Dividend Yield: The forward yield sits at approximately 2.0% based on the conservative $1.00 payout.⁵²

Latin American Peer Comparison

Institution	Country	P/B Ratio	P/E Ratio	ROE (Trailing)	Market Position
Credicorp (BAP)	Peru	~2.4x	~13.6x	19.0%	#1 Dominant
IFS	Peru	~1.5x	~10.0x	16.8%	#3/4 Challenger
BBVA Peru	Peru	~1.4x	~8.6x	16.7%	#2 Incumbent
Scotiabank Peru	Peru	~1.1x	~8.9x	~13.0%	#3/4 Incumbent

Data synthesized from available market and peer analysis metrics as of late 2025/early 2026.⁶

Intrinsic Value Considerations and Anomalies

The current market valuation is highly rational and efficient. A financial institution generating a sustainable 16% to 17% ROE in a stable emerging market warrants a Price-to-Book multiple of approximately 1.5x, assuming a standard cost of equity of 11.5% to 12.0% and a long-term terminal growth rate of 3.0% to 4.0%.

The equity market accurately prices the hierarchy of the Peruvian oligopoly. Credicorp (BAP) earns a massive valuation premium (2.4x P/B) due to its impenetrable 2.3% cost of funds, superior 19% ROE, and dominant liquidity position. Scotiabank trades at a distinct discount (1.1x P/B) reflecting its persistent struggles to match local unit economics. IFS sits exactly where it belongs: a highly competent, highly profitable second-tier player trading at a fair multiple that accurately reflects both its robust 16.8% ROE and its structural liability disadvantage against the market leader.

There is no glaring valuation anomaly at $50 per share; the extreme, asymmetric undervaluation existed when shares traded near $20 in early 2024, a temporary discrepancy that the controlling family aggressively exploited through insider purchases.

10. Synthesis

The Bull Case (Steelmanned)

IFS is a phenomenally managed challenger bank operating within an impenetrable, highly profitable domestic oligopoly. It has successfully navigated the digital transition, amassing a massive user base through Plin and capturing vital merchant transaction flows via the Izipay acquisition. This modern digital infrastructure essentially traps deposits, lowering funding costs, and provides proprietary, real-time underwriting data. The executive management team has demonstrated elite, ruthless capital allocation, hoarding capital during crises and buying back equity aggressively when the market mispriced the stock. With credit costs normalizing and Peru’s macro engine accelerating on the back of copper prices, IFS is perfectly positioned to capture outsized returns by expanding its high-yielding consumer and SME portfolios. Retaining 80% of its earnings while generating a 17% ROE ensures the rapid compounding of intrinsic value, making the current 1.5x P/B multiple a highly attractive entry point for long-term compounding.

The Bear Case (Steelmanned)

IFS is structurally flawed compared to the market leader and mathematically forced into dangerous underwriting behavior. Because its cost of funds is nearly 80 basis points higher than BCP’s, Interbank can only achieve its 17% ROE target by heavily overweighting uncollateralized, high-risk consumer loans and credit cards. When the Peruvian economy inevitably contracts, IFS’s earnings will violently collapse—exactly as they did in the 2023 recession. Furthermore, the pristine asset quality reported in 2025 is a dangerous mirage, artificially manufactured by billions of dollars in government-mandated pension withdrawals that temporarily bailed out distressed retail borrowers. Add in the alarming lack of underwriting discipline demonstrated by the S/ 200+ million loss on the Rutas de Lima infrastructure bond in the insurance portfolio, and the 1.5x P/B multiple appears fully priced for a cyclical peak.

Key Uncertainties

1. Consumer Delinquency Normalization: Will the total cessation of artificial AFP/CTS liquidity injections expose a hidden layer of severe retail insolvency, driving the cost of risk significantly above management’s 2.5% target and crushing ROE?
2. Wallet Monetization Strategy: Can IFS successfully monetize the massive user base of the Plin ecosystem through cross-selling before the structural deflationary pressure on traditional interchange fees permanently damages the institution’s non-interest income?
3. Political Landscape: Will the 2026 presidential and legislative elections result in populist policies (e.g., legislative interest rate caps, further pension destruction, or directed lending mandates) that structurally impair the profitability of the Peruvian banking sector?

What Would Have to be True to Invest

For IFS to represent an exceptional, asymmetric investment at current valuations, rather than merely a fairly priced asset, the following must hold true: Management must explicitly prove that its proprietary data architecture derived from the Izipay and Plin ecosystems has structurally improved its retail underwriting algorithms, permanently reducing the historical volatility of its consumer cost of risk. Furthermore, Peru’s GDP growth must reliably sustain levels above 3.0% through the 2026 election cycle, ensuring continuous formal job creation to support the aggressive expansion of Interbank’s higher-yielding consumer loan book without triggering a catastrophic cascade of credit impairments.

Frequently Asked Questions

General Questions

• What thoughtful questions have other investors asked about this company? During recent earnings calls, analysts have pressed management on the timeline for consumer loan recovery and asset quality expectations following the cessation of artificial government pension withdrawals. They also questioned the potential for further balance sheet impairments related to the troubled Rutas de Lima infrastructure concession, the quantification of synergies and financial impact from the Izipay payment ecosystem, and whether the company’s ROE can sustainably bridge the gap to peer Credicorp’s 20% target. Investors have also asked how the 2026 political election cycle will impact the bank’s forward guidance and loan growth.

Cyclicality & Earnings Nature

• Are earnings at a cyclical high or cyclical low? Earnings are currently at a cyclical high, having emerged from a trough in 2023. IFS reported an all-time record net income of S/ 1,943.2 million for the full year 2025, representing a 48.6% year-over-year surge.
• Are earnings driven primarily by the external environment or internal company actions? It is a mix. Externally, earnings were heavily boosted by government-mandated pension (AFP) and severance (CTS) withdrawals that injected artificial liquidity into the economy, suppressing non-performing loans (NPLs) and lowering provisioning costs. Internally, a strict de-risking strategy executed through 2023 and 2024, combined with a deliberate pivot back to higher-yielding consumer and SME loans in 2025, expanded the risk-adjusted Net Interest Margin (NIM) to 4.0% by Q4 2025.
• How stable are revenues? Core banking net interest income is relatively stable, growing 1.8% year-over-year in 2025. However, consolidated revenue experiences volatility due to the wealth management (Inteligo) and insurance (Interseguro) segments, which are highly sensitive to mark-to-market valuations on proprietary investment portfolios and real estate.
• Outlook for the company’s products and services? The outlook is strong for its digital and higher-yielding retail products. Management guides for high single-digit loan growth in 2026, driven by an accelerating consumer and small business portfolio (which grew 25% year-over-year in 2025).
• How big will this market be? Is it growing? Shrinking? Domestic or international? IFS is a pure-play domestic Peruvian operator. The market is growing structurally due to under-penetration; the system-wide loan-to-GDP ratio remains low at around 40%, offering substantial room for expansion compared to developed economies. Peru’s GDP is forecast to grow at a steady 3.1% to 3.2% in 2025 and 2026.

Business Quality & Competitive Moat

• Is the industry getting more or less competitive? The traditional banking sector remains a stable oligopoly, with the top four banks controlling over 80% of market share. However, competition is intensifying fiercely in the digital payments space (Plin vs. Yape) and in merchant acquiring.
• How profitable is this business? What is the return on capital invested? Return on equity? The business is highly profitable. In 2025, IFS achieved a consolidated ROE of 16.8% (18.5% excluding one-off impairments) and a Return on Assets (ROA) of 2.0%. Trailing Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) runs near 4.6%.
• How profitable is this industry? Are there a lot of competitors? What are the barriers to entry? The Peruvian banking industry is highly profitable, with an average ROE of 15.8% between 2021 and 2025. While there are 19 banks, it is heavily consolidated. Barriers to entry include strict regulatory capital minimums (exceeding standard Basel III), the need for extensive physical/digital distribution infrastructure, and the entrenched network effects of incumbent digital wallets.
• Can this business be easily understood? Yes. It is a traditional financial conglomerate that makes money via interest rate spreads (Interbank), insurance float and underwriting (Interseguro), fee-based wealth management (Inteligo), and payment processing (Izipay).
• Can this company be undermined by foreign, low-cost labor? No. Banking is inherently local, requiring domestic regulatory licenses, localized risk underwriting, and domestic customer relationships.
• Do brands matter? Yes, brand trust is paramount in Peruvian banking to capture sticky retail deposits and primary payroll accounts. Interbank positions itself strongly on customer experience and digital excellence.
• What is the nature of competition? Banks rarely compete on aggressive price/rate wars. Competition is centered on digital ecosystem dominance, acquiring primary transaction accounts, and merchant payment integration.
• What are the customers switching costs? High. Once a customer integrates their payroll, direct deposits, credit cards, and digital wallet (Plin) with Interbank, the friction to migrate to a competitor is significant.

Financial Condition & Balance Sheet

• Does the company have assets that are not fully recognized in the balance sheet? Yes. The network effects and proprietary data from the 13+ million users on the Plin digital wallet and the Izipay merchant network are not capitalized. Additionally, Inteligo manages $9.1 billion in off-balance sheet Assets Under Management (AUM).
• What off-balance sheet liabilities does the company have? IFS carries standard off-balance sheet banking commitments such as indirect loans (guarantees and letters of credit), which totaled roughly S/ 65.7 million by the end of 2025.
• How conservative is the company’s accounting? Accounting appears adequately conservative under IFRS standards. Management proactively booked significant impairments (over S/ 205 million) on the distressed Rutas de Lima infrastructure bonds, writing the residual exposure down to roughly $22 million to clear the risk. NPL coverage ratios sit comfortably around 140%.
• How CapEx hungry is this business? It requires elevated operational and capital expenditure in technology, GenAI, and cybersecurity to maintain its digital moat. Consequently, the bank’s cost-to-income (efficiency) ratio runs at 36.8%, which is highly efficient but reflects these sustained tech investments.

Capital Allocation & Management

• How much free cash flow does the business generate? How does management use this free cash flow? What is their philosophy? As a bank, operating cash flow fluctuates with loan origination and deposit gathering, rendering standard FCF metrics less useful (e.g., operating cash flow showed negative -$2.63 billion TTM due to loan portfolio expansion). However, they generate massive net income (S/ 1.94 billion in 2025) and use retained earnings to fund organic loan growth (expected at high single-digits), while distributing the rest through conservative dividends and aggressive stock buybacks.
• Has the company made any significant acquisitions recently? No major M&A occurred in 2024 or 2025. The last transformative acquisition was the full buyout of payment processor Izipay in 2022.
• Is the company buying back shares? Yes. Following the authorization of a $100 million buyback program, the controlling shareholder entities aggressively purchased shares in the open market between late 2024 and mid-2025, executing multiple large tranches at highly accretive prices between $19.50 and $19.80 per share.
• Does the company issue large amounts of new shares to insiders? No. Dilution is not a material issue here; share counts have remained stable near 111.35 million.
• What is the compensation policy of directors and management? / What are the motivations of management? Management is fundamentally aligned with the controlling Rodriguez-Pastor family, which owns approximately 71% to 73% of the company through Intercorp Perú Ltd. Their primary motivation is long-term compounding of intrinsic value, targeting an 18% medium-term ROE.

Valuation & Market Data

• Is the stock an ADR? MLP? K-1? It is a foreign private issuer incorporated in Panama, dual-listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: IFS) and the Lima Stock Exchange. It is not an MLP and does not issue a K-1.
• Dividend Policy? IFS pays an annual dividend, most recently declared at $1.00 per share for 2025 (a forward yield of ~2.0%). This reflects a highly conservative payout ratio of roughly 21% to 23%, allowing the firm to retain the majority of its capital for reinvestment.
• How profitable is this business? Highly profitable. Full-year 2025 margins include a Net Interest Margin of 5.2%, an efficiency ratio of 36.8%, and a 35.1% net profit margin.
• Is net income diverging from cash from operations? Yes, which is standard for a growing bank. While net income hit record highs, operating cash flows frequently show as negative during periods of aggressive loan origination (cash going out) and investment cycle timing.

Risks & Downside

• What factors would cause the stock to decline? The primary risks are macroeconomic and political. The 2026 general elections in Peru could introduce volatility or populist policies. Operationally, the cessation of government-approved pension withdrawals could expose a hidden layer of consumer insolvency, causing the cost of risk (currently 2.3%) to spike well above management’s 2.5% target.
• What is the risk of a catastrophic loss / Chance of a total loss? Extremely low. The company maintains fortress-like capital buffers, with a total capital ratio of 16.0% and a Core Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio of 12.5%, well above the regulatory requirement of 13.6%. The institution is systematically vital to the Peruvian economy.

Recent News & Events

• Has the business environment changed recently? Yes, Peru’s macro environment recovered sharply. GDP growth bounced back to 3.2% in 2024 and 3.3% in 2025. Inflation has stabilized near 1.5%, allowing the central bank to cut its reference rate down to 4.25%.
• Has the company recently changed accounting policies? In 2023, the company adopted IFRS 17 for its insurance contracts, which required a reconstruction of prior results for comparative purposes.
• Recent changes in the business, new markets, new production facilities, what’s changed recently? New management? There are no new markets or management overhauls. The primary change is a strategic business pivot: after heavily de-risking the portfolio in 2023/2024, Interbank has aggressively re-accelerated growth in high-yielding consumer and small business loans (now 22% of the portfolio) to expand margins. Furthermore, they formed a strategic partnership with Siemens in late 2025 regarding grid/infrastructure AI, though this primarily impacts the broader parent conglomerate’s operations.

Works cited

1. Intercorp Financial Services posts 49% profit jump | IFS SEC Filing, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.stocktitan.net/sec-filings/IFS/6-k-intercorp-financial-services-inc-current-report-foreign-issuer-89bc062d4e27.html
2. Bybit Pay Expands Crypto Payments in Peru Through Yape and Plin, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.mexc.com/en-NG/news/478538
3. Adoption and welfare effects of payment innovations: The … – BCRP, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.bcrp.gob.pe/docs/Publicaciones/Documentos-de-Trabajo/2025/documento-de-trabajo-006-2025.pdf
4. IFS Investor Relations – Intercorp Financial Services Inc, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/ifs/investor-relations
5. INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., accessed February 25, 2026, https://ifs.com.pe/documents/d/ifs/ifs_20241231-pdf
6. Credicorp Ltd. Investment Analysis Report, https://drive.google.com/open?id=1nyHZQMDH8425lqe4TnDi0NkbQm2yLLl4iPbMfSvWbr4
7. Earnings call transcript: Intercorp Financial Services Q4 2025 sees, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-intercorp-financial-services-q4-2025-sees-record-income-93CH-4503560
8. Intercorp Financial (IFS) Earnings Call Transcript | The Motley Fool, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-transcripts/2026/02/12/intercorp-financial-ifs-earnings-call-transcript/
9. Intercorp Financial Services Q3 2025 Earnings Report – MarketBeat, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.marketbeat.com/earnings/reports/2025-11-7-intercorp-financial-services-inc-stock/
10. Investor Report 2Q_2025 – English Version – BBVA Perú, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.bbva.pe/content/dam/public-web/peru/documents/personas/investor-relations/Investor_Report_2Q_2025_English_Version.pdf
11. December 2025, accessed February 25, 2026, https://cdn.aglty.io/scotiabank-peru/PDFs/acerca-de/2025/Scotiabank-Peru-Investor-Presentation-Q3-2025.pdf
12. Strategy – Intercorp Financial Services – Interbank, accessed February 25, 2026, https://ifs.com.pe/strategy
13. Intercorp Financial Services (IFS) investor relations material – Quartr, accessed February 25, 2026, https://quartr.com/companies/intercorp-financial-services-inc_20729
14. Banks in Peru – December 2024 Rankings – rankingslatam, accessed February 25, 2026, https://rankingslatam.com/blogs/industry-news/banks-in-peru-december-2024-rankings
15. Banco BBVA Peru, accessed February 25, 2026, https://docs.publicnow.com/viewDoc.aspx?filename=117725\EXT\302154141028055CE313F8F76F540AAD8619C1EF_248D0A320A94D1E6102AA11090F05A71C88D8B03.PDF
16. Banco Internacional del Peru S.A.A. – Interbank, accessed February 25, 2026, https://docs.publicnow.com/viewDoc.aspx?filename=117728\EXT\776D2DFE4EEE068ECB3D7BB5C859A4CB6CBC6DBD_7F33F57C8CC3E56E1D2C84649B56B73BA10F57F3.PDF
17. Competition in Mobile Payment Services – Note by Peru – O.N.E, accessed February 25, 2026, https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2025)15/en/pdf
18. Banco de Credito del Peru S.A., accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.smv.gob.pe/ConsultasP8/documento.aspx?vidDoc={C0ECC797-0000-C738-BEBC-E52F8CC3A7ED}
19. GLOBAL ECONOMICS Peru—2025 Review and 2026 Outlook, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.scotiabank.com/content/dam/scotiabank/sub-brands/scotiabank-economics/english/documents/latam-insights/lataminsights20251016.pdf
20. Peru – United States Department of State, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.state.gov/reports/2025-investment-climate-statements/peru
21. Intercorp Financial Services Inc. Earnings Call Transcript Q4 2024, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.roic.ai/quote/IFS/transcripts/2024-year/4-quarter
22. Economic Outlook – Peru | BBVA Research, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.bbvaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/EconomicOutlookPeruDec25_.pdf
23. Peru: 2025 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; and Staff Report, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2025/english/1perea2025001-print-pdf.pdf
24. Peru Economic Outlook. December 2025 – BBVA Research, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.bbvaresearch.com/en/publicaciones/peru-economic-outlook-december-2025/
25. Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) Q4 2024 Earnings Call, accessed February 25, 2026, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4756192-intercorp-financial-services-inc-ifs-q4-2024-earnings-call-transcript
26. Peru Non Performing Loans Ratio, 2004 – 2026 | CEIC Data, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/peru/non-performing-loans-ratio
27. Banco BBVA Perú, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.bbva.pe/content/dam/public-web/peru/documents/prefooter/nuestro-banco/Credit-Opinion-of-BBVA-Peru-Moodys-Ratings.pdf
28. Banco BBVA Peru, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.bbva.pe/content/dam/public-web/peru/documents/prefooter/nuestro-banco/S-and-P-Rating-Report.pdf
29. Peru Economic Outlook | BBVA Research, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.bbvaresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Peru-Economic-Outlook_June-25.pdf
30. INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., accessed February 25, 2026, https://ifs.com.pe/documents/d/ifs/ifs_6-k_30062025-pdf
31. Management Presentation – Intercorp Financial Services, accessed February 25, 2026, https://ifs.com.pe/documents/13576036/13603815/MP_apr21.pdf
32. Intercorp Financial Services Inc. Stock Price – Perplexity, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/IFS/financials
33. INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., accessed February 25, 2026, https://ifs.com.pe/documents/d/ifs/6-k_feb-12-2024
34. Intercorp Financial Services Q4 Earnings Call Highlights – MarketBeat, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.marketbeat.com/instant-alerts/intercorp-financial-services-q4-earnings-call-highlights-2026-02-12/
35. Intercorp Financial Services 2026 Company Profile – PitchBook, accessed February 25, 2026, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/153670-78
36. INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC Earnings Call Transcript, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.stockinsights.ai/us/IFS/earnings-transcript/fy25-q2-d85a
37. INTERCORP FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., accessed February 25, 2026, https://ifs.com.pe/documents/d/ifs/6-k-third-quarter-2025-earnings-1-pdf
38. Intercorp Financial Services Inc. Stock Price – Perplexity, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.perplexity.ai/finance/IFS/earnings
39. Annual Report 2023 – SEC.gov, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1615903/000095017024033032/ifs-ex99_annualreport.pdf
40. Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS): history, ownership, mission, accessed February 25, 2026, https://dcfmodeling.com/blogs/history/ifs-history-mission-ownership
41. Intercorp Peru Ltd. Shareholding Structure To Whom It May Concern, accessed February 25, 2026, https://content-us-2.content-cms.com/9b3f67ef-5a9f-4acc-8ce8-bcc27fa681c7/dxdam/b3/b35e50b0-0be9-4545-bcc8-03a81da6619b/Shareholder%20Structure%20-%20Jan25.pdf
42. IFS – Intercorp Financial Services Inc Stock Price and Quote – Finviz, accessed February 25, 2026, https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=IFS
43. Intercorp Financial ($IFS) Surges to $37 After Major Shareholder’s, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.waiker.ai/data-lab/waiker-news/5756
44. Intercorp Financial Services (NYSE:IFS) Stock Rating … – MarketBeat, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.marketbeat.com/instant-alerts/intercorp-financial-services-nyseifs-stock-rating-lowered-by-wall-street-zen-2026-02-22/
45. Intercorp Financial Services y Sub 31 12 14-13 (NIIF) UV Inglés.docx, accessed February 25, 2026, https://ifs.com.pe/documents/d/ifs/intercorp-financial-services-y-sub-dic25
46. IFS Dividend Information Intercorp Financial Servs, accessed February 25, 2026, https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/IFS/Dividends/
47. IFS: Dividend Date & History for Intercorp Financial Services Inc, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.dividend.com/stocks/financials/banking/banks/ifs-intercorp-financial-services-inc/
48. Intercorp Financial Services (NYSE:IFS) Dividend Yield, History and, accessed February 25, 2026, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/banks/nyse-ifs/intercorp-financial-services/dividend
49. Banco de Credito del Peru, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.smv.gob.pe/ConsultasP8/documento.aspx?vidDoc={405C888F-0000-CE1C-9C2E-00CB15FC18F9}
50. Intercorp Financial Services Inc (IFS) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Hig, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.gurufocus.com/news/8625407/intercorp-financial-services-inc-ifs-q4-2025-earnings-call-highlights-record-net-income-and-strategic-growth-amid-challenges
51. Peruvian lender Interbank prices tier two with BCP as main comp, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.globalcapital.com/article/2ecjjvjunyze6vu21rcao/emerging-markets/em-latam/peruvian-lender-interbank-prices-tier-two-with-bcp-as-main-comp
52. IFS Stock Quote | Price Chart | Volume Chart Intercorp Financial Servs, accessed February 25, 2026, https://marketchameleon.com/Overview/IFS/Summary/
53. Intercorp Financial Services Inc (IFS) Stock Price, Trades & News, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.gurufocus.com/stock/IFS/summary
54. Credicorp Compare against Competitors – Investing.com, accessed February 25, 2026, https://www.investing.com/pro/BVL:BAP/compare/NYSE:IFS,NYSE:BCH,NYSE:BSAC,NYSE:BBD,OTCPK:SNLAF,NASDAQCM:ISBA
55. Banco Internacional del Peru Compare against Competitors, accessed February 25, 2026, https://ng.investing.com/pro/BVL:INTERBC1/compare/BVL:IFSTASE:DSCTBVL:BBVAC1BVL:BBVABVL:SCOTIAC1