Executive Summary

The Boeing Company (BA) presents a complex and deeply polarized investment case, defined by a stark dichotomy between powerful secular tailwinds in the global aerospace and defense markets and severe, self-inflicted operational and financial challenges. The company’s fundamental value proposition is anchored by its entrenched position within a protected duopoly and a multi-trillion-dollar, multi-decade demand cycle for new aircraft and related services. This provides a clear and visible pathway to long-term revenue and cash flow generation. However, a series of profound execution failures, culminating in the 737 MAX tragedies and the subsequent January 2024 Alaska Airlines incident, has fundamentally damaged its competitive standing against Airbus, eroded its once-sterling reputation for engineering excellence, and placed its balance sheet under considerable strain.

This analysis finds that while the long-term demand outlook for Boeing’s products and services is exceptionally robust, the company’s path to recovery is fraught with significant execution risk. Boeing is in the nascent stages of a necessary but arduous cultural and operational transformation, conducted under the unprecedented and prescriptive oversight of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This regulatory scrutiny, particularly the production cap on the critical 737 MAX program, serves as the primary governor on the pace of financial recovery.

Financially, the company has become unbalanced. The Boeing Global Services (BGS) segment has emerged as the sole bastion of consistent, high-margin profitability. In contrast, the core Commercial Airplanes (BCA) division, the ultimate driver of long-term value, remains loss-making and a drain on cash. The Defense, Space & Security (BDS) segment, despite a strong backlog, is burdened by billions in losses from legacy fixed-price development contracts, highlighting past failures in strategic risk management.

An investment in Boeing is therefore a high-risk, high-reward proposition contingent on the ability of a new leadership team to successfully execute a multi-year turnaround. The current valuation appears depressed relative to the company’s normalized, long-term earnings potential. However, this discount appropriately reflects the significant uncertainty surrounding the timeline for production stabilization, margin recovery, and the critical rebuilding of trust with regulators, customers, and the flying public. The key catalysts for the stock will be tangible evidence of operational stability and a clear, credible path toward achieving its long-term free cash flow targets.

I. Industry Dynamics & Enduring Duopoly

A. Global Aerospace & Defense (A&D) Landscape: A Supercycle of Demand

The global aerospace and defense industry is currently characterized by a fundamental and sustained imbalance: demand is significantly outpacing supply. In 2024, the sector saw record global revenue of $922 billion across the top 100 A&D companies, yet production continues to lag soaring demand in both the commercial and defense segments.¹ This dynamic has created a uniquely favorable long-term environment for established original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).

Commercial Aviation Boom: The post-pandemic recovery in air travel has been swift and robust, fueling a surge in demand for new, more fuel-efficient aircraft as airlines seek to modernize and expand their fleets. This has resulted in a record industry-wide commercial aircraft backlog exceeding 16,000 units, which represents more than a decade of production at current constrained rates.¹ This extensive backlog provides exceptional long-term revenue visibility for the dominant OEMs.

Defense Sector Resurgence: Concurrent with the commercial boom, a deteriorating geopolitical landscape has prompted a significant increase in government defense spending. Global defense budgets grew by 9% in 2024, driven by heightened global instability and strategic government investment in next-generation military technology, including space, cyber, and advanced weapons systems.¹ For diversified firms like Boeing, this provides a stable, often counter-cyclical, source of demand that complements the more economically sensitive commercial business.

Persistent Supply Chain Fragility: The primary constraint on the industry’s ability to meet this demand is a persistently fragile global supply chain. Widespread labor shortages, scarcity of key raw materials and components like aluminum and semiconductors, and persistent inflationary pressures have severely limited the production capacity of all OEMs.¹ Consequently, a major strategic priority for the entire sector has shifted towards enhancing supply chain resilience through supplier diversification, digitization, and long-term operational planning.¹ This supply-demand imbalance has created a “supercycle” dynamic that has shifted a significant portion of the industry’s profitability toward suppliers and aftermarket service providers. With OEMs unable to deliver new aircraft quickly, airlines are forced to extend the operational lives of their existing, aging fleets.² These older aircraft require more intensive and frequent maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO), benefiting engine makers and service providers. In 2024, engine makers and aircraft lessors generated over 90% of the aerospace industry’s profits, demonstrating that the primary beneficiaries of the current boom are not necessarily the aircraft manufacturers themselves.²

B. Competitive Moats and Barriers to Entry

The commercial aircraft manufacturing industry is protected by some of the most formidable barriers to entry in the global economy, which effectively insulates the incumbent duopoly from new competition.

• Prohibitive Financial Barriers: The capital required to design, develop, test, certify, and produce a new commercial aircraft is astronomical, with costs often running into the tens of billions of dollars. The Boeing 787 program, for example, cost over $32 billion to develop.¹⁰ These massive, high-risk investments have payback periods that can span decades, creating a financial barrier that is nearly impossible for new entrants to overcome.¹⁰
• Intense Regulatory Hurdles: Gaining airworthiness certification from the world’s leading aviation authorities—the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)—is a multi-year, technically exhaustive, and costly process. These stringent safety, environmental, and noise regulations serve as a critical non-tariff barrier that protects established players who have the experience and resources to navigate this complex landscape.¹⁰
• Technological and Manufacturing Complexity: Building modern aircraft requires a vast and highly skilled workforce of engineers and technicians, deep institutional knowledge, and the ability to manage an immensely complex global supply chain integrating millions of specialized components. This accumulated intellectual property and physical infrastructure cannot be easily or quickly replicated.¹⁰
• Incumbent Advantages: Boeing and Airbus benefit from decades-long relationships with airline customers, extensive global MRO and support networks, and significant political and financial support from their respective governments. These deep-rooted strategic relationships create a powerful competitive moat that new entrants find difficult to penetrate.¹³

C. The Boeing-Airbus Duopoly: A Shifting Balance of Power

For the past three decades, the global market for large commercial jet airliners has been a classic duopoly, with Boeing and Airbus collectively controlling approximately 90-95% of the market.¹⁰ However, the competitive balance within this duopoly has shifted decisively in favor of Airbus over the last decade, a trend that has accelerated dramatically in the past two years due to Boeing’s internal crises.

Over the ten-year period from 2015 to 2024, Airbus has significantly outperformed Boeing, securing 8,950 net orders compared to Boeing’s 5,012, and delivering 7,043 aircraft to Boeing’s 5,312.¹⁵ This sustained outperformance culminated in 2023, when the total number of Airbus aircraft in service globally surpassed Boeing’s for the first time in history.¹⁵

The competitive chasm widened alarmingly in 2024. A combination of intensified regulatory scrutiny following the Alaska Airlines incident and a prolonged machinists’ strike crippled Boeing’s production capabilities.¹⁶ As a result, Boeing’s share of total deliveries plummeted to just 30%, its lowest level since the initial 737 MAX grounding period.¹⁹ This disparity is not merely a cyclical fluctuation but a reflection of a deeper structural shift, particularly in the critical narrow-body segment. The Airbus A320 family, which surpassed the Boeing 737 in total orders in 2019, now commands a dominant 65% share of the single-aisle backlog.¹⁵ With the FAA’s production cap limiting Boeing’s ability to compete, Airbus is cementing its long-term leadership in the most voluminous and profitable segment of the market.

Metric	2022	2023	2024
Net Orders
Boeing	774 20	1,314 15	317 15
Airbus	820	2,094 15	826 15
Deliveries
Boeing	480 20	528 15	348 15
Airbus	663 17	735 15	766 15
Boeing Delivery Share	42.0%	41.8%	31.2%
Airbus Delivery Share	58.0%	58.2%	68.8%
Table 1: Boeing vs. Airbus – Commercial Aircraft Market Share (2022-2024). Data compiled from multiple sources.

D. Market Position Across Segments

• Commercial Airplanes: Boeing remains one of the two dominant global players but has clearly ceded the leadership position to Airbus. Its market share has been eroded across the board, most acutely in the high-volume narrow-body segment where the 737 MAX family lags the A320neo family in both backlog and production rates.¹⁵
• Defense, Space & Security: Boeing is the fourth-largest contractor for the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), with major franchise programs like the F-15 fighter, AH-64 Apache helicopter, and KC-46 tanker.²⁴ It competes directly with other defense primes such as Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon (RTX). However, its competitive standing in this segment has been tarnished by significant financial losses and execution failures on key fixed-price development programs.²⁶
• Global Services: In the aftermarket services sector, Boeing leverages its vast installed base of commercial and defense aircraft as a primary competitive advantage. It competes against a fragmented market of third-party MRO providers, parts suppliers, and other OEMs.³¹

II. Dissecting the Business Segments

An analysis of Boeing’s three core business segments reveals a deeply unbalanced company. The long-term value driver, Commercial Airplanes (BCA), is currently a significant cash drain, while the Defense, Space & Security (BDS) segment is burdened by unprofitable contracts. This leaves the smaller but highly profitable Boeing Global Services (BGS) segment to serve as the primary source of stability and earnings. This internal dynamic is precarious; the investment thesis for the entire company hinges on the successful operational and financial turnaround of the BCA division.

Metric	2022	2023	2024
Revenue (in Billions)
Commercial Airplanes (BCA)	$25.87	$33.90	$22.86
Defense, Space & Security (BDS)	$23.16	$24.93	$23.92
Global Services (BGS)	$17.61	$19.13	$19.95
Total Revenue	$66.84	$77.96	$66.73
Operating Margin (%)
Commercial Airplanes (BCA)	-8.5%	-5.2%	-32.6%
Defense, Space & Security (BDS)	-15.4%	-6.9%	-22.6%
Global Services (BGS)	14.3%	17.5%	18.2%
Table 2: Boeing Segment Financial Performance (FY2022-2024). Data compiled from company filings and financial data providers.24 Note: Margin calculations may vary based on source methodology.

A. Commercial Airplanes (BCA): The Epicenter of Value and Turmoil

Historically Boeing’s largest and most important division, BCA has become the epicenter of the company’s operational and financial struggles. In fiscal year 2024, BCA’s revenue collapsed by 32.6% to $22.86 billion, a direct consequence of the production halts and slowdowns mandated by the FAA and caused by labor strikes.³² The segment reported a significant operating loss, with a margin of (5.1)% in the second quarter of 2025, driven by low delivery volumes, the high cost of rework, and necessary investments in quality control systems.³³

• Narrow-Body (737 Family): The 737 MAX remains the company’s most critical product, accounting for the vast majority of its backlog with 4,862 unfilled orders as of July 2025.³⁴ However, its production is currently capped by the FAA at a rate of 38 aircraft per month. This regulatory ceiling is the single greatest constraint on Boeing’s ability to generate revenue and cash flow. The company is focused on stabilizing production at this rate before it can seek regulatory approval to increase output to its target of 42 per month and beyond.³³
• Wide-Body (787, 777, 767): The wide-body programs offer a brighter spot. Production of the 787 Dreamliner has successfully ramped to seven aircraft per month as of Q2 2025, with a target of ten per month by 2026.¹⁷ The 787 has also experienced strong order momentum, securing 243 gross orders in the first half of 2025.³⁴ In contrast, the next-generation 777X program has been a source of significant challenges. Plagued by a series of technical and certification issues, including a critical engine thrust link problem that grounded the test fleet in 2024, the program’s first delivery has been delayed to 2026—a full six years behind its original schedule.³⁷ This multi-year delay represents a major strategic failure, creating a market vacuum that Airbus has eagerly filled with its competing A350-1000. While the 777X still holds a respectable backlog of 551 unfilled orders, the delay has damaged customer relationships and ceded a significant competitive advantage in the lucrative large wide-body market.⁴¹
• Order Backlog: Despite the production turmoil, demand remains robust. As of the second quarter of 2025, Boeing’s total company backlog stood at $619 billion, with the BCA portion comprising over 5,900 aircraft valued at $522 billion. This backlog provides a clear, multi-year line of sight to future revenue, assuming the company can resolve its production issues.³³

B. Defense, Space & Security (BDS): Stable Demand, Troubled Execution

In FY2024, BDS became Boeing’s largest segment by revenue at $23.92 billion, though this was primarily due to the collapse in BCA’s revenue.²⁴ The segment benefits from the strong tailwind of rising global defense spending and maintains a healthy backlog of $74 billion as of Q2 2025.³³ The contract pipeline is robust, with recent major awards including a $2.56 billion contract for the E-7A airborne early warning and control aircraft and a $450.5 million contract for Japan’s F-15 modernization program.⁴²

However, the segment’s financial performance has been severely undermined by a portfolio of legacy fixed-price development contracts. Programs such as the KC-46A tanker, the T-7A Red Hawk trainer, the VC-25B (the next Air Force One), and the MQ-25 Stingray drone have collectively incurred billions of dollars in losses due to cost overruns, schedule delays, and technical challenges.²⁶ In the third quarter of 2024 alone, Boeing recorded $2 billion in charges related to these programs.²⁶ These losses are the direct result of a past strategy of making aggressive, lowball bids to win contracts, which has proven to be a significant failure in risk management. While management has publicly vowed to never again sign such contracts for development programs, the financial drag from these existing agreements will continue to weigh on BDS profitability for years to come.²⁷

C. Boeing Global Services (BGS): The Consistent Profit Engine

BGS has been the bedrock of Boeing’s financial performance throughout its recent crises. The segment provides high-margin aftermarket services, including parts, maintenance, training, and digital solutions, to both commercial and defense customers. In FY2024, BGS was the only Boeing segment to generate a positive operating profit, contributing $3.62 billion on revenues of $19.95 billion.²⁴ Its performance has remained strong into 2025, posting an impressive operating margin of 19.9% in the second quarter.⁴²

The growth strategy for BGS is centered on capitalizing on the massive global installed base of Boeing aircraft. The company’s long-term forecast projects a total addressable market for aviation services worth $4.7 trillion over the next 20 years (2025-2044).⁴⁵ Key growth initiatives are focused on expanding digital offerings, such as predictive maintenance and advanced fleet management analytics. These software- and data-driven solutions provide high-margin, recurring revenue streams that are less cyclical than new aircraft sales, making BGS a crucial element of Boeing’s long-term strategy for stabilizing earnings and cash flow.⁴⁶

III. Navigating the Crucible: Crisis and Recovery (2022-2024)

Boeing is not emerging from a crisis; it is in the middle of a profound and existential one. The period from 2022 to 2024 has been defined by the company’s struggle to address the deep-seated cultural and operational failures exposed by the 737 MAX tragedies, a struggle that was brought into sharp relief by the January 2024 Alaska Airlines incident. The regulatory response to this latest failure marks a fundamental and likely permanent shift in the relationship between Boeing and the FAA, moving from an era of delegated authority and trust to one of direct, prescriptive oversight. This new reality imposes significant constraints on the company and defines the primary risks for investors.

A. The Enduring Aftermath of the 737 MAX Crisis (2018-2019)

The two fatal crashes of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 were not isolated events but symptoms of a systemic breakdown. The financial impact was staggering, with direct costs estimated at $20 billion and indirect costs, including lost sales and customer compensation, exceeding $60 billion.⁴⁷ The company ultimately paid a $2.5 billion settlement to resolve criminal fraud charges for misleading safety regulators.⁴⁷

More damaging and lasting, however, was the blow to Boeing’s reputation. The crisis shattered the company’s century-old image as a paragon of engineering excellence and safety, replacing it with a perception of a corporation that prioritized profits over people.⁴⁸ Subsequent investigations and reports have traced the root of this cultural decay back decades, particularly to the 1997 merger with McDonnell Douglas, which is widely seen as having initiated a shift from an engineering-led culture to one dominated by financial management and aggressive cost-cutting.⁵¹

B. The Alaska Airlines Incident (January 2024) and Regulatory Response

On January 5, 2024, a mid-exit door plug detached from a nearly new Alaska Airlines 737-9 MAX aircraft in mid-air. The subsequent investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) revealed a shocking and rudimentary manufacturing failure: four critical bolts intended to secure the door plug had never been installed.⁵⁴

The FAA’s response was unprecedented in its scope and severity. The agency immediately grounded 171 aircraft of the same configuration.⁵⁶ Crucially, it went further by taking the extraordinary step of halting all planned production rate increases for the 737 MAX program, imposing a hard cap of 38 aircraft per month.⁵⁶ The FAA then launched its own comprehensive audit of Boeing’s production lines and those of its key supplier, Spirit AeroSystems.

The audit uncovered “multiple instances” where the companies failed to comply with manufacturing quality control requirements.⁵⁶ This led FAA Administrator Mike Whitaker to publicly state that the issues at Boeing were systemic and demanded a “fundamental cultural shift” back toward a primary focus on safety and quality, above profits.⁵⁶ The agency mandated that Boeing develop a comprehensive, time-bound corrective action plan to address these systemic failures, effectively placing the company under direct and continuous regulatory supervision.

C. Manufacturing and Certification Process Improvements

Under intense pressure, Boeing has begun to implement its corrective action plan. The company announced immediate actions to bolster quality, including adding numerous new inspection points at its own factories and at Spirit AeroSystems, conducting dedicated “team sessions on quality” to refocus the workforce, and, in a significant move, opening its factory doors to its airline customers for additional oversight inspections.⁵⁹

The FAA has institutionalized its more intrusive approach by permanently increasing its onsite safety inspector presence at Boeing and Spirit facilities. This signifies a new, less trust-based regulatory relationship where the FAA will directly verify compliance rather than delegating that authority.⁵⁶ The core of this mandated recovery effort is an overhaul of Boeing’s safety culture. This involves strengthening its formal Safety Management System (SMS), simplifying complex manufacturing processes to reduce the chance of errors, and creating robust channels for employees to report safety concerns without any fear of retaliation.⁵³

IV. Financial Performance & Capital Allocation

The period from 2015 to 2024 encapsulates a dramatic and damaging arc in Boeing’s financial history. The company transitioned from a peak of operational excellence and aggressive capital returns to a state of profound financial distress characterized by massive losses, sustained cash burn, a heavily indebted balance sheet, and a capital allocation strategy wholly redirected from shareholder returns to corporate survival and repair.

A. Historical Performance (2015-2024)

The 10-year financial summary starkly illustrates the company’s decline. The years 2015-2018 were a period of strong growth and profitability. However, beginning in 2019 with the onset of the 737 MAX crisis, every key financial metric collapsed. The company has reported substantial net losses for five consecutive years. Fiscal year 2024 was particularly challenging, with revenue falling to $66.5 billion and the net loss widening to $11.8 billion, exacerbated by production stoppages.²⁴

Free cash flow (FCF), the lifeblood of any industrial company, tells a similar story. After generating robust FCF in the pre-crisis era, Boeing experienced years of significant cash burn. While the company managed to return to positive FCF in 2022 and 2023, it relapsed in early 2025, reporting a cash usage of $2.3 billion in the first quarter.⁴⁶ A key benchmark for the company’s recovery is its long-term target, first articulated in 2022, of achieving $10 billion in annual FCF by the 2025/2026 timeframe. However, given the new production constraints, this timeline is now widely considered to be at high risk.⁴⁶

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), a key measure of profitability and capital efficiency, has been decimated. After peaking in the pre-crisis period, ROIC has been deeply negative for several years. For the twelve months ending in December 2024, Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) stood at a dismal -19.9%, reflecting the company’s inability to generate profits from its vast asset base.⁶³

Metric (in Millions USD, except %)	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	2024
Total Revenue	96,114	94,571	93,392	101,127	76,559	58,158	62,286	66,608	77,794	66,517
Net Income/(Loss)	5,176	4,895	8,197	10,460	(636)	(11,941)	(4,290)	(4,935)	(2,222)	(11,817)
Operating Cash Flow	9,429	10,494	13,341	15,322	2,446	(18,411)	(3,410)	3,512	5,960	(12,080)
Free Cash Flow	6,919	7,894	11,591	13,599	(4,289)	(19,720)	(4,396)	2,292	4,432	(13,880)
Total Debt	9,628	10,950	10,883	13,610	27,159	63,363	56,820	57,024	52,313	57,500
ROCE (%)	47.7%	57.1%	100.7%	116.3%	-15.9%	-16.8%	-0.8%	-1.6%	2.9%	-19.9%
Table 3: Boeing Historical Financial Summary (2015-2024). Data compiled from company filings and financial data providers.60 Note: FCF is calculated as OCF less CapEx. ROCE figures are from third-party financial data providers and may vary based on calculation methodology.

B. Debt Levels and Credit Profile

To navigate the twin crises of the 737 MAX grounding and the COVID-19 pandemic, Boeing took on a substantial amount of debt, most notably through a massive $25 billion bond issuance in 2020.⁴⁶ This has left the company with a fragile balance sheet and significant debt maturities on the horizon, including $4.3 billion due in 2025 and another $8.0 billion in 2026.⁷⁰

This financial strain has led to a series of credit rating downgrades. As of late 2024, both major rating agencies, Moody’s and S&P Global, rate Boeing’s senior unsecured debt at the lowest tier of investment grade (Baa3 and BBB-, respectively), just one notch above “junk” status.⁷¹ Both agencies maintain a negative outlook, explicitly warning that a failure to stabilize operations and generate positive free cash flow could trigger a further downgrade to non-investment grade.⁷⁰ A downgrade to junk status would materially increase Boeing’s cost of capital and could complicate its ability to finance its vast operations, making the defense of its investment-grade rating a paramount strategic priority for management.

C. Capital Allocation Strategy: From Returns to Repair

Boeing’s capital allocation strategy has undergone a complete and forced reversal.

• Pre-Crisis (2013-2018): Aggressive Shareholder Returns: This era was defined by a relentless focus on returning capital to shareholders. The company spent over $43 billion on share buybacks and consistently increased its dividend, culminating in a $20 billion share repurchase authorization announced in December 2018.⁴⁶ This strategy, while popular with investors at the time, is now widely criticized for having starved the company of investment in new product development and engineering excellence.⁵¹
• Post-Crisis (2019-Present): Preservation and Reinvestment: The financial crises of the past five years have forced a dramatic pivot. Dividends and share buybacks were suspended in 2020 to preserve liquidity and have not been reinstated.⁴⁶ The company’s capital allocation priorities are now, in order:

1. Debt Reduction: Using all available free cash flow to pay down debt and strengthen the balance sheet is the non-negotiable top priority.⁴⁶
2. Investment in Operations: Significant capital is being deployed into research and development (R&D) and capital expenditures (CapEx) aimed at improving manufacturing quality, stabilizing the supply chain, enhancing factory safety, and investing in digital tools. In 2024, Boeing invested $6 billion in these areas.³⁶

Management has made it clear that any consideration of resuming shareholder returns is a distant prospect, contingent upon achieving a state of sustained, high-level free cash flow generation and a materially de-levered balance sheet.⁴⁶

V. Growth Opportunities & Strategic Initiatives

Despite its profound near-term challenges, the long-term growth outlook for Boeing is underpinned by powerful, multi-decade secular trends in its core markets. The core of the bullish investment thesis rests on the company’s ability to eventually resolve its operational issues and capitalize on this immense and highly visible demand landscape.

A. Long-Term Commercial Aviation Demand

The 20-year demand forecast for commercial aircraft provides a powerful safety net for Boeing’s valuation. The company’s own Commercial Market Outlook (CMO) for 2025–2044 projects a global need for 43,600 new airplanes, a market valued in the trillions of dollars.⁶⁶ This forecast is driven by an anticipated annual passenger traffic growth rate of 4.2%, a figure that outpaces projected global economic growth. This outlook is corroborated by Boeing’s primary competitor, Airbus, which forecasts a nearly identical demand for 43,420 new aircraft over the same period.⁸⁰ Industry bodies like Airports Council International (ACI) also project robust long-term growth, with global passenger numbers expected to nearly double by 2045.⁸³ The primary drivers of this sustained demand are the expansion of the global middle class, particularly in emerging economies, increasing urbanization, and the continued decline in the real cost of air travel, which makes it accessible to a broader population.⁸²

B. Emerging Market Penetration

Emerging markets are the undisputed epicenter of future aviation growth. Regions such as Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and Latin America are projected to account for more than half of the global commercial fleet by 2044, a significant increase from their approximately 40% share in 2024.⁸⁰ Boeing’s long-term strategy is heavily focused on capturing this growth. This involves establishing a deeper regional presence through local partnerships, building out MRO and services hubs to support growing fleets, and tailoring its product and service offerings to meet the specific needs of these dynamic markets.⁴⁶

C. Defense Modernization and Space Exploration

The resurgence in global defense spending provides a stable and growing source of revenue. Heightened geopolitical tensions are driving demand for the modernization of military fleets and the development of next-generation capabilities.⁴ Boeing’s strategic initiatives in its BDS segment are focused on capturing a larger share of these government contracts. Key R&D priorities include autonomous systems (such as the MQ-25 and MQ-28), advanced surveillance platforms (P-8, E-7), and strategic partnerships with NASA and the U.S. Department of Defense on space exploration and national security satellite programs.⁴⁶

D. Digital Services and Sustainable Technologies

A core element of Boeing’s future strategy is the expansion of its high-margin BGS division. The company aims to grow its portfolio of digital services, including predictive maintenance, advanced data analytics, and comprehensive fleet management solutions. These offerings create stable, recurring revenue streams that are less susceptible to economic cycles.⁴⁶ Looking further ahead, Boeing is investing in the foundational technologies that will define the next generation of aircraft. This includes R&D into sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), alternative propulsion systems like hydrogen and electric, and autonomous flight technologies. While these are long-term initiatives, they are crucial for positioning the company to compete in the next major aircraft product cycle.⁴⁶

VI. Risk Factors & Headwinds

An investment in Boeing carries a substantial and multifaceted risk profile. The company’s path to recovery is narrow and exposed to numerous potential setbacks, ranging from internal execution failures to external geopolitical shocks.

A. Regulatory and Certification Risks

The most significant and immediate risk facing Boeing is the new, intensified regulatory environment. The FAA’s decision to cap 737 MAX production and assume direct control over the timeline for any future rate increases introduces a critical element of uncertainty into all financial forecasts.⁵⁶ The company’s ability to grow revenue and cash flow is no longer a matter of its own operational capacity but is now contingent on satisfying a more stringent and skeptical regulator. Furthermore, the risk of additional delays in the certification of the 737-7, 737-10, and 777X programs remains high. Any further setbacks in these programs could trigger customer penalties, lead to order cancellations, and inflict additional damage on the company’s already fragile reputation.³⁶

B. Execution and Operational Risks

Until Boeing can demonstrate a sustained period of stable production and flawless quality, the risk of another high-profile safety or quality incident remains elevated. Any new event, even a minor one, would likely have severe consequences, further damaging the company’s relationship with regulators and customers and potentially leading to even stricter oversight. Compounding this internal risk are the persistent vulnerabilities in the global aerospace supply chain. The entire industry is grappling with shortages of labor and materials, and any significant disruption at a key supplier could quickly derail Boeing’s carefully managed production ramp-up plans, with immediate negative impacts on deliveries and cash flow.⁵

C. Competitive and Geopolitical Risks

While the Boeing-Airbus duopoly remains secure for the foreseeable future, a long-term strategic threat is emerging from China’s state-backed Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (COMAC). Although its C919 narrow-body and planned C929 wide-body are not yet competitive on a global scale, COMAC poses a significant risk to Boeing’s position in the crucial Chinese market.¹⁰ Beijing is leveraging state-directed orders to build a domestic aerospace champion, which could effectively cap the duopoly’s growth in what is projected to be the world’s largest aviation market. This geopolitical reality places a potential long-term ceiling on Boeing’s addressable market.

More immediately, Boeing is highly exposed to geopolitical trade tensions, particularly between the United States and China. The imposition of retaliatory tariffs could significantly increase production costs, given that nearly 30% of its aircraft parts are imported, and could jeopardize future sales to the vital Chinese market, which has only recently resumed taking deliveries of Boeing aircraft.¹²

D. Financial and Economic Risks

As an industrial manufacturer at the top of the economic value chain, demand for Boeing’s commercial aircraft is inherently cyclical and highly sensitive to the health of the global economy, airline profitability, and volatile factors like fuel prices. On a company-specific level, Boeing’s balance sheet remains a key vulnerability. Its high debt load and a credit rating teetering on the edge of non-investment grade create significant financial fragility and limit the company’s strategic flexibility to invest in new programs or weather another unexpected shock.⁷⁰

VII. Valuation Analysis

Valuing The Boeing Company in its current state is a challenging exercise that pits a deeply troubled near-term reality against a potentially bright long-term future. Standard valuation multiples based on trailing earnings are not meaningful due to the company’s unprofitability. Consequently, any credible valuation must be based on an assessment of its normalized, future earnings and cash flow power, an exercise that is heavily dependent on assumptions about the timing and success of its operational turnaround.

A. Multiple-Based Valuation

A comparative analysis of Boeing’s valuation multiples reveals a company that is difficult to categorize as definitively cheap or expensive.

• Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio: With negative trailing twelve-month earnings, Boeing’s P/E ratio is not meaningful (NM).⁶⁵ For historical context, when the company was consistently profitable, its 10-year average P/E ratio was 23.37x.⁹⁴
• Price-to-Sales (P/S) Ratio: This is the most relevant trailing multiple given the lack of earnings. Boeing’s TTM P/S ratio is 2.24x.⁹³ This is more expensive than some defense peers like Lockheed Martin (1.49x) but less expensive than others like RTX (2.55x). It is also slightly higher than the peer average of 2.0x but below the broader U.S. Aerospace & Defense industry average of 3.1x, suggesting a mixed valuation picture.⁹³
• Enterprise Value-to-EBITDA (EV/EBITDA): Similar to P/E, the trailing EV/EBITDA multiple is negative (-26.6x) and not useful for valuation.⁹⁵ However, forward-looking estimates based on analyst consensus provide a potential path to normalization. The 1-year forward EV/EBITDA is a high 53.3x, but this is projected to decline to 23.8x in two years and 17.5x in three years, which would bring it in line with the industry median of around 20x.⁹⁶ This trajectory indicates that the market is pricing in a significant recovery in earnings over the next several years.

Compared to its primary rival, Airbus, Boeing’s valuation is difficult to assess on a like-for-like basis. Airbus is currently profitable and trades at a forward P/E ratio of approximately 29x, offering investors a clearer valuation benchmark based on actual, positive earnings.⁹³

Metric	Boeing (BA)	Airbus (EADSY)	Lockheed Martin (LMT)	RTX Corp. (RTX)	Northrop Grumman (NOC)	General Dynamics (GD)
Market Cap (USD)	~$178B	~$168B	~$103B	~$206B	~$84B	~$85B
P/S (TTM)	2.24x	2.01x	1.49x	2.55x	2.1x	1.7x
P/E (Fwd 1-Yr)	NM	29.35x	20.78x	26.79x	21.82x	21.39x
EV/EBITDA (Fwd 1-Yr)	53.3x	17.8x	16.0x	19.6x	N/A	N/A
Table 4: Comparative Valuation Multiples – Aerospace & Defense Peers. Data compiled from multiple financial data providers as of late 2025.93 Note: “NM” indicates “Not Meaningful” due to negative earnings. Forward multiples are based on analyst consensus estimates.

B. Intrinsic Valuation Considerations

The core of any intrinsic valuation of Boeing rests on estimating its “normalized” earnings and free cash flow potential once production stabilizes and margins recover.

• Normalized Earnings Power: The key question is what level of profitability and cash flow Boeing can achieve in a stable state. The company’s 2022 investor day guidance, which targeted approximately $10 billion in annual free cash flow by 2025/2026, serves as a useful, albeit now delayed, anchor for this analysis.⁶² Achieving this level of cash generation would fundamentally re-rate the stock.
• Discount Rate: Given the significant and well-documented execution, regulatory, and financial risks, a higher-than-average discount rate should be applied to any discounted cash flow (DCF) model to properly account for the heightened uncertainty.
• Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) Analysis: A SOTP analysis can provide a more nuanced valuation. The stable and highly profitable BGS segment could be valued separately using a higher multiple, akin to a high-quality industrial services business. The more cyclical and currently unprofitable BCA and BDS manufacturing segments would be valued on a normalized earnings basis with a lower multiple, reflecting their higher risk profile. This approach helps to highlight the significant embedded value in the BGS division.

C. Key Valuation Questions

The valuation of Boeing boils down to three critical questions:

1. What are realistic, sustainable operating margins for the BCA segment post-recovery? The ability to return to the low-double-digit margins seen pre-crisis is a key variable. The increased cost of quality control and a less favorable product mix could permanently impair peak margin potential.
2. How should the massive order backlog be valued? The $522 billion BCA backlog is a tremendous asset, providing unparalleled revenue visibility.³³ However, its present value must be heavily discounted to account for the long delivery timeline (over a decade), execution risk, potential customer concessions or cancellations, and the time value of money.
3. What is the appropriate valuation discount relative to peers and historical norms? Given the severe execution risks and regulatory overhang, a significant valuation discount to both its own historical multiples and to its more stable competitor, Airbus, is warranted. The central debate for investors is whether the current stock price reflects a sufficient discount for these risks.

VIII. Management & Corporate Governance

Boeing’s operational and safety crises are inextricably linked to failures in its corporate culture and governance. In response to intense pressure from regulators, customers, and investors, the company has initiated a sweeping overhaul of its senior leadership and board structure, representing a critical inflection point in its history. The success of this turnaround will ultimately depend on whether this new leadership can fundamentally break from the cost-centric culture that has defined the company for the past two decades.

A. Leadership Overhaul and Cultural Transformation

The fallout from the January 2024 Alaska Airlines incident triggered a dramatic management shake-up. In March 2024, Boeing announced that CEO Dave Calhoun would step down by the end of the year, independent Board Chair Larry Kellner would not stand for re-election, and the head of the Commercial Airplanes division, Stan Deal, would retire immediately.⁹⁹

This leadership sweep was a clear acknowledgment that a new direction was required. The board appointed Steve Mollenkopf, an existing independent director, as the new Board Chair, tasking him with leading the search for a new CEO.⁹⁹ Stephanie Pope, who had recently been appointed as the company’s Chief Operating Officer, was immediately named the new head of BCA.⁹⁹ In July 2024, the board announced the selection of Kelly Ortberg, a respected industrial executive with a strong operational background from his time leading Rockwell Collins, as the new President and CEO, effective August 2024.¹⁰² The defense division also saw a leadership change, with Steve Parker being named the permanent CEO of BDS after serving in an interim capacity.¹⁰³

This new leadership team has been given a clear mandate: to stabilize the company and rebuild its culture around a primary focus on safety and quality.⁹⁹ The selection of an external CEO with a strong engineering and manufacturing pedigree is a significant signal of the board’s intent to shift away from the finance-driven leadership of the past.

B. Board Composition and Oversight Reforms

In the years following the initial 737 MAX crisis, Boeing took several steps to reform its board-level governance. Most notably, it established a new, permanent Aerospace Safety Committee to provide dedicated oversight of the company’s safety policies and processes in the design, production, and operation of its products.⁹⁹ The board also actively recruited several new independent directors with deep expertise in engineering, safety, and manufacturing to address criticisms that it lacked sufficient technical knowledge to effectively oversee the company’s complex operations.⁹⁹

Despite these reforms, Boeing’s governance practices remain under intense external scrutiny. A 2024 FAA expert panel report described a “disconnect” between senior management and the workforce on safety issues, and a federal judge rejected a plea deal between Boeing and the Department of Justice, citing concerns about the proposed oversight mechanisms.⁵³ This indicates that pressure from regulators and the legal system on the board to ensure accountability and drive genuine cultural change will remain a powerful force for the foreseeable future.

IX. Investment Synthesis and Key Questions

This comprehensive analysis culminates in a nuanced investment thesis that balances immense long-term potential against severe and immediate risks. The following section synthesizes the findings to directly address the key strategic questions facing any potential investor in The Boeing Company.

1. Has Boeing successfully navigated past its crisis period, or do significant execution risks remain?

Boeing has not navigated past its crisis; it is in the very heart of it. The period since the January 2024 Alaska Airlines incident represents the most acute phase of a crisis that began years earlier. The appointment of a new leadership team and the implementation of an FAA-mandated quality improvement plan mark the beginning of a long and arduous recovery process, not its conclusion. Significant execution risks remain the paramount concern for investors. These include the potential for further quality control lapses on the factory floor, the persistent fragility of the global aerospace supply chain, and the immense challenge of fundamentally transforming a corporate culture under the glare of intense public and regulatory scrutiny. The path to recovery will be measured in years, not quarters, and is likely to be marked by continued volatility.

2. What is the realistic timeline for full production rate recovery?

A full recovery of production rates to pre-crisis levels—for example, consistently producing more than 50 737 MAX aircraft per month—is highly unlikely before 2026-2027 at the earliest. The critical factor is that the timeline is no longer dictated by Boeing’s internal ambitions or market demand. Instead, it is controlled by the FAA, which has made it unequivocally clear that any increase above the current production cap of 38 per month will only be granted when the agency is fully satisfied with the maturity and effectiveness of Boeing’s safety and quality management systems. Therefore, the most realistic scenario for investors to model is a gradual, milestone-based ramp-up over the next two to three years, with progress contingent on meeting the FAA’s stringent requirements.

3. How sustainable is Boeing’s competitive position against Airbus?

Boeing’s fundamental position within the global aerospace duopoly is sustainable, primarily due to the immense and prohibitive barriers to entry that protect both incumbents from new competition. However, its competitive standing relative to Airbus has been structurally weakened. Airbus’s current dominance in the critical narrow-body segment, underscored by its larger backlog and higher production rate, is now deeply entrenched and will be difficult for Boeing to reverse for at least a decade without the launch of an all-new aircraft program. Boeing remains highly competitive in the wide-body and dedicated freighter markets, but its overall share of the commercial aircraft market is likely to remain below 50% for the foreseeable future.

4. What are the most significant catalysts that could drive outperformance?

Several key positive catalysts could unlock significant value and drive outperformance in Boeing’s stock:

• Regulatory Approval for Rate Increases: The single most important near-term catalyst would be the FAA’s formal approval for Boeing to increase the 737 MAX production rate above the current cap of 38 per month. This would serve as the clearest external validation that the company’s quality improvements are taking hold.
• Sustained Operational Stability: A consistent track record of meeting or exceeding quarterly delivery targets for several consecutive quarters would demonstrate to the market that the manufacturing system has stabilized.
• Successful Program Execution: The smooth and successful certification of the remaining 737 MAX variants (the -7 and -10) and, most importantly, the on-schedule entry-into-service of the 777X in 2026 would be major de-risking events.
• Accelerated Financial Recovery: A faster-than-expected return to strong, sustainable positive free cash flow, enabling the company to begin aggressively paying down debt, would significantly improve its financial risk profile and likely lead to a positive re-rating by credit agencies and the market.

5. How should investors weigh the attractive long-term growth prospects against near-term execution risks?

This is the central dilemma for any investor considering Boeing stock. The appropriate approach is dictated by one’s investment horizon and tolerance for risk.

• For the long-term investor (5+ years), the investment thesis is built on the powerful secular tailwinds of global aviation growth and the enduring nature of the duopoly. From this perspective, the current operational turmoil can be viewed as a severe but ultimately temporary disruption that has created a deep cyclical value opportunity. The bet is that new management can right the ship over time, allowing the company to capitalize on its multi-trillion-dollar backlog.
• For the short-to-medium-term investor (1-3 years), the focus must be squarely on the significant execution risks. The stock is likely to remain highly volatile, trading on news flow related to production rates, regulatory announcements, and any potential quality issues. The path to recovery will not be linear, and setbacks are probable.

Ultimately, an investment in Boeing today is a wager on the success of one of the most significant and complex corporate turnarounds in recent history. The potential reward is a substantial re-rating of the stock as it transitions from a crisis-stricken industrial company back to a stable, cash-generative blue chip. The risk is that the turnaround falters or takes significantly longer than anticipated, leading to further financial strain and a permanent impairment of the company’s competitive position and long-term earnings power.

Works cited

1. Aerospace and defense industry performance and outlook – PwC, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/industrial-products/library/aerospace-defense-review-and-forecast.html
2. 2025 AlixPartners Aerospace & Defense Outlook | AlixPartners, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.alixpartners.com/newsroom/2025-alixpartners-aerospace-defense-outlook/
3. Aircraft orders soar by 900%, creating a record aircraft order backlog, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.aircraftinteriorsinternational.com/industry-opinion/aircraft-orders-soar-by-900-creating-a-record-aircraft-order-backlog.html
4. Aerospace and defense: US Deals 2025 midyear outlook – PwC, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/industrial-products/library/aerospace-defense-deals-outlook.html
5. Emerging trends in aerospace and defense 2025 – KPMG agentic corporate services, accessed August 29, 2025, https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/sg/pdf/2025/06/emerging-trends-in-aerospace-and-defense-2025-report.pdf
6. Summer 2025 | M&A Report In The Aerospace, Defense & Government Industry Sector, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.cfaw.com/blog/summer-2025-ma-report-in-the-aerospace-defense-government-industry-sector
7. Outlook 2025: Aerospace, Defense & Government Services, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.harriswilliams.com/our-insights/2025-industry-outlook-trends-aerospace-defense-government-services
8. GAO-24-106493, COMMERCIAL AVIATION MANUFACTURING: Supply Chain Challenges and Actions to Address Them, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/assets/d24106493.pdf
9. Aerospace supply chain report 2025: Is the crisis over? | Roland …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/Aerospace-supply-chain-report-2025-Is-the-crisis-over.html
10. Competition Between Boeing and Airbus: How New Entrants Could …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://blogs.jobsreach.net/2024/12/12/competition-between-boeing-and-airbus-how-new-entrants-could-reshape-the-industry-and-economy/
11. BRS0011 – Evidence on Leaving the EU: implications for the aerospace industry – UK Parliament Committees, accessed August 29, 2025, https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/82217/html/
12. Assessing Trade Barrier Effects on the Commercial Aerospace Supply Chain, Aircraft Manufacturing and Cross-Border Deliveries – Flight Plan, accessed August 29, 2025, https://flightplan.forecastinternational.com/2025/04/16/assessing-trade-barrier-effects-on-the-commercial-aerospace-supply-chain-aircraft-manufacturing-and-cross-border-deliveries/
13. Why Airbus And Boeing Have No Competition And Dominate The Market – Simple Flying, accessed August 29, 2025, https://simpleflying.com/why-airbus-and-boeing-have-no-competition-2/
14. The Boeing-Airbus Duopoly: Titans of the Skies – Quartr, accessed August 29, 2025, https://quartr.com/insights/company-research/the-boeing-airbus-duopoly-titans-of-the-skies
15. Competition between Airbus and Boeing – Wikipedia, accessed August 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_between_Airbus_and_Boeing
16. Airbus vs. Boeing: Who Dominated the 2024 Aircraft Market? – Precision Metal Spinning, accessed August 29, 2025, https://precisionmetalspinning.com/industry-news-blog/airbus-vs-boeing-who-dominated-the-2024-aircraft-market/
17. Airbus Beats Out Boeing By Delivering More Aircraft In 2024 Compared To 2023, accessed August 29, 2025, https://simpleflying.com/airbus-boeing-deliveries-2024-vs-2023/
18. Boeing’s aircraft deliveries and orders in 2024 reflect the company’s rough year – AP News, accessed August 29, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/boeing-airbus-aircraft-deliveries-orders-2024-675f14cb86c5d5a5a7a3048b108703b7
19. Shaking out the Airbus and Boeing 2024 delivery numbers – Cirium, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.cirium.com/thoughtcloud/ascend-consultancy-shaking-out-the-airbus-and-boeing-2024-delivery-numbers/
20. Boeing Reports Commercial Orders and Deliveries for 2022, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.boeing.com/investors/news/press-release-details/2023/Boeing-Reports-Commercial-Orders-and-Deliveries-for-2022/default.aspx
21. Airbus and Boeing 2024 Aircraft Deliveries-Significant Gap | – The Ferrari Consulting and Research Group / Supply Chain Management, accessed August 29, 2025, https://theferrarigroup.com/airbus-and-boeing-2024-aircraft-deliveries-significant-gap/
22. Analysis: How Airbus Soared Past Boeing by Delivering Twice as Many Planes, accessed August 29, 2025, https://businesstravelerusa.com/news/airbus-beats-boeing-deliveries/
23. Airbus vs Boeing: Who Rules Aircraft Manufacturing Now?, accessed August 29, 2025, https://manufacturingdigital.com/news/airbus-supply-chain-disrupts-boeing-reign
24. How Boeing Makes Money – Investopedia, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/032715/how-boeing-makes-its-money.asp
25. Top 15 Boeing Competitors and Alternatives in 2025 – Consainsights, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.consainsights.com/company-profile/boeing/competitors
26. Defense Implications of Challenges at Boeing – Congress.gov, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IN12455
27. Boeing defense mess shows how weak contracting can wreck a business – Legal Dive, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.legaldive.com/news/boeing-defense-mess-shows-how-weak-contracting-can-wreck-a-business/730784/
28. Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS) took a hit, too – AGN – Aerospace Global News, accessed August 29, 2025, https://aerospaceglobalnews.com/news/boeing-defense-space-security-bds-took-a-hit-too/
29. Boeing’s defense failures: billions lost, deadlines missed, accessed August 29, 2025, https://defence-blog.com/boeings-defense-failures-billions-lost-deadlines-missed/
30. Boeing’s Challenges: Production Woes, Air Force One Delays, and New Orders Amid Uncertainty – FOCUS Resources, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.focusresourcesinc.com/boeings-challenges-production-woes-air-force-one-delays-and-new-orders-amid-uncertainty/
31. General Information – Boeing, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.boeing.com/company/general-info
32. Boeing Company Revenue Breakdown By Segment | Bullfincher, accessed August 29, 2025, https://bullfincher.io/companies/the-boeing-company/revenue-by-segment
33. Boeing reports US$22.7 billion Q2 revenue – AviTrader, accessed August 29, 2025, https://avitrader.com/2025/07/30/boeing-reports-us22-7-billion-q2-revenue-455-net-aircraft-orders-and-us619-billion-backlog/
34. Airbus and Boeing Report July 2025 Commercial Aircraft Orders and …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://flightplan.forecastinternational.com/2025/08/12/airbus-and-boeing-report-july-2025-commercial-aircraft-orders-and-deliveries/
35. Airbus and Boeing Report December 2024 Commercial Aircraft Orders and Deliveries, accessed August 29, 2025, https://flightplan.forecastinternational.com/2025/01/24/airbus-and-boeing-report-december-commercial-aircraft-orders-and-deliveries/
36. 2024 Annual Report – Boeing, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.boeing.com/content/dam/boeing/boeingdotcom/company/annual-report/2024/2024-annual-report.pdf
37. How Boeing Solved A Major Setback On The 777X – Simple Flying, accessed August 29, 2025, https://simpleflying.com/boeing-solved-major-setback-777x/
38. Boeing 777X | Aviation Week Network, accessed August 29, 2025, https://aviationweek.com/term/boeing-777x?page=1
39. Whatever Happened To The Boeing 777X? – Jalopnik, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.jalopnik.com/1855830/boeing-777x-specs-delays-problems-explained/
40. Boeing To Resume 777X Test Flights | AirlineGeeks.com, accessed August 29, 2025, https://airlinegeeks.com/2025/01/16/boeing-to-resume-777x-test-flights/
41. Boeing Confident 777X Deliveries Will Begin Next Year – ePlaneAI, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.eplaneai.com/news/boeing-confident-777x-deliveries-will-begin-next-year
42. Boeing Defense & Space Business Q2 Revenue Up 10%, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.govconwire.com/articles/boeing-defense-space-business-q2-revenue-kelly-ortberg-mq-25-t-7a
43. Contracts For Dec. 10, 2024 – Defense.gov, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3993982/
44. Contracts For Aug. 9, 2024 – U.S. Department of Defense > Contract, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/3868384/
45. Services Market Outlook – Boeing, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.boeing.com/commercial/market/services-market-outlook
46. Boeing’s Financial Strategy & Goals Over the Years [Deep Analysis …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/boeings-financial-strategy-goals/
47. Financial impact of the Boeing 737 MAX groundings – Wikipedia, accessed August 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_impact_of_the_Boeing_737_MAX_groundings
48. The Boeing 737 MAX: A Tale of Branding, Crisis, and Recovery – Data Label, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.data-label.co.uk/blog/the-boeing-737-max-a-tale-of-branding-crisis-and-recovery/
49. The Boeing 737 MAX – Repositorio.comillas.edu., accessed August 29, 2025, https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11531/55762/TFG%20COM%20-%20Kieffer%20Duarte%2C%20MARK.pdf?sequence=1
50. Boeing 737 Max Crisis of 2018–2019: A Content Analysis – RAIS Conferences, accessed August 29, 2025, https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/0440.pdf
51. Why Boeing’s Problems with the 737 MAX Began More Than 25 Years Ago – Baker Library, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.library.hbs.edu/working-knowledge/why-boeings-problems-with-737-max-began-more-than-25-years-ago
52. Can Boeing be trusted again? What steps can the biggest name in aviation take to repair its reputation? – Northeastern Global News, accessed August 29, 2025, https://news.northeastern.edu/2024/03/28/boeing-crisis-reputation/
53. The Story of Boeing’s Failed Corporate Culture – The CPA Journal, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.cpajournal.com/2025/08/12/the-story-of-boeings-failed-corporate-culture-3/
54. FAA’s Oversight Failures Contributed to Alaska Airlines Door Plug …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://simpleflying.com/faa-oversight-failures-alaska-door-incident/
55. NTSB faults Boeing, FAA in Alaska Airlines 737 Max door blowout – Straight Arrow News, accessed August 29, 2025, https://san.com/cc/ntsb-faults-boeing-faa-in-alaska-airlines-737-max-door-blowout/
56. Updates on Boeing 737-9 MAX Aircraft | Federal Aviation …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/updates-boeing-737-9-max-aircraft
57. US opens safety investigation into Boeing after Alaska Airlines blowout | News | Al Jazeera, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/12/us-opens-safety-investigation-into-boeing-after-alaska-airlines-blowout
58. FAA calls for Boeing ‘culture shift’ 1 year after Alaska Airlines door plug incident – YouTube, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6q-Sb0C3op4
59. 737-9 Updates: Boeing announces immediate actions to strengthen …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.boeing.com/737-9-updates/jan-15-2024-boeing-announces-immediate-actions-to-strengthen-quality
60. FORM 10-K, accessed August 29, 2025, https://s2.q4cdn.com/661678649/files/doc_financials/2024/q4/c19d996b-ed2b-4443-a6c3-649b7e6ed1ee.pdf
61. Is Boeing Stock a Buy? 5 Pros and 1 Big Risk to Watch … – MarketBeat, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.entrepreneur.com/finance/is-boeing-stock-a-buy-5-pros-and-1-big-risk-to-watch-in/483060
62. Boeing Investor Conference 2022, accessed August 29, 2025, https://s2.q4cdn.com/661678649/files/doc_presentations/2022/11/2022-Investor-Conference-Combined.pdf
63. Return On Capital Employed For Boeing Co (BA) – Finbox, accessed August 29, 2025, https://finbox.com/NYSE:BA/explorer/roce/
64. Boeing Return on Investment 2010-2025 | BA – Macrotrends, accessed August 29, 2025, https://macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/BA/boeing/roi
65. Is Boeing Stock (BA) a Good Investment? – AAII, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.aaii.com/investingideas/article/14221-is-boeing-stock-ba-a-good-investment
66. Boeing or Airbus: Which Aerospace Giant Offers More Upside Now? – August 28, 2025, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/2743995/boeing-or-airbus-which-aerospace-giant-offers-more-upside-now
67. Boeing Return on Investment 2010-2025 | BA | MacroTrends, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/BA/boeing/roi
68. 10-K – SEC.gov, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/12927/000001292716000099/a201512dec3110k.htm
69. ba-20241231 – SEC.gov, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/12927/000001292725000015/ba-20241231.htm
70. Moody’s Ratings places Boeing’s ratings on review for downgrade, accessed August 29, 2025, https://ratings.moodys.com/ratings-news/428410
71. Moody’s Ratings downgrades Boeing’s senior unsecured rating to Baa3, outlook negative, accessed August 29, 2025, https://ratings.moodys.com/ratings-news/419450
72. US$60 mil med-term nts Credit Rating – S&P Global, accessed August 29, 2025, https://disclosure.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/instrument-details/sectorCode/CORP/entityId/101463/issueId/73085
73. Boeing’s $3.9 billion Q4 losses: the S&P view – Aircraft Interiors International, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.aircraftinteriorsinternational.com/industry-opinion/boeings-3-9-billion-q4-losses-the-sp-view.html
74. Ratings agencies warn of downgrade if Boeing strike prolonged – Al Jazeera, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2024/9/13/ratings-agencies-warn-of-downgrade-if-boeing-strike-prolonged
75. Is Boeing’s Stock Able to Soar Again? – Argent Capital Management, accessed August 29, 2025, https://argentcapital.com/2024/05/is-boeings-stock-able-to-soar-again/
76. Boeing Board Raises Dividend 20 Percent, Increases Share Repurchase Authorization to $20 Billion, accessed August 29, 2025, https://investors.boeing.com/investors/news/press-release-details/2018/Boeing-Board-Raises-Dividend-20-Percent-Increases-Share-Repurchase-Authorization-to-20-Billion/default.aspx
77. Boeing’s Struggles Highlight the Perils of Stock Buybacks – Green Alpha Advisors, accessed August 29, 2025, https://greenalphaadvisors.com/boeings-struggles-highlight-the-perils-of-stock-buybacks/
78. Boeing or Airbus: Which Aerospace Giant Offers More Upside Now? – Nasdaq, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/boeing-or-airbus-which-aerospace-giant-offers-more-upside-now
79. Commercial Market Outlook – Boeing, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.boeing.com/commercial/market/commercial-market-outlook
80. Boeing Predicts Emerging Markets Will Drive Commercial Aircraft …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.eplaneai.com/news/boeing-predicts-emerging-markets-will-drive-commercial-aircraft-demand-for-next-20-years
81. Commercial Market Outlook | 2025-2044 – Boeing, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.boeing.com/content/dam/boeing/boeingdotcom/market/assets/downloads/2025-commercial-market-outlook.pdf
82. Airbus Global Market Forecast 2025-2044, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/commercial-aircraft/global-market-forecast
83. The trusted authority on air travel demand insights | ACI World, accessed August 29, 2025, https://aci.aero/2025/02/26/the-trusted-authority-on-air-travel-demand-insights/
84. Key drivers in air passenger demand forecasting – IATA, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.iata.org/en/publications/newsletters/iata-knowledge-hub/key-drivers-in-air-passenger-demand-forecasting/
85. Boeing (BA) Predicts Robust Growth in Emerging Markets’ Airline Industries | BA Stock News, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.gurufocus.com/news/2927625/boeing-ba-predicts-robust-growth-in-emerging-markets-airline-industries–ba-stock-news
86. Decisive Edge – Boeing, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.boeing.com/defense/decisiveedge
87. Comac C929 – Wikipedia, accessed August 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comac_C929
88. Comac C919 – Wikipedia, accessed August 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comac_C919
89. China seeks new heights with C929 and C939 jumbo jets, but can it build them without the West? – CNA, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/east-asia/china-comac-widebody-global-aviation-air-travel-4929821
90. The great leap skyward: China’s jetliner dreams are getting real …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/great-leap-skyward-china-s-jetliner-dreams-are-getting-real
91. How good is the C929? – Leeham News and Analysis, accessed August 29, 2025, https://leehamnews.com/2025/04/14/how-good-is-the-c929/
92. Boeing (BA) P/E Ratio: Current & Historical Analysis, accessed August 29, 2025, https://public.com/stocks/ba/pe-ratio
93. BA The Boeing Company Peers & Competitors – Seeking Alpha, accessed August 29, 2025, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/BA/peers/comparison
94. BA – Boeing PE ratio, current and historical analysis – FullRatio, accessed August 29, 2025, https://fullratio.com/stocks/nyse-ba/pe-ratio
95. Boeing (NYSE:BA) Stock Valuation, Peer Comparison & Price …, accessed August 29, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/capital-goods/nyse-ba/boeing/valuation
96. BA EV/EBITDA – Boeing Co – Alpha Spread, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.alphaspread.com/security/nyse/ba/relative-valuation/ratio/enterprise-value-to-ebitda
97. Boeing vs. Airbus: The Key Reason Why Airbus Stock is Better | Nasdaq, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/boeing-vs.-airbus:-the-key-reason-why-airbus-stock-is-better
98. The Boeing Company – Enterprise Value – Wisesheets, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.wisesheets.io/enterprise-value/BA
99. Boeing Announces Board and Management Changes – Mar 25, 2024, accessed August 29, 2025, https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2024-03-25-Boeing-Announces-Board-and-Management-Changes
100. Boeing announces board and management changes – JEC Composites, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.jeccomposites.com/news/spotted-by-jec/boeing-announces-board-and-management-changes/?news_type=announcement,business&end_use_application=aerospace&exceptionaltags=people-in-composites
101. Boeing CEO to Step Down at End of 2024 – Modern Distribution Management, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.mdm.com/news/operations/manufacturing/boeing-ceo-to-step-down-at-end-of-2024/
102. Boeing Board Chair Message to Employees on CEO Announcement – News Releases | Boeing Newsroom, accessed August 29, 2025, https://boeing.mediaroom.com/news-releases-statements?item=131471
103. Boeing Announces More Top Leadership Changes, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.flyingmag.com/boeing-announces-more-top-leadership-changes/
104. Corporate Governance – Boeing, accessed August 29, 2025, https://www.boeing.com/company/general-info/corporate-governance